Showing posts with label BLA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BLA. Show all posts

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Baloch Liberation Army Claims Khuzdar Strike Under 'Operation Marg-E-Gaddaran', Five Killed


The Baloch Liberation Army has claimed responsibility for Wednesday’s attack near the compound of Shafiq-ur-Rehman Mengal in Khuzdar, alleging that five people, including a police officer, were killed in the operation. The incident was reported by The Balochistan Post.

According to the statement, BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch said the group’s fighters targeted what it described as an “important and active base” belonging to Mengal in the Awak area of Aranji, Wadh. The organisation claimed that all five armed men present at the site were associated with an alleged “death squad”.

The BLA further stated that its fighters seized weapons and other military equipment following the attack. Those killed were identified as Abdul Hayee, Naimatullah, Yahya, Naseer Ahmed and Noora Mohammad Zai. The group accused Noora Mohammad, described as a police officer, of working for the alleged “death squad” under the cover of a government uniform.

The attack was described as part of the BLA’s “Operation Marg-e-Gaddaran”, or “Death to Traitors”, which had been announced earlier this year against individuals and armed groups accused of operating under state patronage.

The spokesperson linked this operation to the BLA’s Majeed Brigade attack on Mengal’s main compound in Khuzdar on July 8, where the group claimed 34 of Mengal’s associates were killed, while Mengal himself escaped in a bulletproof vehicle.

The BLA said that under “Operation Marg-e-Gaddaran”, it would continue targeting what it calls “traitors” and their operatives. The organisation claimed that its military units remained continuously active in destroying alleged secret bases. It also issued what it described as a final warning to people associated with Mengal or other alleged “death squads”.

The statement urged those individuals to sever ties, end intelligence or military cooperation, and return to civilian life. The BLA said that those who withdrew from such associations would not be harmed. However, it warned that anyone continuing to provide information or assistance to Mengal would be regarded as a “national traitor” and directly targeted.

The group further declared that “Operation Marg-e-Gaddaran” would continue “with full intensity and strength” until, in its words, Balochistan had been “completely purged of traitors”. The BLA reiterated its commitment to intensifying armed operations against those it accuses of working under state patronage.

ANI


Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Baloch Liberation Army And Baloch Republican Guard Claim Deadly Convoy And Lithium Site Attack


Balochistan witnessed a fresh escalation of violence as both the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Baloch Republican Guards (BRG) claimed responsibility for a series of coordinated operations across Lasbela, Jiwani, Mashkel and Kachhi.

The reported incidents included a deadly attack on a Pakistani military convoy, the killing of four individuals allegedly linked to Military Intelligence, the destruction of equipment at a lithium exploration site, and road blockades in Kachhi district.

The BLA stated that its Fateh Squad targeted a convoy belonging to the Pakistani military’s 15 FF Bomb Disposal Party in the Kashari area of Wallapat, Lasbela. The attack began with an improvised explosive device blast against a military vehicle, followed by direct firing.

The group claimed that two vehicles were completely destroyed and two others severely damaged. According to the BLA, nine military personnel were killed and more than eleven wounded, including members of the Light Engineering Battalion and 15 FF.

Pakistani officials confirmed the incident but reported lower casualties, stating that four security personnel, including a Naib Subedar and two Levies personnel, were killed, while seven others, including a civilian, were injured. Authorities withheld further details.

The BLA further claimed responsibility for what it described as an intelligence-based operation in Jiwani. During this action, four individuals allegedly associated with the Pakistani military and Military Intelligence were killed.

The group also announced that its fighters seized control of a lithium exploration site in Mashkel. During the raid, four drilling machines and five vehicles were set ablaze. Employees of the company were reportedly detained but later released after being warned.

The BLA reiterated its opposition to lithium exploration and mining projects in Balochistan, warning both local and international companies against involvement. It declared that lithium extraction and exploration would be treated as legitimate targets under its strategy of “economic blockade”.

Meanwhile, the BRG confirmed that its fighters carried out road blockades and snap-checking operations at several points in Kachhi district. Vehicles were stopped and checked, while patrols were conducted in the area.

The BRG stated that no state personnel were encountered during the operations but claimed responsibility for the activities. Both organisations emphasised that such actions would continue until what they described as the liberation of Balochistan.

The targeting of lithium exploration sites highlights the growing intersection between insurgency and resource politics in the region. Lithium, considered a critical mineral for global energy transition, has drawn increasing interest from international companies.

The BLA’s explicit opposition to such projects signals a strategy to disrupt economic initiatives that it perceives as exploitative. This adds a new dimension to the insurgency, linking armed resistance with resource nationalism.

The Pakistani authorities have yet to release comprehensive details of the convoy attack or the lithium site incident. However, the claims by both groups underscore the persistence of insurgent activity across Balochistan, with operations ranging from direct military engagements to economic sabotage.

The emphasis on road blockades and snap-checking also reflects attempts to assert control over local mobility and logistics.

The BLA and BRG’s statements reaffirm their commitment to continuing armed operations until their stated objective of an independent Balochistan is achieved. The incidents further illustrate the complexity of the conflict, where military, economic and political dimensions are increasingly intertwined.

ANI


Thursday, September 10, 2026

Baloch Liberation Army Claims 28 Operations, Reports 52 Pakistani Personnel Killed Across Balochistan


The Baloch Liberation Army has claimed responsibility for 28 operations across Balochistan between 1 and 7 September, stating that 52 Pakistani military personnel were killed and several others injured. The group also confirmed that 12 of its fighters were killed during clashes with Pakistani forces. These claims were reported by The Balochistan Post on X.

The operations were said to have taken place in Pasni, Kharan, Kalat, Turbat, Mastung, Surab, Tump, Pishin, Jhal Magsi, Noshki, Chagai and Quetta. The BLA described the attacks as part of its ongoing campaign against Pakistani forces and infrastructure projects it considers exploitative.

According to the statement, the first operation occurred on 1 September at Zero Point in Pasni, Gwadar. BLA fighters attacked a joint police and Levies post along with checkpoints belonging to Customs and the Coastal Police. The group claimed it seized weapons and military equipment, took control of the checkpoints, and later set them on fire, destroying the posts.

The BLA also reported an ambush on a Pakistani military convoy at Albat in Kharan and an attack on personnel transporting armoured vehicles at Garari in Kalat. It claimed that several personnel were killed or injured and three armoured vehicles were severely damaged.

On 2 September, the group said its fighters targeted a Pakistani military armoured vehicle with an improvised explosive device at Guro in Mastung’s Khadkocha area. The convoy was then ambushed, with the BLA claiming four personnel were killed and more than seven injured.

On 3 September, the BLA’s Special Tactical Operations Squad carried out an attack in Hajika, Surab, using an explosives-laden vehicle against a Pakistani military convoy. The group claimed one military vehicle was destroyed and seven personnel were killed.

The Fateh Squad of the BLA was reported to have attacked Pakistani forces at Ziarat Cross in Pishin. The group claimed 18 personnel were killed and five injured, while two vehicles were destroyed. Weapons and military equipment were also seized.

Further attacks were claimed in Tump, Mastung, Kalat and Jhal Magsi. The BLA also said it was responsible for the killings of Abdul Rehman Langove, described as the Noshki district president of the Balochistan Awami Party, and Rehmat Saeed in Quetta. The group accused both of working as operatives for Pakistani forces.

The statement additionally referred to clashes at Nokchah in Chagai on 31 August. The BLA claimed 16 Pakistani military personnel, including a senior officer, were killed, while 10 of its fighters also died in the fighting.

The group reiterated its stance that its “economic blockade” against Pakistani forces and projects would continue on major highways across Balochistan. It pledged to sustain armed operations until the establishment of what it described as an independent and sovereign Balochistan.

These casualty figures and claims were reported by The Balochistan Post and attributed to the BLA. Independent verification of the group’s claims remains difficult due to restricted access to conflict zones in Balochistan.

ANI


Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Balochistan: Who’s In Control?

A BLA attack killed 25 Pakistani soldiers in a deadly coordinated twin attack on 6-Sep-2026

by Nilesh Kunwar

Bloody Friday

With Sarmachars (Guerillas) of the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) carrying out two successful attacks, Friday turned out to be a particularly bad day for the Pakistani security forces. In the first incident that occurred at Ziarat Cross, BLA freedom fighters belonging to its Fateh Squad ambushed a Frontier Corps (FC) convoy in broad daylight killing 18 soldiers and destroying two vehicles. In videos released by BLA, its Sarmachars can be seen targeting the vehicles which are ablaze.

The second incident took place in Hajika, Surab where BLA’s Special Tactical Operations Squad (STOS) triggered a remote controlled improvised explosive device (RCIED) killing seven Pakistani soldiers and completely destroying their vehicle. Losing 25 soldiers in a single day belies Pakistan army’s repeated claims that not only is the situation in Balochistan under control, but also that due to the security forces’ complete control over the area, Baloch fighters are on the back-foot.

Pak Army Hits Backs

Soon after the Friday killings, Pakistan army’s media wing Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) claimed that the Pakistan army had carried out several intelligence based operations targeting hideouts in Mastung, Quetta, Sibi and Kalat districts of Balochistan. In these operations 48 fighters armed Baloch groups and Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) terrorists were reportedly killed which is definitely commendable, if true.

However, while the Pakistan army may view the elimination of nearly 50 Baloch fighters as redemption of sorts, unfortunately it doesn’t come as any consolation for the bereaved family members of the dead soldiers. Au contraire, this incident once again throws up some very disturbing questions that need to be answered honestly, the first being, who is in actual control of Balochistan?

Secondly, why is it that after every incident in which security forces suffer major loss of lives, the Pakistan army is able to neutralise nearly double the number of soldiers killed(or at times even more), number of terrorists) in IBO’s, and that too within just 24 to 72 hours? But more on this later…

Thirdly, if the Pakistan army’s spy agency Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) can generate such accurate intelligence regarding location of armed fighters so quickly, why can’t it be proactive and undertake such IBO’s before its rank and file are attacked and decimated?

Director General (DG) of ISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry maintains that it’s the Pakistan army but deliberate attempts were being made to create a perception that the situation in Balochistan was deteriorating.

In July end, he boasted that “The way the kinetic prong of the counter-terrorism is maturing, responding and delivering, that is before you,” and provided details of military operations in Balochistan. However, rather than providing answers, his confused narrative has only raised more questions.

According to DGISPR, during the period January to July this year, security forces carried out more than 31,000 intelligence based operations (IBOs) in Balochistan, and this province recorded 1,148 incidents of clashes with armed Baloch fighters.

As these translate to an average of 164 incidents per month, or nearly six every day, it’s amply clear that the “kinetic prong” of counter-terrorism operations hasn’t really been as effective as DGISPR would like us to believe.

So what’s the truth?

Numbers Game

The Pakistan army has always been a law unto itself in Balochistan. However, after seeing a perceptible rise in its brutality against innocent civilians and indiscriminate surge in enforced disappearances and extra judicial killings it’s apparent that security forces in Balochistan have been given a carte blanche by Field Marshal Asim Munir. This isn’t a speculation but an inference backed by statistics.

Field Marshal Munir became army chief in November 2022 and as such it would be fair to analyse the efficacy of his counter-terrorism policy from 2023 onwards. Data compiled by South Asia Terrorism Portal indicates that the number of armed Baloch fighters claimed to have been killed by Pakistani forces show an incremental (125 in 2023, 186 in 2024, 436 in 2025 and 948 till September 5, 2026), which is a positive.

However, fatalities amongst Pakistani security forces and law enforcement agencies too have risen significantly (186 in 2023, 315 in 2024, 751 in 2025, and 660 till September 2026).

Despite repeated claims of extraordinary success in counter-terrorism operations and normalcy, the reality is that Pakistani security forces have not been able to get the situation in Balochistan under control. So, it has conveniently changed the narrative by trying to convince the public that success in counter-terrorism operations should not be measured in terms of reduction in terrorism related incidents but by comparing fatalities suffered by Pakistani security forces vis-à-vis those of Sarmachars.

This has been acknowledged by Lt Gen Chaudhary’s perverse boast that “in 2025, for every martyr we were taking out minimum two (terrorists) and this year, we are taking out minimum 2.5 (terrorists).” 

Isn’t this an irrefutable proof that counting body bags is Rawalpindi’s sole criteria for counter-terrorism performance? This brings us back to the earlier mentioned question-how does the Pakistan army manage to kill Baloch fighters in such large numbers after every major attack on its troops, and that too almost immediately?

Here again, one doesn’t have to look too far because a DGISPR has himself provided the answer. Readers would recall that during a media interaction session in 2019. When asked about enforced disappearances in Balochistan, the then DGISPR Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor nonchalantly replied, “We don’t wish that anyone should be missing. But when it is war, you have to do a lot of things- as they say, all is fair in love and war; war is very ruthless.”

Coming from horse’s mouth, isn’t this revelation an incontrovertible confirmation that the Pakistan army routinely indulges in enforced disappearances? And so, isn’t it obvious that this vile practice has tacit approval of Rawalpindi? It’s no secret that the Pakistani security forces routinely present corpses of Baloch youth who had been forcibly disappeared earlier as those of armed fighters killed in encounters.

After the 2025 Jaffar Express attack, BLA published the particulars of 13 of its fighters along with their photos who had been killed in this operation. However, ISPR claimed that 33 BLA fighters had been killed, and a week after the incident 23 corpses were dumped in Quetta Civil Hospital.

That the locals weren’t allowed to identify and claim the dead bodies and the secret burial of 13 unidentified corpses in Quetta’s Kasi Graveyard in the dead of the night by policemen clearly indicates that the deceased were victims of enforced disappearance who had been extra-judicially executed and passed off as BLA fighters killed in operations.

Mention of Pakistani security forces orchestrating enforced disappearances and committing extra-judicial executions has even been recorded by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in its 2019 World Report on Pakistan. Facing severe criticism for killing innocent people and passing them off as Baloch fighters, the Pakistan army has found a cunning way out- presenting the dead as Baloch fighters.

Family members are now being coerced into holding press conferences to publicly disown their missing relatives and even falsely label them as active fighters of proscribed groups or their supporters. That’s the reason why Lt Gen Chaudhary has the confidence to publicly declare that Baloch fighters “commit terrorism, get killed, and then they turn out to be on the very list of missing persons that they created. The data for both matches completely.”

In its reply to ISPR’s claim of having eliminated nine Baloch fighters after a serving Lt Col was abducted and killed by its fighters, BLA made it clear that it “takes utmost pride in its struggle and the martyrdom of our comrades during this struggle… (and) announces all martyrdom of its members with great glory and honour. If any of our freedom fighters had lost their lives in this successful operation, we would have taken pride in making it public and paying rich tributes to them.”

On the one hand we have the security forces secretly burying unidentified bodies at night, while on the other hand we find BLA openly honouring their fallen comrades by posting their names and photos on its website. Who to believe is left to the reader.

How “Soon”?

It was in April 2025 that Field Marshal Munir assured those attending the Overseas Pakistanis Convention in Islamabad that he would “beat the hell” out of the armed Baloch fighter groups “very soon.” More than a year has since elapsed, but the inordinately high casualty figures of security force personnel reveal that despite the field marshal’s assurance to “beat the hell” out of them “very soon,” armed Baloch groups are neither down nor out.

Will the field marshal therefore care to clarify as to how soon will be his “very soon”?

Nilesh Kunwar is a retired Indian Army Officer who has served in Jammu & Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland and Manipur. He is a keen ‘Kashmir-Watcher,’ and after retirement is pursuing his favourite hobby of writing for newspapers, journals and think-tanks. Views expressed above are the author's own


Saturday, September 5, 2026

25 Pakistani Soldiers Killed In Deadly Ambush In Balochistan


The Balochistan Liberation Army claimed responsibility for killing 25 Pakistani army personnel in two separate attacks, marking one of the deadliest escalations in the province in recent months.

The group released a cinematic-style video through its media outlet Hakkal, showing explosions, gunfire, and a Pakistani military truck engulfed in flames. The footage also depicted fighters standing near burning vehicles and seizing weapons from damaged trucks, with bodies lying on the ground.

On Friday, the BLA stated that 18 Pakistani personnel were killed when its Fateh Squad ambushed a military convoy at Ziarat Cross, destroying two vehicles. Five others were injured but managed to escape.

This ambush was described as one of the most brazen attacks carried out by Baloch separatists in recent times.

The Fateh Squad, an elite combat unit specialising in guerrilla warfare and ambushes in Balochistan’s mountainous terrain, has previously been linked to high-profile operations, including the hijacking of the Jaffar Express in March 2025.

In a separate incident in Hajika, Surab, the BLA claimed that its Special Tactical Operations Squad (STOS) executed a remote-controlled vehicle-borne blast, killing seven Pakistani soldiers.

These casualty figures have not been independently verified, and Pakistan has not released official details of the attacks. However, videos circulating on social media show bodies of Pakistani soldiers being sent to their families discreetly under the cover of darkness.

The BLA has intensified its campaign in recent months. Last month, it claimed responsibility for 36 operations across different regions, killing over 33 personnel. The scale of violence has revived memories of the group’s ‘Operation Herof’ in 2024, during which it targeted key transportation infrastructure, including sections of the Karachi-Quetta highway and a railway station in Mastung. That operation resulted in the deaths of over 25 Pakistani soldiers and left dozens injured.

Pakistan’s military responded swiftly to the latest attacks, claiming to have killed nearly 50 militants during raids on hideouts in Mastung, Sibi, Quetta, and Kalat.

The army stated that those killed belonged to outlawed groups, including the Baloch Liberation Army and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). These tit-for-tat strikes highlight the surge in violence in Balochistan, Pakistan’s largest province, which has been plagued by insurgency for decades.

The broader resurgence of violence has seen the BLA and other insurgent groups intensify attacks against Pakistani military installations and convoys. For decades, Baloch groups have accused Pakistan of human rights violations, including enforced disappearances and crackdowns on political activists. 

The province, which shares a long border with Afghanistan, has remained a focal point of separatist demands for greater autonomy or independence.

The recent escalation underscores the growing intensity of the conflict, with both sides engaging in increasingly lethal operations.

The BLA’s use of specialised units such as the Fateh Squad and STOS reflects its evolving tactics, while Pakistan’s military response demonstrates its determination to suppress the insurgency despite mounting criticism over its handling of the crisis.

Agencies


Thursday, August 27, 2026

Baloch Liberation Army Ambush Military Convoy, 13 Soldiers Killed And Multiple Vehicles Destroyed In Mastung


The Baloch Liberation Army has claimed responsibility for a major attack on a Pakistani military convoy in Mastung district, stating that 13 soldiers were killed and at least 10 injured.

According to spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch, the group’s fighters destroyed an armoured vehicle with an improvised explosive device in Khadkocha on the night of 22 August, before ambushing another armoured vehicle and accompanying vehicles.

The BLA said its Special Tactical Operations Squad carried out the operation.

Local sources confirmed that one armoured vehicle was destroyed in the explosion and another damaged. They added that armed fighters subsequently ambushed the convoy, causing further damage to another military vehicle.

Regional sources reported that the bodies of two soldiers and eight injured personnel were taken to Nawab Ghaus Bakhsh Raisani Memorial Hospital in Mastung, while other injured personnel were airlifted to the Combined Military Hospital in Quetta. Pakistani authorities have not released official casualty figures.

Following the attack, the Balochistan Home Department imposed an indefinite curfew in Khadkocha and surrounding areas from 7 AM on 23 August. Residents were ordered to remain indoors, with movement on roads and in markets suspended. Officials said the measure was necessary due to security concerns and ongoing operations in the area.

The BLA also claimed responsibility for a separate attack in Hairabad, Turbat, on 23 August, stating that three soldiers were killed and three injured.

Officials confirmed that an FC road search team was attacked but reported only three injuries. They said six armed men on motorcycles threw a grenade and opened fire before fleeing when FC personnel returned fire.

The BLA further claimed eight other operations in Noshki, Kalat, Kharan, Washuk, Zehri and Chagai, promising more details in its weekly statement. Local sources emphasised that Khadkocha has become a persistent challenge for security forces, recalling a major attack in the same area on 17 July when a convoy of more than 18 buses and security vehicles travelling from Quetta towards Karachi was targeted. The BLA had claimed responsibility for that incident as well, alleging dozens of casualties.

In a separate incident on 22 August, a bridge on the N-25 national highway between Anjeeri Cross near Khadkocha was destroyed in an explosion. Authorities said unidentified individuals targeted the bridge with explosives, though no casualties were reported

Officials did not immediately provide details on the extent of the damage or its impact on traffic along the highway, which is a key route connecting Balochistan with Karachi and other regions. This was the third reported bridge attack within a week.

On 21 August, a bridge in the Zidi area of Khuzdar was destroyed in an explosion, while earlier a bridge on the Kharan–Karachi highway in the Sotagan area of Kharan was demolished using heavy machinery. No group has claimed responsibility for the bridge attacks.

The Mastung ambush highlights the growing intensity of insurgent operations in Balochistan, with the BLA continuing to target military convoys, infrastructure and security personnel.

The imposition of curfews and repeated attacks on strategic road links underscore the deteriorating security environment in the province, where insurgent groups are increasingly challenging state authority.

Agencies


Saturday, August 15, 2026

Baloch Leader Extends Independence Day Greetings To PM Modi, Calls Pakistan’s I-Day A Black Day


A day after urging the global Baloch population to mark Pakistan’s Independence Day as a “Black Day,” Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch extended warm greetings to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the people of India on the nation’s 80th Independence Day.

In his message, Mir Yar Baloch highlighted the historic, civilizational, and spiritual bonds between India and Balochistan. He offered to open Balochistan’s seaports for trade with India to support the “Make in India” program, emphasising that such cooperation could help propel India toward becoming the world’s second-largest economy.

He expressed heartfelt congratulations on behalf of the Republic of Balochistan, describing the occasion as sacred and proud. Paying tribute to Indian freedom fighters including Mahatma Gandhi, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, Rani Lakshmibai, and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, he said their immortal sacrifices continue to inspire nations striving for justice and self-determination.

Mir Yar Baloch pointed to the ancient Hinglaj Mata Temple in Balochistan, describing it as a sacred symbol of India’s spiritual connection with the region, binding both nations together for centuries.

Taking aim at Islamabad, he urged the international community to challenge Pakistan’s narrative, asserting that Pakistan lacked any legal, diplomatic, political, or moral proof of Balochistan’s incorporation. He warned that allowing Pakistan to thrive would be tantamount to grave diplomatic and political suicide.

He pitched strong economic and strategic ties with New Delhi, stressing that India’s economic growth targets could be accelerated through partnership with Balochistan. He praised Prime Minister Modi’s vision of making India the world’s third-largest economy and said Balochistan could give wings to this dream.

He proposed opening Balochistan’s seaports for Indian trade and providing a large market for goods produced under the Make in India program. He added that minerals entrusted to the Baloch nation could bring an economic revolution to the region.

By expelling Pakistan from Balochistan, he argued, the rogue state would be deprived of trillions of dollars worth of minerals, preventing it from funding terrorism in Kashmir or unrest in the wider region.

Just a day earlier, Mir Yar Baloch had called on six crore Baloch people worldwide to observe Pakistan’s Independence Day on August 14 as a “Black Day.” He urged them to hoist black flags and wear black armbands to signal rejection of Pakistani rule. His condemnation followed Pakistani military airstrikes in Surab that reportedly left dozens of civilians dead and injured.

Earlier today, Prime Minister Modi hoisted the National Flag at the Red Fort in New Delhi. The ceremony was synchronised with a 21-gun salute by the 1721 Field Battery (Ceremonial), marking the nation’s 80th Independence Day celebrations.

ANI


Wednesday, August 12, 2026

PAF JF‑17s Rain Seven Bombs On Balochistan’s Surab; 30 Plus Civilians Dead; Scores Injured


Pakistan’s military under Asim Munir has once again unleashed brutal force against the citizens in Balochistan who is seeking freedom from Pakistani occupation, News18 reported.

The latest atrocity unfolded in Surab district’s Goandhan village, where an airstrike at midnight turned a celebration of independence into a massacre. On the very night when Baloch citizens were rejoicing with flags and slogans of freedom, JF-17 fighter jets descended like predators, raining explosives on sleeping families.

The devastation left 28 civilians dead, including nine children, seven women, and twelve men, while more than seventeen others were pulled out of rubble with severe injuries. The death toll is expected to rise further as many remain in critical condition.

Eyewitnesses described the horror as houses collapsed into heaps of mud and concrete, burying bodies beneath debris. Survivors clawed through ruins with bare hands, searching for loved ones, while the Pakistani administration maintained complete silence.

The brutality was not limited to aerial bombardment; local sources revealed that soldiers encircled the area before and after the strikes, subjecting civilians to torture. This pattern reflects a long-standing military program in Balochistan, where enforced disappearances, torture cells, and staged encounters have become routine. The midnight bombing, however, marks a chilling escalation, showing the army’s descent into sheer savagery.

The timing of the attack underscores Munir’s fury at the growing defiance of Baloch citizens. Just a day earlier, the province had witnessed widespread celebrations of independence from Pakistan, with streets filled by flags and chants against Islamabad’s rule.

This open defiance rattled Munir, who reportedly gave his forces free rein to crush the spirit of rebellion. The airstrike was thus not a tactical operation but a calculated act of vengeance, designed to instil fear and silence the voices of freedom.

The roots of Balochistan’s rebellion lie in decades of exploitation and neglect. Despite being rich in natural gas, gold, copper, and other minerals, the province remains mired in poverty, unemployment, and lack of basic facilities. Locals accuse the Pakistani state of plundering their resources while offering nothing in return but repression.

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has further alienated the population, as mega projects bypass local communities and benefit outsiders. The military’s heavy-handed tactics—abductions, torture, and killings—have only deepened resentment, fuelling insurgent groups and strengthening the demand for separation.

The aftermath in Goandhan village is one of utter ruin. Broken homes, scattered belongings, and lifeless bodies pulled from rubble paint a grim picture of Pakistan’s war against its own people. The silence of the authorities adds insult to injury, leaving survivors to grieve alone.

For Balochistan, this massacre is not an isolated incident but part of a larger struggle for dignity, identity, and control over its own resources. The midnight airstrike has become a symbol of Munir’s desperation to crush a movement that refuses to die.

Agencies


Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Pakistan Records 3,172 Violence Cases Including 644 Murders And 462 Kidnappings In First Half of 2026, Punjab Worst-Hit


Pakistan reported 3,172 violence cases in the first half of 2026, with Punjab accounting for nearly three-quarters of all incidents. The majority of cases involved gender-based violence, including 132 honour killings, underscoring a deepening crisis of insecurity and social vulnerability.

Pakistan witnessed a troubling rise in violence between January and June 2026. Courts dealt with 3,172 new cases during this period, reflecting the persistence of violent crime despite ongoing convictions. The figures highlight the scale of the problem, with 644 murder cases and 462 kidnapping cases reported.

A significant proportion of these incidents were linked to gender-based violence. The report noted that 132 people were killed in so-called honour killings during the first half of the year.

In approximately 27 per cent of these cases, the perpetrators were acquaintances of the victims, while husbands were identified as the accused in 13 per cent of murder cases. This underscores the disturbing role of individuals known to victims in perpetuating violence.

The data further revealed that people aged between 21 and 30 accounted for a high proportion of involvement in killing and murder cases. This trend has intensified concerns about violence among young adults and the urgent need for preventive interventions targeting this demographic.

Punjab emerged as the worst-hit province, accounting for 74 per cent of all reported incidents. Sindh followed with 17 per cent, while Khyber Pakhtunkhwa recorded 6 per cent. The remaining 3 per cent of cases were collectively reported from Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan, Islamabad, and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The concentration of cases in Punjab highlights the province’s acute vulnerability to violent crime.

The findings also emphasised that legal proceedings and convictions by courts alone have not been sufficient to prevent fresh incidents of violence. Despite judicial action, the continued rise in reported cases suggests systemic weaknesses in preventive measures and law enforcement capacity.

The persistence of gender-based violence remains a central concern. Vulnerable groups, particularly women, continue to face disproportionate risks, with honour killings and domestic violence contributing significantly to the overall figures. The involvement of close acquaintances and family members in many of these cases points to entrenched social and cultural issues that legal action alone cannot resolve.

The report warned that unless timely and effective preventive measures are implemented, the situation could deteriorate further. This includes the need for community-level interventions, awareness programs, and stronger institutional mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations. The role of young adults in violent crime also calls for targeted strategies addressing social pressures, unemployment, and radicalisation risks.

The rise in violence during the first half of 2026 adds to Pakistan’s broader security challenges. July 2026 was already recorded as the deadliest month of the year, with 606 people killed in terror-related incidents, further compounding the country’s fragile security environment. The convergence of criminal violence and terrorism underscores the scale of the crisis facing Pakistan.

The figures from Samaa TV’s report highlight that Pakistan’s violence problem is not only persistent but also evolving, with gender-based crimes and youth involvement becoming increasingly prominent. 

Without comprehensive reforms and preventive strategies, the trajectory of violence is likely to worsen in the months ahead.

ANI


Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Balochistan Liberation Front Claims 117 Pak Soldiers Killed In July Operations Across Balochistan


The Balochistan Liberation Front has claimed responsibility for a series of large-scale operations conducted across Balochistan during July, alleging that 97 Pakistani military personnel were killed and 15 others seriously injured.

The group also stated that five individuals it described as informants were killed, bringing the total number of alleged enemy losses to 117. According to its monthly operational report, the BLF carried out 48 attacks across 23 different locations, including Mastung, Khuzdar, Basima, Mand, Tump, Kahan, Chagai, Kharan, Kalat, Gomazi, Jhao, Quetta, Zamuran, Surab, Mashkel, Buleda, Karachi, Pasni, Rakhni, Naal, Khudan, Balnegwar, and Mashkay.

The BLF spokesperson Major Gwahram Baloch said the operations were directed against Pakistani military and state forces, as well as infrastructure, communication networks, and surveillance systems. 

He emphasised that the objective was to weaken what the group described as Pakistan’s colonial structure in Balochistan, halt the exploitation of the region’s resources, and reduce the state’s military influence.

The group highlighted the July 22 attack on a large Pakistani military convoy at Macro Stop in the Khadkocha area of Mastung as the most significant operation of the month, claiming that 17 personnel were killed and 10 injured, with the convoy sustaining heavy damage.

The BLF further claimed that its fighters established blockades and assumed control of nine locations along major highways during July, aiming to disrupt military supply routes and maintain operational superiority.

It stated that seven Pakistani military convoys were ambushed, resulting in casualties and material losses. The group also reported coordinated attacks on six major military camps and seven checkpoints, asserting that these operations inflicted further damage on Pakistani forces.

On the technological front, the BLF claimed to have destroyed two drones used for aerial reconnaissance and surveillance, along with three ground surveillance cameras. It also alleged that 15 Pakistani military vehicles were destroyed in attacks and explosions, while five modern weapons were seized from personnel.

The statement detailed the use of varied guerrilla tactics, including 16 heavy-weapon attacks, eight ambushes, five intelligence-based covert operations, four sniper attacks, two grenade launcher attacks, two improvised explosive device attacks, and one hand-grenade attack.

Major Gwahram Baloch concluded by stating that the BLF would continue its operations with regularity, innovation, diversity, and greater intensity until what he described as the complete freedom and sovereignty of Balochistan.

The group’s monthly report reflects an escalation in both the scale and intensity of its claimed operations, underscoring its intent to sustain pressure on Pakistani military forces and infrastructure across the province.

ANI


Monday, August 3, 2026

Pakistan Records Over 3,000 Terror Incidents In 2026: Pakistani Army Blames Afghan Taliban


Pakistan’s military has revealed that more than 3,000 terrorism-related incidents occurred across the country in 2026, resulting in the deaths of 800 people, including security personnel.

The Inter-Services Public Relations Director-General, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, disclosed the figures during a press conference in Islamabad on Friday.

He stated that 3,145 incidents of terrorism were recorded this year. Of these, 1,971 took place in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 1,148 in Balochistan, and 26 in other regions. He emphasised that the scale of violence was unprecedented, with an average of 10 terrorists killed daily, the highest ratio ever recorded.

Chaudhry confirmed that 819 Pakistanis were killed in these attacks. Among them were 303 army personnel and 194 law enforcers from the police and civil armed forces. He added that 2,084 terrorists were eliminated during the same period, reflecting the intensity of counter-terrorism operations.

He highlighted that 40,348 intelligence-based operations were conducted across the country, with 31,000 of them concentrated in Balochistan. He noted that 28 suicide bombings occurred this year, most of them carried out by Afghan nationals and individuals linked to Afghan security forces.

Addressing perceptions about Balochistan, Chaudhry argued that deliberate attempts were being made to portray the province as deteriorating. He said the fundamental issue was elitism and the tribal Sardari system, which had maintained the status quo since 1947. He explained that under this system, a poor man’s child could not access education or progress, and elites and sardars continued to dominate.

On the question of Pakistan being a ‘hard state’, Chaudhry clarified that the concept did not mean military rule or armed forces dominance. He said a hard state was one where the constitution and law applied equally to everyone, which unfortunately was not the case in Pakistan.

He asserted that those in Balochistan who resisted change were the prime movers of terrorism. He accused them of committing acts of violence and spreading narratives of instability to protect their interests. He insisted that the military would not appease such elements but would instead engage with the actual stakeholders, the people of Balochistan.

Commenting on Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi’s remarks about new administrative units, Chaudhry said the army had long advocated for good governance as essential for Pakistan’s security and stability. He stressed that governance reforms were critical to addressing underlying issues.

Turning to Afghanistan, Chaudhry launched a scathing attack on the Taliban regime in Kabul. He alleged that terrorism was the business of the Afghan government, sustaining its economy, state, and even diplomacy. He claimed that Afghan diplomacy itself revolved around terrorism.

He provocatively remarked that the only thing common between India and Afghanistan was terrorism, though he did not provide evidence to support this allegation.

The figures presented underscore the scale of Pakistan’s security challenges in 2026, with thousands of operations, hundreds of casualties, and persistent cross-border concerns. The military’s narrative reflects both its frustration with Afghanistan and its determination to confront domestic insurgency while pushing for governance reforms.

PTI


Saturday, August 1, 2026

Global Dealmaker, Ruin Within: Pakistan’s Jugular Vein (PoK) Rebellion, Pakistan’s Brutal Split


Pakistan under Field Marshal Asim Munir embodies a paradox that is both striking and dangerous. Abroad, it presents itself as a broker of global instability, mediating conflicts and offering corridors of connectivity. At home, however, it remains coercive, repressive, and deeply fragile, according to an analysis by The Print.

This duality has defined the state for decades, with the military’s ideology preferring perpetual risk over compromise. The consequences are stark. In 2025, Pakistan recorded 3,417 violence-linked fatalities, a 34 per cent increase from the previous year, marking its worst security record in a decade.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan accounted for more than 96 per cent of these deaths. Economically, the country grew by 3.7 per cent in FY2025-26, but remains trapped inside a $7-billion IMF program, with public debt hovering at 68.5 per cent of GDP. Diplomatic agility thus coexists uneasily with structural fragility.

The current crackdown in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir illustrates this contradiction most brutally. The Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee began in 2023 with demands for cheaper flour, electricity priced against locally generated hydropower, and an end to elite privileges.

Its agenda has since expanded to demand abolition or restructuring of the 12 assembly seats reserved for refugees living elsewhere in Pakistan. These seats, 12 of 45 directly elected and 12 of the 53-member House, are seen by protesters as a mechanism for Islamabad to engineer governments in Muzaffarabad. 

Islamabad, unwilling to relinquish this control, has branded the protesters “state-enemies.” Casualty figures remain contested due to communications blackouts. Reuters conservatively estimated around 30 deaths since June, while JAAC alleges dozens more dead and hundreds wounded.

The political gravity of this revolt is undeniable. Baloch and Pashtun dissent has long been dismissed by the Punjabi establishment as peripheral. But Kashmir is different. Pakistan has spent decades portraying it as its shah rag, or jugular vein. When the supposed vein itself rejects the centre’s control, the metaphor collapses into absurdity.

India has sharpened its response, particularly after Defence Minister Khwaja Asif accused Indian agencies of backing JAAC. New Delhi’s legal position remains rooted in the unanimous 1994 Parliament resolution demanding Pakistan vacate the occupied territories.

Gilgit-Baltistan, however, was largely absent from Indian discourse until Rajnath Singh’s 2022 declaration that India’s journey to resolve Kashmir would only be complete after “reaching Gilgit and Baltistan.” Even now, many Indians conflate Gilgit-Baltistan with so-called Azad Kashmir, overlooking their distinct institutions, populations, and grievances.

This distinction is critical because it is where China enters the picture. Gilgit-Baltistan forms the northern throat of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor. The Karakoram Highway enters Pakistan from Xinjiang through Khunjerab, traverses Punjab and Sindh, and ends at Gwadar in Balochistan. 

China has already seen its interests attacked from Gwadar to Dasu, where five engineers were killed in 2024. Instability now shadows the northern corridor as well. A 68-day traders’ protest halted Khunjerab traffic in 2025, and in 2026 electoral and dam-compensation protests blocked the highway again.

Financially, Beijing’s investments are complex. The CPEC portfolio is valued above $60 billion, mixing commitments, loans, and private power projects. Yet it is far from complete. One assessment counted only 38 of nearly 90 proposed projects finished, with 23 under construction and roughly a third untouched. Analysts such as Andrew Small have described China as Pakistan’s greatest economic hope and trusted military partner.

This logic explains why CPEC might still prevail. In 2025, the two sides launched CPEC 2.0, promising five corridors—growth, livelihood, innovation, green development, and regional connectivity—alongside realignment of the Karakoram Highway, new industrial zones, and the delayed ML-1 railway.

Despite chronic instability, China is unlikely to abandon this route or its access to the Arabian Sea. Persistent violence may instead push Beijing towards a more visible security posture: deeper intelligence coordination, hardened enclaves, private protection, and perhaps eventually an official outpost. Such a development would concern both India and the United States.

Yet fears of Pakistan’s “Balkanisation” remain improbable. China, Turkey, the US, Gulf financiers, and Pakistan’s army all have strong incentives to prevent state fracture, even if domestic reforms and strategic course corrections are indefinitely postponed.

For India, the reality is clear. Pakistan will remain flailing, punching above its weight internationally while cracking down internally. It will regenerate cross-border infiltration into India as a survival tactic. Pakistan is neither a miraculous winner of global instability nor an imminent ruin.

It is a state monetising disorder while being consumed by disorder; mediating wars overseas while militarising politics at home; offering corridors to others while closing roads to its own citizens. In today’s upended order, muddles can become leverage and puddles may reflect grand ambition.

But no performance can indefinitely reconcile mediation abroad with repression within. Eventually, the mountains return the echo.

Agencies


Amnesty International Slams Pakistan Over Enforced Disappearance of Baloch Activist Jiand Baloch


Amnesty International has strongly condemned Pakistan over the enforced disappearance of Baloch activist Jiand Baloch, highlighting the long-standing discrimination and marginalisation faced by the Baloch community.

The organisation issued a statement on its official website detailing the circumstances of Jiand’s disappearance and the broader pattern of repression in Balochistan.

Jiand Baloch, aged 29, is the chairperson of the Baloch Students Organization, a group that campaigns for student rights in Balochistan and has been vocal on the issue of enforced disappearances. He has worked closely with families of the disappeared, advocating for their return. He is also a father of two young children, a two-year-old daughter and a three-year-old son.

According to Amnesty International, Jiand was forcibly taken from his home in Quetta around 1 AM on 24 July 2026. His family reported that ten men identifying themselves as law enforcement officers, accompanied by four men in plain clothes, entered the house at midnight. Jiand was not present at the time, but his parents, wife and children were inside.

The men searched the house, causing damage, and physically assaulted Jiand’s father. They also threatened to take his wife and mother. When Jiand arrived at the gate of the house, he was immediately seized without explanation and taken away. No information was provided about his whereabouts, and the police refused to register a First Information Report.

Amnesty noted that Jiand has been targeted previously for his activism. His work with the BSO and his campaigns against enforced disappearances have made him a prominent voice in Balochistan. The organisation stressed that his abduction is part of a wider crackdown on Baloch activists that has intensified since 2025, with arbitrary detentions and disappearances spreading across the province and beyond.

The statement underlined that the Baloch people have historically faced systemic discrimination and marginalisation in Pakistan. Amnesty International emphasised that the disappearance of Jiand Baloch is not an isolated incident but reflects a disturbing pattern of state repression.

The organisation called for his immediate release and urged Pakistan to end its practice of enforced disappearances, which violate fundamental human rights and international law.

This case has drawn international attention, with rights groups warning that the continued targeting of activists in Balochistan risks further destabilising the province. Amnesty International’s intervention underscores the urgency of addressing the plight of the Baloch people and ensuring accountability for those responsible for such abuses.

ANI


Friday, July 31, 2026

United Baloch Army And Baloch Republican Guards Claim Explosive Attacks And Clashes In Kachhi


Two Baloch armed organisations, the United Baloch Army (UBA) and the Baloch Republican Guards (BRG), have claimed responsibility for separate attacks in Balochistan’s Kachhi district.

The incidents occurred on Wednesday and were accompanied by intermittent clashes between Pakistani security forces and armed fighters in the region, according to The Balochistan Post.

Reports indicated that a vehicle belonging to Pakistani security forces was struck by an explosion in the Sanni area of Kachhi. Armed exchanges were also reported from nearby locations, suggesting a wider pattern of confrontation.

UBA spokesperson Mazar Baloch stated that the group had targeted a vehicle from a seven‑vehicle convoy of Pakistani forces using a remote‑controlled explosive device in the Chighardi area between Dhadar and Sanni. He claimed that eight personnel were killed instantly and two others sustained serious injuries.

The spokesperson added that UBA fighters engaged security personnel escorting the convoy in a brief exchange of fire before withdrawing. He declared that the organisation claimed responsibility for the attack and emphasised that such operations would continue until the establishment of an “independent Balochistan”.

Meanwhile, the BRG announced that its fighters had been carrying out attacks on two separate convoys of Pakistani forces since 7:00 am on Wednesday. The group claimed that clashes were still underway at the time of its statement and promised to release a detailed account later.

In another statement, BRG spokesperson Dostain Baloch said the group had targeted a government irrigation office in the Dhadar area of Kachhi by planting explosive devices at the site. He alleged that government personnel present at the office suffered casualties and material losses, while the building itself was extensively damaged.

The BRG claimed responsibility for the attack and asserted that such operations would continue until the “complete independence of Balochistan”. The group’s statement echoed the broader narrative of Baloch armed organisations, which have repeatedly declared their intent to escalate operations against Pakistani forces and state institutions.

The attacks in Kachhi highlight the continuing volatility in Balochistan, where multiple armed groups remain active. The use of remote‑controlled explosives, direct assaults on convoys, and targeting of government infrastructure reflects a sustained insurgency campaign.

Pakistani security forces have faced repeated challenges in containing these operations, while the armed groups continue to frame their actions as part of a wider struggle for independence.

ANI


Thursday, July 30, 2026

Balochistan Unrest: Body Bags And Lies


Last week was one of the bloodiest Balochistan witnessed in recent times. In just four days, the Pakistan army and other security forces operating under its command suffered at least 42 fatalities in a series of attacks by Baloch Sarmachars (Guerrillas) fighting for Independence that commenced on July 5.

While Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif dashed to Balochistan’s capital Quetta to assure families of the deceased that those responsible for these killings would be brought to justice, the Pakistan army quickly announced the commencement of a new air-and-ground offensive- Operation Shaban against Baloch freedom fighters.

According to Dawn, Pakistani security forces have since July 5, killed a total of 102 Baloch fighters with a whopping 64 killings being attributed to Operation Shaban alone, which is indeed an impressive achievement that supports Sharif’s assurance. This spectacular success also speaks volumes about the Pakistan army’s prowess. However, these statistics also spawn some very disconcerting thoughts.

Disturbing Questions

After its attacks that commenced on July 5, Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) fighters would have definitely taken basic preventive actions in anticipation of the inevitable retaliatory strikes by swiftly shifting bases, dispersing themselves and taking extra care to conceal their locations from ground and aerial observation.

As such, if the Pakistan army could still accurately identify the latest locations where Baloch fighters had taken refuge and eliminate 64 of them in just a matter of days as it claims, then it’s evident that they possess extraordinary surveillance capabilities. And if this is true, then why didn’t the Pakistan army launch Operation Shaban earlier and save many lives? Instead of being proactive, why does the Pakistan army wait for some major incident and only take concerted military action thereafter?

In April 2025, Field Marshal Asim Munir had boasted that “we will soon beat hell out of them (Baloch sarmachars).” As more than a year has since elapsed and armed Baloch groups continue to challenge government writ with impunity by frequently blocking highways, taking temporary control of places and attacking security forces at will, the next question that the people are now asking is- how long will the Field Marshal’s “soon” take?

The elimination of more than a hundred Baloch fighters by the Pakistan army almost immediately after having suffered a major military setback, though commendable, reminds one of a curiously recurring pattern. A major attack on security forces followed by spectacularly successful retaliation in which the casualties inflicted on the attackers is inexplicably always in excess of one-and-a-half times to even more than twice of what the security forces have suffered. Claim of having broken the back of armed Baloch groups and then silence till the next attack.

While this may be a sheer coincidence, casualty figures being contested by armed Baloch groups creates an element of doubt. It may be argued that these groups try and play down the number of their own fatalities to show that they are winning, and on the face of it, this explanation makes sense. However, a deeper analysis of the armed Baloch groups’ mindset throws up a very strong counter- argument.

The Dead Don’t Speak

The Pakistan army has a dubious record of staging extra-judicial killings and passing-off those murdered as terrorists just to cover up its military reverses, and this isn’t an unsubstantiated allegation.

Director General (DG) of Pakistan army’s media wing Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) had openly admitted this when asked about enforced disappearances in Balochistan during a media interaction in April in 2019. Readers would recall that he had then unashamedly said, “We don’t wish that anyone should be missing. But when it is war, you have to do a lot of (unpleasant) things- as they say, all is fair in love and war; war is very ruthless.” Any further proof required?

Killing to Save Face

Due to abject apathy of the international community, this vile practice continues unabated and one recent example is aftermath of the 2022 abduction and killing of serving Pakistan army officer Lt Col Laeeq Mirza Baig by BLA fighters in the Ziarat area Balochistan. Soon after Lt Col Baig was killed, ISPR announced that nine terrorists involved in his murder had been eliminated.

However, BLA outrightly rubbished ISPR’s claim by saying that all its fighters involved were safe. Its statement read, “Baloch Liberation Army takes utmost pride in its struggle and the martyrdom of our comrades during this struggle. BLA announces all martyrdoms of its members with great glory and honour. If any of our freedom fighters had lost their lives in this successful operation, we would have taken pride in making it public and paying rich tributes to them.”

This argument definitely makes sense, because besides official recognition and glorification of supreme sacrifice made by its fighters, BLA doesn’t have other incentive to motivate its rank and file. Since concealing names of its fighters killed in action would be tantamount to ignoring their “martyrdom” and adversely impact morale of its cadres, doing so is something any armed group can ill-afford.

That innocents were killed and passed off as BLA fighters by the Pakistan army in this case is also evident from the findings of the Human Rights Council of Balochistan (HRCB). Its post on social media states “5 bodies out of 9 have been identified & all 5 persons are registered enforced disappeared persons who had remained in the custody of forces for months & years.”

Amongst these so-called ‘BLA fighters’ there was an engineer who had been abducted in broad daylight from his office at Airport Road, Quetta in 2021 and a practicing physiotherapist abducted by the Pakistan army in 2022. The facts are in public domain but the Pakistan army remains beyond the reach of law.

Following the March 2025 Jaffar Express hijacking, ISPR issued a statement declaring that 33 BLA fighters had been killed in this incident. Promptly rebutting this claim, BLA announced that it had lost only 13 fighters (including 5 Fidayeen from the Majeed Brigade). As it disclosed the identity of its deceased fighters and also released their photographs, it’s obvious that BLA proudly announced the martyrdom of their dead, and it would be absurd to believe that this group denied this honour to the remaining 20 deceased fighters by concealing their identities.

What makes the ISPR’s claim of 33 BLA casualties all the more suspicious is the fact that a week after the Jaffar Express hijacking incident, the Pakistan army dumped 23 dead bodies of “unidentified” militants in Civil Hospital Quetta, but refused to allow family members of those disappeared by security forces to identify them. And with the police secretly burying 13 of these unidentified bodies in Quetta’s Kasi graveyard at night, it’s absolutely clear that there’s much more than what meets the eye.

As dead men don’t talk and ISPR is adept in spinning yarns, it’s impossible to say for sure as to how many of the more-than-one-hundred killed by the Pakistani security forces in Balochistan are actually BLA fighters. With no one to hold their hands, the Baloch people are a forsaken lot, and to add to their woes, the Pakistan army is having a field day due to complete lack of accountability.

The Field Marshal’s complete reliance on employing force to intimidate the Baloch people into submission has only made them more defiant and his belief that he can “beat hell out of them” has created a worrisome situation. While Field Marshal Munir may blame India for instigating Baloch freedom fighters, the harsh reality is that by inflicting unbearable physical, mental and psychological trauma on the Baloch people, the Pakistan army itself is strengthening their resolve to fight for freedom.

Tailpiece: After the March 2025 Jaffar Express hijacking incident, army chief Munir demanded that Pakistan be turned into a “hard state,” and in less than three months, Pakistan’s plaint government complied by passing the contentious Counter-Terrorism (Balochistan Amendment) Act 2025 giving sweeping powers to security forces operating in the province. The bill criminalising enforced disappearances is however yet to see the light of day. Passed by Pakistan's National Assembly in 2021, it has not yet come into force, and God-fearing Field Marshal Munir has not uttered a word on the same.

But then, why should he? After all, how can Pakistan be a “hard state” if enforced disappearances are criminalised?

Nilesh Kunwar is a retired Indian Army Officer who has served in Jammu & Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland and Manipur. He is a keen ‘Kashmir-Watcher,’ and after retirement is pursuing his favourite hobby of writing for newspapers, journals and think-tanks. Views expressed above are the author's own


Saturday, July 25, 2026

Siliguri Corridor Transforms Into Elephant’s Trunk As Pakistan Faces Cracks From PoK To Balochistan


The Siliguri Corridor has long been described as India’s “Chicken’s Neck,” a vulnerable strip of land only 22 kilometres wide at its narrowest point, FirstPost reported.

It separates Nepal from Bangladesh, with Bhutan and China’s Chumbi Valley looming to the north.

For decades, this fragile passage has been the sole lifeline connecting India’s Northeast to the mainland, supporting eight states. That vulnerability defined its reputation since 1947.

Today, however, the Indian Army is reshaping the narrative, calling it the “Elephant’s Trunk,” a term that reflects growing strength and resilience.

Three new garrisons have transformed the corridor’s defensive posture. Lachit Borphukan Military Station in Assam now manages logistics for the eastern theatre. Kishanganj in Bihar oversees western approach roads.

Chopra in West Bengal sits directly against the border. These additions, combined with existing BSF posts, ensure multiple layers of surveillance and defence rather than a single fragile watch line. The corridor is no longer a thin bottleneck but a fortified artery.

Further north, the Trishakti Corps has received advanced weaponry and air defence systems. S-400 batteries, BrahMos regiments, and a Rafale squadron operating from Hasimara Air Force Station now dominate the skies and ground around the Chumbi Valley.

This is the same area that triggered the Doklam stand-off in 2017. The deployment of missiles, radar cover, and fighter aircraft makes any attempt to threaten the corridor far more complex than simply blocking a road or railway.

India has also built redundancy into its connectivity. The Kaladan route through Myanmar, supported by new rail and highway links, provides an alternative entry point into the Northeast. This fallback option reduces the strategic vulnerability of the corridor and changes the calculus for adversaries considering pressure tactics. The Northeast is no longer dependent on a single fragile passage.

Concerns remain, however. Vice Admiral Shekhar Sinha (Retd) recently warned that a Chinese firm is reviving an old runway at Lalmonirhat, just 135 kilometres from the corridor. Reports also suggest Pakistan is assisting in routing Chinese J-10 fighters to Bangladesh’s air force.

This combination of northern and southern pressure highlights the corridor’s continued strategic importance. India’s military build-up is designed to counter precisely such two-front scenarios.

Theatre command reform is expected to unify the corridor’s defence under a single northern command once Cabinet approval is secured. At present, the north and south sides of the corridor answer to different chains of command, leaving a gap in coordination. A unified command structure will close that gap and ensure seamless response to threats.

While India strengthens its eastern frontier, Pakistan faces mounting internal crises. At the UN Security Council, India reiterated its position that Kashmir is not open for discussion and accused Pakistan of running terrorism as state policy.

On the Indus Waters Treaty, Delhi maintained its stance that no trust can be rebuilt while terrorism remains a tool of leverage. These statements were aimed at the record, for arbitration and future disputes, rather than at persuading Islamabad directly.

Pakistan’s gambit to use the treaty as leverage has failed. Army Chief Asim Munir hoped his role in mediating the Iran-US ceasefire would earn American pressure on Delhi to restore the treaty. Neither Washington nor Brussels obliged, both deepening ties with India instead. The rhetoric from Rawalpindi now reflects frustration rather than strategy.

In Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, Nawaz Sharif has asked his brother, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, to install him as the territory’s leader. Yet Pakistan’s own constitutional rules require domicile in PoK, which Sharif lacks.

This contradiction comes amid weeks of unrest, subsidy cuts, and curfews. The banned Joint Awami Action Committee has led protests, exposing the fragility of Islamabad’s control. Analysts note that India may have missed its best chance to alter the territorial status quo before Pakistan’s nuclearization in the late 1980s, when contingency plans reportedly existed under General Sundarji’s Brasstacks exercise.

Balochistan presents an even deeper wound. The province has seen its bloodiest stretch in years, with coordinated attacks by the BLA and TTP forcing the army to accept a judicial commission, a rare concession.

Activist Mir Yar Baloch’s viral independence declaration has drawn global attention to the insurgency. Analysts argue that Israel, the US, and Afghanistan’s Taliban now have independent incentives to weaken Islamabad through Balochistan, turning the province into a multi-actor conflict theatre. Pakistan’s army is visibly struggling to contain the violence.

Taken together, Pakistan’s failed water-treaty gambit, unrest in PoK, and insurgency in Balochistan reveal a state lecturing the world on sovereignty while losing control over its own territories. India’s fortification of the Siliguri Corridor and its diplomatic firmness contrast sharply with Pakistan’s internal fractures, underscoring a shifting balance in South Asia’s strategic landscape.

Agencies


Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Pakistan Army: Disowning The Dead, Abandoning The Living


by Nilesh Kunwar

"Look at my identity card; Pakistan (army) has issued this to me...I request, for God's sake, my father is disabled, and I am the eldest at home. Do not commit this injustice by saying that we're not your personnel" - Plea made by soldier captured by Baloch Liberation Army after the Pakistan army disowned him, February 2026.

Dead Disowned

It was during this very same month in 1999, that the Pakistan army’s top brass exposed barefaced apathy towards its rank and file killed in combat during the Kargil war by refusing to accept their dead bodies. Denied military honours and a final resting place in their own country, these dead army men were nevertheless lucky to receive military funerals in accordance with Islamic burial rites thanks to the Indian army.

27 years have since elapsed and though the Pakistan army has officially accepted its role in the Kargil war, it has made no efforts whatsoever to repatriate mortal remains of these soldiers, indicating the continuing disconnect between Generals in Rawalpindi and soldiers on the battlefield. And recent events in Balochistan further highlight the existence that its base mindset has turned far more perverse.

Abandoning The Living

On January 31, the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) took seven Pakistan army soldiers in custody during Operation Herof-2 and videos in which these men in uniform were seen displaying their military issue identity cards and frantically appealing to the authorities for negotiating their release. BLA issued a seven- day ultimatum for negotiations for prisoner exchange and extended the same by another seven more days.

But the Pakistan army responded by saying that none of its soldiers were either missing or in custody of Baloch fighters. This categorical denial in itself should have put all speculation to rest, because if the seven men in uniform seen in the video weren’t Pakistan army soldiers then the question of any negotiations obviously didn’t arise. So, why did BLA demand negotiations for prisoner swap if it didn’t have Pakistan army men in its custody?

It may be contended that this could be a propaganda gimmick, which is definitely possible. However, those closely following developments in Balochistan are not inclined to believe this for a number of reasons. One, BLA values its spoken reputation and as such wouldn’t indulge in a puerile act of not only passing off imposters as Pakistan army personnel but even demanding a prisoner swap.

Next, the impassioned pleas of the seven uniformed men in the video giving out their personal particulars including home addresses and flashing their service identity cards leaves little room for doubting their military credentials. Furthermore, with CNN-New 18 quoting an unofficial response of the Pakistan army on this incident that stated, “The execution of Pakistan army soldiers by the BLA is not ‘war,’ it is cold-blooded murder,” is there still any room of doubt left?

Police Betrayed

On the night of July 6, BLA fighters attacked a police outpost in the Mangi dam area of Ziarat district. According to the Pakistan army’s media wing Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), the police men put up a valiant fight killing 15 attackers. However, the post was overwhelmed and while nine policemen died during the attack, 18 others were abducted by BLA before military reinforcements could arrive, and later killed.

Though seemingly comprehensive, ISPR’s version of this unfortunate incident nevertheless raises several questions.

Firstly, ISPR has claimed that the police men had killed 15 BLA fighters, which going by statistical attrition data indicates that the police men gave a tough and coordinated fight. Thus, the BLA still being able to overwhelm the post and abduct 18 policemen is something that doesn't sound very convincing as it suggests that somewhere during this fire-fight the police men just gave up and allowed themselves to be captured by BLA.

Secondly, as the area which this incident took place is remote, the abducted police men would have been moved on foot to some hideout during the night which would have been time consuming, and so they couldn’t have gone very far. As the Pakistan army has helicopters and drones with night vision capabilities, why these assets weren’t deployed to track down the BLA fighters defies comprehension.

Thirdly, while ISPR claims that the dead bodies of policemen were retrieved by security forces, Pakistani media has reported that due to “delays in official recovery operations,” the same was done by families of the deceased. This has also been confirmed by many on social media and the question that arises is-- why did the Pakistan army which is overseeing operations in Balochistan display such apathy in a life-and-death situation?

Lastly, the death of policemen in attacks by armed groups in Balochistan is a harsh reality that everyone accepts, and that’s why, though tragic, the Mangi dam police outpost incident was no different from numerous similar attacks on policemen in the past. So, the prolonged sit-in by family members of the deceased policeman at Quetta's Koila Phatak and their refusal to bury the dead until authorities addressed the security failures indicates that something extraordinary had occurred.

Disturbing Revelations

Despite the Pakistan army’s complete clampdown on media reporting from Balochistan and frequent internet shutdowns, some disturbing facts related to the Mangi dam police out post attack have emerged. Though difficult to authenticate, these assertions help in filling gaps in ISPR’s version of this incident due to which they gain credibility

The first doubt is that when the policemen knew very well that BLA would eventually kill them, why did they surrender or allow the attackers to take them into custody, especially when they were giving the attackers a tough fight and inflicting heavy casualties on them?

It is now being revealed that police men at the Mangi dam outpost had resisted the attackers for 4-5 hours, but had no choice but to surrender after running out of ammunition. Insiders say that fearing weapons and ammunition reaching into the hands of Baloch fighters, maintaining minimal ammunition stocks and avoiding issue of heavy automatic weapons to the police is a common practice followed by the Pakistan army.

Just a week before this attack, 14 police men at an outpost in Balochistan’s port city Gwadar had been dismissed from service as armed men had “looted official weapons, ammunition and other government equipment, and fled without facing any resistance.” So, it’s quite likely that the Pakistan army may have scaled down weapons and ammunition holdings in police outposts as a precautionary measure to prevent recurrence.

Locals are also claiming that the police outpost made several frantic radio calls reporting that ammunition was running low and had even requested for immediate reinforcements. Unfortunately no assistance ever came, and this explains why the police men lost a fight they were winning that night due to non-availability of ammunition.

Then there's the question of why families of the deceased police men organised a sit-in and refused to bury the dead for nearly ten days demanding inquiry into “security failures” that led to the killings until the government agreed to form a judicial commission to probe this incident.”

Three issues that need to be investigated thoroughly are:

• One, what compelled the policemen at Mangi dam outpost to surrender to BLA fighters?
• Two, why did the Pakistan army fail to recover the dead bodies of the deceased police men forcing their family members to do so after waiting for more than 24 hours?
• Three, when Hong Kong based NgTeng Fong –Sino Group Belt and Road Research Institute had in its June 2026 report clearly mentioned that “we see a severe increase in attacks in July in the Balochistan region,” why weren’t security arrangements in the Mangi dam enhanced, especially since it was an isolated post located in a remote area?

The Balochistan Levies Question

It’s no secret that Pakistan’s police force in the restive areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan are both ill-equipped and ill-trained to fight armed groups. It’s also no secret that instead of overcoming these deficiencies, police men are being employed for tasks far beyond their capabilities.

While police are being made the whipping boy in Balochistan, no one is questioning the government’s October 2025 decision to merge the Balochistan Levies with the Balochistan police. For those who may not be aware, Balochistan Levies comprises locals and policed 90 percent of Balochistan and is rated higher for efficiency and reliability as compared to the police force that predominantly consists of non-locals.

The military doesn’t seem to like the Balochistan Levies. Why else was it disbanded both by President Pervez Musharraf and Field Marshal Asim Munir? While the Balochistan Assembly revived it in 2010, the ‘failed’ field marshal merged it with Balochistan Police in October last year.

Rawalpindi's dislike for Balochistan Levies is most probably due to the apprehension that being sons of the soil its rank and file cannot be fully relied upon when it comes to carrying out illegal tasks like enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings-the basic tools of Pakistan army’s operations in Balochistan.

Sham Inquiry?

Many feel that it would be naïve to expect that the judicial commission would specifically identify security lapses because doing so will expose the Pakistan army’s culpability as regards intelligence failure and not taking timely action to reinforce or assist the beleaguered outpost that led to the death of 27 police men. The army’s failure to recover dead bodies of the slain policemen too is unlikely to find mention in the inquiry commission report for obvious reasons.

Similarly, while yielding to public pressure after the Mangi dam outpost attack, the government has agreed to examine the public demand for restoration of Balochistan Levies, and this is a promising development. However, the associated problem is that should this happen, it would be yet another embarrassment for the Field Marshal Munir, which he cannot afford at this stage.

And this brings us to the million dollar question- who will bell the cat?

Nilesh Kunwar is a retired Indian Army Officer who has served in Jammu & Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland and Manipur. He is a keen ‘Kashmir-Watcher,’ and after retirement is pursuing his favourite hobby of writing for newspapers, journals and think-tanks. Views expressed above are the author's own