Iran Rejects Trump’s Claim of Total US Control Over Strait of Hormuz; 'Claims Don't Change Reality' Says Iran

Iran has dismissed President Donald Trump’s assertion that the United States has “total control” over the Strait of Hormuz, insisting that the strategic waterway remains blocked until Tehran’s conditions are met.

The Persian Gulf Strait Authority stated on X that repeated claims by Washington do not alter the reality on the ground, emphasising that the strait will remain closed until Iran’s demands are accepted.

The Iranian response followed Trump’s post on Truth Social in which he declared that the US naval deployment constituted a “WALL OF STEEL” and that Iran could do nothing to challenge it. He claimed that America had full control over the strait and vowed to maintain it.

Trump also asserted that Iran’s military infrastructure had been severely degraded and concluded his message with the phrase “Praise be to Allah,” while accusing Tehran of spreading “fake news” and suffering from “300% inflation.”

The confrontation over the Strait of Hormuz has escalated after weeks of military exchanges involving Iranian, Israeli, and US forces. The waterway, through which nearly one-fifth of global petroleum trade passes, has once again become the focal point of tensions.

Tehran has repeatedly warned that maritime traffic could be restricted if external pressure continues, while Washington has reinforced its naval presence to guarantee freedom of navigation.

Trump’s remarks coincided with indirect diplomatic engagement between Washington and Tehran. Behind-the-scenes discussions have sought to ease the Hormuz crisis and restore regular maritime traffic. However, Iran’s newly appointed head of the Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei, made clear that reopening the strait depends on the fulfilment of specific conditions.

Rezaei stated on X that Iran demands the United States end the war and blockade, release frozen Iranian assets, and agree to a region-wide ceasefire that includes Lebanon and Gaza. He stressed that until all these conditions are met, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed. His message underscored Tehran’s firm stance that the crisis cannot be resolved without comprehensive concessions from Washington.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical chokepoints. Past military standoffs in the area have triggered spikes in international crude prices and heightened fears of wider conflict.

The current escalation has already led to expanded naval patrols, rerouting of commercial shipping, and renewed international appeals for diplomatic restraint.

Commercial shipping continues under strict security oversight, but the environment remains volatile. Diplomatic attention is now focused on whether negotiations can produce a temporary truce to reduce the risk of armed conflict while keeping vital maritime trade routes open. The situation highlights the fragile balance between military confrontation and diplomatic manoeuvring in one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

PM Modi And President Trump To Resolve Russian Oil Tariff Dispute Says Senior US Presidential Counsellor Peter Navarro

Senior US Presidential Counsellor Peter Navarro has stated that President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi share a very good working relationship and will resolve issues concerning the Russian-oil-related tariff matter.

His remarks came amid ongoing efforts by India and the United States to strengthen their multi-faceted partnership across strategic domains.

Navarro recalled that during the Ukraine-Russia war, he had written an op-ed in the Financial Times pointing out that prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, India was not engaged in the oil trade with Russia.

However, after the conflict began, India became heavily involved, selling refined products on behalf of Russia, which contributed to sustaining Moscow’s war effort. He noted that this issue has since been resolved, though his article had sparked strong reactions online from Indian audiences. He urged that such disagreements should not be handled through hostile exchanges, emphasising that problems in America are resolved differently.

Responding to a question from ANI, Navarro reiterated that the matter of tariffs would be worked out directly between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi. He stressed that it was not for him or any group to interfere in the bilateral discussions, underscoring the strength of the leaders’ personal rapport.

The comments followed the passage of the Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 in the US Senate on 7 August.

The bipartisan legislation, approved by an overwhelming 86-11 vote, authorises President Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on goods from countries such as India and China that continue importing Russian oil and gas.

The measure is designed to escalate economic pressure on Moscow and Tehran, targeting nations that maintain significant energy trade ties with Russia.

Under the provisions, the US president has discretionary authority to enforce tariffs on imports from the world’s top five buyers of Russian crude oil or natural gas. The legislation also introduces fresh sanctions against Russian President Vladimir Putin, senior political and military officials, financial institutions, energy developments and entities linked to Russia’s war effort.

It extends restrictions to older and reflagged oil tankers allegedly used by Russia to circumvent global sanctions and maintain export revenues. The broader objective is to curtail financial flows sustaining Russia’s economy and military campaign.

India remains one of the largest buyers of Russian crude globally, alongside China. The legislation effectively presents energy-importing nations with a choice between continuing to purchase discounted Russian energy or retaining access to the lucrative US market. This places India in a delicate position, balancing its energy security requirements with the risk of punitive tariffs on its exports to the United States.

India expanded its procurement of discounted Russian crude after the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022. The move was aimed at securing national energy needs during global market turmoil. 

Historically, Russia was not a primary supplier for India, but the availability of cheaper crude allowed Indian refiners to optimise raw material costs and ensure uninterrupted domestic supplies. This was particularly important amid transit disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and volatility in global energy markets.

The issue of tariffs now forms a critical element in India-US relations, with both governments seeking to reconcile strategic cooperation with economic realities.

Navarro’s assurance that Trump and Modi will resolve the matter reflects confidence in the resilience of the bilateral partnership, even as new challenges emerge in the global energy landscape.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Iran Signals Maritime Service Fees In Hormuz Talks With Oman Amid US Opposition

Iran has confirmed that service fees for maritime passage through the Strait of Hormuz are under consideration, with negotiations between Tehran and Muscat nearing completion on a temporary route. The United States remains opposed, while shipping industry bodies warn that compulsory charges could destabilise global trade.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stated at a weekly press conference that maritime services must be reimbursed. He explained that while specific details were not yet being discussed, the principle of charging for services was clear.

He emphasised that negotiations with Oman were progressing smoothly and constructively, with mechanisms being developed to ensure safe shipping, environmental protection, maritime services, and crime prevention.

Baghaei confirmed that Iran and Oman are working on a temporary intermediate route to replace the existing northern and southern passages. This route would remain in place until a new traffic separation scheme is agreed.

He attributed the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to US and Israeli military aggression, insisting that reopening depends on the removal of hostile conditions imposed on Iran. He reiterated that Iran is not directly negotiating with the United States, though messages continue to be exchanged through mediators.

US President Donald Trump commented that Washington is “only semi-negotiating” with Iran, stressing that economic pressure will continue to mount rather than military escalation. He told Axios that Iran is in “very bad shape” economically and confirmed that an agreement involving Iran, Oman, and the United States on traffic management has been pending for several days.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi added that Tehran and Muscat are “very close” to finalising an agreement on a temporary maritime route. Reports indicate that Oman has proposed a voluntary fee system modelled on the Strait of Malacca, while Iran has pushed for compulsory charges.

Tehran is reportedly seeking between five and seven per cent of cargo value per transit, amounting to $8–11 million for a super tanker, while Oman favours a lower rate of around three per cent. The Persian Gulf Strait Authority, which would collect fees, is already under US sanctions.

Shipping industry organisations including ICS, BIMCO, INTERTANKO, and the World Shipping Council have written to the UN and IMO warning that compulsory charges would amount to a toll in all but name.

They argue that such measures would undermine international norms governing straits used for global navigation. Insurance complications have also emerged, with new war-risk clauses terminating cover for vessels that pay Hormuz transit fees, raising compliance risks for shippers.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical energy corridors, carrying nearly 20 per cent of global crude oil and 25 per cent of liquefied natural gas shipments. Recent military tensions have disrupted traffic, increased insurance costs, and heightened fears over energy security.

The proposed agreement between Iran and Oman seeks to stabilise navigation, but the imposition of fees has become a central point of contention between regional powers, shipping companies, and global institutions.

The outcome of these negotiations will determine whether Hormuz remains freely navigable or becomes subject to charges that could reshape global shipping economics. With the 60-day toll-free window closing around 19 August, the shipping industry faces immediate uncertainty over costs and compliance.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Trump Demands Compensation From Iran As Tehran Insists On War Damages

Donald Trump has escalated tensions by rejecting Iran’s demand for war reparations and instead insisting that Tehran must pay compensation for decades of alleged attacks, killings, and repression.

His counter-demand, which includes restitution for US casualties, Iranian protesters, and regional conflicts, risks further complicating negotiations over reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

US President Donald Trump on Monday dismissed Iran’s demand for financial compensation over damages caused during the US-Israeli military operations in the country. He argued that Tehran must instead be held accountable for casualties resulting from its own actions.

Posting on Truth Social, Trump described Iran’s demand as an “interesting idea” but declared that he would present a counter-demand in future diplomatic negotiations.

Trump stated that Iran must pay compensation for casualties and injuries linked to its actions, including the October 2000 USS Cole bombing, which killed 17 US sailors. He also referenced Iran’s late military commander Qassem Soleimani, alleging that Tehran’s leadership was responsible for conflicts that led to thousands of fatalities. Soleimani was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad in 2020 authorised by Trump.

Extending his demand, Trump insisted that Iran should compensate families of protesters allegedly killed by the regime over the past five decades. He claimed that 52,000 people had lost their lives in the last five months alone, a figure far higher than estimates from rights groups. He confirmed that American negotiators had been instructed to integrate these conditions into all upcoming talks with Tehran.

Iran, meanwhile, has linked its demand for war reparations to conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, lifting US sanctions, and ending naval blockades. The strategically vital waterway, through which a fifth of global oil once flowed, has been heavily disrupted by sporadic missile and drone attacks. According to The Wall Street Journal, these disruptions have severely impacted commercial maritime traffic and rattled global markets.

Despite Trump’s repeated claims that the maritime corridor remains open, shipping activity has been heavily constrained. He has also threatened a “massive bombing campaign” against Tehran, though reports suggest Iranian authorities are prepared for a prolonged conflict.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) declared that the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed until Washington agreed to all of Tehran’s conditions, including financial restitution.

Iranian security chief Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr reiterated calls for an end to “war and aggression” against Iran and its allies in Lebanon, Palestine, Yemen, and Iraq. The IRGC further emphasised that the maritime transit route would continue to serve as a “theatre of war” until the US met all of Iran’s stipulations.

Trump’s counter-demand has drawn attention to decades of alleged Iranian involvement in regional conflicts. He argued that Tehran should also be held responsible for damages and deaths in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza. His stance has been described as a direct response to Iran’s insistence that US reparations are a precondition for peace. Analysts warn that these demands could push a resolution further out of reach, with oil prices already rising amid fading hopes of a deal.

The situation underscores the deepening impasse between Washington and Tehran. While Iran insists on reparations and sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, Trump’s counter-claims highlight a widening gulf that complicates prospects for peace. With shipping traffic dwindling and global markets unsettled, the standoff continues to pose significant risks to international stability.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

FBI Director Kash Patel To Visit Russia In October Amid Speculation of Strategic Exchanges

FBI Director Kash Patel is preparing for a visit to Russia in mid-October, a move described by Politico as both unusual and sensitive given the current geopolitical tensions between Washington and Moscow over the war in Ukraine.

The trip is scheduled for 14–15 October, with stops in Moscow and St Petersburg, and Patel is expected to be hosted by the FSB, Russia’s primary security agency that succeeded the Soviet-era KGB.

Patel’s planned travel has drawn attention due to his history of involvement in controversial Russia-related matters during President Donald Trump’s first term. He was linked to efforts that attempted to cast doubt on investigations into whether Trump colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election. 

His recent pattern of high-profile international travel as FBI chief has also attracted scrutiny from Congress.

Russian state-aligned newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets commented on the development, suggesting that Patel should arrive with tangible offerings if he seeks cooperation. Vladimir Vasiliev of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ Arbatov Institute for US and Canadian Studies remarked that Russia could potentially provide compromising material on Democrats, while also noting that Moscow would expect something in return.

He added that the Americans might also have information to share, and the Russian side could ask, “What do we get in return?” or “What do you have to say about this or that issue?”

Vasiliev is closely connected to the Russian International Affairs Council, which operates under the chairmanship of Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. His comments reflect speculation about the possible motives behind Patel’s visit, though no official agenda has been disclosed. It remains unclear whether Patel will meet President Vladimir Putin or other senior Kremlin officials during his stay.

The last known FBI director to visit Russia was Robert Mueller in 2013. Mueller later became special counsel tasked with investigating alleged links between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia, as well as broader Russian efforts to interfere in US elections.

Patel’s upcoming trip therefore carries significant symbolic weight, given the historical context and the sensitive nature of US-Russia relations today.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

'Palestinian Statehood off The Table While I’m PM' Says Benjamin Netanyahu

Israel has formally rejected US President Donald Trump’s 15‑point Gaza peace plan, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declaring that no Palestinian state will be established while he remains in office.

Speaking at a cabinet meeting in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu stressed that Israeli forces would not withdraw from the enclave until Hamas is “genuinely” disarmed, reiterating that the military would continue operations to neutralise threats against Israeli citizens and soldiers.

Netanyahu’s remarks came amid mounting pressure from far‑right coalition partners who have demanded a fresh cabinet vote to abandon the peace plan. With opinion polls showing a competitive electoral race, the Prime Minister emphasised that Israel remains engaged in discussions with Washington, but insisted that while some American ideas are acceptable, others are not, and Israel would stand firm on its positions.

Trump’s framework, unveiled in late July, outlines a phased strategy to end the Gaza conflict. It calls for the disarmament of armed factions, staged withdrawal of Israeli troops, and the transfer of governance to a Palestinian technocratic body known as the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza. 

Under the plan, heavy weaponry, tunnels, and military sites would be placed under the committee’s control, while an international stabilisation force would separate Israeli troops from Palestinian‑administered areas.

The roadmap envisages reconstruction efforts and a longer‑term political process towards Palestinian self‑determination.

However, Israel insists that full demilitarisation of Hamas must precede any troop pull out. Despite a ceasefire established last October, Israeli forces have continued military strikes, underscoring the deep mistrust between the parties.

The rejection has widened the rift between Israel and regional stakeholders. Eight Muslim‑majority nations — the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt — issued a rare joint declaration condemning ongoing Israeli military operations in Gaza.

Their foreign ministers warned that continued military action could derail international peace efforts, provoke further escalation, and intensify the humanitarian crisis in the enclave.

The joint statement reflects growing frustration across the region, where leaders argue that the Gaza peace plan represents the most viable path to stability.

They cautioned that Israel’s refusal to implement the framework risks undermining diplomatic progress achieved through months of negotiations and could jeopardise broader regional security.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

US Redirects 53 Vessels, Deploys Stealth Fighters As Iran Blockade Intensifies

US Central Command has confirmed that American forces have redirected fifty‑three commercial vessels as part of the ongoing blockade against Iran.

Two ships have been disabled and two boarded during enforcement operations. More than thirty vessels were permitted safe passage for humanitarian aid deliveries, underscoring the dual nature of the blockade which combines strict interdiction with limited humanitarian allowances.

The command highlighted that sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln continue to maintain F/A‑18E Super Hornets to ensure the carrier strike group remains fully mission ready. CENTCOM shared footage of maintenance activities on the flight deck, emphasising readiness to enforce the blockade.

The Abraham Lincoln is operating in the Arabian Sea, projecting sustained American naval power in the region.

CENTCOM also released imagery of a US Marine Corps F‑35C stealth fighter jet launching from the Abraham Lincoln as the carrier transited the Arabian Sea. This demonstration of advanced strike capability reinforces the message that the blockade is backed by overwhelming force. The command reiterated that as of 2 August, thirty‑five vessels had been redirected, with two disabled and two boarded, showing continuity in enforcement measures.

On Sunday, CENTCOM confirmed that thirty‑five commercial vessels were redirected, alongside the disabling of two ships and boarding of two others. The blockade, reimposed last month, continues to be enforced across regional waterways, with American forces maintaining a visible and active presence.

US Vice President JD Vance stated that Washington is working to establish a secure maritime route through the Strait of Hormuz to allow commercial shipping while maintaining pressure on Iran. He explained that Tehran has indicated willingness to permit maximum oil flow through the strait, but Washington remains sceptical of Iranian assurances. Vance stressed that the United States is attempting to maximise oil and gas exports from the region to stabilise global energy prices.

Speaking to Fox News, Vance declared that the United States has destroyed Iran’s nuclear program, dismantled its conventional military, and significantly reduced its asymmetric capabilities. He added that Washington is now assessing whether Tehran is prepared to make long‑term changes in its relationship with the United States. If not, he said, America will continue applying pressure while ensuring energy supplies remain steady for domestic benefit.

The blockade forms part of a broader strategy to constrain Iran’s regional influence and military capacity. The United States is simultaneously pursuing diplomatic channels while maintaining military dominance in the Gulf.

The Abraham Lincoln strike group, with its carrier‑borne aircraft including F/A‑18E Super Hornets and F‑35C stealth fighters, represents a formidable deterrent against Iranian escalation.

The situation in the Strait of Hormuz remains tense. While humanitarian shipments are permitted, commercial traffic faces strict scrutiny. The blockade has already redirected dozens of vessels, and enforcement actions against non‑compliant ships demonstrate Washington’s resolve. The United States continues to balance military pressure with limited humanitarian concessions, aiming to weaken Iran’s strategic position while avoiding a complete shutdown of essential supplies.

The broader conflict has implications for global energy markets. Any disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply transits, threatens to destabilise international commerce. Washington’s efforts to secure safe passage routes reflect concern over the economic consequences of prolonged confrontation.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

US Senate Approves Russia Sanctions Bill Granting Trump Tariff Authority On India And China

The United States Senate has passed a sweeping bipartisan sanctions bill that could authorise President Donald Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on imports from countries that continue to purchase Russian oil and gas.

India and China are among the nations identified as major buyers, with Washington maintaining that such trade sustains Moscow’s economy and funds its military operations in Ukraine.

The legislation, formally titled the Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, was approved by an overwhelming 86–11 vote. It is named after the late Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who played a central role in shaping its provisions.

The measure is designed to escalate economic pressure on Russia and Iran while signalling consequences for nations that maintain significant energy trade ties with Moscow.

Under the bill, the US president is granted discretionary authority to impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on imports from the world’s top five buyers of Russian crude oil or natural gas. India, alongside China, is highlighted as one of the largest purchasers of Russian crude globally.

The legislation seeks to force energy-importing nations to choose between continuing to buy discounted Russian energy or retaining access to the lucrative US market.

Beyond targeting foreign energy buyers, the bill introduces fresh sanctions against Russian President Vladimir Putin, senior political and military officials, financial institutions, energy projects and entities linked to Russia’s war effort.

It also extends restrictions to older and reflagged oil tankers allegedly used by Russia to circumvent global sanctions, aiming to cut off revenue streams sustaining Moscow’s economy and military campaign.

India’s procurement of discounted Russian crude expanded significantly after the outbreak of the Russia–Ukraine conflict in 2022. While Russia was not historically a primary supplier, Indian refiners capitalised on discounted rates to optimise costs and ensure uninterrupted domestic supplies amid global market volatility and transit disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. New Delhi has consistently defended its energy strategy as being guided by national interest, energy security and affordability for its citizens.

Washington has repeatedly raised concerns about global purchases of Russian oil, but Indian refiners have maintained a pragmatic stance focused on domestic stability. If broadly applied, a 100 per cent tariff could raise import costs for US buyers across sectors such as engineering goods, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, textiles and auto components. In response, Indian exporters may explore market diversification or adjust operational strategies to maintain competitiveness.

Although the bill secured strong Senate support, some lawmakers expressed reservations about expanding presidential tariff authority. An amendment proposed by Senators Rand Paul and Ron Wyden to remove the new tariff powers was defeated.

Senator Raphael Warnock, who had raised concerns about the framework, confirmed receiving written assurances from the Trump administration outlining operational safeguards.

The legislation also incorporates measures targeting Iran by extending the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 through 2031, sustaining pressure on Tehran’s energy sector. The package thus combines sanctions against two countries viewed by Washington as major geopolitical adversaries.

Under the draft terms, countries may qualify for exemptions if they account for less than 15 per cent of Russia’s total natural gas exports and are actively reducing reliance on Russian energy. The bill also grants the president full authority to waive sanctions or tariff restrictions if deemed in the US national interest.

The measure now moves to the House of Representatives for consideration when lawmakers return later this month. House approval is required before the legislation can be sent to President Trump for signature, leaving significant legislative and diplomatic processes ahead before any tariff measures could take effect.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Strait of Hormuz Reopening Hinges On US Acceptance of Iran’s Conditions

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps declared on Saturday that the Strait of Hormuz will only reopen once the United States fully accepts Iran’s conditions.

IRGC spokesperson Sardar Mohebi emphasised that reopening the waterway would depend on specific mechanisms and conditions distinct from the ongoing negotiations with Oman. He stated that the US must end interference in regional negotiations before any reopening could take place.

Iranian officials confirmed that discussions with Oman are progressing towards a new shipping protocol for the strait. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the two sides were very close to reaching an agreement, but additional conditions would need to be met. He highlighted that US compensation to Iran was among the requirements before the strait could be reopened.

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council secretary Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr outlined a detailed list of conditions.

These included an end to US threats against Iran, cessation of military action against the country and its regional allies, withdrawal of naval and air forces enforcing the blockade, compensation for damages caused during the conflict, and the lifting of sanctions with the unfreezing of Iranian assets.

President Masoud Pezeshkian described the current situation as the best time to reach an agreement. He stressed that Tehran would not compromise on the rights of the Iranian people. In a post on X, he reiterated that the government’s reliance is on domestic capacities and the people, while underlining the necessity of a compassionate approach towards citizens. He quoted a principle that people are either religious brothers or equal in creation.

Pezeshkian also accused Israel and the United States of attempting to turn Persian Gulf states against Tehran. He alleged that both nations were exploiting Iran’s internal challenges amid the ongoing West Asia conflict. His remarks came as the military confrontation continues, with the restoration of commercial maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz remaining a central issue.

The IRGC’s position underscores Tehran’s determination to link the reopening of the strait to broader strategic concessions from Washington. The conditions laid out by Iranian officials highlight the depth of mistrust and the scale of demands that must be addressed before any resolution can be achieved.

The situation remains fluid, with negotiations involving Oman offering a potential pathway, but the decisive factor lies in whether the United States will accept Iran’s terms in full.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

62 India-Bound Vessels Transit Hormuz Safely As 4,052 Indian Seafarers Repatriated

A total of sixty-two vessels carrying India-bound cargo have successfully transited the Strait of Hormuz, according to Minister of Ports, Shipping, and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal.

He informed the Lok Sabha on 7 August that these transits were completed safely as of 3 August, despite the ongoing regional instability.

Of the sixty-two vessels, twenty-three were Indian-flagged, while thirty-nine were foreign-flagged. This highlights the scale of India’s reliance on both domestic and international shipping operators to maintain the flow of essential cargo through one of the world’s most strategically sensitive maritime corridors.

The minister also confirmed that 4,052 Indian seafarers have been repatriated from the Gulf region. This large-scale evacuation effort underscores the government’s commitment to ensuring the safety and welfare of Indian nationals working in maritime sectors during the crisis.

Sonowal emphasised that the government has maintained close and continuous contact with the families of affected seafarers. Immediate financial support of ten lakh rupees has been released through the Seafarers Welfare Fund Society to assist families impacted by the disruption.

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global energy supplies, carries nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil trade. Shipping traffic in the region has been severely affected following the blockade of the Strait after the outbreak of the US-Iran war.

The situation has placed immense pressure on international shipping and energy markets, with India’s proactive measures ensuring that its vessels and seafarers remain safeguarded.

India’s maritime control room continues to operate on a twenty-four-hour basis, monitoring vessels and seafarers in real time. This mechanism has been crucial in coordinating safe transits and facilitating repatriation efforts.

The developments highlight India’s ability to manage maritime security challenges in one of the most volatile regions of the world. By ensuring safe vessel passage, repatriating thousands of seafarers, and providing financial aid to families, the government has demonstrated a comprehensive response program to protect national interests and human welfare amid escalating geopolitical tensions.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

US Anticipates Iran-Oman Deal To Reopen Strait of Hormuz

Progress has reportedly been made in negotiations between Iran and Oman that could soon lead to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

A United States official stated on Friday that the talks are advancing and may result in an agreement allowing standard commercial oil shipments to resume. The strategic waterway has been closed for five months due to conflict, disrupting global energy flows.

Reuters, citing the US official who spoke on condition of anonymity, reported that Washington expects a deal shortly between Iran and Oman, the two nations bordering the strait. Securing control of the passage is seen as a crucial step toward a broader peace agreement.

The official explained that once the deal is announced to restore commercial shipping without impediments, the United States will lift the blockade of Iranian ports.

The official stressed that future steps would depend on Iran fulfilling its obligations. He emphasised that US actions will remain performance‑based and tied to Iran’s implementation of its commitments. This conditional approach reflects Washington’s cautious stance in the ongoing negotiations.

President Donald Trump has expressed optimism that fuel prices could decline as talks progress. He noted that stabilising one of the world’s most critical maritime trade routes could help lower gasoline prices if the negotiations succeed.

Speaking to reporters at the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump voiced confidence that the conflict with Iran would end “pretty soon,” adding that he did not believe the Islamic Republic could sustain the confrontation much longer. He reiterated that the United States remains committed to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Trump remarked that negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz are moving forward, though security concerns remain. He explained that while the blockade led by the US Navy is still in place, the risk of mines or other threats continues to complicate matters. He warned that even a single mine could disrupt shipping, as companies would be reluctant to risk billion‑dollar vessels in such conditions.

On the other side, Iran’s Acting Defence Minister Brigadier General Majid Ebn‑e‑Reza declared on Thursday that the country’s Armed Forces are fully prepared to counter any external threat. He emphasised that Iran’s military strength is rooted in its indigenous defence industry.

He stated that signs of the enemy’s erosion of power are becoming more evident, while Iran’s domestically developed defence technology surpasses regional military hardware.

He warned that countries relying on foreign suppliers for military superiority would eventually realise the limitations of their approach compared to Iran’s self‑reliant defence program.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most strategically important waterways in the world, serving as a vital transit route for global crude oil exports.

The outcome of the Iran‑Oman negotiations could determine whether the corridor reopens under a mutually acceptable framework, potentially easing tensions and stabilising energy markets.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

US Senate Approves Russia Sanctions Bill Threatening Tariffs On India And China

The United States Senate has passed the Russia Sanctions Bill, formally named after the late Senator Lindsey Graham, with a decisive bipartisan vote of 86 to 11.

The legislation authorises tariffs of up to 100 per cent on the top five countries purchasing Russian crude oil and natural gas, including China and India. It must now proceed to the House of Representatives before becoming law.

The bill is designed to impose mandatory sanctions on senior figures within the Russian government, including President Vladimir Putin, as well as foreign companies supporting Russia’s defence industrial base.

It also provides exemptions for countries importing less than 15 per cent of Russia’s total natural gas exports, thereby shielding smaller buyers from punitive measures.

Earlier, Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, told ANI that it was up to negotiating teams to determine whether the sanctions bill would affect ongoing trade talks with India. He declined to elaborate further, stressing that the matter lay firmly within the remit of negotiators.

The Senate had already cleared an initial procedural hurdle earlier in the week with a vote of 86 to 12, paving the way for the bill’s passage. Officially titled the Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, the legislation seeks to restrict petroleum revenues that finance Russia’s military campaign in Ukraine. India, China, Slovakia, Hungary and Azerbaijan are identified as primary countries of concern due to their continued purchases of Russian hydrocarbons.

The timing of the bill coincides with broader India–US trade negotiations, where tariff structures remain a contentious issue. In February 2026, both countries outlined an interim trade understanding proposing a reciprocal tariff rate of 18 per cent on Indian exports, in exchange for expanded Indian procurement of US energy resources and technology.

However, implementation was disrupted when the US Supreme Court invalidated the reciprocal tariff mechanism under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, forcing the administration to adopt a temporary Section 122 framework.

At present, under a subsequent Section 301 framework tied to forced-labour considerations, most Indian goods face a 10 per cent supplementary duty above standard Most-Favoured-Nation rates. Despite these shifting structures and legal uncertainties, both sides continue active dialogue aimed at easing tariff pressures, broadening market access and deepening economic ties. Hassett has previously described the US–India relationship as complicated but expressed optimism that a deal could eventually be reached.

The passage of the Russia Sanctions Bill represents a significant escalation in Washington’s efforts to curtail Moscow’s energy revenues.

For India, the legislation introduces fresh uncertainty into trade negotiations and raises the prospect of steep tariffs on its imports of Russian crude, a critical component of its energy security strategy.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

PM Netanyahu Reaffirms Strengthening of India-Israel Bond Amid Regional Developments

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday reaffirmed that India and Israel will continue to strengthen their bonds.

His remarks came in a post on X, where he re-shared Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s message about their recent conversation. Modi had informed that the two leaders discussed further strengthening the Special Strategic Partnership and reviewed the situation in West Asia.

Netanyahu wrote, “Thank you, my friend, Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi. Together we continue to strengthen the bond between Israel and India.” His statement highlighted the personal rapport between the two leaders and the strategic depth of the bilateral relationship.

The telephonic conversation between Modi and Netanyahu took place on Thursday. It focused on reviewing and expanding bilateral ties, with discussions centred on deepening cooperation across multiple sectors and addressing regional developments.

The Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal confirmed the details during the bi-weekly press briefing in New Delhi on Friday. He noted that the call was initiated by the Israeli side and received by Prime Minister Modi.

Jaiswal emphasised that the leaders discussed ways to further strengthen the friendship and partnership across various sectors. He underlined the robust framework of the India-Israel Special Strategic Partnership, which has become a defining feature of their relations.

According to the Prime Minister’s Office, both leaders reviewed sustained progress in bilateral relations and reaffirmed their commitment to enhancing cooperation for mutual benefit. Their conversation also included an exchange of views on recent developments in West Asia, with both leaders agreeing to remain in close contact.

This dialogue followed a previous telephonic discussion in March, when Modi and Netanyahu had spoken about the regional situation. The continuity of such exchanges reflects the importance both nations place on maintaining regular communication amid evolving regional dynamics.

Economic and diplomatic ties between India and Israel continue to show strong momentum. In July, the two countries concluded the second round of negotiations for a proposed Free Trade Agreement. The negotiations aim for an early, balanced, and comprehensive economic pact that will strengthen trade, investment, and economic ties.

Highlighting the broader scope of bilateral relations, Israeli Ambassador to India Reuven Azar remarked in June that ties remain on an “amazing trajectory” despite regional conflicts. He pointed to expanding cooperation in defence, infrastructure, finance, and trade as evidence of the resilience and growth of the partnership. Azar stressed that bilateral ties have consistently strengthened over the past three years, with both countries deepening engagement across multiple sectors.

The Special Strategic Partnership between India and Israel now encompasses defence, technology, innovation, and economic collaboration. It reflects a shared vision to advance mutual prosperity and contribute to regional stability.

The latest conversation between Modi and Netanyahu underscores the determination of both governments to sustain momentum in their partnership and to navigate regional complexities together.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

India Reaffirms Seafarer Safety As Priority After Vessel Attack Off Yemen

India has reiterated that the safety and security of its vessels and seafarers remain a matter of high importance following the sinking of the Indian‑flagged mechanised sailing vessel MSV Faize Noore Oliya in the Red Sea off Yemen earlier this week.

During a bi‑weekly briefing in New Delhi, MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stressed that the government attaches high priority to the issue.

He explained that Indian missions across the Gulf region are in constant contact with shipping companies, maritime authorities and other relevant agencies. He noted that 24/7 helplines are being operated to support affected individuals and their families.

Jaiswal emphasised India’s consistent call for safe and unimpeded navigation through international waterways. He underlined that the free flow of commerce must be protected and urged all parties to refrain from targeting civilian infrastructure and commercial vessels. He added that coordination continues with the Ministry of Shipping and local authorities in West Asia and the Gulf region to safeguard Indian seafarers.

The Ministry of External Affairs had already condemned the attack on the vessel, confirming that all thirteen Indian nationals onboard, along with one Yemeni crew member, were successfully rescued.

Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal echoed these concerns. He described the strike as an unprovoked attack on a defenceless vessel and reaffirmed that the safety of Indian seafarers is the government’s supreme priority. He confirmed that all fourteen crew members were rescued by the Yemeni Coast Guard and brought safely to the Port of Mokha.

Sonowal added that the Director General Maritime Administration has been instructed to coordinate across agencies to ensure ongoing security for Indian seafarers operating in high‑risk waters.

The incident has reignited anxieties over maritime security in the Red Sea and the Bab al‑Mandab Strait. This narrow chokepoint connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea and is one of the world’s most critical shipping routes. Recent months have seen a resurgence of attacks targeting commercial vessels in the region, raising concerns over global trade and energy security.

India, as one of the largest suppliers of maritime manpower, has a direct stake in ensuring the safety of its nationals at sea. The government has already rolled out a “Seafarer‑First” program under the DGMA, which includes real‑time tracking of vessels, mandatory voyage risk assessments, ship‑shore security drills and continuous monitoring through the DG Communication Centre.

An integrated digital platform, eNavik, operational since July, enables real‑time reporting of marine casualties and security incidents. It also facilitates coordination with the Indian Navy and international maritime agencies.

The emergency response mechanism has already handled thousands of calls and emails from seafarers and their families, while repatriation efforts have brought many Indian nationals home from conflict‑affected waters.

Officials have stressed that the latest attack underscores the urgent need for international cooperation to safeguard freedom of navigation and protect commercial shipping. The Red Sea and adjoining waters remain volatile, with escalating risks to seafarers and global trade routes.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Mojtaba Khamenei Reportedly In Critical Condition Amid Intensifying Speculation On Iran’s Leadership: Report

Israeli media have reported that Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is in critical condition and has been rushed to hospital.

Channel 14 (C14), citing sources inside Iran, and the Jerusalem Post, quoting IranWire and figures close to President Masoud Pezeshkian’s administration, stated that rumours of Khamenei being in an “extremely critical condition” are circulating widely at the highest levels of the regime.

One source even remarked that they “would not be surprised if we heard news of his martyrdom soon.”

Khamenei assumed the position of Supreme Leader shortly after his father was killed in joint US-Israeli military strikes on 28 February 2026. Since then, he has not made any public appearances and has communicated only through written statements.

Reports suggest he was injured and possibly disfigured in the initial strikes on his father’s compound, forcing him into hiding and compelling him to rely on intermediaries to communicate with senior regime figures in order to avoid further targeting.

President Masoud Pezeshkian recently admitted in a state TV interview that direct interaction with Khamenei is currently “very difficult.” This acknowledgement has added weight to speculation about his health and accessibility.

International and regional reports have repeatedly questioned both his physical location and his capacity to lead. In July, Saudi outlet al-Hadath, citing an Israeli security source, claimed that Khamenei was “not in Iran.” Around the same time, US President Donald Trump asserted in a Fox News interview that Iran’s top military leadership had been eliminated, claiming that Khamenei was “90% gone” and incapacitated following the military campaign.

Iranian state officials have consistently downplayed the severity of his injuries. Representatives from the Health Ministry previously described them as superficial, while senior officials maintained that he continues to provide strategic oversight and operational directives. However, the persistent absence of live appearances or direct public addresses has fuelled intense speculation about his health and the stability of his leadership.

Western and opposition intelligence sources have frequently suggested that Khamenei sustained severe or disfiguring injuries, explaining his total absence from public view and reliance solely on written statements. Contrastingly, Iranian officials insist he remains capable of guiding the country’s strategic direction. This divergence in narratives underscores the uncertainty surrounding his condition and the future of Iran’s leadership at a time of heightened regional tension.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading