Skyroot Aerospace's Innovative Vacuum Nozzle Testing: Overcoming Flow Separation Through Water Injection

Skyroot Aerospace, a trailblazing Indian space tech start-up, has achieved a
ground breaking milestone in rocket engine development by successfully testing
its Raman-2 engine with a vacuum nozzle for
seconds using an innovative
water injection technique to mitigate flow separation. This achievement marks
a critical step toward advancing India’s private space sector, particularly in
orbital launch vehicle technology.
The Raman-2 engine, designed for
upper-stage propulsion and orbital adjustments, employs a vacuum-optimised
nozzle that faces performance challenges during terrestrial testing due to
atmospheric pressure. By strategically injecting water into separation zones,
Skyroot engineers simulated vacuum conditions on Earth, enabling
full-area-ratio testing and gathering vital data for flight qualification.
1. The Raman-2 Engine: A Hypergolic Powerhouse For Orbital Missions
Skyroot’s Raman series encompasses hypergolic engines designed for attitude
control and upper-stage propulsion in the Vikram launch vehicles. While
Raman-1 focuses on roll control with rapid-pulsing thrusters, Raman-2
represents a higher-thrust variant tailored for orbital adjustments. Key
features of the Raman-2 engine include:
Engine Design And Propulsion
Hypergolic Propellants: Utilises monomethylhydrazine (MMH) and nitrogen
tetroxide (N₂O₄), which ignite spontaneously upon contact, eliminating the
need for complex ignition systems.
Vacuum Nozzle: Optimised for space environments with an extended nozzle to
maximize exhaust velocity and specific impulse (Isp) in the vacuum of space.
Regenerative Cooling: A single higher-thrust engine design with regenerative
cooling, enhancing efficiency for prolonged burns.
Technical Specifications
Parameter | Raman-1 (Roll Control) | Raman-2 (Upper Stage) |
---|---|---|
Peak Thrust | 890 N (Vacuum) | ~3.5 kN (Vacuum)* |
Pulse Width | 60 milliseconds | Continuous burn |
Total Pulses | 280 | N/A |
Burn Time | 104 seconds | 200 seconds |
Test Duration | 352 seconds | 200 seconds |
*Raman-2 thrust figures inferred from Dhawan-II’s 3.5 kN vacuum thrust and
Raman-2’s role as a higher-thrust variant.
2. The Challenge of Flow Separation In Vacuum Nozzles
Extended nozzles designed for vacuum operation face inefficiencies during
Earth-based testing due to flow separation, a phenomenon where exhaust gases
detach from the nozzle walls, reducing performance. This occurs because:
Causes of Flow Separation
Adverse Pressure Gradients: Atmospheric pressure creates a mismatch between
the nozzle’s internal and external pressures, causing the exhaust to separate.
Boundary Layer Thickening: Turbulent flow and friction along the nozzle walls
thicken the boundary layer, leading to detachment.
Shock Wave Formation: In over-expanded nozzles, shock waves can disrupt smooth
exhaust flow, exacerbating separation.
Consequences For Testing
Flow separation reduces the effective area ratio of the nozzle, limiting the
achievable exhaust velocity and specific impulse. For a vacuum nozzle, this
results in, lower thrust, reduced mass flow rate due to incomplete expansion. Terrestrial tests fail to replicate the nozzle’s vacuum
performance, compromising flight readiness.
3. Skyroot’s Innovative Solution: Water Injection For Flow Control
To overcome flow separation, Skyroot engineers employed a water injection
system to mimic vacuum conditions during terrestrial testing. This method
addressed the core challenge by:
Mechanism of Action
Filling Separation Zones: Water injected into the nozzle’s separation regions
fills the low-pressure zones, effectively creating a "simulated vacuum"
environment.
Maintaining Continuous Flow: By preventing exhaust detachment, the nozzle
operates at its full area ratio, enabling accurate Isp and thrust
measurements.
Advantages Over Conventional Methods
Method | Limitations | Skyroot’s Approach |
---|---|---|
Nozzle Redesign | Compromises vacuum performance | No structural modifications |
Active Flow Control | Requires complex actuators | Simple water injection system |
Reduced Test Duration | Incomplete data collection | Full 200-second burn achieved |
Method Limitations Skyroot’s Approach
Nozzle Redesign Compromises vacuum performance No structural modificationsActive Flow Control Requires complex actuators Simple water injection systemReduced Test Duration Incomplete data collection Full 200-second burn achieved
4. The Raman-2 Test: A 200-Second Milestone
The April 2025 test of Raman-2 marked a major achievement, demonstrating the
engine’s readiness for orbital missions. Key outcomes included:
Test Configuration
Vacuum Nozzle: A divergent nozzle optimized for space exhaust expansion.Water Injection System: Strategically placed injectors to counteract separation.Propellant System: MMH/N₂O₄ hypergolic propellants for reliable ignition.
Performance Metrics
Metric Value Significance
Burn Duration 200 seconds Matches orbital mission requirementsFlow Separation Mitigated Achieved full-area-ratio operationThrust Consistency Stable output Validated autopilot control systems
5. Broader Implications For Skyroot’s Rocket Development
The success of Raman-2 aligns with Skyroot’s broader propulsion strategy,
which combines hypergolic and cryogenic engines to address diverse mission
needs:
Hypergolic vs. Cryogenic EnginesEngine Type Raman Series Dhawan SeriesPropellants MMH/N₂O₄ LNG/LOX (Cryogenic)Application Attitude control, upper-stage adjustments Main upper-stage propulsionKey Advantage Instant ignition, rapid pulsing High Isp, green propellantsSynergy in Vikram Launch VehiclesVikram-1: Utilises Raman-1 for roll control and Dhawan-I for upper-stage propulsion.Vikram-2: Scheduled to deploy Raman-2 for orbital adjustments and Dhawan-II for main upper-stage thrust.
6. Innovations In Manufacturing And Propulsion
Skyroot’s engineering prowess extends beyond propulsion to advanced
manufacturing techniques:
3D Printing And Composite Materials
Raman-1: 3D-printed thrust chamber and injector, metal matrix composite
throat, and high-temperature composite thermal protection.
Dhawan-II: Fully 3D-printed cryogenic engine with LNG/LOX compatibility,
achieving a 200-second burn in 2023.
Sustainable Propellants
LNG/LOX: Replaces traditional RP-1/kerosene, offering lower costs and reduced
carbon emissions.
7. Challenges And Future Directions
While the Raman-2 test is a breakthrough, Skyroot faces ongoing challenges:
Upcoming Milestones
Flight Qualification: Two remaining milestones before Vikram-1’s launch.
Scalability: Adapting water injection for larger engines or repeated use.
Cryogenic-Hypergolic Integration: Ensuring seamless operation between
Dhawan-II and Raman-2 in Vikram-2.
Global Competition
Skyroot competes with established players like SpaceX (Raptor engines) and
emerging firms like Relativity Space (3D-printed rockets). Its focus on hybrid
propulsion systems and green propellants positions it uniquely in the
small-satellite launch market.
Conclusion
Skyroot Aerospace’s Raman-2 engine test exemplifies ingenuity in overcoming
propulsion challenges through innovative flow control techniques. By
addressing flow separation with water injection, the team validated a critical
component for orbital missions, reinforcing India’s growing role in global
space exploration. The synergy between hypergolic and cryogenic engines,
coupled with 3D-printed manufacturing, positions Skyroot to disrupt the launch
vehicle market with cost-effective, modular solutions. As the company
progresses toward its first orbital launch, these advancements underscore its
potential to redefine access to space.
IDN
No comments:
Post a Comment