Islamabad requires support of at least 12 out of 39 member states to remove
its name from the grey list and this will largely depend on the approach the
US will take at the Paris plenary
In view of the upcoming October 21-23 plenary and sub-groups meeting of the
Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Pakistan is understood to have hired a top
lobbyist firm on the Capitol Hill to push a narrative favouring Islamabad with
Trump administration and get bailed out of the club of nations on the “grey
list.”
With all-weather friend and iron brother China, Ottoman empire revivalist
Turkey and increasingly radicalised Malaysia behind Pakistan, there is no
possibility of Islamabad getting pushed into FATF’s black list as only three
out of 39 member states are required to block the proposal. Islamabad,
however, requires support of at least 12 out of 39 member states to remove its
name from the grey list and this will largely depend on the approach the US
will take at the Paris plenary.
According to diplomats based in the US and Paris, the Pakistan foreign
ministry has hired Houston (in Texas) based lobbying firm Linden Strategies to
push its case with the Trump administration. The lobbying firm website
describes it as a “government relations and business development firm
providing strategic analysis and advisory to domestic and international
clients, including sovereign nations.” The firm’s specialisation is in
government relations, strategic communication, business advisory and political
consulting with clients spanning the globe.
Apparently, the narrative that Pakistan wants the Houston firm to communicate
to Trump administration is as follows:
■ Main leadership of the Taliban, Haqqani network, al Qaeda and Daesh
global terrorist groups is based in Afghanistan with sufficient funds
available to them. This means that Islamabad has disavowed that Taliban
shura and the Haqqani network operate from Quetta, across Bolan Pass, and
Peshawar, across Khyber Pass, and there is no hand of Pakistan’s deep
state in al Qaeda and Daesh or so-called Islamic state in Afghanistan. The
fact is that Haqqani network chief Sirajiuddin Haqqani is the sword arm of
the Taliban as its deputy leader with Maulvi Hibatullah Akhunzada being a
cleric.
■ While Pakistan claims that Muridke based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) remains
defunct, terror financing cases have been registered against most of the
identified leaders of Jamaat-ud-Dawa and Falah-e-Insaniat foundation. The
fact is that LeT chief Hafiz Saeed, main accused in 26/11 attacks, has
handed over the reins of the proscribed group to son Talha, who is
instigating violence and in touch with sleeper cells across the Line of
Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir.
■ The Imran Khan government claims that Bahawalpur based Jaish-e-Mohammed
(JeM) terrorist group follows a unique Afghan war based model of
operation. While its key leaders are not in Pakistan, the group is
operating through its sympathisers. The fact is that JeM’s emir Masood
Azhar has a serious medical condition and is bed-ridden in Bahawalpur. His
brother Mufti Rauf Asghar now operates the group with training camps both
in Pakistan as well as across the Durand Line in Afghanistan. The JeM’s
main operator in Kashmir is Kasim Jan, 2016 Pathankot attack accused, who
gets instruction from Asghar. The JeM is a family enterprise with
terrorism as its main product.
■ Pakistan claims that it has successfully convicted four designated
persons and two other senior leaders, and that terror financing cases have
been instituted against 11 designated persons (61 cases) and eight other
leaders (37 cases). The fact, however, is that according to FATF’s 2019
mutual evaluation report there were 66 organisations and approximately
7,600 individuals proscribed under UN Security Council resolution 1373,
which was passed to prevent and suppress financing of terror acts post
9/11 attacks.
Despite hiring a top lobbying firm and offering its leverage with Taliban to
US for reduction of violence in Afghanistan, Pakistan will not be able to
escape the grey list this time as its 2019 mutual evaluation report leaves a
lot to be desired and it is still to comply with all the 27 points of FATF
action plan of the past.