Showing posts with label ICJ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ICJ. Show all posts

Friday, July 24, 2026

Marco Rubio Slams International Criminal Court (ICC) As 'Lunatics And Crazies' And 'Stupid Organisation' Threatening US Sovereignty


US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday launched a scathing attack on the International Criminal Court, branding it a “stupid organisation” run by “lunatics and crazies.”

Speaking in Manila during the ASEAN meetings, Rubio reiterated Washington’s refusal to accept the court’s jurisdiction over American citizens and officials. He stressed that the United States had never signed the Rome Statute and therefore was not bound by the ICC’s authority.

Rubio argued that the ICC was overstepping its mandate by attempting to prosecute individuals from non-member states. He warned that the court had entertained discussions about charging US military personnel and even American presidents, which he dismissed as unacceptable.

He insisted that such actions would never be tolerated and that Washington had repeatedly warned the ICC against pursuing this path.

He declared that if other nations wished to participate in what he described as a “stupid organisation,” they were free to do so, but the United States would not allow its jurisdiction to be applied to Americans. Rubio emphasised that the US position was firm both now and in the future, and that consequences would follow if the ICC ignored these warnings.

His remarks came shortly after the US State Department announced a sweeping campaign to dismantle what it described as the ICC’s threat to American sovereignty. In a media note issued on 13 July, the department revealed that Rubio had initiated a “whole-of-government response” designed to systematically disable the ICC’s ability to operate against US servicemen or officials.

The statement characterised the ICC as an “intolerable threat” to sovereignty, accusing it of claiming authority to prosecute and imprison Americans despite the United States never joining the Rome Statute.

It highlighted that the court had previously opened investigations into US servicemen and intelligence officers, portraying the ICC as an unaccountable global arbiter and a supranational enforcement arm of a globalist bureaucracy.

The State Department outlined a range of measures under consideration. These included urging allies and partners to reject the ICC’s claimed authority over Americans, scrutinising countries that continue to support the court while benefiting from US assistance, and encouraging coordination among other non-Rome Statute states. It also mentioned the possibility of imposing visa restrictions, travel bans, and sanctions on ICC personnel and affiliated organisations.

Rubio’s comments reflect a continuation of longstanding US opposition to the ICC, rooted in concerns that the court undermines national sovereignty and could be used politically against American interests. His remarks in Manila underscore Washington’s determination to resist any attempt by the ICC to extend its jurisdiction to US citizens and officials.

ANI


Tuesday, November 18, 2025

India Reacts Cautiously To Sheikh Hasina Death Verdict Amid Diplomatic Sensitivities


India on Monday responded with cautious neutrality after a special tribunal in Bangladesh sentenced the country’s ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina to death on charges of crimes against humanity.

Hours after the ruling, New Delhi said it had “noted the verdict” and reaffirmed its commitment to “engage constructively with all stakeholders” in the interest of peace, democracy, and stability in Bangladesh.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) underscored India’s longstanding position of prioritising the welfare of the Bangladeshi people over partisan alignments. “As a close neighbour, India remains committed to the best interests of the people of Bangladesh, including in peace, democracy, inclusion, and stability,” the MEA said in its official statement. It avoided direct commentary on the tribunal’s judgement or on Bangladesh’s subsequent demand for Hasina’s extradition.

Sheikh Hasina, currently residing in India after fleeing Dhaka amid widespread protests on August 5 last year, was tried in absentia by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) of Bangladesh.

The tribunal also sentenced her close aide and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death. Both were found guilty of crimes against humanity by the interim government that replaced Hasina’s Awami League administration.

In a forceful response, Hasina denounced the verdict as “politically motivated” and the tribunal as “rigged”. She accused the unelected interim government of pursuing a “murderous agenda” to eliminate her and eradicate the Awami League’s political influence. Reiterating her stance, Hasina asserted that she was unafraid to face accusations in a legitimate international court, urging that any charges be brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague for a fair trial.

Bangladesh’s foreign ministry reacted swiftly, pressing India to act under the terms of the bilateral extradition treaty. Citing the agreement, Dhaka described it as India’s “duty” to hand over Hasina in light of the ICT’s sentencing.

However, New Delhi made no mention of the extradition request, reflecting its delicate diplomatic balance between principle and pragmatism.

The tribunal’s ruling has come at a crucial moment for the crisis-hit nation, with parliamentary elections scheduled for February. The interim government has already barred the Awami League from contesting the polls, a move that has drawn criticism from international observers calling for inclusive democratic participation.

The judgement is expected to escalate political polarisation in Bangladesh while posing fresh challenges for India’s foreign policy. As Dhaka grapples with questions of legitimacy, governance, and human rights, New Delhi must navigate between moral responsibility, regional security considerations, and the need to preserve stability along its shared border.

Based On PTI Report


Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Adani To Initiate International Arbitration Over Bangladesh Power Payment Dispute


Adani Power has formally initiated international arbitration against Bangladesh to resolve a prolonged dispute over outstanding payments for electricity supplied under a 2017 power purchase agreement.

The disagreement pertains to the calculations and billing of certain cost components under the contract between Adani Power and the Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB). This development comes after months of stalled negotiations and partial payments, with the issue now moving towards a formal legal resolution.

The dispute centres on payments owed for power supplied from Adani's 1,600 MW coal-fired Godda plant in India, which provides about 10% of Bangladesh's electricity needs. Bangladesh's interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus since 2024, has challenged the payment obligations, citing concerns over contract terms and accusing Adani of failing to pass on tax benefits received from the Indian government.

Bangladesh's financial challenges, including a strained foreign exchange position and high import costs, have further complicated timely payments, leading to mounting dues.

Adani Power reported that the outstanding dues had decreased substantially — from nearly $2 billion early in 2025 to around $500 million more recently — following partial repayments and resumed supply. Despite these financial tensions, Adani has reiterated its commitment to supplying reliable and competitively priced electricity to Bangladesh. The company maintains that it continues to meet its contractual obligations and works actively to resolve the disagreements through dialogue.

The power purchase agreement embodied a 25-year supply deal signed during the previous government headed by Sheikh Hasina. The current administration is reviewing the contract and other similar power agreements, considering their financial sustainability and transparency.

Due to unresolved differences in cost billing, both parties agreed to trigger the contract’s dispute resolution clause, leading to the arbitration move. Bangladesh’s de facto power minister confirmed ongoing negotiations and acknowledged arbitration as a possible next step.

This arbitration pursuit by Adani reflects broader challenges in cross-border energy trade agreements where financial, political, and contractual complexities intersect. It highlights the fragility of supply agreements amid shifting political landscapes and economic pressures in developing countries. 

Resolution through arbitration is expected to provide a legally binding and impartial framework to address the contested cost elements and safeguard long-term energy cooperation between India and Bangladesh.

The dispute is a significant episode in the larger context of Bangladesh’s energy sector reforms and efforts to stabilise its economy amidst political change, while Adani aims to protect its investments and contractual interests. Both parties remain engaged in dialogues, aiming for a solution that ensures uninterrupted power supply to Bangladesh while addressing the financial and legal contentions fairly.

This case will likely set precedents for future energy trade agreements involving Indian firms and neighbouring countries, emphasising the importance of transparent contract terms and equitable dispute resolution mechanisms in international power supply contracts.​

Agencies


Thursday, July 24, 2025

Brazil Backs ICJ Genocide Case Filed By South Africa Against Israel


Brazil has taken a significant step in international diplomacy by preparing to formally intervene in the genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). This move, announced by Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, places the country among a growing group of states seeking legal scrutiny of Israel’s actions in Gaza under the 1948 Genocide Convention.

Rationale For Intervention

Brazil’s foreign ministry emphasized that “the international community cannot remain inactive in the face of ongoing atrocities.” The statement underscored the nation's belief that continued moral ambiguity or political omission is no longer acceptable, warning that impunity undermines global legality and damages the credibility of the multilateral system.

The intervention comes as Israeli military operations in Gaza have drawn heightened international scrutiny, particularly regarding restrictions on humanitarian aid, which have propelled the territory toward a severe famine.

Brazil’s government voiced “deep indignation at the recurring episodes of violence against the civilian population” not just in the Gaza Strip, but also in the West Bank, condemning what it described as the “shameless use of starvation as a weapon of war.” The ministry cited the plausibility that Palestinians’ rights to protection against genocide are being “irreversibly impaired,” forming the basis for its legal action at the ICJ.

Alignment With International Partners

Brazil’s decision mirrors interventions by countries including Spain, Turkey, and Ireland, all of whom have filed for the ICJ to determine if Israel has violated its obligations under the Genocide Convention. These interventions collectively mark a notable diplomatic push, especially from the Global South and allied states, to hold Israel accountable under international law.

Political Context And Reactions

At the recent BRICS summit, President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva intensified his condemnation of Israel’s campaign in Gaza, labelling it as genocide and calling for urgent international action. He described the conflict as an “indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians and the use of hunger as a weapon of war,” emphasizing that “the world cannot remain indifferent” to such developments. President Lula also argued for a two-state solution as the only lasting resolution to the conflict.

Israel, for its part, has consistently denied accusations of genocide or intentional civilian targeting. The Israeli embassy in Brasilia criticized Brazil’s stance, saying that the harsh rhetoric fails to capture the complex realities on the ground and ignores the role of Hamas. Brazil’s National Israeli association, CONIB, also objected to the government’s move, calling it a misguided break from the countries’ historical partnership, reflecting domestic and diplomatic debate over Brazil’s foreign policy direction.

The ICJ Proceedings And Humanitarian Concerns

The case at the ICJ was initiated by South Africa in late 2023, alleging that Israel’s actions during the Gaza war, including blockades, airstrikes, and what South Africa calls a longstanding policy of occupation, amount to genocide. Although the Court has not yet ruled on the main allegation, it issued provisional measures in January 2024 directing Israel to prevent acts that could contravene the Genocide Convention and to improve humanitarian aid access to Gaza.

Despite these legal directives, international pressure has reportedly yielded limited changes on the ground. Major Western allies, such as the United States, remain steadfast in their support for Israel. On the ground, humanitarian organizations have reported over 1,000 Palestinian deaths at aid distribution sites since May, and the United Nations has labelled some of these sites as “death traps.” The full blockade imposed by Israel in March halted aid for months, with only partial resumption through organisations closely tied to Israel and the US.

Broader Diplomatic And Legal Implications

Brazil’s involvement adds further weight to the case and signals growing momentum for international legal action regarding the conflict. As Brazil formalizes its intervention, the ICJ is expected to set a timetable for new legal briefs and arguments, marking a shift from a bilateral dispute to a broader global test of the Genocide Convention and international accountability mechanisms. The outcome remains unpredictable, but Brazil’s participation demonstrates increasing resolve from the Global South to address violations of humanitarian norms and press for substantive protection of civilian populations affected by conflict in Gaza.

Brazil’s formal support for South Africa’s ICJ genocide case against Israel represents both a moral stance and a strategic diplomatic manoeuvre, with the potential to influence international law and regional politics for years to come.

Based On ANI Report


Saturday, February 8, 2025

U.S. President Donald Trump Freezes Aid To South Africa Over Expropriation Act


On February 7, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to halt U.S. aid to South Africa, citing concerns over the Expropriation Act, which the White House claims discriminates against the country’s white minority. The order references South Africa’s role in bringing accusations of genocide against Israel before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

The White House stated that the United States will stop aid to South Africa as long as it "continues to support bad actors on the world stage and allows violent attacks on innocent disfavored minority farmers". Trump also announced plans to establish a resettlement program for white South African farmers and their families, citing concerns over their safety and economic future.

The executive order states, “The United States will promote the resettlement of Afrikaner refugees escaping government-sponsored race-based discrimination”. U.S. officials are expected to prioritize humanitarian aid, including the admission and resettlement of Afrikaners—primarily white descendants of early Dutch and French settlers—through the United States Refugee Admissions Program.

The Expropriation Act, signed into law last month by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, grants the government the authority to seize land in specific instances, such as when it is underutilized or when redistribution is deemed in the public interest, to correct historical injustices stemming from apartheid-era land dispossession.

Trump's close ally Elon Musk has been vocal about the Expropriation Act, calling it a threat to the country’s white minority. Musk has also clashed with the South African government over policies requiring major companies, such as his Starlink satellite internet service, to allocate 30% equity to historically disadvantaged groups.

In addition to halting aid, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has announced that he will skip upcoming G20 talks in South Africa, accusing the country’s government of pursuing an "anti-American" agenda.

The South African government has dismissed Trump’s claims as misinformation, arguing that the new land law does not authorize arbitrary confiscation but rather aims to correct deeply rooted economic disparities. The law remains a highly debated issue in South Africa, where most farmland is still owned by white citizens despite the end of apartheid three decades ago. Ramaphosa has reached out to Musk to address the tensions stemming from Trump’s remarks about the new land law. During their conversation, Ramaphosa reaffirmed South Africa’s commitment to constitutional values, including the rule of law, justice, fairness, and equality.

ANI


Monday, January 6, 2025

International Crimes Tribunal Issues Arrest Warrant For Sheikh Hasina


The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) of Bangladesh has issued an arrest warrant for former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and 11 others, including high-ranking officials, due to allegations of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. This warrant mandates that the authorities arrest and present these individuals before the tribunal by February 12, 2025.

This is the second arrest warrant issued against Hasina, who has been living in India since August 5, 2024, after her government was overthrown amid significant protests. The ICT, led by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Majumdar, issued the warrants following petitions from the prosecution. The tribunal has recorded multiple cases against Hasina related to her time in office, including accusations of crimes against humanity stemming from incidents during her regime.

Additionally, the Bangladeshi government has formally requested India for Hasina's extradition, which was confirmed by India's Ministry of External Affairs. The tribunal's actions reflect ongoing tensions and political instability in Bangladesh following Hasina's departure from power.

ANI


Wednesday, November 27, 2024

ICC Prosecutor Seeks Arrest Warrant For Myanmar Junta Chief Over Rohingya Crackdown

Myanmar's Junta Chief Min Aung Hlaing

The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor, Karim Khan, has formally requested an arrest warrant for Myanmar's military leader, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, in connection with alleged crimes against humanity targeting the Rohingya population. This request was made during Khan's visit to Bangladesh on November 27, 2024, and marks a significant step towards accountability for the military's actions during the 2016-2017 crackdown on the Rohingya, which resulted in over 700,000 people fleeing to Bangladesh due to widespread violence including massacres and sexual assaults.

Khan's request alleges that Min Aung Hlaing is responsible for the deportation and persecution of the Rohingya, which occurred primarily between August and December 2017. This is the first time an arrest warrant has been sought against a senior official from Myanmar by the ICC, indicating a potential shift in international efforts to address impunity for such crimes. The ICC's jurisdiction stems from its previous ruling that it could investigate crimes linked to the Rohingya as they were committed partially in Bangladesh, an ICC member state.

Human rights advocates have welcomed this move as a crucial moment for justice, emphasizing that it sends a strong message to military leaders that they cannot evade accountability. Maria Elena Vignoli from Human Rights Watch stated that this action is vital for the Rohingya community, reinforcing their struggle for justice. The ICC judges will now review the evidence presented by Khan and decide whether to issue the warrant; there is no set timeline for this decision.

In response, Myanmar's military regime has rejected the ICC's jurisdiction, asserting that it does not recognize the court's authority as Myanmar is not a member state. Nonetheless, Khan indicated that further warrants against other military officials may follow as part of ongoing investigations into human rights violations in Myanmar.


Sunday, November 24, 2024

Britain, Ireland To Comply With ICC, Arrest Netanyahu If He Sets Foot There


The recent issuance of arrest warrants by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant has prompted significant responses from the UK and Ireland, indicating their willingness to comply with international law.

The UK government has stated it will comply with its legal obligations under both domestic and international law regarding the ICC's arrest warrants. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasized that the UK will "always comply" with its legal duties, although they refrained from commenting on specific cases or hypotheticals concerning Netanyahu's potential arrest upon arrival in the UK.

The UK's ICC Act of 2001 mandates that when an arrest warrant is issued by the ICC, it must be processed through British courts. This means that if Netanyahu were to enter the UK, a judicial review would take place to determine whether to endorse the warrant for execution.

In contrast to the UK's more cautious approach, Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris confirmed that Ireland would arrest Netanyahu if he set foot in the country. This reflects Ireland's strong support for international courts and their rulings, particularly in light of deteriorating relations with Israel following Ireland's recognition of Palestinian statehood.

The ICC's warrants stem from allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity related to actions taken during the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. The court accuses Netanyahu and Gallant of using starvation as a method of warfare and intentionally targeting civilians.

Other countries, including Canada, have also indicated they would comply with the ICC’s warrants. However, nations like Hungary have invited Netanyahu to visit, rejecting the ICC's authority. The U.S., while a critic of the ICC's actions, has expressed strong support for Israel amid these developments.


Thursday, October 17, 2024

International Crimes Tribunal Issues Arrest Warrants For Sheikh Hasina, 45 Awami League Leaders


Dhaka: The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) on Thursday issued arrest warrants against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and 45 other top Awami League leaders, including former ministers and officials, according to a report by The Daily Star.

The arrest warrant has been issued in connection with alleged crimes against humanity committed during the July-August uprising.

ICT, led by its chairman Justice Md Golam Mortuza Majumdar, passed the orders. This decision comes after the prosecution filed two petitions with the tribunal, seeking arrest warrants against them, Chief Prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam told The Daily Star.

The tribunal has also ordered the concerned authorities to produce Hasina and 45 others before it after arresting them by November 18. Notably, former ministers Obaidul Quader, Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, Hasan Mahmud and Anisul Huq are among the 46, as per the tribunal sources.

Over 60 complaints of crimes against humanity and genocide have been filed against former PM Sheikh Hasina and many of her party memeber with the ICT investigation agency. The investigation agency and the prosecution team have already launched probes into the complaints, the Daily Star reported. The government has also prepared a draft to amend the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act-1973.

According to the Dhaka Tribune, Advocate Tajul Islam, the chief prosecutor of the tribunal, informed the media that also said that Interpol's assistance would be sought to bring back fugitives, including Hasina, who are currently abroad.

Earlier on August 31, Bangladesh interim government's foreign affairs advisor Mohammed Touhid Hossain, had said that as cases mount against Sheikh Hasina, his country could consider seeking the extradition of the former premier but that would create an "embarrassing situation for the Indian government."

In an exclusive interview to Reuters TV in Dhaka, Hossain said that "since there are so many cases" against Hasina in Bangladesh, the country's home and law ministries could make the request to extradite her.

Sheikh Hasina had resigned from her post of Prime Minister on August 5 and fled to India in a military aircraft, following mounting protests against the contentious government job quota system that had sparked widespread anti-government demonstrations.

Following Hasina's resignation, a caretaker government was formed in Bangladesh, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed


Thursday, October 10, 2024

Bolivia Joins South Africa In Genocide Case Against Israel At International Court of Justice


Sucre: Bolivia has formally joined South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Al Jazeera reported.

The South American country applied on October 8 to intervene in the case which accused Israel of perpetrating "genocidal acts" in violation of the Genocide Convention.

Bolivia's move puts it among a growing list of states who are party to this case. This includes a host of countries such as Colombia, Libya, Spain, Mexico, Palestine, Nicaragua and Turkey.

In November last year, the south American country has cut official ties with Israel over the conflict in Gaza. The minister of the Presidency Maria Nela Prada announced the country would send humanitarian aid to Gaza.

Bolivia "decided to break diplomatic relations with the Israeli state in repudiation and condemnation of the aggressive and disproportionate Israeli military offensive taking place in the Gaza Strip," Deputy Foreign Minister Freddy Mamani has announced last year.

Earlier this year in January, the ICJ ruled that Israel must do everything in its power to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza and ensure United Nations-mandated investigators have "unimpeded access" to the enclave.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the court's interim ruling as "outrageous".

South Africa has since returned several times to the ICJ, arguing that Gaza's desperate humanitarian situation demands new emergency measures.

South Africa's lawyers had asked the ICJ in late May to impose emergency measures, saying Israel's attacks in Gaza's southern city Rafah must be stopped to ensure the survival of the Palestinian people. This ruling however was ignored by Israel.

It is significant to note that while ICJ rulings are legally binding, the court has no means to enforce them.

In its submission to the ICJ, Bolivia, which severed ties with Israel in November, argued, "Bolivia seeks to intervene since it considers that it has a responsibility to condemn the crime of genocide," it said.

Israel and Hamas have been engaged in conflict since October 7 last year where Israel saw the deaths of over 1200 nationals and in retaliation conducted targeted military actions over the hideouts of leaders of terrorist organisations Hamas and Hezbollah which were responsible for the dastardly act. It was seen that the brunt of the escalations between Israel and the terrorist groups also saw civilians caught in the crosshairs of the conflict.

According to the United Nations, over 40,000 lives were lost in Gaza since military action begun from both the sides.

Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), said in a post commemorating the first anniversary of the war that people in the enclave are continuing to endure "unspeakable suffering".

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed


Wednesday, June 26, 2024

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrants Against Russian Army Chief Valery Gerasimov, Former Defence Minister Shoigu


Moscow: The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued an arrest warrant for former Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu and the current Chief of Staff of Armed forces, Valery Gerasimov, for alleged international crimes, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, according to CNN.

The two are accused of two war crimes, according to the court, which are targeting civilian targets and intentionally causing significant incidental harm or damage to civilian property.

They are charged with crimes against humanity as well.

However, the Russian state media outlet TASS referred to the ICC ruling as "null and void." Presently, Shoigu leads the Security Council of Russia.

"It is meaningless, as the ICC's jurisdiction does not extend to Russia, and [the decision] was made within the framework of the West's hybrid war against our country," TASS quoted the body as saying.

On Tuesday, officials from Ukraine greeted the news with enthusiasm. According to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the ruling demonstrates that "no cabinet door or military rank can shield Russian criminals from accountability."

Dmytro Lubinets, the nation's human rights ombudsman, stated that Ukraine was one step closer to receiving justice as a result of the ICC ruling.

The chief of the Ukrainian presidential office, Andriy Yermak, stated that Gerasimov and Shoigu were being held "individually responsible.

"This is an important decision. Everyone will be held accountable for evil," he said in a statement.

Shoigu and Gerasimov are now on the ICC's wanted list as a result of the arrest warrants; however, it's unclear if they will ever go to trial. Trials are not held in absentia by the court, and Moscow is not likely to turn them up, CNN reported.

The ICC has previously issued arrest warrants for Russian official Maria Lvova-Belova and President Vladimir Putin for an alleged conspiracy to deport Ukrainian children to Russia. With the issuance of these two warrants, the total number of top Russian officials wanted for war crimes has increased to four.

(With Inputs From Agencies)


Saturday, May 25, 2024

UAE Welcomes Decision of ICJ To Impose Additional Provisional Measures On Israel


Abu Dhabi: The UAE welcomed the decision of the International Court of Justice to impose additional provisional measures on Israel, demanding an immediate halt to military operations in Rafah governorate, and the exacerbation of the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs underscored that the UAE affirms the need to reach an immediate ceasefire, protect civilians, avoid further loss of life, and halt escalation in all the regions of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Furthermore, the Ministry emphasised the importance of alleviating the extremely critical and deepening humanitarian catastrophe faced by civilians in Gaza due to the continuous Israeli aggression against the Strip.

The Ministry reaffirmed the significance of ensuring the arrival of humanitarian and relief aid urgently, sustainably and without impediment to the Gaza Strip. In this context, it stressed the importance of the decision issued by the Court regarding the necessity of keeping the Rafah Crossing open for the widespread and unhindered entry of humanitarian aid.

The Ministry underlined that the UAE continues to work with unprecedented determination with international partners to intensify all efforts to ensure the arrival and distribution of relief through all available means. Moreover, this includes the safe delivery of aid by land, sea and air to contribute to alleviating the critical humanitarian conditions faced by the residents of the Gaza Strip due to this ongoing war.

The Ministry reiterated the UAE's unwavering call on the international community to intensify all regional and international efforts to achieve peace and the two-state solution. The Ministry underscored that the UAE is steadfast in its commitment to reinforcing peace and justice, safeguarding the legitimate rights of the brotherly Palestinian people, and establishing an independent sovereign Palestinian State, in accordance with the resolutions of international legitimacy.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed


Tuesday, May 21, 2024

'Outrageous': US President Slams International Criminal Court's Request To Arrest Israel PM


Washington: US President Joe Biden said on Monday that the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor's application for arrest warrants against the Israeli leaders is 'outrageous' and reaffirmed his support for Israel amid ongoing war with Hamas.

President Biden also asserted that there is no 'equivalence' between Israel and Hamas.

"The ICC prosecutor's application for arrest warrants against Israeli leaders is outrageous. And let me be clear: whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence -- none -- between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security," President Biden said in a statement.

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has applied for arrest warrants against top Israeli and Hamas leaders for alleged war crimes.

ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan said on Monday that his office had applied for arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders for alleged crimes committed during the Hamas-led October 7 attack on southern Israel and Israel's subsequent war on Gaza.

Moreover, the US State Department also issued its statement over the matter and rejected the announcement from the ICC Prosecutor, calling it 'shameful'.

"The United States fundamentally rejects the announcement today from the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) that he is applying for arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials, together with warrants for Hamas terrorists. We reject the Prosecutor's equivalence of Israel with Hamas. It is shameful. Hamas is a brutal terrorist organization that carried out the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust and is still holding dozens of innocent people hostage, including Americans," US State departement said in a statement.

"Moreover, the United States has been clear since well before the current conflict that ICC has no jurisdiction over this matter. The ICC was established by its state parties as a court of limited jurisdiction. Those limits are rooted in principles of complementarity, which do not appear to have been applied here amid the Prosecutor's rush to seek these arrest warrants rather than allowing the Israeli legal system a full and timely opportunity to proceed. In other situations, the Prosecutor deferred to national investigations and worked with states to allow them time to investigate. The Prosecutor did not afford the same opportunity to Israel, which has ongoing investigations into allegations against its personnel," it added.

ICC Prosecutor Khan announced his office had "reasonable grounds" to believe that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant bear "criminal responsibility" for "war crimes and crimes against humanity".

Khan also applied for arrest warrants for three Hamas leaders - Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh, and Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri (also known as Deif) - for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed


Friday, May 17, 2024

South Africa Urges International Court of Justice To Order Gaza Ceasefire, Halt Israel's Rafah Op


The Hague: South Africa has urged the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to order Israel to halt its assault on Rafah as part of its case accusing Israel of genocide against the Palestinians, Al Jazeera reported on Thursday.

South Africa, which filed its case in January over Israel's war on Gaza, is seeking additional emergency measures over its offensive on Rafah, a city in the southern Gaza Strip where more than one million displaced Palestinians had sought shelter from Israeli attacks on other parts of the enclave.

It told the court in The Hague on Thursday that the Palestinian people are facing "ongoing annihilation" and the assault on Rafah was "part of the endgame in which Gaza is utterly destroyed".

Israel is pressing on with its attacks in Rafah despite "explicit warnings" that they could carry "genocidal" consequences, South African lawyer Tembeka Ngcukaitobi said.

Israel, which has rejected South Africa's claim that it is violating the 1949 Genocide Convention as baseless, will respond on Friday, Al Jazeera reported.

Minutes before the court hearings opened, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the widely criticised operation in Rafah "will continue as additional forces will enter" the area.

Rafah is a tiny, overcrowded city where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have taken shelter in tents and are facing the rapid spread of diseases and a severe lack of food and clean water. The only hospital in the area has shut down, leaving only a small facility that has been overwhelmed, Al Jazeera reported.

Judges at the ICJ have previously issued provisional measures, ordering Israel to take actions to limit humanitarian suffering in Gaza.

Among those provisions was for Israel to ensure basic food supplies arrive without delay to the Palestinians in Gaza, all of whom are suffering from severe hunger--some have even faced famine--as a result of Israel's total siege.

This month, the Israeli army seized and shut down the Palestinian side of the Rafah border crossing between the Gaza Strip and Egypt, a vital entry point for humanitarian aid. Aid agencies have warned that the closure has significantly hindered their operations.

Because it is Gaza's primary hub for humanitarian assistance, "if Rafah falls, so too does Gaza," South Africa said in a written submission to the court.

"The thwarting of humanitarian aid cannot be seen as anything but the deliberate snuffing-out of Palestinian lives. Starvation to the point of famine," lawyer Adila Hassim said.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed


Thursday, May 2, 2024

Turkey Joining South Africa's Genocide Lawsuit Against Israel


Tel Aviv: Turkey announced it is joining South Africa's genocide lawsuit against Israel in the International Court of Justice on Wednesday.

"Our legal experts have been studying how to participate in the legal case against Israel at the ICJ," said Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan as he announced the move.

Fidan said an application will soon be filed with the ICJ.

During the mid-January hearings, South Africa argued to the judges in the Hague that Israel's military campaign was intended to cause "the destruction of the population" of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli representatives, led by former Supreme Court president Aharon Barak, rejected the claims, arguing that Israel has a right to defend itself, respects international law, and that Palestinian casualties were the result of Hamas embedding its tunnels and military infrastructure in civilian areas.

Israel, which is not a member of the ICJ, also argued that the court has no jurisdiction and asked the court to reject the case outright.

In a provisional ruling issued on January 26, the ICJ ordered Israel by a vote of 15-2 to "take all measures" to prevent "genocide" in Gaza, but did not order the implementation of a ceasefire.

Legal experts said it could take years for a final ruling on whether Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. However, a ruling on the genocide claim, while legally binding, would be difficult to enforce.

Meanwhile, Israeli leaders are bracing for the possibility that the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, may soon issue warrants for the arrest of senior Israeli officials for war crimes, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Chief of the Israel Defense Forces Lt.-Gen. Herzi Halevi. It is also speculated that Khan will ask for warrants to be issued against Hamas leaders.

Although both the ICC and ICJ are based in the Hague, they are separate courts.

Foreign Minister Israel Katz instructed Israel's embassies to "immediately prepare for the outbreak of a severe anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli anti-Semitic wave in the world."

Due to what the Foreign Ministry said is the "seriousness of the threat," Katz also instructed Israeli representatives to impress on local Jewish communities the need to boost security for their institutions.

Israel is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which founded the ICC.

Further straining Jerusalem-Ankara ties, Turkey gave permission for a provocative flotilla to depart from Istanbul to break Israel's naval blockade of Gaza. The convoy of three ships was spearheaded by an Islamist aid organization with ties to Hamas.

However, the flotilla suffered a setback on Friday when Guinea-Bissau withdrew its flag from two of the convoy's three ships. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition blamed Israeli pressure and vowed that the ships would eventually sail.

At least 1,200 people were killed and 240 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in Hamas's attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Around 30 of the remaining 133 hostages are believed dead.

(With Agency Inputs)