
India and China convened the 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on Border Affairs (WMCC) in New Delhi on Thursday.
The Indian delegation was led by Sujit Ghosh, Joint Secretary (East Asia) in the Ministry of External Affairs, while the Chinese side was headed by Hou Yanqi, Director General of the Boundary and Oceanic Affairs Department of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The meeting was followed by an official release from the MEA on Friday.
Both sides engaged in frank discussions and reviewed the situation along the Line of Actual Control. They underlined that maintaining peace and tranquillity in the border areas remained essential for the overall development of bilateral relations.
The MEA emphasised that both sides agreed to continue using existing diplomatic and military channels, including the WMCC, local commander-level meetings and other agreed mechanisms, to resolve outstanding issues and avoid misunderstanding and miscalculation along the LAC.
As a follow-up to the outcomes of the 24th round of the Special Representatives’ talks held last year, the two sides held detailed exchanges on boundary delimitation, border management, mechanism-building and trans-border cooperation.
The Indian side specifically reiterated the need for an early meeting of the Expert Level Mechanism on trans-border rivers and stressed the importance of sharing technical details regarding upstream projects.
This emphasis reflects India’s longstanding concerns about China’s upstream hydropower and water diversion projects, which have implications for downstream flows into India’s northeastern states.
The MEA release highlighted that India pressed for transparency in China’s upstream projects, noting that technical details are vital for building trust and ensuring that water-related cooperation does not become a source of friction.
The Indian side has consistently sought greater clarity on China’s activities along trans-border rivers, particularly the Brahmaputra, where large-scale dam construction has raised concerns about ecological and strategic impacts.
The meeting followed the 35th WMCC held in Beijing in May, where both sides described the discussions as constructive and forward-looking. At that time, both delegations expressed satisfaction with progress in maintaining peace and tranquillity along the border, noting that this stability has enabled the gradual normalisation of bilateral relations. The continuation of dialogue in New Delhi underscores the commitment of both countries to sustain engagement despite unresolved issues.
Last year in August, during the 24th round of the Special Representatives’ dialogue, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi agreed on the need to approach the boundary question from the perspective of the overall bilateral relationship.
They sought a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable framework for settlement in accordance with the 2005 Agreement on Political Parameters and Guiding Principles. The talks also produced agreements to establish an Expert Group under the WMCC to explore early progress in boundary delimitation, set up a Working Group to improve border management, create additional General Level Mechanisms in the eastern and middle sectors, and continue using diplomatic and military channels to address border-related issues.
The MEA reiterated that both sides remain committed to maintaining communication through established mechanisms to ensure stability and prevent misunderstandings along the LAC.
The emphasis on dialogue, transparency and mechanism-building reflects a cautious but deliberate effort to stabilise ties, even as strategic mistrust persists. The Indian insistence on upstream project details highlights the intersection of water security and geopolitics, an increasingly important dimension of bilateral relations.
ANI














