India’s TEJAS Light Combat Aircraft: Three Decades of Development Hurdles

The HAL TEJAS, India’s indigenous light combat fighter, has faced a protracted
journey since its conceptualisation in the early 1980s, often sensationalised
as being "stuck on the ground for 33 years".
This narrative stems from the project’s sanction in 1983 to replace ageing
MiG-21s, yet full operational capability remains elusive even in 2026. While
the aircraft achieved its first flight in 2001 and initial operational
clearance by 2015, persistent delays in production, engine integration, and
avionics have fuelled perceptions of stagnation.
Development began under the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) with
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) as the manufacturing partner, aiming for a
lightweight, multi-role delta-wing jet. Sanctions following India’s 1998
nuclear tests severely disrupted foreign collaborations, forcing indigenous
redesigns of critical systems like flight controls and radar.
The project’s initial ₹560 crore budget ballooned to over ₹13,000 crore by
2015, exacerbated by import dependencies for over a third of components,
including GE F404 engines.
Engine woes have been central to the delays. Lacking an indigenous powerplant,
TEJAS relies on imported F404-IN20 units, with the more powerful F414 for MK-2
variants still years away from full indigenisation.
Supply chain bottlenecks from GE have hamstrung production; as of early 2026,
TEJAS MK-1A remains tethered to foreign engines for decades, despite urgent
Indian Air Force (IAF) needs amid squadron shortages.
Weight creep plagued early prototypes, pushing the jet beyond design limits
and necessitating structural redesigns. The landing gear, described as
over-engineered, emerged as a recent flashpoint: in late 2024, the entire IAF
TEJAS fleet—along with prototypes and naval variants—was grounded after gear
failures in Bangalore and Jaisalmer. HAL identified the snag, leading to a
redesign that aligns with MK-1A upgrades, including a lighter undercarriage
shedding up to 800 kg.
India's HAL TEJAS took approximately 30 years from project sanction in 1985 to
initial operational clearance in 2015. Other global fighter jets typically had
shorter gestation periods, measured from key project approval or start to
first operational service.
| Fighter Jet | Start Year | Operational Year | Period (Years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAL TEJAS (India) | 1985 | 2015 | 30 |
| F-16 (USA) | 1975 | 1980 | 5 |
| F-15 Eagle (USA) | 1969 | 1974 | 5 |
| F/A-18 Hornet (USA) | 1975 | 1983 | 8 |
| F-22 Raptor (USA) | 1986 | 2005 | 19 |
| F-35 Lightning-II (USA) | 1995 | 2015 | 20 |
| Eurofighter Typhoon | 1984 | 2003 | 19 |
| Dassault Rafale (France) | 1986 | 2001 | 15 |
| Saab Gripen (Sweden) | 1982 | 1996 | 14 |
| Su-27 Flanker (USSR) | 1976 | 1985 | 9 |
| MiG-29 Fulcrum (USSR) | 1977 | 1983 | 6 |
Periods are approximate, using consistent milestones like government approval to initial service entry; exact definitions vary slightly by program. Tejas faced unique delays due to technology challenges and funding issues.
A high-profile crash at the 2025 Dubai Air Show amplified scrutiny, with the
TEJAS prototype suffering a catastrophic failure during a display, raising
alarms over reliability and quality control. Videos and analyses highlighted
issues like underpowered performance, avionics glitches, and weapons
integration shortfalls, contrasting TEJAS with rivals like Pakistan’s JF-17
and China’s J-10C, which boast mature deployments.
The Comptroller and Auditor General’s 2015 report flagged 53 significant
shortfalls compromising combat survivability, from limited range (around 400
km combat radius) to inadequate weapon loads compared to heavier jets like
Rafale or Su-30MKI. TEJAS excels in agility and cost (projected cheaper
long-term than imports), but its light category limits deep-strike roles
against peer adversaries.
Production rates at HAL have lagged critically. The first squadron, No. 45
"Flying Daggers", formed in 2016 with initial operational clearance jets, but
scaling to 20 aircraft per squadron by 2018 proved optimistic. By 2026, fewer
than 50 TEJAS Mk1/MK-1A units serve in IAF squadrons, far short of the 83
needed to phase out MiG-21s, amid bureaucratic hurdles and skill gaps in
maintenance.
Geopolitical pressures compound the saga. With China and Pakistan modernising
air forces rapidly, India’s "Atmanirbhar Bharat" push for self-reliance hinges
on TEJAS success, yet export ambitions—to nations like Argentina, Egypt, and
Malaysia—withered post-crash due to doubts over maturity. The IAF’s 2024
grounding underscored that technical glitches are routine even in advanced
programmes like the F-35, framing it as a rectifiable step rather than
collapse.
Future variants offer redemption. TEJAS MK-1A integrates Israeli ELTA AESA
radar, digital fly-by-wire enhancements, and reduced weight for better
thrust-to-weight ratios. MK-2, with GE F414 engines and increased payload,
targets medium-weight roles, while the naval TEJAS LSP variant adapts for
carrier operations. However, timelines slip: MK-1A deliveries crawl, and MK-2
first flight is postponed beyond 2027.
HAL’s production ramp-up, bolstered by private sector partnerships under Tata
and others, aims for 16-24 jets annually, but legacy issues like specialised
tooling persist. DRDO’s leadership, including former chief Vijay Kumar
Saraswat, attributes delays to external blocks like the Missile Technology
Control Regime, now eased with India’s membership.
In defence of the program, TEJAS embodies hard-won technological sovereignty.
Amid global supply disruptions, its 4.5-generation features—relaxed stability
fly-by-wire, composite airframe (45% by weight), and multi-role
versatility—position it as a viable MiG-21 successor. Groundings and crashes,
while embarrassing, drive iterative fixes, mirroring global norms.
Critics argue bureaucratic overreach and IAF’s late involvement (post-2006)
inflated costs by ₹20,000 crore in interim upgrades. Yet, with President
Trump’s administration eyeing Indo-Pacific alliances, TEJAS could pivot to
co-production deals, offsetting delays.
Ultimately, TEJAS is not "stuck"—it flies operationally, albeit encumbered.
Resolving engine independence and production scale will determine if India’s
aerospace ambitions soar or sputter. The next 33 years demand swifter
execution to match the jet’s radiant promise.
IDN (With Agency Inputs)
No comments:
Post a Comment