Thursday, May 7, 2026

Indian Navy Deploys First Indigenous Maritime Spotter Drone From INS Vikrant


India has deployed its first indigenous Maritime Spotter Drone from INS Vikrant, developed by Mumbai-based Sagar Defence Engineering. This marks a major leap in naval aviation technology, enabling real-time surveillance, piracy interception, and autonomous operations from moving warships. 

The system is now integral to India’s maritime security architecture.

The Indian Navy has formally inducted the Maritime Spotter Drone, a pioneering unmanned aerial system designed and manufactured by Sagar Defence Engineering.

This drone represents India’s first indigenous ship-launched tactical spotting multi-copter, capable of autonomous launch and recovery from moving platforms such as INS Vikrant, the country’s maiden aircraft carrier. Unlike conventional drones that require stationary bases, the Spotter can take off and land while the ship is manoeuvring at high speeds, a capability possessed by only a handful of companies worldwide.

Trials demonstrated the drone’s ability to disengage and perform spotting manoeuvres at speeds of 20 knots, before successfully landing back on INS Vikrant. It has achieved flight endurance of up to 120 minutes in rough sea conditions, covering distances of 20 kilometres while carrying payloads of up to 3 kilograms.

Equipped with electro-optic and thermal imaging cameras, the Spotter provides real-time intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), enhancing situational awareness and enabling rapid decision-making during mission-critical operations.

The drone has already proven its worth in live operations. During the interception of the hijacked merchant vessel MV Ruen by Somali pirates, Spotter drones provided continuous surveillance, guiding naval assets and marine commandos to the precise location of the vessel.

Pirates even attempted to shoot down the drone, underscoring its frontline role in high-risk missions. The system’s ability to transfer control seamlessly between ships or to MARCOS units on handheld systems further expands its operational flexibility.

Sixty units of the Spotter Drone have been procured by the Indian Navy, making them integral to warships across the fleet. Their deployment strengthens India’s counter-piracy, anti-smuggling, and maritime security operations in the Indian Ocean Region. The drones also contribute to broader strategic missions, including persistent surveillance and safeguarding sea lanes critical to India’s trade and energy security.

Captain Nikunj Parashar, Co-founder and Managing Director of Sagar Defence Engineering, highlighted the importance of indigenous innovation in defence technology. Having himself faced pirate threats during his merchant navy career, Parashar emphasised that the Spotter Drone was designed to save lives by providing early warning and actionable intelligence.

The system is a product of India’s Indigenous Design, Development and Manufacture (IDDM) framework, aligning with the vision of Aatmanirbhar Bharat by reducing reliance on foreign technologies.

The induction of the Spotter Drone from INS Vikrant is not only a technological milestone but also a strategic statement. It demonstrates India’s ability to integrate advanced unmanned systems into frontline naval platforms, creating a seamless fusion of sea and sky. This synergy sets a new benchmark in autonomous maritime capability, ensuring that every horizon is watched and every mission is future-ready.

Agencies


S-71K Kover Missile Bolsters Su-57E's Appeal For India, But Seeker Limits Persist


The revelation of the S-71K Kover cruise missile tailored for the Su-57 and its S-70 Okhotnik unmanned wingman does indeed shift the calculus for India’s evaluation of the Su-57E.

The missile’s 300 km stand-off range is a crucial factor, allowing the launch platform to remain outside most hostile air defence envelopes, reported Malaysia based defence portal Defence Security Asia.

This is particularly relevant for the Indian Air Force, which has long sought reliable deep strike options without exposing its manned assets to high-risk environments.

The 250 kg warhead, derived from the OFAB-250 family, provides substantial destructive capability against fixed installations, making it suitable for pre-planned missions where precision and survivability matter more than adaptability.

The inertial navigation system, while optimised for fixed targets, underscores the missile’s role as a cost-efficient solution for strategic strikes rather than dynamic battlefield engagements. Its design philosophy—leveraging commercial components for rapid fielding—suggests Russia’s intent to make the system affordable and scalable, which could appeal to India as it balances budgetary constraints with operational needs.

Comparative Analysis of Stand‑Off Strike Missiles

Missile Origin Range Warhead Guidance Key Strengths Limitations
S‑71K Kover Russia ~300 km 250 kg HE fragmentation (OFAB‑250 family) Inertial navigation (INS) Cost‑efficient, rapid fielding
Designed for UCAV integration (Okhotnik)
Enables Su‑57 to act as command node
Optimised for fixed targets
Lacks multi‑mode seekers
Limited against mobile/highly defended assets
JASSM/JASSM‑ER USA 370 km (baseline), >926 km (ER) 450 kg penetrator (WDU‑42/B) GPS + INS + Imaging Infrared (IIR) Stealthy design
Precision strike with CEP ~3 m
Effective against fixed & relocatable targets
Integrated on multiple platforms (F‑15, F‑16, B‑1, B‑2, F‑35)
Higher cost (~$1M+ per missile)
Production bottlenecks in high‑intensity conflicts
Storm Shadow/SCALP EG UK/France ~560 km 450 kg BROACH tandem penetrator GPS + INS + Terrain reference + IIR terminal seeker Designed for hardened/buried targets
Proven combat record (Iraq, Libya, Ukraine)
Low‑observable, terrain‑hugging flight
Very high unit cost (~£2M)
Fire‑and‑forget, cannot retarget mid‑flight

The integration with the S-70 Okhotnik UCAV is perhaps the most transformative aspect. By enabling distributed strike missions, the Su-57 can act as a command node, directing unmanned assets into contested airspace while itself remaining at a safer distance. This manned-unmanned teaming concept aligns with India’s growing interest in networked warfare and autonomous systems.

For India, the addition of the S-71K capability enhances the Su-57E’s attractiveness as more than just a stealth fighter—it becomes part of a broader strike ecosystem. The ability to conduct deep strikes without risking frontline fighters could fill a gap left by delays in indigenous programmes such as the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft.

However, the caveat remains significant: the missile is optimised for fixed targets and lacks sophisticated multi-mode seekers. Against mobile, heavily defended, or high-value dynamic targets, its utility would be limited compared to advanced Western stand-off weapons. This means India would need to view the S-71K as a complementary capability rather than a comprehensive solution.

In essence, the S-71K Kover adds a genuine stand-off strike dimension to the Su-57 package, reinforcing its appeal for India’s evaluation.

Yet, the limitations in seeker technology highlight the need for India to consider whether this capability aligns with its operational doctrine, which often demands flexibility against both fixed and mobile adversary assets.

The Su-57E with the S-71K could serve as a potent tool for strategic deterrence and pre-planned missions, but India would still require other systems to address dynamic battlefield challenges.

DSA


Operation Sindoor Fuels India’s Defence Export Boom, Propelling ₹38,424 Crores Surge


India’s battlefield success in Operation Sindoor has directly fuelled a record-breaking defence export boom, with ₹24,000 crore in fresh orders and total exports hitting ₹38,424 crore in FY2025-26. This surge has transformed India into a top-tier global defence exporter, reshaping its economy, industry, and strategic standing.

India commemorates the first anniversary of Operation Sindoor on 7 May 2026, a 96-hour conflict whose tactical success has left a lasting economic and industrial legacy. The battle-proven credentials of indigenous systems showcased during the operation translated into unprecedented export orders, propelling India into the ranks of leading defence exporters.

According to Ministry of Defence data, total defence exports for FY2025-26 reached ₹38,424 crore, marking a 62.6 per cent surge compared to the previous year. This growth trajectory was driven almost entirely by the demonstrated lethality and reliability of Indian systems under combat conditions, shifting global perception from “budget-friendly alternatives” to “strategic necessities.”

The precision strikes on May 7, 2025, targeting Nur Khan and Rahimyar Khan airbases, highlighted the Air-Launched BrahMos missile’s ability to penetrate sophisticated defences. This live demonstration provided marketing unmatched by any defence expo.

Similarly, Indian loitering munitions neutralised adversary radar installations during Suppression of Enemy Air Defences operations, proving resilience in contested electronic environments. These successes led to a flood of inquiries and contracts.

Between July 2025 and March 2026, ₹24,000 crore in new export orders were driven by four star performers: the BrahMos missile system, Akash-NG air defence system, indigenous loitering munitions, and the Netra AEW&C platform.

The export boom revitalised India’s domestic manufacturing ecosystem. For the first time, the private sector contributed nearly half of total exports, with ₹17,352 crore in FY2026, representing a 54 per cent year-on-year growth.

This industrial momentum supported approximately 1.5 lakh jobs and channelled profits into next-generation technologies such as AI-driven autonomous swarms and hypersonic glide vehicles. Defence production reached ₹1,54,000 crore in FY2025, a 3.2-fold increase over the past decade, with 65 per cent of equipment now manufactured domestically.

The defence budget has tripled since FY2014, reaching ₹7,85,000 Crores for FY2027, accounting for 14.67 per cent of the Union Budget. Targets for FY2029 include ₹3,00,000 Crores in production and ₹50,000 Cores in exports.

India’s rise as an exporter is matched by diversification of imports. Russian share has declined from 70 per cent to 40 per cent, with France and Israel emerging as key suppliers. Policy initiatives such as Production Linked Incentive schemes, corporatisation of Ordnance Factory Boards, and Positive Indigenisation Lists have deepened reliance on local MSMEs and start-ups.

Over 16,000 MSMEs and 1,000 start-ups are now active in the defence supply chain, attracting nearly USD 2 billion in funding since 2017. This ecosystem enables India to offer “security-in-a-box” packages of missiles, radars, and training, strengthening its Act East and Look West diplomacy.

Major defence firms have secured landmark contracts. HAL leads with orders for 97 TEJAS MK-1A jets worth ₹62,000+ Crores and 12 Su-30MKI aircraft. BEL signed a ₹1,950 Crores contract for mountain radars and partnered with France’s Safran to produce HAMMER precision weapons.

BDL expanded with new manufacturing units and signed a ₹2,096 Crores deal for INVAR anti-tank missiles. L&T advanced indigenous production of BvS10 Sindhu vehicles and K9 Vajra-T howitzers. 

Adani Defence partnered with Italy’s Leonardo for helicopter production, while Bharat Forge secured contracts for carbines and underwater systems. MDL is finalising a massive ₹90,000 Crores submarine deal with Germany, and Reliance Defence secured a ₹600 Crores export order for ammunition. Tata Advanced Systems won contracts to upgrade Pinaka rocket systems.

Despite this momentum, challenges remain. India continues to rely on imports for high-end technologies such as jet engines and advanced sensors, and R&D intensity lags behind global leaders. 

Addressing these gaps will require deeper industry-academia collaboration and investment in disruptive technologies.

However, with the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2026 and the iDEX program, resilience is growing. As India looks toward 2029 targets, the record-breaking figures of 2026 demonstrate how battlefield success has weaponised industrial potential.

Agencies


China Unveils J-35AE Fifth-Gen Stealth Fighter, Export To Pakistan Raises India’s Strategic Concerns


China’s unveiling of the J-35AE stealth fighter for export, with Pakistan poised to acquire up to 40 jets, represents a major strategic shift in South Asia. For India, this development creates a potential “stealth gap” as its indigenous stealth program remains years away, forcing reliance on air defence systems like the S-400 to counter low-observable threats.

China has introduced the J-35AE, an export-ready fifth-generation stealth fighter, signalling its ambition to rival the American F-35 Lightning II in global defence markets.

The aircraft, developed by Shenyang Aircraft Corporation under the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, is the second fifth-generation platform after the J-20, but unlike the J-20, it has been designed with foreign buyers in mind.

The J-35AE mirrors the domestic J-35A, offering stealth shaping, internal weapons bays, advanced avionics, and an Active Electronically Scanned Array radar capable of tracking multiple targets simultaneously.

It can reach speeds of Mach 1.8 and deploy long-range PL-15 missiles from its internal bays, while also carrying payloads on external hardpoints. A modern electro-optical targeting system enhances detection and engagement while maintaining low observability.

China has positioned the J-35AE as a more affordable alternative to the F-35, with costs estimated between $35 million and $80 million per unit. Reports suggest Pakistan is the most likely launch customer, with indications of pilot training already underway in China.

Islamabad has reportedly signalled intent to procure up to 40 aircraft, though Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has attempted to downplay the reports as media speculation. Nonetheless, the trajectory points to Pakistan’s acquisition, potentially alongside systems such as the KJ-500 airborne early warning aircraft, forming an integrated combat network.

For Pakistan, the induction of the J-35AE would mark a leap in capability, modernising its fleet beyond aging F-16s and Mirages. The stealth fighter would provide low radar visibility, long-range engagement, and network-centric warfare capabilities.

However, challenges remain: operating fifth-generation aircraft is costly and technically demanding, and Pakistan’s financial constraints may force retirement of older platforms. There are also concerns about operational dependency on China, including possible monitoring mechanisms tied to the aircraft.

Strategically, the deployment of J-35AE fighters in Pakistan has profound implications for India. India currently lacks a fifth-generation stealth fighter, relying instead on advanced fourth-generation and 4.5-generation platforms such as the Rafale and Su-30MKI.

While these aircraft are formidable, they lack full stealth features, creating a vulnerability against Pakistan’s potential stealth fleet. India’s Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft programme is still in development and unlikely to be operational until the next decade, leaving a window during which both China and Pakistan could operate stealth platforms.

Analysts warn this creates a “two-front” challenge, with Pakistan able to leverage stealth for “first-look, first-shot” engagements against high-value Indian assets such as airborne warning systems and refuelling aircraft.

China’s decision to fast-track deliveries of the J-35AE to Pakistan, reportedly moving timelines forward to mid-2026, underscores Beijing’s determination to strengthen Islamabad’s deterrence posture. The package may include not only fighters but also KJ-500 airborne early warning aircraft and HQ-19 missile-defence systems, creating South Asia’s first integrated fifth-generation combat ecosystem.

This represents the most consequential change in regional airpower since India inducted the Rafale, and marks the first export of a Chinese fifth-generation fighter, breaking the Western monopoly on stealth aircraft sales.

For India, the development highlights the urgency of accelerating modernisation efforts. Reliance on systems such as the S-400 air defence network will be critical to detect and track stealth targets, but long-term solutions lie in expediting indigenous stealth programmes and considering interim acquisitions.

The deepening China-Pakistan defence partnership, now extending into stealth technology, could significantly alter the strategic balance in South Asia, forcing India to recalibrate its airpower doctrine and procurement priorities.

Agencies


Operation Sindoor Anniversary: Army, IAF Angels of Vengeance Honour Pahalgam Martyrs



India's Defence Ministry released a special video at 1:05 a.m., commemorating the precise moment of its strikes on terror targets in Pakistan last year—launched in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack.

The Indian Army and Air Force have marked the first anniversary of Operation Sindoor with powerful videos and images, reaffirming India’s uncompromising stance against terrorism.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh praised the armed forces’ bravery, precision, and synergy, while the military showcased visuals of strikes on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

A year after the launch of Operation Sindoor on 7 May 2025, the Indian Army released fresh videos highlighting the military action against terror infrastructure across the border. The Army’s message was unequivocal: India will “track, identify and punish every terrorist and their backers.” The Indian Air Force echoed this sentiment with its own video, declaring “India forgives nothing,” underscoring the nation’s resolve to deliver justice for victims of terrorism.

The operation was India’s decisive response to the brutal Pahalgam terror attack of 22 April 2025, in which twenty-six innocent people were killed in the Baisaran Valley. Tourists were singled out and shot after being asked about their religion, with attackers killing men in front of their families.

To honour the victims and deliver justice, India named its counter-terror mission Operation Sindoor, symbolising both sacrifice and retribution.

The strikes were carried out with unprecedented synergy between the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Precision missile and aerial strikes targeted nine terror camps linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, including bases in Bahawalpur, Muridke, Muzaffarabad, Kotli, and Bhimber.

These locations had long served as command centres for cross-border terrorism. The operation eliminated over one hundred terrorists and dismantled critical infrastructure, sending a clear message that nuclear blackmail would no longer deter India’s response.

The anniversary videos released by the armed forces showed visuals of military planning, troop mobilisation, and precision strikes. Satellite images of destroyed terror camps were also shared, reinforcing the scale and effectiveness of the operation.

The Army described the mission as “planned, trained and executed,” while the Air Force emphasised the seamless coordination across services. The footage included scenes of debris, fireballs, and destroyed radar systems, illustrating the devastating impact of India’s cruise missiles, drones, and precision glide bombs.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, speaking at the ANI National Security Summit, hailed the armed forces for their courage and restraint. He described Pakistan as the “terror epicentre” and warned that India had voluntarily stopped Operation Sindoor but remained ready for a long war if provoked.

Singh emphasised that the operation was a symbol of national resolve, showcasing unmatched precision and synergy, and reinforcing India’s march towards Atmanirbharta in defence production.

The anniversary was also marked by heightened security in Jammu, with authorities on alert to prevent any retaliatory attempts. Across defence establishments, tributes were paid to the sacrifices of military personnel, and school students painted posters depicting Operation Sindoor, reflecting the operation’s resonance in public memory.

Operation Sindoor is now regarded as one of India’s most significant military missions in decades, redefining its counter-terror doctrine.

It demonstrated India’s willingness to act decisively, its ability to integrate tri-service capabilities, and its determination to dismantle terror infrastructure despite the risks of escalation.

The anniversary reaffirmed that India forgets nothing and forgives nothing, ensuring that justice for Pahalgam victims remains eternal in memory and action.

Agencies


India And Vietnam Elevate Defence And Security Cooperation As Cornerstone of Strategic Partnership


Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President To Lam of Vietnam reaffirmed that defence and security cooperation remains a central pillar of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between the two nations.

Both sides agreed to intensify collaboration in traditional and emerging areas of defence, with a particular emphasis on enhancing defence systems procurement and expanding engagements across multiple domains. This reflects the shared commitment of India and Vietnam to strengthen their strategic alignment and contribute to stability in the wider Indo-Pacific region.

The joint statement highlighted that defence cooperation will be deepened through defence policy dialogue, joint exercises, staff talks, joint research and co-production of new defence technologies.

It also included enhanced port calls by naval vessels and air force aircraft, peacekeeping activities, information sharing, hydrography, defence exhibitions, capacity building, defence industrial cooperation, maritime security, maritime safety, and search and rescue operations. These initiatives are designed to align with the mutual interests and priorities of both countries.

The leaders welcomed the steady progress in implementing the Defence Lines of Credit extended by India to Vietnam, which have significantly bolstered Vietnam’s defence capabilities and advanced bilateral cooperation.

They expressed satisfaction with the implementation of bilateral defence agreements, including the Mutual Logistics Support Agreement, the Memorandum of Agreement on Submarine Search and Rescue Support and Cooperation, and the Letter of Intent on Strengthening Defence Industrial Cooperation. These frameworks continue to provide a strong foundation for expanding defence ties.

The statement noted the inaugural joint hydrographic survey conducted by the two navies in May 2025 off the coast of Vietnam, which was welcomed as a milestone in maritime cooperation. Both sides agreed to conduct similar exercises regularly in the future, reinforcing their shared commitment to maritime safety and security.

Vietnam also expressed appreciation for the training offered by India to Vietnamese defence personnel under the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation Programme, delivered through Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force Training Teams at institutions such as the Telecommunications University, Naval Academy, and Air Force College in Nha Trang. India’s support for the establishment of the Army Software Park at TCU, Nha Trang, was also acknowledged as a significant contribution to capacity building.

The leaders welcomed the decision for India and Vietnam to co-chair the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus Experts’ Working Group on Cyber Security for the 2027–2030 cycle, which will enhance cooperation in addressing emerging cyber threats. They also agreed to strengthen cooperation in legal and judicial fields through the effective implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Law and Justice of India and the Ministry of Justice of Vietnam.

Both sides committed to deepening cooperation between the Ministry of Public Security of Vietnam and the National Security Council Secretariat of India to achieve shared objectives.

This includes broadening collaboration in information sharing, cybersecurity, counterterrorism, combating high-tech crime, transnational crime, money laundering, and online scams.

The importance of effectively utilising existing mechanisms, such as the India-Vietnam Security Dialogue, was underscored as a means to advance these goals.

The leaders welcomed the successful convening of the First India-Vietnam Cyber Policy Dialogue, which provided a platform to exchange views on recent developments in cyber policies, review the cyber threat landscape, identify areas of bilateral cooperation, and discuss joint capacity building activities and cooperation at multilateral fora on ICT issues.

Both sides agreed to enhance the exchange of experience and expand cooperation in the security domain, including promoting training and capacity building for law enforcement officers, professional training, foreign language training, cybersecurity incident response skills, UN Peacekeeping, and other mutually agreed activities.

The joint statement concluded by commending the effective implementation of the Joint Vision Statement on India-Vietnam Defence Partnership towards 2030, which continues to guide the growing defence ties between the two countries.

This vision provides a long-term framework for cooperation, ensuring that defence and security remain at the heart of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.

ANI


India And Japan Sign Landmark Agreements On Quantum Science Cooperation


India and Japan have taken another decisive step in strengthening their strategic partnership in science and technology with the signing of key agreements in healthcare innovation and frontier technologies during a high-level bilateral meeting in New Delhi.

The meeting was attended by Japan’s Minister for Science and Technology Policy and Minister of State for Space Policy, Kimi Onoda, and India’s Union Minister of State for Science & Technology and Earth Sciences, Jitendra Singh.

The discussions culminated in the exchange of a Memorandum of Cooperation in the field of health and medical devices between the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and India’s Department of Science and Technology (DST).

This agreement is expected to accelerate joint research projects, capacity-building initiatives, and funding support mechanisms to advance medical technologies and healthcare solutions.

In addition, a Letter of Intent on cooperation in Quantum Science and Technology was signed between Japan’s Cabinet Office and India’s DST. This marks a significant milestone in collaboration on next-generation technologies such as quantum computing, secure communication systems, quantum sensing, and materials research.

Both sides agreed to strengthen cooperation under India’s National Quantum Mission, with emphasis on researcher exchange programmes, joint innovation platforms, and industry internships to foster talent and innovation.

Speaking at the meeting, Jitendra Singh highlighted the “natural synergy” between India and Japan in science and technology, pointing out that Japan’s advanced capabilities combined with India’s vast talent pool create strong potential for joint innovation.

He noted that the partnership has entered a “new phase” following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Japan in 2025, which laid the groundwork for deeper collaboration in emerging technologies.

Japanese Minister Kimi Onoda praised India’s rapid economic growth and its thriving innovation ecosystem, particularly the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence across sectors. She emphasised Japan’s strengths in advanced manufacturing and quantum technologies, expressing confidence that the partnership would lead to transformative outcomes in both healthcare and quantum science.

The healthcare sector was identified as a priority area, with both countries agreeing to enhance collaboration through joint research, innovation-driven projects, and mechanisms to accelerate the development of cutting-edge medical devices. This cooperation is expected to contribute to improved healthcare delivery and innovation in medical technology across the Indo-Pacific region.

The engagement reaffirmed the shared commitment of India and Japan to advancing science and technology cooperation as part of a broader vision for a free, open, and innovation-driven Indo-Pacific. 

By aligning their strengths in healthcare innovation and quantum technologies, the two nations are positioning themselves as key players in shaping the future of science and technology in the region.

ANI


India And Vietnam Finance Ministers Strengthen Cooperation Amid Global Economic And Geopolitical Challenges


Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman held discussions with Vietnam’s Finance Minister Ngo Van Tuan in New Delhi on Wednesday, focusing on ways to deepen cooperation across technology, innovation, energy, and pharmaceuticals.

The meeting came against the backdrop of evolving global economic and geopolitical challenges, with both sides emphasising resilience and stability in their respective economies.

The talks coincided with the celebration of ten years of the India-Vietnam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, which both ministers acknowledged as a relationship that has continued to strengthen and expand.

The Vietnamese side expressed keen interest in advancing collaboration in technology-driven sectors, energy cooperation, and pharmaceutical development, reflecting Vietnam’s ambition to integrate more deeply into global value chains.

According to a post by the Finance Ministry on X, Sitharaman praised Vietnam’s strong macroeconomic management and ongoing institutional reforms. She noted that these reforms have contributed to Vietnam’s improved credit outlook and rising competitiveness, enhancing its resilience and integration into international trade and investment frameworks. This recognition underscored India’s appreciation of Vietnam’s economic trajectory and reformist approach.

Ngo Van Tuan, in turn, commended India’s macroeconomic leadership and expressed interest in learning from India’s experience in several areas. He highlighted India’s tax reforms, the development of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and the role of public investment in driving growth as areas of particular relevance to Vietnam’s own economic agenda. His remarks reflected Vietnam’s intent to draw lessons from India’s policy innovations to strengthen its domestic economy.

Sitharaman outlined India’s support mechanisms for the MSME sector, which include direct and indirect tax reforms, interest subventions, public procurement policies, and AI skilling initiatives aimed at workforce development. She emphasised India’s efforts to modernise and simplify tax administration, noting that faceless assessments and technology-driven systems have enhanced transparency and efficiency in governance. These reforms, she explained, have created a more predictable and investor-friendly environment.

The Finance Minister also presented the PM Gati Shakti platform as an integrated, technology-enabled framework for infrastructure development. Vietnam showed interest in this approach, recognising its potential to streamline planning and execution across multiple sectors. The platform’s emphasis on connectivity and efficiency resonated with Vietnam’s own infrastructure development priorities.

Sitharaman fondly recalled her visit to Vietnam during her tenure as Defence Minister, underscoring the warmth and strength of bilateral ties. Her personal recollection added a layer of continuity to the relationship, highlighting the multifaceted nature of India-Vietnam cooperation that spans defence, economy, and people-to-people exchanges.

The meeting reaffirmed the shared commitment of both nations to further deepen the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and expand cooperation across key sectors. It also reflected the broader strategic alignment between India and Vietnam in navigating global uncertainties and building resilient economies.

The talks took place during the three-day state visit of Vietnam’s President To Lam to India. He was accompanied by a high-level delegation comprising several ministers and senior officials, as well as a strong business delegation. Earlier on Wednesday, President To Lam held a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, further cementing the momentum of India-Vietnam relations at the highest level.

This dialogue between the finance ministers added significant economic depth to the visit, complementing the strategic and political discussions between the leaders and reinforcing the trajectory of enhanced cooperation between the two countries.

ANI


Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal And Airbus India Chief Discuss Aerospace Manufacturing And MRO Expansion


Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal held discussions with Airbus India and South Asia President and Managing Director Jurgen Westermeier on Wednesday, focusing on expanding aerospace manufacturing and aviation-related capabilities in India.

The meeting took place against the backdrop of India’s push for greater localisation in aerospace manufacturing and its ambition to emerge as a major global hub for aviation and aircraft component production.

In a post shared on X, Goyal stated that the discussions centred on strengthening sourcing from India, advancing aerospace manufacturing, scaling up supply chains, enhancing Maintenance, Repair, and Operations capabilities, and deepening skill development initiatives.

He emphasised that these efforts are aimed at positioning India as a global aviation hub. Goyal described the interaction as a productive meeting with Westermeier, highlighting the importance of increasing collaboration between India and Airbus across manufacturing, supply chains, and skill development.

The talks come at a time when global aerospace companies are increasingly looking at India as a sourcing and manufacturing destination amid diversification of supply chains. India’s growing role in aerospace is being reinforced by policy initiatives that encourage localisation, skill development, and integration into global supply chains.

Earlier this year, Westermeier welcomed the framework for an interim Bilateral Trade Agreement between India and the United States, describing it as a runway for Indian suppliers to scale globally.

He noted that the announcement of a framework for reciprocal and mutually beneficial trade was not merely about reducing tariffs but about creating opportunities for Indian suppliers to expand their global presence.

Westermeier explained that the initiative would help foreign original equipment manufacturers diversify sourcing strategies and improve the integration of Indian suppliers into the global aerospace ecosystem.

He further stressed that for capital-intensive sectors such as aerospace manufacturing, certainty in tariffs and predictability in policy are critical for sustained growth. Westermeier expressed hope that reduced tariffs would allow Indian suppliers to integrate more seamlessly into the global aerospace supply chain.

The meeting between Goyal and Westermeier underscores India’s strategic intent to strengthen its aerospace sector, enhance its MRO capabilities, and build a skilled workforce capable of supporting advanced aviation technologies.

It also highlights Airbus’s commitment to deepening its engagement with India, aligning with the country’s broader vision of becoming a self-reliant and globally competitive aerospace hub.

ANI


Dutch Frigate HNLMS De Ruyter Arrives In Kochi To Strengthen India-Netherlands Maritime Partnership


The Royal Netherlands Navy frigate HNLMS De Ruyter (F804) has arrived in Kochi, escorted by Indian Navy Fast Interceptor Craft, marking a significant step in Indo-Dutch maritime cooperation.

The visit coincides with a high-level Dutch naval delegation’s engagements in Southern Naval Command, underscoring shared commitment to training, interoperability, and industrial collaboration.

HNLMS De Ruyter, a De Zeven Provinciën-class air defence and command frigate, entered Kochi harbour on 4 May 2026. The vessel was ceremonially received with naval honours, including a band performance, after being escorted by Indian Navy Fast Interceptor Craft.

The frigate is currently on a five-month Indo-Pacific deployment under the mission “Pacific Archer,” aimed at strengthening diplomatic, economic, and security ties with like-minded nations. The deployment began from Den Helder on 12 April and includes stops in Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, South Korea, Tokyo, Hawaii, and the Caribbean Antilles before returning to the Netherlands.

The visit coincided with the arrival of Major General (Royal Marines) Rob De Wit, Deputy Commander of the Royal Netherlands Navy, and Marisa Gerards, Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, to Southern Naval Command in Kochi.

The delegation was received by Rear Admiral Prakash Gopalan, Chief of Staff, Southern Naval Command, with discussions centred on enhancing cooperation in training, operational engagements, and exchange of best practices. The Dutch Deputy Commander had earlier participated in the IONS Conclave of Chiefs during MILAN 2026 in Visakhapatnam, further reinforcing the continuity of naval dialogue.

In a solemn gesture, Major General De Wit and Ambassador Gerards laid wreaths at the Southern Naval Command War Memorial on 4 May, coinciding with the Netherlands’ National Remembrance Day, paying tribute to fallen personnel.

The delegation is scheduled to engage in a series of bilateral activities, including visits to professional training establishments under Southern Naval Command, demonstrations of advanced simulators, and inspections of state-of-the-art training infrastructure. These engagements highlight the emphasis on enhancing training cooperation and sharing of best practices between the two navies.

The Dutch delegation will also visit Cochin Shipyard Limited to gain insights into India’s shipbuilding capabilities and explore avenues for industrial collaboration. This aspect of the visit underscores the growing interest in defence-industrial cooperation between India and the Netherlands, particularly in the context of shipbuilding and maritime technology. The crew of HNLMS De Ruyter also visited heritage sites in Kochi with Dutch influence, including the Dutch Cemetery in Fort Kochi, reflecting historical ties between the two nations.

The frigate’s commanding officer, Commander Rodger de Wit, emphasised that the deployment is structured in phases, with the current focus on strengthening ties with Indo-Pacific partners. He noted that India and the Netherlands, though geographically distant, share common responsibilities in safeguarding freedom of navigation and maritime security.

The ship’s advanced capabilities include a vertical launch system for missiles, close-in weapon systems, a 127mm main gun, Harpoon missile launchers, and torpedo tubes, making it one of the most sophisticated assets in the Royal Netherlands Navy.

On departure from Kochi, HNLMS De Ruyter will undertake a Passage Exercise (PASSEX) with an Indian Naval ship, further strengthening interoperability and operational synergy. This exercise will serve as a practical demonstration of the growing operational partnership between the two navies, reinforcing their shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

ANI


The US + Israel War On Iran: Blockade, Hormuz Closure Fuel Global Oil Crisis And Recession Fears


by Col (Dr.) P K Vasudeva

The conflict between Iran and Israel is a long-standing ideological, political, and proxy war, intensified by Iran’s nuclear programme and its funding of anti-Israel militant groups (Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis). Israel views Iran's nuclear goals and threats as an existential danger, leading to direct military strikes, cyberattacks, and assassinations.

The recent attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran are part of a complex conflict, not just one single reason. The US and Israel say Iran is developing nuclear weapons capability (uranium enrichment + missile systems), which is a direct threat, especially to Israel. The stated goal of the strikes is to destroy Iran’s missile and nuclear infrastructure. Iran, however, says its nuclear programme is peaceful, which is a major point of dispute.

The US has also had tensions with Iran since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. So this war didn’t start suddenly—it’s been building for years. Iran has strong influence in the Middle East (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, etc.). Israel especially wants to weaken Iran’s ability to support armed groups near its borders. There are ongoing negotiations about Iran’s nuclear programme and sanctions. These talks failed due to disagreements on nuclear limits and sanctions relief. After diplomacy stalled, tensions escalated into military action.

The Twelve-Day war (June 13-24, 2025) was an intensive, US backed Israeli military conflict against Iran, triggered by failed nuclear negotiations. Israel targeted military and Iranian Nuclear sites, assassinating leaders while the US engaged in Operation Midnight Hammer with cyber-attacks and nuclear sites at Fordow and Natanz with B-2 Bombers. Heavy casualties 1090 people, 400 civilians and 10,000sites damaged. The war concluded on June 24 2025 after a truce brokered by US and Qatar.

On 28 Feb, 2026, both countries launched large-scale coordinated strikes on Iran. Iran then retaliated with missile attacks on Israel and US bases in Gulf countries, turning it into a wider war. Israel’s leadership has openly said their goal is to stop Iran from ever getting nuclear weapons.

They also aimed to push back Iranian influence and prevent future attacks. Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in a joint U.S.-Israeli airstrike in Tehran. The strike targeted high-ranking Iranian officials, causing significant damage and killing several senior leaders, including members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

The primary goal was to neutralise Iranian offensive missiles, destroy missile production facilities and dismantle military infrastructure to prevent nuclear weapon development. As of April over 6000 Iranian military personnel were killed, 15,000 wounded and about 1,000 Hezbollah fighter killed.

One of the biggest impacts is global economic upheavals. Iran disrupted the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil route surge of oil prices and global inflation increased. The situation is similar to similar to the 1973 oil crisis, affecting economies worldwide. This war is a case study in 21st-century combat with the use of drones, AI targeting, and cheap mass weapons resulting in “Missile vs cheap drone” as a new defence strategy. This marks a shift from traditional warfare to asymmetric, tech-driven warfare. Future wars will likely follow this model.

Weakening global alliances have emerged resulting in strained international systems like NATO divisions and disagreements over support, declining public support for Israel in the US, and signalling possible decline of Western alliance unity. This could accelerate a shift toward a multipolar world order.

The situation looks confusing because war and diplomacy are happening at the same time. Here’s a clear, factual breakdown of why attacks happened even while “peace talks” were going on. The attacks actually started before real peace talks began.

Both sides did not trust each other. The US accused Iran of: advancing its nuclear programme supporting groups like Hezbollah and Iran accused the US and Israel of trying to weaken or change its regime not being serious about diplomacy. Some reports suggest the attack had been planned in advance, even while talks were ongoing.

The US And Iran Forwarded 15 And 10 Point Plans Respectively For Ceasefire.

US "15-Point" Ceasefire Plan (Main Demands) Are -

1. Dismantle major nuclear sites (Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan)
2. Permanent ban on nuclear weapons
3. No uranium enrichment inside Iran
4. Hand over enriched uranium to IAEA
5. Full international inspections (IAEA access)
6. Limit ballistic missile range and stockpile
7. Stop support to proxy groups (Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis)
8. End funding and arming of militant groups
9. Implement regional & security conditions
10. Strait of Hormuz must stay open to global shipping
11. Accept Israel's right to exist (politically sensitive demand) Initial temporary ceasefire (e.g., 30 days) for negotiations
12. Long-term peace agreement after compliance
13. Incentives offered by US
14. Sanctions relief if Iran complies
15. Support for civilian nuclear energy (like Bushehr plant)

The US plan is very strict on nuclear + military limits, in exchange for sanctions relief and economic benefits.

Iran "10-Point" Ceasefire Plan

Iran's plan is almost the opposite approach of the US - focusing on sovereignty and ending pressure. Core demands are --

1. Permanent end to all attacks (not temporary ceasefire)
2. Guarantee of non-aggression against Iran
3. End attacks on Iran's allies (Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis)
4. Lift all US sanctions (primary + secondary)
5. Remove UN and international sanctions/resolutions
6. Release frozen Iranian assets
7. Compensation / reparations for war damage
8. US military withdrawal from the region
9. Iran keeps control/influence over Strait of Hormuz
10. Recognition of Iran's right to nuclear enrichment

Iran wants sanctions removed + security guarantees + recognition of its power, without giving up its core capabilities. Both the parties did not agree to in toto to each other’s demands.

In early April 2026, the United States and Iran agreed to a two-week, conditional ceasefire. This agreement was reached just hours (roughly under 2 hours) before a deadline set by Donald Trump for potentially massive military escalation against Iran. The deadline was tied to U.S. demands—especially that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz and meet other conditions.

The ceasefire didn’t happen spontaneously—it was brokered through last-minute diplomacy led by Pakistan, which urged both sides to pause and negotiate. Trump had threatened severe strikes if Iran didn’t comply. Iran signalled willingness to pause hostilities and allow maritime passage. Both sides agreed to a temporary halt to attacks to allow negotiations. The truce was extended and remained fragile, with ongoing tensions and military pressure continuing in the background.

Talks were hosted in Islamabad. Facilitated by the government of Pakistan Led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and senior military/diplomatic officials Pakistan’s role was crucial—it acted as a neutral intermediary, carrying messages, structuring negotiations, and trying to narrow gaps between the two sides.

United States delegation Led by senior officials appointed under Donald Trump Included Vice President J D Vance, accompanied by special envoy Steve Witcoff and advisor Jared Kushner who focused on nuclear, maritime, and security issues

Iranian delegation was led by Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and included Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, among other high-ranking national security and economic officials.

The marathon discussions lasted 21 hours between April 11-12, 2026, at the Serena Hotel in Islamabad, involving several rounds of direct and indirect talks but miserably failed.

The main failed points were -

• US lead negotiator JD Vance stated that Iran refused to meet conditions aimed at stopping its nuclear weapons capability.
• Iran demanded control over the strategic waterway and refused to accept US terms for its unconditional opening.
• The Iranian side accused the US of presenting "unreasonable" and "maximalist" demands.

Iran viewed U.S. demands as excessive, while the U.S. said Iran refused its “final terms.” Both delegations departed Islamabad without a memorandum of understanding (MoU), leaving the ceasefire at risk.

Immediately after that, the U.S. escalated pressure by launching a naval blockade of Iranian ports (April 13, 2026). This blockade targeted ships entering or leaving Iran, not all global shipping.

Iran had already been using the Strait as leverage, but after the blockade, it restricted or controlled passage. It warned that if its own exports were blocked, others wouldn’t pass freely. The attacks, seizures, and threats began against ships that created what analysts call a “dual blockade”.

Iran briefly allowed limited transit (around mid-April, tied to ceasefire dynamics). Within 24 hours, it closed the Strait again because the U.S. refused to lift its port blockade. Iran explicitly said the closure was a response to the U.S. blockade

Iran laid naval mines in the Strait as part of its strategy to deter or control shipping. Ships were even advised to follow specific safe routes to avoid mines. This made the Strait extremely dangerous commercially unusable for most global shipping.

The U.S. intercepted and redirected ships heading to Iran. It enforced the blockade with naval forces and began mine-clearing and surveillance operations as tensions escalated.

Donald Trump announced an extension of the ceasefire beyond the initial two weeks. But it wasn’t a formal permanent deal — it was open-ended and conditional. The ceasefire would continue until Iran agreed to U.S. terms or negotiations concluded.

Iran clearly stated that it would not continue talks or normalise the situation unless the U.S. lifted the naval blockade. It would not reopen the Strait of Hormuz while the blockade remained. Iran continues to reject negotiations unless the blockade ends.

Under international law (especially UNCLOS and laws of naval warfare): A naval blockade can be legal during an armed conflict, if certain conditions are met (declared, proportionate, non-discriminatory). However, many legal experts and countries argue the broader U.S. actions may violate the UN Charter or freedom of navigation principles. Both the countries are exercising pressures as under.

U.S. strategy: Ceasefire + blockade = pressure Iran to concede
Iran’s strategy: Strait closure + refusal to negotiate = counter-pressure
Both sides are technically “in ceasefire” but still applying economic and maritime warfare

On 25th April Abbas Araghchi (Iran’s foreign minister) visited Islamabad primarily to meet Pakistani mediators — not the U.S. directly. Iran explicitly ruled out direct talks with the United States during this visit. He conveyed Iran’s position and conditions through Pakistan, acting as an intermediary. Iran’s three core preconditions included: Lifting of the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports, end to military pressure / guarantees against further attacks, and respect for Iran’s strategic interests (including nuclear and regional issues). These were presented as a framework for restarting talks, not as a final agreement.

Iran’s delegation left Islamabad for Oman before any U.S. officials arrived or met them. Planned U.S. envoys (like Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner) never actually held talks. In fact, Donald Trump cancelled the U.S. delegation’s trip altogether after seeing Iran’s stance.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met with President Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg on April 27 as he seeks support from Moscow amid a flurry of diplomacy aimed at bringing an end to the war with the United States and Israel. Putin told Araghchi, who arrived from Oman earlier in the day, that Russia was ready to do "everything that serves your interests, the interests of all the people of the region, so that peace can be achieved as soon as possible."

The Kremlin leader also praised the Iranian people for "fighting for their independence and sovereignty" in the face of U.S.-Israeli attacks, which have killed more than 3,000 people in Iran. "Russia, just like Iran, intends to continue our strategic relationship," Putin said in comments carried by Russian state media.

The U.S. has deployed three aircraft carrier strike groups: USS Gerald R. Ford, USS Abraham Lincoln and USS George H.W. Bush that’s one of the largest naval buildups in decades. It includes: 200 aircraft 15,000 personnel Marines and amphibious forces This is maximum pressure posture, not yet full war.

The US has accused China of supplying missile-related materials to Iran. However, China has officially denied sending weapons but the focus is on economic lifelines and tech/intelligence support. Factually, China is supplying missiles, drone and other sophisticated defence equipment to Iran in large quantity.

Based on current reporting: Trump is applying extreme pressure (blockade + military build-up) but also still pushing for negotiations. This is coercive diplomacy, and not rush to war.

If a prolonged standoff blockade continues. Iran disrupts Hormuz intermittently and there is no full war. Medium risk is limited strikes, targeted U.S. attacks on Iranian naval/missile sites and Iran retaliates regionally. Low probability: Full-scale war would require massive escalation or miscalculation. Neither the U.S., China, nor Russia currently wants this.

The continued US blockade of Iranian ports and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is driving a severe global economic crisis. With 20% of global oil and LNG shipments stalled, crude prices have exceeded $120 per barrel, prompting International Monetary Fund (IMF) warnings of a global recession, fuel shortages, and rising fertilizer prices, severely impacting Asian nations and supply chains.

The author is a Defence Analyst and Commentator. He is also for Professor International Trade. Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of IDN


Forensic Analysis of Iran's Shooting Down of A USAF F-15E Strike Eagle


by Joydeep Ghosh

In a first ever confirmed combat loss of USAF aircraft inside Iran in the ongoing Iran - USA/Israel war, Iran has shot down a U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle, a twin seater fighter jet.

Early on April 3, 2026; in a major escalation in the five-week-old U.S.-Iran conflict, Iranian forces shot down a U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jet over Iranian territory. U.S. officials have confirmed the incident, and have confirmed that a high-stakes search-and-rescue operation is underway.

Reports came to light when on April 3, 2026, Iranian state media, including outlets linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), announced that Iranian air defences had downed an American fighter jet. They released photos and videos purporting to show wreckage, including identifiable parts like a tail fin consistent with an F-15E Strike Eagle.

F-15E Strike Eagle Is a two-seat strike fighter flown by a pilot and weapons systems officer. A combat search-and-rescue mission was launched immediately. Videos circulating on social media showed U.S. aircraft—including an HC-130 Combat King refueler tanker and HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopters, both operating at low altitude over what appears to be southwestern Iran’s Kuzestan province as part of the rescue effort.

Some reports say, one of the two crew members has been successfully rescued by U.S. forces and is alive, in American custody, and receiving medical treatment. Search continues for the second crew member. Iranian media claimed the crew ejected and that a reward is being offered for their capture. Some Iranian reports initially mentioned an F-35 or even a second jet, but visual evidence and U.S. confirmations point specifically to an F-15E.

Photos released by Iranian sources showing claimed F-35 but it resembled F15E wreckage (tail section, fuselage fragments, and other debris). Analysts have also verified consistency with an F-15E Strike Eagle. The F-15E Strike Eagle is a highly capable all-weather strike fighter, known for its range, payload, and combat-proven record. It has been a backbone of U.S. air operations in the Middle East for decades. This incident comes amid intensified U.S. strikes on Iranian targets as part of Operation Epic Fury (or related campaigns under the Trump administration). Earlier in the conflict (March 2026), three F-15Es were lost in a friendly-fire incident over Kuwait, but those were not attributed to Iranian action. Today's downing is the first direct combat loss credited to Iranian defences.

Iran has long boasted advanced air-defence systems, including Russian- and domestically-produced systems like the S-300 variants and indigenous Bavar-373s. The IRGC’s Khatam al-Anbiya Air Defense Headquarters claimed responsibility for shooting down the fighter jet, stating the jet was intercepted during operations over Iranian airspace.

Reactions

U.S. Side: USAF officials describe the loss as a serious but isolated incident. Search-and-rescue operations remain active, with emphasis on bringing the crew home safely. President Trump has previously warned of further strikes in response to Iranian aggression.

Iranian Side: Iran’s state media is framing the event as a major victory, broadcasting footage and offering rewards for the pilots’ capture. This boosts domestic morale amid ongoing conflict.

Broader Impact: This is a significant escalation. It demonstrates that Iranian air defences retain strike capability despite weeks of U.S. and Israel air strikes. It could complicate future U.S. air operations and raise risks for pilots. Energy markets are already volatile due to the war; this could further spike oil prices. The incident also highlights the human cost; prayers are pouring in on social media for the crew’s safety, with many Americans expressing concern over service members in harm’s way.

Despite confirmation and proof, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has not yet issued a full official statement,

Key Question

• Exact location of the downing (reports point to southwestern or central Iran).
• How the jet was engaged (surface-to-air missile?).
• Status of the second crew member.

The war, now in its fifth week, has already triggered a global energy crisis and heightened regional tensions. This downing of F-15E SE could prompt intensified U.S. responses or diplomatic manoeuvring. The downed F-15E SE belonged to the 494th Fighter Squadron (“Panthers”), part of the 48th Fighter Wing at RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom. The squadron uses the distinctive “LN” tail code with a red stripe on the vertical stabilizers. This unit has been forward-deployed to the U.S. Central Command area as the 494th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron in support of Operation Epic Fury. Aviation experts identified the wreckage (including tail sections with LN markings and red bands) as matching 494th FS aircraft.

Iranian state television has aired footage of what it claims are U.S. rescue aircraft (fixed-wing planes, helicopters, and drones) operating at low altitude over rural southwestern provinces. These videos show aircraft silhouetted against the sky and have been geolocated to the crash area. Social media and verified clips (circulated by outlets like CNN, CBS News, and Sky News) depict U.S. HC-130J aircraft refuelling HH-60 helicopters low over Iranian terrain, a classic CSAR tactics. One widely shared video shows a formation of a C-130 tanker with two Pave Hawks.

Later, U.S. sources told CBS News and Reuters that one crew member has been successfully rescued and is in American custody receiving medical care. The search continues for the second crew member (pilot or weapons systems officer). Iranian media has used these visuals to claim U.S. forces are “invading” their airspace, while simultaneously broadcasting appeals to civilians.

Still frames from videos circulated by Iranian media and social platforms showing U.S. helicopters and a tanker aircraft (believed to be part of the CSAR effort) operating low over Iran. These match descriptions of HC-130J and HH-60 operations. Iranian state television (including local affiliates linked to the IRGC) has publicly offered a “valuable reward” / “precious prize” to any civilian who captures the U.S. crew members alive and hands them over to police. An on-air anchor stated: “If you capture the enemy pilot or pilots alive and hand them over to the police, you will receive a precious prize.” The broadcast initially included a crawl urging viewers to “shoot them if you see them” (referring to U.S. aircraft), which was later revised to focus on capture. Armed local tribesmen in the region have reportedly joined the hunt in response to the appeal.

No specific monetary amount (e.g. Dollars or Rials) has been officially announced by Iranian authorities in verified reporting — it is consistently described as a “valuable reward” or “prize.” Some unverified social media claims mention large sums, but mainstream outlets (AP, Reuters, CBS) report only the vague “precious prize” offer.

Propaganda Escalation

This marks a significant propaganda escalation for Iran, with Iranian media framing the incident as a major victory while attempting to mobilize the public against the rescue effort. Situation remains fluid. U.S. Central Command has not released further official details on the crew’s status or exact location of the incident, citing operational security. Currently one crew member is confirmed safe; efforts continue for the rescue of second.

As the Iran - USA/Israel war enters 35th day, Iran continues to fire cluster bombs into Israel, even as USA and Israel have continued to claim that Iran’s Navy, Air force has been decimated and missile firing capability are down. It was just last week the USA declared what is its aim was for the war, however all know what USA, Israel want to do with Iran.

This has resulted in question Donald Trump’s dubious claims, and have solidified assertions, that USA empire is on a decline. All in all, it looks Iran is steadily gaining a strong upper hand over Israel and USA with the Strait of Hormuz firmly under its grip.

Joydeep Ghosh tracks strategic affairs, geopolitics, aerospace, defence, and diplomacy issues closely. Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of IDN


US Navy Fires At A Iranian Tanker Disabling It In Gulf of Oman Amid Expanding Blockade


The US Navy has escalated its blockade enforcement by firing on and disabling the Iranian‑flagged oil tanker M/T Hasna in the Gulf of Oman, using a 20mm cannon from an F/A‑18 Super Hornet launched off USS Abraham Lincoln.

The incident underscores rising maritime tensions, with CENTCOM confirming that 52 vessels have now been turned back under the blockade.

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) announced that the operation took place on Wednesday morning, 6 May, when the Iranian‑flagged tanker M/T Hasna attempted to transit international waters toward an Iranian port.

Despite repeated warnings, the crew failed to comply with instructions to halt. In response, US forces disabled the vessel’s rudder by firing several rounds from the fighter jet’s cannon, effectively preventing the tanker from continuing its course toward Iran. CENTCOM confirmed that the tanker is no longer proceeding to its destination.

The fighter jet involved in the strike was deployed from the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN‑72), which is part of the US Navy’s extensive deployment in the region. CENTCOM further noted that the USS George HW Bush (CVN‑77) is also engaged in the blockade, forming part of a large contingent of warships, aircraft, and personnel enforcing restrictions on Iranian maritime traffic. 

According to CENTCOM’s latest update, 52 commercial vessels have been instructed to reverse course or return to port since the blockade began, highlighting the scale of enforcement measures.

The blockade itself was instituted in April under President Donald Trump’s directive, aimed at restricting Iran’s maritime access and curbing its oil exports. The US military has repeatedly emphasised that its actions are being carried out “deliberately and professionally” to ensure compliance with the blockade.

However, the disabling of the Hasna marks a significant escalation, as it involved direct fire against a large commercial vessel rather than smaller interdictions or redirections.

The broader context of this confrontation includes ongoing tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman, where US forces have been actively intercepting Iranian‑linked shipping. In recent weeks, American forces have destroyed Iranian small boats, cruise missiles, and drones launched by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps against escorted commercial ships.

Despite these clashes, Washington maintains that a ceasefire remains technically in place, though fragile, as diplomatic discussions continue regarding a possible memorandum of understanding to end hostilities.

The deployment in the Gulf region is substantial, with an armada of US Navy warships, Army attack helicopters, Air Force fighter jets, and approximately 15,000 service members stationed around the Strait of Hormuz.

This military presence underscores Washington’s determination to enforce the blockade and prevent Iranian oil shipments from reaching global markets. The disabling of the Hasna demonstrates the willingness of US forces to escalate enforcement measures when vessels refuse to comply.

Iran has consistently condemned the blockade, labelling it an “act of war” and a violation of international norms. Tehran has warned that it will resist coercive tactics and has already responded with aggressive actions, including seizing commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

The latest incident is likely to deepen the diplomatic rift and heighten the risk of further maritime confrontations in one of the world’s most strategic waterways.

ANI


Most Army’s Don’t Make Promises They Can’t Keep, But Some Do


by Nilesh Kunwar

Unlike politicians who Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev maintained would “promise to build a bridge even when there are no rivers,” a man in uniform is looked upon as an upright person-a bit blunt at times, but always truthful. Perhaps that’s why even though it isn’t a principle of war and has practically little to do with warfare, the “don’t make a promise that you can’t keep” maxim is a personal quality that every army tries great pains to instil in its rank and file.

There’s a more practical reason too. People are well aware that while politicians are guided by self-interest, soldiers are motivated by their deep commitment to duty even if it demands self-sacrifice. Hence, while people invariably take promises made by politicians with a pinch of salt, they accept assurances given by the military without any qualms as they are convinced that they would be fulfilled.

It is therefore universally accepted that an army man’s word is his honour. Unfortunately, there are times when the military exploits public vulnerability by making “pie-crust promises” and the Pakistan army is one such example.

New Delhi’s August 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Indian Constitution that gave “special status” to J&K struck a lethal blow to Pakistan’s pathetic Kashmir narrative. The turbulence it created in Islamabad and the incoherent diplomatic response is understandable, but by jumping into the fray Rawalpindi once again re-established the fact that as far as Kashmir was concerned, it was the army and not Pakistan’s Foreign Office that called the shots.

Readers would recall the then Pakistan army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa declaration that "Pakistan Army firmly stands by the Kashmiris in their just struggle to the very end,” and his not-so-discreet “We are prepared and shall go to any extent to fulfil our obligations” warning.

This was followed by Director General (DG) of Pakistan army’s media wing Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) declaring that "Kashmir is our jugular vein and we will go to any lengths to protect it."

More than six years have since elapsed but the Pakistan army has failed to deliver on its promise of going to “any extent” for protecting its so-called “jugular vein.” On the contrary, by adhering to ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC), it’s clear that despite its impressive display of ‘sound and fury’, Rawalpindi has quietly fallen in line and accepted the fact that it can do nothing whatsoever to either influence or undo abrogation of Article 370.

However, just like each and every Pakistan army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir also continues playing to the domestic gallery and this he has done with aplomb, claiming that “What India labels as terrorism is, in fact, a legitimate and lawful struggle for freedom, recognised by international law.” He has however not only been able to explain as to how terrorism can ever be “legitimate and lawful” but also failed to cite the legal provisions under which terrorism is “recognised by international law.”

If freedom of press existed in Pakistan then someone would have definitely asked the Field Marshal that if the violence in J&K is indeed “a legitimate and lawful struggle for freedom, recognised by international law,” then why he considers the ongoing freedom struggle by armed groups in Balochistan to be terrorism. He also would have been asked that when Rawalpindi openly says that it can “go to any extent to fulfil our obligations,” what moral right does he have to complain about New Delhi’s alleged (and unproven) support to Baloch Sarmachars (Guerrilla freedom fighters).

Anyone asking Field Marshal Munir uncomfortable questions would be immediately charged with ‘digital terrorism’ and accused of being an agent of India’s spy agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), but muzzling the media is impossible. With the Ministry of Planning and Development recent report that Pakistan’s current water storage holding was just sufficient for about 90 days, people have started taunting the Pakistan army on social media reminding it of the assurance that no water stoppage by India will be permitted under any circumstances.

One of the posts contains the video of DGISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhary’s laughable May 2025 remark made after the targeted terrorist attack in Pahalgam by Pakistan sponsored terrorists that led to New Delhi holding the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) in abeyance. He had then threatened India by saying “Tum hamara paani band kar doge, hum tumhari saans band kar denge. (If you stop our water, we will stop your breath).”

This video was followed by curt remarks reminding DGISPR that India had stopped our water a year back and querying, “What are you still waiting for?” Some have even criticised DGISPR for showing lack of originality, accusing him of stealing Lashkar-e-Taiba chief Hafiz Saeed’s “If you stop the water, we will, God willing, stop your breath and then blood shall flow in these rivers”warning.

While the Field Marshal has also issued the equally puerile threat of using 10 missiles to destroy any dams India builds, he’s not yet become a subject of ridicule, probably since his threat would be effective only after India builds a dam on Chenab River. But with New Delhi already having floated international tenders for construction of the 1,856 MW Sawalkote hydroelectric project on Chenab River earlier this year, people could well ask the Field Marshal as to why the army is behaving like a silent spectator while Pakistan is being 'starved' of water?

Leaving rhetoric aside, the fact of the matter is that water scarcity problem in Pakistan will only worsen in the coming days and even though IWT being held in abeyance is not significantly responsible for this shortage, the Pakistan army has made the people believe otherwise.

As such, there’s a distinct possibility that water scarcity could create widespread unrest in Pakistan and the public will definitely demand that Rawalpindi walks the talk on its promise to ensure water availability by choking India, flowing rivers of blood and even using missiles against dams.

New Delhi is in no hurry to review its decision of holding IWT in abeyance and Rawalpindi knows that any use of violence to force it to relent would invite a viscous military response. However, since the Field Marshal has befooled its people by telling them that bringing India to its knees is a child’s play for the Pakistan army, he may be compelled to undertake some military misadventure false flag operation purely to save face.

Should this happen, Pakistan will end up paying a very heavy price-all because of making promises that it can’t keep!

Nilesh Kunwar is a retired Indian Army Officer who has served in Jammu & Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland and Manipur. He is a keen ‘Kashmir-Watcher,’ and after retirement is pursuing his favourite hobby of writing for newspapers, journals and think-tanks. Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of IDN