Contest To Select AMCA Manufacturing Has Escalated Into A High-Stakes Institutional Battle
The contest to select India’s manufacturing partner for the Advanced
Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (AMCA) has escalated into a high-stakes
institutional battle, with protests reaching the Aeronautical Development
Agency (ADA)—the nodal design body responsible for conceptualisation of the
project, according to a
report by Manu Pubby of ET News.
The AMCA, earmarked as India’s fifth-generation fighter development program,
is seen as a critical element in strengthening indigenous aerospace
capabilities and reducing long-term dependence on foreign suppliers.
At the heart of the dispute lies the expression of interest (EOI) floated by
ADA in June, which invited both public and private sector companies to compete
for the role of developmental partner tasked with producing at least five AMCA
prototypes before moving to eventual series production following certification
and induction.
While the initiative was envisioned to create a more level playing field,
discontent has arisen over certain qualifying criteria, especially those tied
to financial performance.
The immediate flashpoint has been the financial evaluation metrics,
particularly the clause linking a company’s eligibility to the
“revenue-to-order book ratio.”
This benchmark, according to officials, was introduced to prevent the
concentration of all aeronautical manufacturing work within a single public
sector entity and to ensure that new hubs of aerospace capability could emerge
in India’s private sector.
Crucially, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)—the state-owned giant and
obvious frontrunner in the competition—has protested against the clause,
arguing that it places the organisation at a structural disadvantage.
HAL maintains an order book worth over ₹2 lakh crore, with massive ongoing
work involving light combat aircraft, advanced trainer jets, helicopters, and
upgrade programs.
Because of this backlog, HAL’s revenue-to-order book ratio appears
disproportionately weak, thereby earning it no points under the EOI metric.
HAL has formally conveyed its objections to ADA, submitting that the
qualifying parameters are skewed against its bid and tilt the balance in
favour of private competitors who do not face such burdens.
The protests mark a turning point in India’s attempt to diversify aerospace
manufacturing by actively encouraging private participation. For years,
private companies have argued that competing with HAL on a level playing field
is nearly impossible because of the extensive government investment in HAL’s
infrastructure spanning decades.
Many firms have pointed out that the capital intensity, domain knowledge, and
specialised facilities in aeronautical production are absent in the private
sector and would require time and state backing to develop. Consequently, the
Ministry of Defence structured the AMCA partnership scheme to explicitly allow
private entities to compete meaningfully.
The plans include the provision of critical prototyping infrastructure
directly by ADA, ensuring no inherent advantage accrues to HAL on the basis of
legacy facilities alone. The defence ministry’s rationale is to prevent the
formation of a single choke point in India’s fighter jet production landscape,
which would otherwise rest entirely on HAL, already stretched across multiple
high-value programs.
The revenue-to-order book clause, however, represents more than just an
accounting criterion. It reflects a policy-level intent to reshuffle India’s
aerospace industrial landscape. By penalising HAL’s sheer volume of
commitments while neutralising its infrastructural advantage, policymakers are
visibly tilting the table towards drawing private players into the fold.
The move signals an acknowledgement that HAL alone cannot carry the burden of
upcoming national aviation projects, which besides AMCA also include the
Gaganyaan program’s crew module systems, AMCA engines in collaboration with
foreign OEMs, and continued Tejas Mk1A/Tejas Mk2 manufacturing runs.
For policymakers, distributing load across multiple firms not only reduces
risk but also strengthens India’s defence industrial resilience in the long
run.
However, HAL’s opposition underscores that the conflict could create
institutional friction at a critical juncture. Sources indicate that one
possible resolution being explored is to mandate or incentivise HAL to form a
joint venture or consortium with a private partner under the AMCA program.
Such an arrangement would allow HAL to leverage its expertise while
transferring capacity and know-how to private industry, creating an alternate
aeronautical hub. HAL, too, may see benefits in load sharing as its order
backlog leaves little room for new absorption without risking delays to
existing commitments.
The Ministry of Defence is aware that the program’s timelines cannot afford
conflict-driven slowdowns, having already projected AMCA as a cornerstone for
India’s 2030+ combat fleet strategy.
Private companies, meanwhile, view this opportunity as a watershed moment.
While acknowledging limited prior experience in aircraft manufacturing, firms
argue that the AMCA program—structured with government-provided infrastructure
and R&D support—could help India replicate in military aerospace what has
been achieved in sectors like missiles, radars, and UAVs: a thriving
public-private ecosystem.
For them, the EOI’s terms are an explicit affirmation that they are being
treated as genuine contenders, not token participants. The last date for
submission of applications has already been extended to September 30 to
accommodate multiple meetings with potential bidders, signalling ADA’s intent
to secure broad-based and serious participation.
At stake is not only India’s fifth-generation stealth-capable combat aircraft
program but also the future architecture of its defence manufacturing
ecosystem. HAL’s protest represents a pushback against criteria that dilute
its traditional primacy, while the government appears strongly inclined to
encourage structural reform in the aerospace domain.
The eventual outcome—whether a private firm secures prototype production
rights, whether HAL partners with a private consortium, or whether a hybrid
solution emerges—will shape the trajectory of India’s fighter jet industrial
base for the next three decades.
If managed deftly, AMCA could become the pivot around which India transitions
from a HAL-dominated model towards a multi-polar aerospace industry, capable
of simultaneously serving massive domestic requirements and competing
internationally in high-value defence exports.
Quick timeline checklist of AMCA’s industrial strategy milestones:
| Data/Timeline | Event / Milestone | Key Details / Significance |
|---|---|---|
| June 2025 | Expression of Interest (EOI) issued by ADA | Invited both public and private Indian companies to participate as developmental partners for AMCA prototype manufacturing. |
| July–August 2025 | Industry consultations held | Meetings organised between ADA, HAL, and private sector players to clarify terms of participation and facility-sharing arrangements. |
| August 2025 | HAL protest lodged with ADA | HAL challenges the financial criteria (revenue-to-order book ratio), claiming bias due to its heavy ₹2 lakh crore backlog. |
| September 2025 | EOI deadline extended | Last date pushed to September 30, 2025 to allow broader participation and resolution of stakeholders’ concerns. |
| Q4 2025 (Expected) | Evaluation of bids and partner selection process begins | ADA will assess responses, with emphasis on financials, manufacturing capability, and potential for creating private-sector aerospace hubs. |
| 2026 (Projected) | Finalisation of industrial partnership model | Possible HAL-private JV or consortium model to balance expertise with private sector ecosystem-building. |
| 2026–2028 | Prototype construction phase | Development of at least 5 AMCA prototypes, leveraging ADA-provided infrastructure and chosen industrial partners. |
| 2028–2029 | Testing and evaluation period | Prototype flight tests, systems integration, stealth validation, and certification processes initiated. |
| ~2030 onwards | Initial production orders expected | Upon successful certification, scaled production orders to follow. Private sector role expected to expand alongside HAL in production. |
| Beyond 2030s | Full-scale AMCA induction and export potential explored | AMCA enters IAF service; industrial base matures from public-sector centric to multi-node public-private partnerships in advanced aerospace. |
IDN (With Inputs From ET News)
No comments:
Post a Comment