Thursday, March 5, 2026

How The Ghatak UCAV Approval Might Finally Give The Kaveri Engine Its Wings


The long-awaited Kaveri engine, once intended to be the heart of India's premier fighter jets, appears to have found a new lease on life through the shadows of stealth technology. Recent recommendations by the Defence Procurement Board to acquire 60 Ghatak Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) have effectively pivoted the Kaveri program from a stalled ambition into a critical strategic asset, The Week reported. 

This move signals a significant shift in how India intends to achieve self-reliance in aerospace propulsion.

Developing a domestic jet engine is widely considered the "holy grail" of aeronautical engineering, a feat only a handful of nations have mastered. The Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE) has spent decades refining the Kaveri, but the engine famously struggled to meet the high-thrust demands required for the TEJAS in full combat configuration.

By transitioning the project toward the Ghatak drone, engineers have cleverly bypassed the need for a complex afterburner, focusing instead on a "dry" derivative of the engine.

A "dry" engine operates without the additional fuel injection of an afterburner, which is typically used by supersonic fighters to achieve bursts of high speed. For a stealth UCAV like the Ghatak, removing the afterburner is not a compromise but a tactical advantage.

The absence of the afterburner significantly reduces the aircraft’s infrared signature, making it much harder for heat-seeking missiles and enemy sensors to track, thereby enhancing its "invisible" profile.

The Ghatak itself is a sophisticated evolution of the Autonomous Unmanned Research Aircraft (AURA) project. Designed as a flying-wing aircraft, it lacks the vertical tail fins found on traditional planes, a design choice specifically intended to deflect radar waves.

This shape, combined with the dry Kaveri engine, allows the drone to penetrate deep into contested airspace to perform high-stakes missions such as the Suppression of Enemy Air Defences (SEAD) and Destruction of Enemy Air Defences (DEAD).

In terms of performance, the Kaveri-powered Ghatak is expected to operate at high subsonic speeds, reaching approximately Mach 0.9. With a service ceiling of 13,000 metres and a two-hour mission endurance, the drone provides the Indian armed forces with a persistent, low-observable platform for both reconnaissance and precision strikes. These specifications suggest a highly capable "loitering" weapon system that can wait for the opportune moment to strike without being detected.

The procurement recommendation for 60 units is more than just a purchase order; it is a vote of confidence in indigenous research and development. It provides the GTRE with a stable production run and real-world flight data, which are essential for the iterative process of engine design.

If the Kaveri performs reliably in the Ghatak, it could pave the way for more powerful variants to eventually find their way back into manned fighter programs or larger transport aircraft.

The integration of the Kaveri engine and the Ghatak UCAV represents a pragmatic "Plan B" that has turned into a primary strategic objective. By matching the engine’s current capabilities with a platform that specifically benefits from its "dry" configuration, India is successfully bridging the gap between experimental technology and operational military hardware.

The Kaveri may not have powered the TEJAS into the supersonic realm, but it is now poised to power India into the era of autonomous stealth warfare.

The Week


India's 'YAMA' Swarm Interceptor Ushers In Era of Affordable Drone Defence


India has achieved a significant breakthrough in counter-drone technology with the successful testing of the autonomous swarm interceptor 'YAMA'. Developed by Bangalore-based private firm Flying Wedge Defence and Aerospace, this innovation promises to bolster the nation's defences against the proliferating threat of drone swarms in modern warfare.

The 'YAMA' autonomous interceptor is designed specifically to neutralise flying warheads and hostile drone swarms.

The 'YAMA' system, tested under the company's FWD program, represents India's first indigenous autonomous swarm interceptor. Named after the mythological figure Yamaraj, the god of death, it symbolises its role in swiftly neutralising airborne threats. This development underscores the growing role of private enterprise in India's defence sector.

Drones have transformed contemporary battlefields, serving as pivotal tools for surveillance and precision strikes. Conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war, last year's India-Pakistan skirmish, and tensions between Iran and the United States-Israel alliance have highlighted their dominance. These engagements have driven unprecedented global demand for effective anti-drone solutions.

A notable incident during the Iran-US-Israel confrontation illustrated the asymmetry in drone warfare. An Iranian drone, valued at just 20,000 dollars, evaded a US Patriot interceptor costing 4 million dollars. This event signals a paradigm shift, where victory may hinge on affordable, efficient defences rather than expensive high-end systems.

In response to this evolving landscape, Flying Wedge Defence and Aerospace has engineered 'YAMA' to counter flying warheads and hostile drone swarms with remarkable precision. The system's low unit cost of approximately 10,000 dollars enables interception at up to 100 times less expense than traditional methods, making it a game-changer for cost-sensitive militaries.

The successful trial, captured in a video released by the company, showcased 'YAMA' interceptors engaging and destroying drone swarms mid-air. Officials described the performance as exemplary, affirming that such low-cost, high-efficiency technology can significantly enhance India's layered air defence architecture.

Headquartered in Bangalore, Flying Wedge joins a cadre of innovative private firms contributing to India's self-reliance in defence manufacturing. This milestone aligns with national initiatives like 'Make in India' and 'Atmanirbhar Bharat', fostering indigenous capabilities in cutting-edge military hardware.

The rise of drone swarms poses unique challenges to conventional air defences, which are often optimised for larger threats like aircraft or missiles. 'YAMA' addresses this gap through autonomous swarm tactics, where multiple interceptors coordinate to overwhelm and eliminate targets en masse.

Experts anticipate that 'YAMA' will integrate seamlessly into India's broader counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) framework, complementing assets from public sector undertakings like DRDO. Its scalability and affordability could enable mass deployment along vulnerable borders and critical infrastructure.

As regional adversaries ramp up their drone inventories—evident in recent Pakistan-India border incidents—'YAMA' equips Indian forces with a proactive edge. The technology's precision minimises collateral damage while maximising threat neutralisation, a vital attribute in densely populated theatres.

The private sector's involvement, exemplified by Flying Wedge, accelerates innovation cycles unburdened by bureaucratic delays. This test not only validates 'YAMA's' technical viability but also paves the way for rapid production scaling to meet Armed Forces' demands.

Looking ahead, further trials and user evaluations will refine 'YAMA's' algorithms for diverse scenarios, including electronic warfare environments. International interest is likely, positioning India as an exporter of advanced C-UAS solutions amid global drone proliferation.

This development reaffirms India's strategic pivot towards asymmetric warfare capabilities. By prioritising cost-effective interceptors, the nation counters low-cost drone threats without straining defence budgets, ensuring robust deterrence in an era of hybrid conflicts.

India TV News


'US Hits Iranian Ship in Our Backyard—PM Stays Silent' Says Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi


The sinking of the Iranian frigate IRIS Dena by a United States submarine near Sri Lanka has ignited a fierce political storm in India, as the Leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s perceived inaction.

In a pointed statement, Gandhi argued that the volatile West Asia conflict has now breached India's "backyard," suggesting that the Prime Minister's silence reflects a surrender of the nation's strategic autonomy during a period of grave geopolitical instability.

The timing and context of the maritime strike are particularly sensitive for New Delhi. The IRIS Dena was traversing the Indian Ocean on its return journey from Visakhapatnam, where it had participated in the International Fleet Review (IFR) and the MILAN 2026 naval exercises.

These events are flagship displays of India’s maritime diplomacy, designed to foster cooperation among diverse international navies, making the destruction of an invited guest’s vessel a significant diplomatic embarrassment.

The gravity of the situation extends beyond diplomatic protocol to the very foundations of India’s economic security. Gandhi highlighted that the escalating tensions in the Gulf region pose a direct threat to the country’s energy lifelines.

With over 40% of India's oil imports and an even higher percentage of its LPG and LNG supplies transiting through the vulnerable Strait of Hormuz, any further escalation could lead to a domestic energy crisis.

Adding weight to the criticism, former Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal expressed dismay over the American operation, asserting that the US had blatantly ignored India’s regional sensitivities.

Sibal noted that the Iranian vessel was essentially defenceless at the time of the attack, as protocol for the MILAN exercises requires participating ships to be cleared of ammunition. He further suggested the attack was premeditated, noting that the US Navy had withdrawn from the exercises at the last minute, likely to facilitate this targeted strike.

The international fallout has been immediate and threatening. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi condemned the act as an "atrocity at sea," noting that the vessel was struck in international waters nearly 2,000 miles from Iranian shores. He issued a stern warning that the United States would "bitterly regret" the precedent set by the destruction of the frigate and its crew of approximately 130 sailors.

The incident was officially confirmed by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who verified that a torpedo hit from an American submarine was responsible for the sinking. As the regional power dynamic shifts, the Indian government faces mounting pressure to break its silence and address the moral and strategic implications of an allied power attacking a diplomatic guest within the Indian Ocean Region.

ANI


New Delhi’s Strategic Pivot: India Formally Condoles The Death of Ayatollah Khamenei


India has officially extended its condolences to Iran following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, marking a notable evolution in New Delhi’s diplomatic stance.

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited the Iranian embassy in Delhi today to meet with the ambassador and sign the condolence book. This formal gesture follows the Supreme Leader’s death on Sunday, which occurred shortly after joint US-Israeli air strikes targeted Tehran.

The decision to offer formal condolences represents a subtle but significant shift for the Indian government. Until this point, New Delhi had maintained a "studied silence" regarding the air strikes and the subsequent loss of life. This neutrality was held despite intense pressure from domestic Opposition parties, who had spent several days demanding a clear and formal statement from the Ministry of External Affairs.

The timing of this diplomatic outreach is particularly sensitive. It coincides with a period of extreme maritime tension, as Iran recently announced that the Strait of Hormuz would be closed to vessels from the United States, Israel, and the European Union. The Iranian Revolutionary Guards have explicitly warned that any ships belonging to these Western powers or their supporters spotted in the strategic waterway will be targeted.


In tandem with the Foreign Secretary’s visit, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar confirmed via social media that he held a telephonic conversation with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also addressed the broader regional instability, expressing deep concern over the Middle Eastern situation and reiterating India’s traditional preference for dialogue and diplomacy as the primary tools for dispute resolution.

India’s initial hesitation mirrored the reactions of most global powers, many of whom have refrained from issuing condolences for Khamenei’s killing. Russia and China were the only other major nations to take such a step early on. By joining them now, New Delhi is attempting to balance its complex web of international alliances while acknowledging a long-standing partner.

The domestic political landscape has been a major factor in this development. The Congress party, led by Sonia Gandhi, had earlier issued a sharp critique of the government’s perceived impartiality. Gandhi argued that failing to defend national sovereignty or international law in the face of targeted killings raised serious questions about the credibility and direction of India’s foreign policy.

Furthermore, the economic history between the two nations underscores the importance of the relationship. India once sourced 13 per cent of its oil from Iran, though trade volumes plummeted following the 2018 US withdrawal from the nuclear deal and the subsequent imposition of sanctions. 

Despite these economic hurdles, the Opposition has consistently reminded the government of the deep-rooted civilizational and strategic ties that bind the two countries.

The shift in New Delhi’s approach suggests a move away from the silence that critics had labelled as an "abdication" of responsibility. By engaging in formal mourning protocols, India is attempting to uphold its ethos of global interconnectedness while navigating a volatile geopolitical environment where the rules-based order is under significant strain.

Agencies


EAM Jaishankar Calls Iranian Counterpart Seyed Abbas Araghchi Amid Conflict


External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar held a crucial telephonic conversation on Thursday with his Iranian counterpart, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, against the backdrop of a rapidly deteriorating security environment in West Asia.

The interaction comes at a time of heightened tensions in Iran and the wider Gulf region, where escalating violence and instability have raised alarms in major capitals, including New Delhi.

Jaishankar confirmed the engagement through a brief post on X, stating that he had a telecon with the Iranian Foreign Minister in the afternoon.

While he did not divulge the substance of the conversation, the timing and context suggest that regional security, protection of Indian nationals, and the safety of maritime traffic and energy flows would have been among the key issues discussed. The confidentiality around specific details underscores the sensitivity of the present crisis.

In recent days, the situation in Iran and the surrounding Gulf has worsened significantly, with increased violence, disruptions to daily life, and heightened risks to critical infrastructure and commercial routes. The sharpening conflict has generated deep concern in New Delhi, which closely monitors developments in West Asia due to India’s extensive economic, energy, and human links with the region.

On Tuesday, the Ministry of External Affairs issued a strongly worded statement expressing India’s deep concern over the escalation in Iran and the Gulf region. The statement urged all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate tensions, and ensure the protection of civilians. India reiterated that any further aggravation would have severe implications for regional stability and could trigger wider insecurity with global repercussions.

The Indian government has placed particular emphasis on the safety of its diaspora in the Gulf. Nearly one crore Indian citizens live and work across the region, forming one of the largest expatriate communities there.

Their welfare, legal protection, and physical security are of paramount interest to New Delhi, especially during periods of military confrontation or political unrest. Any destabilisation in this geography directly translates into risks to Indian lives and livelihoods.

The MEA highlighted that India cannot remain indifferent to developments that adversely affect its nationals abroad. Remittances from the Gulf constitute a significant source of household income for millions of Indian families, and any mass displacement, evacuation contingency, or prolonged disruption would carry both humanitarian and economic costs. This has driven India to pursue a careful diplomatic balancing act, engaging all stakeholders while advocating de-escalation.

Another core area of concern for India is the vulnerability of trade and energy supply chains transiting the Gulf and adjacent waters.

A substantial share of India’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas imports passes through sea lanes that now face elevated security threats due to the conflict. India’s external trade with the region is also heavily reliant on safe and predictable maritime routes, port operations, and insurance conditions.

The government has warned that any major disruption to these energy and trade corridors would have serious consequences for the Indian economy. Higher freight and insurance costs, rerouting of vessels, delays in deliveries, and potential spikes in global energy prices could all transmit shocks into the domestic economy. This would impact inflation, industrial output, fiscal planning, and overall economic stability, exacerbating existing global uncertainties.

India has also taken a firm position against attacks on merchant shipping, reflecting both its commercial stakes and its broader commitment to freedom of navigation and maritime security. Recent incidents targeting commercial vessels in the region have already resulted in Indian crew members being killed or going missing, according to the MEA. These losses underline the human cost of maritime insecurity and the need for robust diplomatic and security responses.

Given its status as a major supplier of seafarers and maritime professionals to the global workforce, India views the safety of shipping lanes as not just a regional, but a strategic global issue. Attacks on merchant ships threaten lives, disrupt global supply chains, and undermine confidence in international trade routes. New Delhi has therefore consistently urged respect for international law and maritime norms in these contested waters.

Jaishankar’s outreach to Araghchi fits into India’s broader pattern of active, multi-vector diplomacy in times of crisis. New Delhi has traditionally maintained pragmatic relations with both Iran and key Gulf partners, while also keeping close ties with major powers. In the present context, lines of communication with Tehran are vital for conveying concerns about Indian nationals, shipping security, and the uninterrupted flow of energy.

The conversation is likely to have been used by India to seek assurances regarding the security of Indian citizens and commercial interests, while also encouraging steps to avoid further escalation.

Although official readouts have not yet been issued, such high-level contacts typically aim to reinforce de-escalatory messages, explore mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations, and identify areas for cooperation in consular and maritime domains.

The evolving situation in West Asia continues to present complex diplomatic and security challenges for India. As the conflict environment remains fluid, New Delhi is expected to intensify its monitoring, maintain close contact with regional governments, and coordinate with international partners where necessary.

Preparedness measures, including contingency planning for evacuation and alternative shipping routes, are likely to feature prominently in India’s internal deliberations.

For now, the Jaishankar–Araghchi telecon signals that India is actively engaging with key regional actors to safeguard its interests and contribute to diplomatic efforts aimed at stabilising the region. The government’s public messaging underscores three central priorities: protecting Indian lives, securing trade and energy flows, and opposing any attacks on commercial shipping that endanger civilians and disrupt the global economy.

ANI


Middle Powers Unite In Tech Triangle To Counter Global Fragmentation


A nascent strategic alliance is taking shape among Australia, Canada, and India, as middle powers seek inventive strategies to manoeuvre through a world order growing ever more splintered.

This development, highlighted in a recent issue brief from the Institute for Security & Development Policy entitled "Changing Geometries: The Rise of a Middle-Power Tech Triangle," underscores a pivotal shift in international relations.

The global landscape, once characterised by a steady evolution, now faces abrupt fractures. Economic interdependence, long viewed as a cornerstone of stability under US-led globalisation, has been repurposed as a tool of coercion.

Supply chains, trade conduits, and technological frameworks are no longer mere economic arteries but battlegrounds for geopolitical supremacy.

In response, middle powers are charting new courses. Eschewing isolationist tendencies or quests for absolute self-reliance, nations like Australia, Canada, and India are pioneering supple coalitions grounded in mutual interests and principles.

The Australia-Canada-India Technology and Innovation (ACITI) Partnership exemplifies this "variable geometry" paradigm, offering a blueprint for pragmatic collaboration.

This proposed ACITI framework targets bolstered synergy in critical and emerging technologies. Areas of focus encompass artificial intelligence, semiconductors, quantum computing, and clean energy infrastructures. By amalgamating expertise and research assets, the trio aims to forge robust supply chains impervious to the shocks of geopolitical strife.

India emerges as a linchpin, leveraging its burgeoning digital economy and vast pool of skilled technologists. The nation's prowess in software development, data analytics, and IT services positions it ideally to drive innovation at scale. This complements Canada's storied research ecosystem, renowned for advancements in AI ethics, machine learning, and biotechnology.

Australia, meanwhile, brings indispensable strengths in critical minerals extraction and processing. Its reserves of rare earth elements, lithium, and cobalt—vital for semiconductors and batteries—are strategic assets in an era of resource nationalism. Together, these capabilities form a synergistic "tech triangle" poised to influence technology standards across the Indo-Pacific and further afield.

The imperative for such alliances stems from escalating US-China tensions. Washington's export controls on advanced chips and Beijing's dominance in solar panels and electric vehicles have exposed vulnerabilities in global tech ecosystems. Middle powers, caught in the crossfire, must diversify to safeguard autonomy without aligning fully with either superpower.

ACITI aligns seamlessly with wider endeavours to pluralise technology networks. Initiatives like the Quad (comprising the US, Japan, Australia, and India) and the Chip 4 alliance (US, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) signal a multipolar tech order. Yet ACITI distinguishes itself by excluding major powers, emphasising middle-power agency.

For India, participation amplifies its "Make in India" and Atmanirbhar Bharat visions. Joint ventures could accelerate semiconductor fabrication plants, quantum research hubs, and green hydrogen projects. Canadian firms, such as those in Toronto's AI cluster, might collaborate with Indian startups on ethical AI frameworks, while Australian miners supply raw materials for Indo-Pacific fabs.

Challenges abound, however. Harmonising regulatory regimes—India's data localisation laws, Canada's privacy stringent standards, Australia's foreign investment scrutiny—demands deft diplomacy. Intellectual property regimes must also align to foster trust in collaborative R&D.

Investment flows will prove decisive. Australia’s Critical Minerals Strategy allocates billions for processing hubs; Canada’s $2.4 billion semiconductor fund targets domestic capacity; India’s ₹76,000 crore incentive scheme beckons global players. Pooled funding for ACITI could catalyse breakthroughs, such as quantum-secure communication networks resilient to cyber threats.

The triangle enhances deterrence. In the Indo-Pacific, where China's assertiveness tests maritime norms, shared tech elevates collective bargaining power. It could standardise 6G protocols or AI safety norms, countering unilateral dominance by tech giants.

Critics might decry it as another Western-aligned bloc, potentially straining India's non-aligned traditions. Yet proponents argue it preserves strategic flexibility, allowing India to engage BRICS partners simultaneously. Canada's middle-power ethos and Australia's regional focus mitigate great-power perceptions.

Success hinges on leadership resolve. Prime ministerial summits, like those envisioned at the 2026 G20 in South Africa, could formalise ACITI. Bilateral deals—India-Australia’s Early Harvest Trade Agreement, Canada-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership—provide scaffolding.

If realised, this tech triangle could inspire replicas: South Korea-Japan-ASEAN in robotics; Brazil-South Africa-EU in biotech. In a ruptured order, such minilaterals offer agility where multilateralism falters.

ACITI embodies middle powers' pivot from passive adaptation to proactive architecture. By weaving resilient tech fabrics, Australia, Canada, and India not only mitigate risks but shape the contours of tomorrow’s digital domain.

ANI


PM Modi And President Stubb of Finland Champion Diplomacy, Law In Push For West Asia Peace


India and Finland have underscored their shared commitment to the rule of law, dialogue, and diplomacy amid escalating tensions in West Asia, as articulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a joint press briefing in New Delhi.

Speaking alongside Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Mr Modi emphasised that both nations firmly believe no conflict can be resolved through military means alone.

He specifically referenced the ongoing crises in Ukraine and West Asia, pledging continued support for swift resolutions and all peace initiatives.

The Prime Minister also highlighted the urgent need to reform global institutions to tackle mounting challenges, describing it as both necessary and pressing.

Rooting out terrorism in all its manifestations emerged as another key area of mutual resolve between the two leaders.

Mr Modi drew attention to the landmark India-European Union Free Trade Agreement signed in January 2026, portraying it as a beacon amid global instability.

In a time of uncertainty, with conflicts raging from Ukraine to West Asia, he noted that India and Europe—major diplomatic powers—are embarking on a golden era of partnership.

This burgeoning cooperation, he argued, bolsters global stability, development, and collective prosperity. The EU pact, in particular, promises to enhance trade, investment, and technological ties between India and Finland.

Both countries stand as vital collaborators in digital technology, infrastructure, and sustainability efforts. The remarks followed a bilateral meeting at Hyderabad House between Mr Modi and President Stubb, who arrived in New Delhi on Wednesday for a State Visit.

Mr Stubb received a ceremonial welcome, underscoring the visit's significance.

Accompanying the Finnish President is a high-level delegation comprising ministers, senior officials, and business leaders.

The itinerary aims to fortify bilateral relations and broaden cooperation across multiple sectors.

This engagement reflects India's strategic outreach to Nordic nations, leveraging Finland's expertise in clean energy, education, and innovation.

Finland's recent NATO accession adds a layer of geopolitical relevance, aligning with India's interests in a multipolar world order.

Mr Modi's pitch for peace resonates with India's consistent stance on de-escalation, as seen in its mediation efforts elsewhere. The leaders' alignment on institutional reforms echoes India's long-standing advocacy for UN Security Council restructuring.

Terrorism's mention aligns with shared concerns, given Finland's support for counter-terror frameworks and India's experiences.

The FTA's timing, early in 2026, positions India-Europe trade as a counterweight to supply chain disruptions from conflicts.

Digital and green tech collaborations could accelerate India's self-reliance goals under Atmanirbhar Bharat.

Infrastructure partnerships may tap Finland's prowess in smart cities and sustainable urban planning.

President Stubb's visit marks a milestone, building on prior exchanges and elevating India-Finland ties to new heights.

ANI


Pakistani Man Says Iran Forced Him Into Plot To Kill Trump, Media Say


A Pakistani national, Asif Merchant, has claimed in a United States court that he was coerced by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) into plotting the assassination of President Donald Trump. 

Merchant, facing charges of terrorism and murder-for-hire, insisted during his trial that his involvement was not voluntary but driven by threats to his family in Tehran.

The Justice Department alleges that Merchant sought to recruit individuals in the US to execute the plot, targeting Trump and other prominent figures. This scheme, according to prosecutors, stemmed from retaliation for the US airstrike that killed IRGC commander Qassem Soleimani in 2020. Merchant's defence paints a picture of duress, with him stating, "I was not wanting to do this so willingly."

Merchant testified that he had never received direct orders to target a specific individual. However, he recounted conversations in Tehran where his Iranian handler mentioned three names: Donald Trump, then-President Joe Biden, and Nikki Haley, the former UN ambassador who vied unsuccessfully for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

Prosecutors have dismissed Merchant's coercion claims, arguing in a letter to the judge dated 2024 that there is "lack of evidentiary support for a true duress or coercion." The trial, which began last week, unfolds amid heightened US-Iran tensions.

The IRGC, Iran's elite force blending military might, economic influence, and intelligence operations, lies at the heart of this affair. Tehran has categorically denied any plot against US officials, labelling the accusations baseless.

The timing of Merchant's trial is stark. It commenced just days before President Trump authorised joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran, which reportedly killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several top officials. Trump justified the operation in an ABC News interview, declaring, "I got him before he got me," explicitly linking it to the alleged Iranian threat.

This case revives memories of Soleimani's killing, which escalated US-Iran hostilities. Merchant, a Pakistani citizen with reported family ties in Iran, allegedly travelled to the US to scout potential operatives. Court documents detail payments and reconnaissance activities tied to the plot.

Legal experts note the challenges in proving duress under US law, which requires imminent threat and no reasonable escape. Merchant's lawyers have not yet commented publicly, nor has the White House responded to enquiries.

Broader geopolitical ripples are evident. The US-Israeli strikes have intensified the Israel-Iran conflict, with live updates tracking developments from Tel Aviv to Tehran. Pakistan's involvement, even peripherally through Merchant, raises questions about regional proxy networks.

Iran's denial aligns with its pattern of rejecting assassination allegations. Yet, the IRGC's global reach—through proxies and operatives—has long concerned Western intelligence. Merchant's testimony, if corroborated, could expose vulnerabilities in counter-terrorism efforts.

The trial continues in a New York federal court, with jurors weighing Merchant's claims against forensic evidence. Outcomes could influence US policy towards Iran amid ongoing Middle East volatility. As proceedings unfold, the world watches how this personal defence intersects with high-stakes diplomacy.

Agencies


Finnish President Alexander Stuff Calls For Indian Permanent Membership In Reformed UN Security Council


The geopolitical landscape witnessed a significant moment of alignment as Finnish President Alexander Stubb, during his official visit to New Delhi, underscored the "utmost importance" of India securing a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council.

Speaking at Hyderabad House alongside Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the President’s remarks highlighted a growing European consensus on the necessity of updating global governance structures to mirror contemporary realities rather than post-1945 dynamics.

President Stubb’s endorsement is rooted in the observation that the world is currently navigating a profound transition in the global order. He pointedly noted that India, alongside its partners in the Global South, is no longer merely a participant in international affairs but a primary architect that will determine the future direction of this evolving system.

This recognition of the Global South’s agency reflects a shift in Nordic foreign policy towards more inclusive multilateralism.

The bilateral discussions held on Thursday were not limited to institutional reforms but delved into the pressing security crises currently destabilising the international community. Stubb addressed the ongoing "war of aggression" in Ukraine, noting with gravity that the conflict has now persisted for four years.

He stressed that a lasting peace is a universal necessity, provided it is anchored firmly in the foundational principles of the United Nations and international law.

Parallel to the situation in Europe, the leaders examined the volatile state of West Asia. Both Finland and India expressed a shared concern over the human and economic costs of these prolonged conflicts. 

President Stubb indicated that his upcoming address at the Raisina Dialogue 2026 would serve as a platform to further advocate for a "division of labour and power" that accurately represents the current distribution of global influence, rather than sticking to outdated historical hierarchies.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi echoed these sentiments, reinforcing the idea that the bond between India and Finland is built upon a mutual commitment to the rule of law, dialogue, and diplomacy. In a world increasingly fragmented by kinetic warfare, the Prime Minister asserted that no modern issue can be truly resolved through military conflict alone.

His call for a swift end to hostilities in both Ukraine and West Asia was framed as a moral and practical imperative for the global community.

Beyond peace efforts, the two leaders identified the reform of global institutions as an "urgent" priority to address modern challenges such as climate change, economic instability, and the persistent threat of terrorism.

The joint briefing served as a testament to the strengthening ties between India and the European Union, with Finland acting as a bridge for deeper cooperation. The meeting concluded with a reaffirmed shared commitment to rooting out terrorism in all its forms, ensuring that security and reform go hand in hand.

ANI


Middle East Tensions Test India’s Economic Resilience, But Growth Path Stays Firm


The escalating conflict in the Middle East presents immediate challenges to the Indian economy, though it is unlikely to undermine the nation's long-term growth trajectory, according to Nagesh Kumar, an external member of the Reserve Bank of India's Monetary Policy Committee.

Kumar, speaking in an e-mailed interview with PTI, highlighted key short-term pressures stemming from the unrest. These include surging oil prices, disruptions to exports bound for the region, and potential declines in remittances from Indian workers abroad.

The conflict threatens the security of the substantial Indian diaspora in the Middle East, adding a human dimension to the economic risks. With US-Israel strikes intensifying the situation, oil prices have already begun to harden, exacerbating inflationary pressures in oil-import-dependent India.

In the immediate term, Kumar anticipates further escalation unless resolved swiftly, given the global stakes in the region. He expressed optimism that the crisis might de-escalate soon, averting prolonged disruptions.

To mitigate these vulnerabilities, Kumar advocates diversifying India's oil sourcing strategies. Recent openings in Venezuelan oil supplies offer a promising avenue, broadening import options beyond traditional Middle Eastern suppliers.

Should the crisis resolve quickly and sanctions on Iran be lifted, India could benefit from access to cheaper oil, turning a potential setback into an opportunity. This flexibility underscores the importance of adaptive energy policies.

Despite these geopolitical headwinds, Kumar maintains that India's inflation outlook remains favourable. Headline Consumer Price Index inflation stood at just 1.3 per cent in December 2025, with projections holding steady around 2.5 per cent for FY2026 under the updated data series.

This benign inflationary environment shows no signs of overheating, providing monetary policymakers with room to manoeuvre. Coupled with a strengthening growth outlook, it positions India to sustain a 'Goldilocks' scenario—neither too hot nor too cold—for an extended period.

However, the immediate-term challenges from the conflict could test this equilibrium. Coordinated fiscal and monetary policies will be essential to navigate these hurdles and propel GDP growth onto a higher path.

Kumar envisions India accelerating from its current circa-7 per cent growth rate to around 8 per cent. This ambition hinges on a revitalised manufacturing sector complementing the enduring dynamism of services.

Exports to the Middle East, a vital trade corridor, face disruptions that could dent merchandise outflows. Remittances, which hit record highs in recent years and fuel household consumption, risk contraction if expatriate incomes falter amid instability.

India's heavy reliance on imported crude—meeting over 85 per cent of its energy needs—amplifies the oil price shock. A sustained Brent crude rally above $80 per barrel could widen the current account deficit and strain forex reserves.

On the positive side, India's strategic reserves and forward purchasing contracts offer a buffer against volatility. Government interventions, such as releasing stockpiles or subsidising fuels, have historically softened such blows.

The RBI's proactive stance, including potential liquidity infusions, could stabilise financial markets. Kumar's call for policy coordination aligns with this, urging fiscal prudence alongside accommodative monetary measures.

Looking beyond the crisis, India's manufacturing push via initiatives like Production Linked Incentives (PLI) gains urgency. Enhancing domestic value chains in defence, electronics, and renewables could insulate growth from external shocks.

Service exports, led by IT and business processes, remain resilient, buoyed by global digital demand. This sectoral balance provides a foundation for the 8 per cent growth ambition Kumar outlines.

India's balanced diplomacy—maintaining ties with all Middle Eastern players—serves as a strategic asset. Quiet evacuations of citizens and humanitarian aid signal prudent crisis management.

While the Middle East flare-up demands vigilant short-term responses, India's macroeconomic fundamentals remain robust. With deft policymaking, the nation can emerge stronger, sustaining its ascent as a global economic powerhouse.

PTI


Second Iranian Vessel Approaches Sri Lanka Amid US Submarine Torpedo Strike On Warship


A second Iranian ship has requested entry into Sri Lanka's territorial waters, heightening concerns in Colombo just one day after a US submarine reportedly sank the Iranian frigate IRIS Dena off the southern coast near Galle. Sri Lankan authorities are deliberating their response with caution, balancing humanitarian obligations against the risk of entanglement in a rapidly expanding Middle East conflict.

The IRIS Dena, part of an Iranian naval fleet returning from a naval review exercise in Visakhapatnam, India, issued a distress signal at 5:08 am on Wednesday. Located approximately 40 nautical miles from Galle in international waters, the vessel was struck by torpedoes from an unidentified US submarine, according to US War Secretary Pete Hegseth. The attack claimed 84 Iranian sailors' lives, with over 80 bodies recovered by Sri Lankan forces.

Sri Lanka's Navy and Coast Guard responded swiftly as first responders under international maritime law. They rescued 32 surviving crew members, who are now receiving treatment for non-life-threatening injuries at Karapitiya Hospital in Galle. Inquests on the deceased sailors' bodies are scheduled for Thursday at the same facility, as Colombo conducts a thorough investigation into the tragedy.

Government spokesman and minister Nalinda Jayathissa addressed the matter in Parliament on Thursday, responding to queries from opposition leader Sajith Premadasa. He confirmed awareness of the second Iranian ship's position in Sri Lanka's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), outside territorial waters, where it awaits emergency assistance. "We are contemplating action to safeguard all lives on board," Jayathissa stated, emphasising Sri Lanka's commitment to regional peace.

The Sri Lankan Navy has remained tight-lipped on the cause of the IRIS Dena's distress, with spokesperson Commander Buddhika Sampath reiterating that their priority is humanitarian rescue under global conventions. Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath echoed this, noting the emergency plea received via standard channels. No official reasons for the sinking have been disclosed by Colombo, amid conflicting narratives.

This incident unfolds against a backdrop of intensified hostilities in the Gulf region. Since 28 February, the United States and Israel have conducted a large-scale joint offensive against Iran, prompting retaliatory strikes that have spilled beyond the Gulf. The IRIS Dena's involvement underscores how naval movements in the Indian Ocean are now collateral to this proxy escalation.

The frigate, a Moudge-class vessel commissioned in 2018, was en route home after participating in India's naval fleet review, a multinational event showcasing regional maritime cooperation. Its demise marks a rare direct naval confrontation in the Indian Ocean, raising questions about freedom of navigation and the rules of engagement in international waters.

Sri Lanka finds itself in a precarious position. As a neutral island nation reliant on maritime trade routes, Colombo must navigate pressures from global powers. Allowing the second ship entry could invite accusations of aiding Iran, while denial risks breaching humanitarian norms and straining ties with Tehran, a key energy supplier.

Domestic political scrutiny is mounting. Premadasa's intervention highlights opposition demands for transparency, with fears that Sri Lanka could become a flashpoint. Jayathissa assured Parliament that interventions aim to de-escalate, but analysts warn of potential Iranian naval reinforcements or US surveillance intensifying near Lankan waters.

Internationally, the event has drawn sharp reactions. Iran has condemned the "piratical" US action, vowing reprisals, while Washington defends it as pre-emptive defence against Iranian aggression. Israel has remained silent, but intelligence sources suggest coordinated submarine operations. India's role, as host of the recent review, adds complexity, given its strategic partnerships with both the US and Iran.

The human cost remains stark. Families of the 84 deceased await repatriation, while injured sailors recover amid tight security. Galle's port district, a serene tourist hub, now buzzes with naval activity and media presence, a stark reminder of distant wars encroaching on South Asian shores.

As the second ship lingers in the EEZ, Sri Lanka weighs its next move. Will it grant refuge, tow the vessel, or redirect it? The decision could set precedents for future incidents in these vital sea lanes, where commercial shipping intersects with great-power rivalry.

Broader implications loom for Indian Ocean stability. With hypersonic threats, submarine warfare, and drone swarms in play, neutral states like Sri Lanka face unprecedented challenges. The IRIS Dena sinking may herald a new era of underwater skirmishes, compelling regional forums like IORA to address escalation risks.

For now, Colombo prioritises aid and inquiry. Yet, as tensions simmer, the second Iranian ship's fate hangs in balance, a litmus test for Sri Lanka's diplomatic agility in a polarised world.

ANI


Mutual Gains, Not Altruism: US Official Spotlights India's Pivotal Role in Trump-Era Partnerships


United States Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau delivered a compelling address at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi on Thursday, framing the US-India relationship as a cornerstone of 21st-century global strategy.

Speaking at a curtain-raiser session titled "Power, Purpose, & Partnerships: American Foreign Policy in a New Era," organised by the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Landau described the moment as "critical" for bilateral ties.

He expressed profound gratitude to ORF and the Government of India for hosting the event, underscoring the value of such forums in fostering dialogue amid evolving international dynamics.

Landau outlined the Trump administration's foreign policy vision, pivoting from broad principles to the specific US-India partnership as a prime exemplar.

Central to his remarks was a clarification of the "America First" doctrine, which he insisted does not equate to isolationism but rather prioritises cooperation with like-minded nations.

"America First obviously does not mean America alone," Landau stated, emphasising that mutual cooperation serves national objectives for all involved parties.

He drew parallels between President Trump's goal to "make America great again" and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's parallel ambitions for India, highlighting shared sovereignty and self-interest.

Landau asserted that the 21st century will be defined by India's ascent, positioning New Delhi as an indispensable player in shaping global outcomes.

India's status as the world's most populous nation, coupled with its vast economic and human resources, makes it a natural partner, he argued.

This alliance thrives on "win-win situations," Landau stressed, explicitly rejecting any notion of charity or one-sided aid.

"I'm not here to do social work or charity. I'm here because it's in the interest of our country, and we think it's in the interest of India to deepen our partnership," he declared candidly.

Economically, Landau expressed optimism about a bilateral trade deal nearing completion, signalling robust progress in commercial negotiations.

The Raisina Dialogue, now in its 11th edition as of 2026, serves as Asia's premier conference on geopolitics and geo-economics, drawing global leaders to deliberate on pressing challenges.

Landau's appearance aligns with heightened US engagement in the Indo-Pacific, where countering China's assertiveness has elevated India's strategic importance.

Recent milestones, such as the Quad framework's revival and defence technology transfers like GE F414 jet engines for Indian fighters, exemplify this deepening bond.

India's indigenous manufacturing push under "Make in India" resonates with America's emphasis on supply chain resilience, creating fertile ground for joint ventures in semiconductors, drones, and critical minerals.

Landau's "mutual interest" framing echoes longstanding US policy shifts, from the 2008 civil nuclear deal to iCET initiatives advancing AI and quantum cooperation.

Amid tensions in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, the partnership bolsters maritime security, with US-India joint exercises like Malabar enhancing interoperability.

Landau's optimism on trade follows intense talks aimed at reducing tariffs and expanding market access, potentially unlocking billions in bilateral commerce.

Critics may view the "America First" lens as transactional, yet Landau positioned it as pragmatic realism benefiting both democracies.

India's defence modernisation, including acquisitions like MQ-9B drones and co-production of Stryker vehicles, further cements this axis.

As global uncertainties mount—from Ukraine's fallout to Middle East volatility—the US-India duo emerges as a stabilising force.

Landau's address reinforces Washington's view of India not as a recipient of benevolence, but as an equal shaping the century's trajectory.

This partnership, rooted in converging interests, promises enduring dividends for both nations and the rules-based order.

ANI


US Tests New Minuteman-III ICBM Amid Iran War: Inside The Nuclear Triad's Stalwart Arsenal


The United States Air Force Global Strike Command conducted a test launch of an unarmed LGM-30G Minuteman-III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on 3 March from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

The missile, codenamed GT 255, lifted off at 11:01 p.m. Pacific Time and carried two test re-entry vehicles that streaked thousands of miles across the Pacific to impact a designated target at Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.

This test unfolded against a backdrop of escalating tensions with Iran, yet officials emphasised that it formed part of a pre-scheduled, long-standing programme. Over 300 such launches have validated the missile's performance, accuracy, and reliability, with data from GT 255 feeding into ongoing force development evaluations.

Lieutenant Colonel Karrie Wray, commander of the 576th Flight Test Squadron, highlighted how the mission assessed individual components and diverse profiles to bolster fleet readiness within the land-based leg of America's nuclear triad. General S.L. Davis, the command's leader, confirmed the test's success in synchronising the system from launch to precise payload delivery.

The LGM-30G Minuteman-III stands as a silo-launched, surface-attack ICBM under Air Force Global Strike Command oversight. Deployed in hardened underground silos across the American heartland, these missiles connect to launch control centres via fortified cabling, with two-officer crews maintaining perpetual alert.

Redundant communication networks ensure direct links to national leadership; should ground links fail, E-6B aircraft can seize command. This architecture underscores the system's design for survivability in crisis.

Features of the LGM-30G Minuteman-III ICBM

FeatureDetails
Primary functionIntercontinental ballistic missile
ContractorBoeing Co.
Power plantThree solid-propellant rocket motors: first stage ATK refurbished M55A1; second stage ATK refurbished SR-19; third stage ATK refurbished SR-73
Thrust (First stage)About 904 kilonewtons
Thrust (Second stage)About 270 kilonewtons
Thrust (Third stage)About 156 kilonewtons
RangeMore than 9,650 kilometres
WeightApproximately 36,030 kilograms
Diameter5.5 feet
Speed at burnoutApproximately 24,000 kilometres per hour
CeilingAround 1,120 kilometres
First deployedJune 1970
Production endedDecember 1978

Powered by three solid-propellant rocket stages—refurbished M55A1 for the first, SR-19 for the second, and SR-73 for the third—the Minuteman-III delivers formidable thrust. The first stage generates around 904 kilonewtons, the second 270 kilonewtons, and the third 156 kilonewtons, propelling it to speeds nearing 24,000 kilometres per hour at burnout.

Weighing approximately 36,030 kilograms with a 5.5-foot diameter, the missile boasts a range exceeding 9,650 kilometres and a ceiling of about 1,120 kilometres. Boeing crafted it, with first deployment in June 1970 and production ceasing in December 1978.

Today, 400 Minuteman-IIIs anchor three missile wings: the 90th at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, the 341st at Malmstrom in Montana, and the 91st at Minot in North Dakota. This force structure ensures dispersed, resilient deterrence.

Conceived in the late 1950s and fielded in the early 1960s, Minuteman-III emerged as a rapid-response, solid-fuelled, inertially guided weapon prioritising endurance against attack. Six decades of upgrades have sharpened targeting, accuracy, and dependability.

Its ballistic trajectory arcs high into the upper atmosphere before re-entry vehicles detach for independent targeting, a capability validated in the GT 255 flight. Engineers from the 377th Test and Evaluation Group gathered telemetry to confirm each element's flawless operation.

Data flows to key stakeholders, including the Department of Defence, Department of Energy, and US Strategic Command, informing comprehensive assessments. Colonel Dustin Harmon, 377th TEG commander, stressed these tests as essential for verifying readiness.

Preparation spanned months, with maintenance from the 91st Missile Wing at Minuteman's North Dakota home and operators from all three wings executing the sequence. General Davis noted how such efforts guarantee proven long-range strike potency.

Despite its veteran status, Minuteman-III remains on full alert as the Air Force readies the LGM-35A Sentinel successor. This modernisation will refresh the nuclear triad's terrestrial component, blending legacy reliability with next-generation precision.

In an era of global volatility, from Iran confrontations to broader strategic rivalries, these tests reaffirm America's commitment to a credible deterrent, ensuring no adversary miscalculates the cost of aggression.

Agencies


Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth Confirms US Submarine Torpedoed Iranian Frigate In Indian Ocean, Leaving 148 Sailors Missing


The Pentagon has confirmed that a United States submarine torpedoed and sank an Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing US-Israeli conflict with Iran.

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the strike on Wednesday, describing it as a demonstration of America's global naval reach. He stated that the frigate IRIS Dena believed itself safe in international waters but was swiftly despatched by a torpedo.

This represents the first time a US submarine has sunk an enemy vessel by torpedo since the Second World War, according to Hegseth, who characterised the operation as a "quiet death".

The IRIS Dena had been spotted recently in the Bay of Bengal during India's International Fleet Review in Visakhapatnam on 18 February 2026, underscoring its active deployment in regional waters.

Sri Lankan authorities responded promptly to the frigate's distress call, issued at dawn on Wednesday. Rescue operations commenced within an hour, approximately 40 kilometres south of the southern port of Galle.

The Sri Lankan Navy recovered 32 crew members from the sunken vessel. Tragically, 148 other sailors remain missing, with officials expressing low hopes for further survivors.

By the time rescue boats arrived, the frigate had completely submerged, leaving only an oil slick on the surface as evidence of its demise.

Sri Lanka's Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath informed parliament that the rescued Iranians were rushed to a major hospital in the island's south. Two navy vessels and an aircraft were mobilised for ongoing search efforts.

A Sri Lankan defence official noted to AFP that searches continue, though the fate of the remaining crew is uncertain. Navy spokesman Buddhika Sampath confirmed the discovery of a few bodies in the vicinity.

Sampath emphasised that Sri Lanka's response aligns with its international maritime obligations, as the incident occurred within the nation's designated search-and-rescue zone in the Indian Ocean.

Sri Lanka has maintained a neutral stance amid the Middle East conflict, repeatedly calling for dialogue to de-escalate tensions. The country relies heavily on remittances from over a million nationals employed in the region, vital for its economic recovery following the 2022 crisis.

Neither the Sri Lankan Navy nor Air Force released footage of the operation, citing sensitivities involving a foreign military.

Police enhanced security around the Galle hospital as injured Iranian sailors arrived under naval escort.

Iran's Ambassador to Colombo, Alireza Delkhosh, was unavailable for immediate comment on the sinking.

The Pentagon framed the attack as part of broader objectives in the US-Israeli campaign against Iran, launched on Saturday, aimed at neutralising the Islamic Republic's naval capabilities.

Hegseth drew parallels to the Second World War, declaring that the US is "fighting to win" in this confrontation.

The incident highlights the expanding theatre of operations into the Indian Ocean, raising concerns over regional stability and international shipping lanes.

AFP


Tehran’s Secret Approach To CIA For Talks Amid Imminent Airspace Collapse


Amid the intensifying US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, operatives from Iran's Ministry of Intelligence have made discreet contact with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

This indirect approach seeks to explore possibilities for peace talks to halt the ongoing hostilities. Officials briefed on the matter revealed the outreach to The New York Times, highlighting a potential shift in Tehran's stance as its leadership grapples with severe pressures.

The timing of this overture is striking. It follows the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, killed in an Israeli airstrike that has plunged Iran's power structure into disarray. With key military and political figures under threat, Tehran's rulers appear increasingly cornered, prompting this covert bid for dialogue despite public defiance.

In Washington, however, the proposal has met with scepticism. US officials do not view the offer as credible at present, influenced by Israeli urgings to press the advantage. Jerusalem favours a sustained offensive aimed at dismantling Iran's military infrastructure and possibly engineering regime change, dismissing any immediate negotiations as a stalling tactic.

President Donald Trump has signalled a hardline position. In a Truth Social post on Tuesday, he declared negotiations with Iran "too late," asserting that the country's air defences, air force, navy, and leadership have been effectively neutralised. This rhetoric underscores the Trump administration's commitment to Operation Epic Fury, the ongoing air campaign conducted jointly with Israel.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth reinforced this confidence during a Pentagon briefing. He proclaimed that American and Israeli forces are achieving "decisive" victories, predicting total control over Iranian airspace in the near term. Such statements reflect the rapid degradation of Iran's defensive capabilities, with strikes targeting command centres, radar installations, and missile sites across the country.

The conflict has exacted a heavy toll on Iran. Recent US and Israeli attacks have struck not only military assets but also civilian infrastructure, including the UNESCO-listed Golestan Palace in Tehran, as confirmed by Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei. Images from Minab depict public mourning after a reported strike on a school, underscoring the broadening human cost.

Simultaneously, operations extend into Lebanon, where Hezbollah strongholds face relentless bombardment. This multi-front pressure has strained Iran's regional proxy network, further isolating the regime and amplifying internal fissures. Exiled Iranian Prince Reza Pahlavi has seized the moment, urging the Iranian diaspora to ramp up international lobbying for a post-revolutionary transition.

Pahlavi described the current juncture as "sensitive" and "fateful," positioning himself as a figurehead for opposition forces. His call aligns with growing diaspora activism, which could influence Western policy if Tehran's overture falters. Yet, uncertainties persist over whether Trump or Iranian hardliners will engage further.

The broader geopolitical stakes remain high. A prolonged campaign risks entangling the US deeper in the Middle East, even as allies like Israel push for escalation. For Iran, the outreach represents a pragmatic pivot amid existential threats, though domestic hardliners may sabotage any concessions. As strikes continue unabated, the window for de-escalation appears narrow.

ANI