Indians Blast NYT for 'Biased' Reporting On Aerial Dogfight Between MiG-21, F-16

1. @nytimesworld you can draw your own conclusions, but dont basic reporting guidelines mean you at least report the detailed Indian claim that the IAF MiG 21 Bison shot down an F-16 before being downed itself ? https://t.co/7qNPw5F9qs— Vishnu Som (@VishnuNDTV) 4 March 2019
Glad you made the point. don't let the number of Pulitzers they won in their 102-year history lull anyone into the false belief that they are necessarily free of biases, ignorance or sloppy journalism.— Anchit Gupta (@AnchitGupta9) 4 March 2019
If India’s new policy is to retaliate against terrorist groups such as JeM in mainland Pakistan (not just in Kashmir), then Balakot is unambiguously bad news for Pakistan. It suggests that what was safe yesterday may be unsafe tomorrow. Recognizing this is just common sense. 3/3— Sadanand Dhume (@dhume) 4 March 2019
.@nytimes is a habitual India basher, but in this case, it may have to do with the general western analysts’ misconception about Indian Armed Forces & what we can do despite our “vintage” weaponry. Pakis actually understand better, that’s why the alleged low nuke threshold. 😜— Yusuf Unjhawala 🇮🇳 (@YusufDFI) 4 March 2019
.@nytimes is a habitual India basher, but in this case, it may have to do with the general western analysts’ misconception about Indian Armed Forces & what we can do despite our “vintage” weaponry. Pakis actually understand better, that’s why the alleged low nuke threshold. 😜— Yusuf Unjhawala 🇮🇳 (@YusufDFI) 4 March 2019
Is US media @nytimes hiding the failure of F16, and how u can claim India loose in dogfight, where it shoot down latest F16 through Vintage Russian fighter.@ippatel @DrGPradhan @AskAnshul https://t.co/ivebcKMO57— lemont (@thelemont) 4 March 2019
Source>>