Monday, September 14, 2026

India Cracks Indigenous GaN Chip Technology To Power Next-Gen Radars And Electronic Warfare: Defence Ministry Report


India’s DRDO has achieved a landmark breakthrough in semiconductor technology, successfully fabricating indigenous Gallium Nitride (GaN) chips and Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMICs) for radar and electronic warfare systems. A single chip measuring just 3.5 x 3 mm delivers 30 watts of power at speeds 300 times faster than silicon, marking a decisive leap in India’s defence self-reliance.

India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation has confirmed the successful development and demonstration of indigenous GaN semiconductor technology for high-frequency military applications.

The Ministry of Defence report highlights the fabrication of X-band MMICs, alongside S-band GaN High Electron-Mobility Transistor power amplifiers, low-noise amplifiers, and switch MMICs.

These components are vital for generating, amplifying, receiving, and controlling high-frequency signals across radar, electronic warfare, communications, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and unmanned systems.

The indigenous GaN chip is remarkably compact yet powerful. Measuring only 3.5 x 3 mm, it can deliver up to 30 watts of output while operating at speeds 300 times faster than conventional silicon-based chips. This performance underscores the scale of advancement in India’s domestic semiconductor capability, enabling radar and combat systems to achieve greater efficiency, range, and resilience.

The Solid State Physics Laboratory, a specialised DRDO facility, has been central to this achievement. SSPL scientists developed indigenous processes to grow and manufacture 4-inch Silicon Carbide wafers, which serve as the foundation for fabricating GaN HEMTs capable of delivering up to 150 watts.

MMICs reaching 40 watts for X-band applications have also been demonstrated. Limited production capability for GaN-on-SiC MMICs has been established at GAETEC in Hyderabad, ensuring that India can scale up production for strategic requirements.

The Ministry of Defence has emphasised that GaN and SiC-based technology offers improved efficiency, reduced size, and lower weight, making it indispensable for future combat systems. GaN-based power amplifiers form the backbone of transceiver modules in Active Electronically Scanned Array radars and electronic warfare jamming pods. These multifunctional MMICs also extend beyond defence, with applications in strategic systems, space, aerospace, 5G, and satellite communications.

This breakthrough is part of India’s broader push for Aatmanirbhar Bharat in semiconductors. The Ministry has described the development of commercially viable SiC and GaN-based MMIC technology as a milestone in building domestic capability and export potential.

To accelerate this ecosystem, the government has engaged the private sector. A landmark contract was signed with Agnit Semiconductors Private Limited under the Innovations for Defence Excellence initiative to design and manufacture advanced GaN wireless transmitters for defence use. This partnership reflects the growing role of Indian Start-Ups and private firms in strengthening the country’s defence technology base.

The strategic implications are profound. Indigenous GaN technology will allow India to upgrade radar systems, enhance electronic warfare capabilities, and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers.

It positions India among the select nations capable of producing advanced semiconductor technology for military applications, bolstering deterrence and operational readiness while opening pathways for commercial and strategic exports.

ANI


From FETT To Flight: Kaveri Dry Engine Primed For Installed-Condition Trials For Ghatak UCAV Flight Tests


India’s indigenous Kaveri Dry Engine has entered a decisive testing phase, with the First Engine To Test (FETT) integrated in July 2025 and uninstalled-condition trials completed. It is now being rebuilt for installed-condition demonstrations, while endurance and mission-cycle validations in India and Russia confirm its readiness for UCAV deployment.

India’s Kaveri Dry Engine is the designated powerplant for the country’s Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles. It is a non‑afterburning aero engine featuring an indigenously designed high‑inlet‑distortion‑tolerant fan, a fuel‑control system, an autonomous engine‑control system, and a short jet pipe. These technologies are critical for stealth UCAV operations, reducing infrared signatures and ensuring reliable thrust control during combat missions.

The Ministry of Defence Annual Report 2025–26 confirmed that the First Engine to Test was integrated in July 2025. Performance and operability testing in the uninstalled condition has been successfully completed.

The engine is now undergoing a rebuild for installed‑condition performance and operability demonstrations, including the staircase test, which validates thrust response across incremental power settings.

Manufacturing of engine modules through Indian Industry Partners is progressing steadily. Companies such as Godrej & Boyce are involved in precision assembly, marking a shift from purely state‑run research to industrial‑scale production. This collaboration ensures quality scaling and accelerates timelines for certification tests, aligning with India’s broader defence‑industrial self‑reliance goals.

The Gas Turbine Research Establishment has incorporated advanced compressors, turbine blades, and stealth‑oriented coatings into the derivative design. The Dry Kaveri variant delivers around 49–52 kN thrust, optimised for unmanned combat aerial vehicles such as the Ghatak UCAV.

Trials have included unrestricted throttle capability tests and Accelerated Simulated Endurance Mission Tests, replicating loiter‑strike‑loiter cycles, rapid throttle changes, and thermal cycling. These validated durability, fuel efficiency, and stealth performance.

By late 2025, the first production‑standard Dry Kaveri (D1) was handed over for baseline validation, with subsequent variants undergoing 150‑hour endurance and altitude trials. Over 140 hours of cumulative testing have been completed, including 70 hours of ground runs in Bangalore and 75 hours of airborne trials in Russia. Certification is targeted for 2026, tied to Cabinet Committee on Security clearance for the Ghatak UCAV.

The Ghatak UCAV, powered by the Kaveri Dry Engine, is expected to cruise near Mach 0.9, operate at altitudes up to 40,000 feet, and carry precision‑guided munitions over ranges exceeding 1,000 kilometres. Its endurance of about two hours on internal fuel makes it suitable for deep‑penetration missions. The absence of an afterburner reduces weight and infrared visibility, enhancing survivability in contested airspace.

The National Aero Engine Test Complex in Karnataka is being readied to support indigenous validation. This facility will reduce reliance on foreign test centres and allow parallel endurance trials.

The experience gained from the Kaveri program strengthens India’s expertise in engine integration, endurance testing, and material science, paving the way for future indigenous fighter engines such as Kaveri 2.0 and propulsion systems for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft.

India’s indigenous combat‑drone engine journey is therefore moving into a crucial testing phase. The combination of domestic innovation, private‑sector partnerships, and international testing collaborations underscores a turning point in India’s aerospace self‑reliance.

Agencies


Felon Vs Dragon: Will India’s Su-57 Checkmate Pakistan’s Chinese J-35 Push?


Russia’s Su-57 stealth fighter has re-emerged as a major defence proposal during President Vladimir Putin’s visit to India for the BRICS summit, Auysh Pandey of Times of India reported.

The offer has reignited debate in New Delhi over whether India should acquire an off-the-shelf fifth-generation fighter from Russia or wait for its indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program to mature.

The urgency stems from Pakistan’s confirmed collaborative agreement with China to acquire the J-35 stealth fighter, while Beijing itself continues to expand its J-20 fleet and advance the J-35 program. This raises the prospect of India facing stealth fighters on both its western and northern fronts.

Russia has repeatedly offered India the Su-57, including proposals for joint production and technology cooperation. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated on September 8 that “issues of selling Su-57 is on the agenda between India and Russia.”

The aircraft combines low-observable design, advanced avionics, long-range weapons, high speed and supermanoeuvrability. Putin has also offered joint production in India under the Make in India framework, though the extent of technology transfer and software access remains unclear without a binding agreement.

Pakistan’s pursuit of the J-35 is strategically significant for India. If inducted, the Pakistan Air Force would gain access to a fifth-generation stealth platform, potentially operating alongside China’s expanding ecosystem of long-range missiles, airborne early-warning systems, electronic warfare and unmanned platforms.

This could alter the regional air-power balance, making India’s fifth-generation capability gap more pressing. India’s Air Force currently faces squadron shortages, with authorised strength at 42 but actual numbers substantially lower due to ageing fleets and delays in new deliveries.

The AMCA program has moved into a concrete development phase, with the Defence Ministry issuing a request for proposal in May 2026 to three private-sector bidders for prototype design, but operational service remains years away.

Russia’s Su-57 proposition is attractive because it offers an operational fifth-generation platform with potential industrial cooperation. Reports suggest India could initially receive aircraft before local production begins, though no final contract has been announced.

The Su-57 is larger and faster than the J-35, with a combat range of around 1,500 km compared to the J-35’s 1,200 km. It can carry R-77M, R-74M2 and R-37M air-to-air missiles, as well as Kh-69 and Kh-38M strike weapons.

The J-35 is linked to China’s PL-15 and PL-10 missiles, with full integration details limited. While the Su-57 emphasises range, speed, manoeuvrability and weapons capacity, the J-35 focuses on stealth, avionics, sensor fusion and networked warfare.

India’s reported plan to acquire 114 Rafales addresses immediate squadron strength, but Rafale remains a 4.5-generation fighter. The Su-57 would provide a fifth-generation capability before AMCA becomes operational.

Pursuing both tracks—Rafale for near-term numbers and Su-57 or AMCA for stealth capability—would be costly and complex, requiring infrastructure, logistics and training for multiple ecosystems. The strongest argument for the Su-57 is timing.

AMCA is India’s long-term solution, but development risks prevent rapid induction. The Su-57 already exists as an operational platform, reportedly used in combat, though independent verification of its battlefield performance remains limited.

Comparisons with the American F-35 highlight different philosophies. The F-35 emphasises stealth, sensor fusion and network-centric operations, supported by a vast international ecosystem. The Su-57 prioritises speed, manoeuvrability, range and weapons.

Russian industry officials claim superiority, but such statements remain promotional rather than independently validated. China’s J-20 and J-35 present the immediate challenge, supported by a sophisticated aerospace ecosystem. Modern air warfare increasingly depends on sensors, data links and electronic warfare rather than one-on-one dogfights, making China’s integrated approach formidable.

Russia’s advantage lies in its willingness to pursue deep industrial cooperation with India, building on decades of joint projects like the Su-30MKI and BrahMos. A Russian-origin fifth-generation aircraft could offer some commonality in training and maintenance, though the Su-57 would still represent a new technological ecosystem. Risks remain, however.

India’s earlier Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft program with Russia stalled due to disagreements, and a large Su-57 programme could divert resources from AMCA. Geopolitically, India’s growing defence ties with the US and France could be complicated by a major new Russian fighter program.

The most practical case for the Su-57 is as an interim solution. A limited acquisition would give the IAF operational experience with fifth-generation technology, bridging the gap until AMCA becomes operational.

This would reduce dependency risks while providing immediate capability against China’s expanding stealth fleet.

However, even a limited fleet requires infrastructure, training and maintenance, making cost a critical factor. India’s decision must rest on binding contractual terms—price, production rights, technology access, weapons integration, software, maintenance, delivery schedules, localisation, upgrades and supply guarantees.

If favourable, the Su-57 could provide India with a bridge to the AMCA era. If not, diverting resources could repeat past dependencies.

Ultimately, India’s fighter dilemma is about time. Rafale addresses immediate shortages, AMCA is the long-term indigenous solution, and the Su-57 offers a potential bridge. The final question is whether that bridge is worth the cost and whether it can be built without delaying AMCA.

Agencies


Why India Must Embrace Radar-Absorbing Coatings And Next-Gen EW Systems For Su-30MKI Jets Survivability


The Indian Air Force continues to rely heavily on the Su-30MKI, with more than 260 aircraft in service and an expected operational life of 15 to 20 years.

While the fighter remains the backbone of Indian aviation due to its range, payload capacity, manoeuvrability and performance, its radar and infrared signatures have become a liability in modern combat environments dominated by advanced detection systems.

The Su-30MKI’s large airframe, canards, air intakes, exposed compressor blades and multiple hardpoints contribute to significant radar reflections. External weapons and fuel tanks mounted under the wings further increase visibility, while the absence of infrared stealth compounds the weakness. 

These design features stem from the aircraft’s role as a heavy fighter optimised for endurance and payload delivery, making them difficult to fully correct without a fundamental redesign of the platform.

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, in collaboration with the Defence Research and Development Organisation, has launched an initiative to address these vulnerabilities.

The focus is on applying radar-absorbing paints and materials developed in India, particularly those using magnetic functional fillers. 

Rather than coating the entire airframe, the treatment will be applied selectively to highly reflective areas such as the interiors of air intake ducts and adjacent fuselage sections. This targeted approach aims to reduce radar cross-section while preserving aerodynamic and flight characteristics.

System-scale demonstrations have already been conducted using locally produced absorbing paint. Laboratory tests were followed by flight trials, including a Tejas light combat aircraft carrying a payload treated with the coating.

Evaluations of the Su-30MKI’s radar cross-section have also been reported, with official technical documents noting a “significant reduction in radar signatures across a broad multi-dimensional frequency range.” These results, however, must still be validated in operationally representative configurations for the heavy fighter.

India’s Su-30MKI fleet is undergoing radar signature reduction trials, but experts stress that survivability in modern contested airspaces also demands a major leap in Electronic Warfare (EW) capabilities.

Indigenous jammer pods, advanced GPS anti-jamming systems, and DRDO-developed EW suites are being integrated under the ‘Super Sukhoi’ upgrade to counter China’s J-20 stealth fighters and advanced Pakistani air defence networks.

Therefore, the need to strengthen Electronic Warfare features in the Su-30MKI has become urgent. Modern air combat is increasingly defined by the electromagnetic spectrum, where adversaries deploy advanced radars, long-range missiles, and networked air defence systems.

India’s Super Sukhoi upgrade program is therefore introducing indigenous Aircraft Self Protection Jammer (ASPJ) pods, Gallium Nitride-based transmitters, and Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) technologies to spoof and confuse enemy radars.

DRDO’s Yodha and Anidra EW suites are being tailored for the Su-30MKI, combining offensive jamming, passive detection, and deception to create false radar targets and blind missile seekers.

In addition, new anti-jamming GPS antennas compatible with India’s NaVIC system are being integrated to resist spoofing and ensure navigation accuracy in contested environments.

These EW enhancements are critical to counter stealth aircraft like China’s J-20 and to penetrate dense air defence networks, ensuring the Su-30MKI remains a credible frontline fighter through the 2030s and beyond.

The initiative reflects India’s broader effort to enhance survivability of its frontline combat aircraft without attempting to transform them into stealth platforms. By selectively reducing radar visibility, the Su-30MKI can remain relevant in contested airspaces while retaining its strengths in payload and range. 

This work also underscores India’s growing self-reliance in advanced defence technologies, with indigenous materials and coatings being developed and tested domestically.

Agencies


India’s Sukhoi Su-57 Rejection Sparks Debate Over Stealth And Strategy


India’s rejection of Russia’s Su-57 stealth fighter was driven by doubts over its stealth design, engine reliability, and technology transfer limitations, Russian media reported.

Analysts argue that India may have made a mistake by dismissing the aircraft outright, as Russia continues to modernise the platform, while India faces delays in its indigenous AMCA program.

India’s rejection of the Su-57 has been explained by defence analyst Abhijit Iyer-Mitra, who told The Times of India that the aircraft cannot truly be considered a fifth-generation fighter. He argued that Russia essentially took the Sukhoi Su-30, modified it slightly, and presented it as a new aircraft.

According to him, the Su-57 retains the same problems as the Sukhoi Su-30, including a large radar cross-section and limited stealth capabilities. He emphasised that India had already invested several hundred million dollars in the joint development project before abandoning it due to these shortcomings.

Iyer-Mitra added that India withdrew from the Su-57 program because of the lack of stealth properties and unresolved design issues. He claimed that nothing has changed since then, and the aircraft remains fundamentally the same. This reflects India’s longstanding scepticism about the Su-57’s ability to meet true fifth-generation standards.

Comparative Analysis of Su-30 and Su-57 Platforms

Parametres Sukhoi Su-30 (Gen 4+) Sukhoi Su-57 (Gen 5)
Platform Basis Modernisation of Soviet era Su-27 design Entirely new integrated airframe
Stealth Technology Absent (high radar signature) Low-Observable (reduced radar cross-section)
Weapons External hardpoints only Internal weapon bays plus external hardpoints
Airframe Materials Conventional Aviation Metals Extensive use of composites
Cruising Speed Supersonic (With afterburners) Supercruise-Capable supersonic flight

But the platform is the same, and the problems are the same as with the Su-30. A huge radar cross-section, limited stealth capabilities, and all that. And don't forget: we participated in this project. We abandoned it — abandoned it, even after investing several hundred million dollars. Nothing has changed since then — today we see the exact same aircraft. - Defence analyst Abhijit Iyer-Mitra said.

In contrast, Sergey Bogdan, chief pilot of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, insisted that the Su-57 meets all fifth-generation requirements and will remain relevant for decades due to continuous upgrades.

He highlighted its internal weapon bays, composite airframe, and aerodynamic shaping designed to reduce radar visibility. Unlike the Su-30, which carries external missiles and fuel tanks, the Su-57 was built with stealth in mind.

The Su-57 also features a new integral airframe with extensive use of composite materials, unlike the Su-30’s conventional Su-27-derived design. It is capable of non-afterburning supersonic flight, supported by new-generation engines, whereas the Su-30 requires afterburners to achieve supersonic speeds, leading to high fuel consumption.

India’s rejection of the Su-57 was not only about stealth. Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh confirmed in July 2026 that New Delhi would not pursue the Su-57, despite Russia offering discounted prices, local assembly at HAL Nashik, and full technology transfer.

India instead prioritised its indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, aligning with the Atmanirbhar Bharat push for self-reliance. The AMCA MK-1 is expected to fly by 2028, powered by GE’s F414 engine, with a more advanced MK-2 planned later. Operational induction, however, may not occur until the 2030s.

In the interim, India is upgrading around 260 Su-30MKI fighters under the “Super Sukhoi” program, equipping them with the indigenous Uttam AESA radar, advanced electronic warfare suites, and long-range weapons such as the Astra missile and BrahMos cruise missile. Additionally, India is negotiating for up to 114 Rafale fighters under the MRFA program, with conditions for domestic production and high local content.

Critics argue that India’s rejection of the Su-57 leaves a capability gap, especially as China deploys J-20 stealth fighters near the Himalayan border and Pakistan considers acquiring J-35 jets.

Russia has already exported Su-57s to Algeria and continues to modernise the aircraft, despite production challenges caused by sanctions and supply chain disruptions.

While India’s decision reflects fiscal realism and a desire for independence, some analysts believe it may have been premature, given the delays in AMCA and the growing regional stealth imbalance.

Agencies


India Emerges As Consensus Builder In A Fractured World


India’s diplomatic achievement at the BRICS Summit 2026 was underscored by the unanimous adoption of the New Delhi Declaration.

This was not just another communiqué but a demonstration of India’s ability to bring sharply divided powers together at a time when wars are widening, blocs are hardening and trust between major powers is under strain.

The expanded 11-member BRICS grouping, which now includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the UAE, unanimously adopted the declaration on the very first day of the summit at Bharat Mandapam after four days of intense negotiations.

The most difficult discussions centred on the language relating to the war in West Asia, making the consensus itself the story.

The challenge was acute because BRICS now includes Iran, directly involved in the West Asian conflict, and the UAE, which maintains close ties with Washington. Russia and China have their own competing interests, while India balances relationships across Western and non-Western worlds.

Yet the final text expressed deep concern over the escalation in West Asia, called for maximum restraint, urged disputes to be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy, and stressed the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure, including nuclear facilities. For India, consensus meant bridging differences through diplomacy rather than starting from identical positions.

One of the most consequential elements for India was the explicit condemnation of the April 22, 2025 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, which killed 26 people.

The declaration condemned terrorism in all forms and specifically named the Pahalgam attack, reiterating the bloc’s commitment to combating cross-border terrorism, terror financing and safe havens. It insisted that perpetrators and supporters must be held accountable under national and international law.

This reference placed India’s core security concern firmly within a major multilateral declaration, giving it wider international diplomatic weight. It reinforced India’s longstanding argument that terrorism cannot be selectively defined according to geopolitical convenience.

The BRICS outcome also reinforced a pattern in Indian diplomacy. In 2023, during its G20 presidency, India secured consensus despite divisions over the Russia-Ukraine war. In 2026, India achieved another difficult consensus inside an expanded BRICS amid an active West Asian conflict.

The significance lies not only in hosting two major summits but in India’s role as a diplomatic bridge between competing worlds. India can speak to Washington and Moscow, Beijing and the Gulf, Tehran and the West. It engages China amid competition, maintains ties with Russia while expanding relations with the US and Europe, and positions itself as a leading voice of the Global South. This is strategic autonomy in practice.

At the heart of India’s BRICS chairship is the proposition that the international system cannot remain structured around outdated institutions. Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighted that the Global South often stands in the front row of crises but the back row of decision-making. India’s answer is to transform the pyramid of privilege into a platform of partnership.

The declaration backed greater representation for emerging markets and developing countries, called for reforms of the United Nations and its Security Council, and supported reforms of Bretton Woods institutions to reflect contemporary realities.

It also backed the aspirations of India and Brazil for a greater role in the UN. India’s strategy is not just about securing a seat at the table but redesigning the table itself.

Another important feature was Modi’s proposal for a BRICS Continuity and Implementation Mechanism, using the Troika to maintain institutional momentum when chairmanship changes annually. India’s chairship involved more than 350 meetings across nearly 30 cities, and the ambition is to ensure that the work survives beyond India’s year as chair.

The declaration itself covered a broad agenda including global governance, terrorism, health, food and energy security, critical minerals, technology, supply chains, trade, financial cooperation and sustainable development.

On health, BRICS welcomed a sub-working group to advance an Integrated Early Warning System for Mass Infectious Diseases. On critical minerals, it called for reliable and resilient supply chains while recognising sovereign rights of resource-rich countries. On technology, India emphasised that future-defining technologies must not become instruments of coercion.

Perhaps most importantly, Modi stressed that BRICS is not an anti-Western alliance. India’s vision is for BRICS to be a platform through which developing economies gain a stronger voice in global rule-making. New Delhi does not want BRICS to replace one dominant bloc with another but to create a more representative system where power is distributed broadly and developing countries shape institutions, standards, rules and security architecture. This is why multi-alignment, strategic autonomy and Global South leadership are central to India’s worldview.

The New Delhi Declaration is therefore more than a diplomatic document. It is a snapshot of a transitioning international system and India’s evolving role within it. India is no longer just participating but convening, shaping agendas and creating space for competing powers to find common ground.

It is not merely demanding reform but proposing mechanisms and roadmaps for the future. The unanimous declaration, achieved despite profound differences, difficult negotiations over West Asia, condemnation of the Pahalgam attack and an ambitious reform agenda, marks a significant diplomatic moment.

After the G20 consensus of 2023, India has delivered another major multilateral consensus. In a fractured world, India is emerging as a consensus-builder, agenda-setter and rule-shaper for the Global South.

Agencies


Malaysian PM Anwar Ibrahim Confirms Talks On BrahMos Missile Purchase From India


Malaysia has confirmed exploratory talks with India on acquiring the BrahMos air-to-surface missile, but Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim stressed that no final decision has been made and the Royal Malaysian Air Force will be the ultimate authority, Malaysian media reported.

The discussions highlight growing defence ties between Kuala Lumpur and New Delhi, with BrahMos seen as a potential game-changer for Malaysia’s maritime and aerial deterrence.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim stated in New Delhi on 13 September that Malaysia is considering the acquisition of India’s BrahMos missile system. He emphasised that while discussions were held with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the final decision rests with Malaysia’s Air Force, which will evaluate operational and technical requirements.

Anwar explained that his position is to defer to the relevant agencies with expertise, particularly the Air Force, to continue the discussions. He noted that initial talks had already taken place and conveyed to Modi his strong support, citing the trust-based relationship between Malaysia and India as a foundation for expanding cooperation in all fields.

The Malaysian leader, who also serves as Finance Minister, acknowledged India’s defence capabilities and long-standing military experience. He highlighted India’s growing role in aerospace, defence, and maritime security, areas where Malaysia seeks to deepen bilateral engagement beyond trade and investment.

The BrahMos missile is a long-range, ramjet-powered supersonic cruise missile. It can be launched from submarines, warships, fighter aircraft, and mobile land-based launchers, giving it versatility across multiple platforms.

Malaysia’s interest reportedly centres on the air-launched BrahMos-A variant, which weighs approximately 2,500 kilograms and is designed for integration with India’s Su-30MKI fighters. Malaysia’s Su-30MKM fleet would be the logical platform, though integration would require significant technical modifications. If acquired, this would provide Malaysia with a high-speed stand-off strike capability against both land and maritime targets, enhancing deterrence in the South China Sea.

The missile maintains speeds of Mach 2.8 to Mach 3, compressing the reaction time available to defending warships or air-defence systems. Its warhead, weighing between 200 and 300 kilograms, can deliver precision strikes with inertial navigation, satellite guidance, and active radar homing. This combination of speed, low-altitude trajectory, and kinetic energy makes BrahMos one of the most difficult missiles to intercept.

For India, BrahMos has become a flagship defence export, already acquired by the Philippines and Indonesia. Malaysia’s potential procurement would mark another Southeast Asian nation considering the system, reinforcing India’s defence export program and strategic footprint in the Indo-Pacific.

The discussions come at a time when Malaysia and India are broadening their partnership into defence and strategic domains.

Anwar’s remarks confirm political openness to the acquisition but underline that no procurement program, budget approval, or contractual timetable has yet been established. The Royal Malaysian Air Force will determine whether the system meets Malaysia’s defence needs.

The potential acquisition could reshape Malaysia’s deterrence posture in the South China Sea, where China’s naval expansion continues to challenge regional security. For Kuala Lumpur, BrahMos represents not only advanced firepower but also a symbol of trust and strategic alignment with India.

Agencies


PM Modi And President Xi Offer To Assist In Ukraine Peace Efforts During BRICS Summit


Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping offered to help find a solution to the Russia-Ukraine war during their meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in New Delhi, according to the Kremlin.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed that Putin welcomed the readiness of both leaders to assist in efforts to resolve the conflict and briefed them on the situation in Ukraine.

Peskov stated that during their bilateral meetings, Modi and Xi took a keen interest in the Ukraine settlement and actively offered their good offices to help find a solution. He emphasised that both leaders expressed their willingness to contribute to peace efforts.

The comments came a day after Modi and Putin held bilateral talks on the sidelines of the BRICS summit. The Ministry of External Affairs reported that the two leaders discussed bilateral ties and exchanged views on regional and global issues, including conflicts in West Asia and the Black Sea region.

Modi reiterated India’s position that dialogue and diplomacy remain the way forward in resolving conflicts. He said India was ready to assist in peace efforts, maintaining New Delhi’s consistent call for a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict while preserving relations with both Russia and Ukraine.

During his meeting with Putin at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Bishkek on August 31, Modi urged the Russian leader to move from “endless war” towards an “end to the war.” This reinforced India’s stance of encouraging dialogue rather than confrontation.

India has also highlighted the wider economic impact of the conflict, particularly on energy supplies, shipping and trade. These concerns have been repeatedly raised by New Delhi in international forums, reflecting the global consequences of the prolonged war.

The Kremlin statement comes as US efforts to revive negotiations between Russia and Ukraine have failed to produce a breakthrough. US President Donald Trump has pushed for an end to the nearly five-year-old conflict and recently held talks with Putin.

US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner also travelled to Moscow and Kyiv as part of efforts to restart negotiations.

Despite the renewed diplomatic push, fighting has continued, with both Russia and Ukraine reporting fresh attacks. The Kremlin’s statement does not indicate that India has launched a formal mediation initiative. Instead, New Delhi has positioned its role as one of encouraging dialogue and diplomacy.

At the BRICS summit, the New Delhi Declaration also stressed the importance of resolving conflicts through dialogue, consultation and diplomatic means. The declaration reflected the collective stance of BRICS members on prioritising peaceful solutions to global disputes.

This development underscores India’s balancing act in global diplomacy, maintaining strategic ties with Russia while also engaging with Western nations.

It also highlights China’s parallel interest in playing a role in conflict resolution, signalling a broader push by major powers within BRICS to influence the trajectory of the Ukraine war.

Agencies


PM Modi’s Midnight Diplomacy: How India United Iran And UAE At BRICS


Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s diplomatic intervention at the BRICS Summit in New Delhi was pivotal in bridging the divide between Iran and the United Arab Emirates.

The two nations had been locked in hostility since the US-Israel coordinated strike on Iran on 28 February, which triggered retaliatory attacks by Tehran on US bases in Gulf states, including the UAE. 

The situation escalated further when Iran struck the Al Minhad Air Base in late August, intensifying tensions and making reconciliation appear impossible.

Abu Dhabi had not been directly involved in the April negotiations in Islamabad between Iran, the US, and regional allies, which left the rift unresolved. Against this backdrop, the BRICS 2026 Summit became the turning point.

On 12 September, both Iran and the UAE signed a joint statement calling for restraint in West Asia, a move widely seen as diplomatic progress. This was significant because earlier in the year, BRICS foreign ministers had failed to agree on a joint statement due to the Iran-UAE divide.

India’s role was central. New Delhi steered consultations to bridge differences, ensuring that the declaration condemned unilateral aggression without naming specific nations.

The statement struck a careful balance, addressing concerns on both sides by condemning deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards. 

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasised at the summit that BRICS must fight against the normalisation of attacks on civilians and vital infrastructure, including peaceful nuclear sites.

Modi’s consistent push for dialogue and diplomacy was evident in his engagements with both leaders. His meeting with President Pezeshkian in New Delhi was their second in less than two weeks, following talks at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Bishkek on 31 August.

PM Modi reiterated India’s support for lasting peace and stability in West Asia, stressing the importance of protecting freedom of navigation, commerce, and the safety of seafarers. India’s unique position, with strong ties to both the UAE and Iran, allowed it to leverage its diplomatic reach without appearing to take sides.

The Iran-UAE meeting on the sidelines of the summit was historic. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian met Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in New Delhi, marking the highest-level contact between the two nations since the conflict began.

This engagement underscored the importance of India’s mediation and the credibility of BRICS as a platform for dialogue among nations often on opposing sides of global conflicts.

The tensions between Iran and the UAE had posed a unique challenge for BRICS, testing its ability to reach consensus on West Asia. The joint statement achieved at the summit was therefore not only a diplomatic feat but also a demonstration of India’s ability to keep the bloc united despite internal divisions. For India, the easing of tensions is crucial, as it directly impacts energy security, shipping costs, and regional stability.

The summit reaffirmed BRICS as a forum capable of addressing global conflicts through dialogue and diplomacy. While the joint statement may not immediately alter the geopolitical landscape, it symbolised progress and showed that even amid war, dialogue remains possible.

PM Modi’s leadership ensured that BRICS did not succumb to paralysis, instead emerging as a platform for constructive engagement.

Agencies


'PM Modi Warns Against Weaponisation of Technology And Minerals At BRICS Summit'


Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday addressed the open session of the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi, focusing on the theme ‘Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability: Shaping the Future for Inclusive Global Growth’.

He warned that the weaponisation of technology and critical minerals could obstruct shared progress across nations. His remarks came during a gathering of leaders and representatives from BRICS member states and partner nations, where he stressed the importance of inclusivity and cooperation in global growth.

The Prime Minister underlined that India has advanced the spirit of friendship, partnership, and cooperation through the BRICS platform. He explained that BRICS cooperation should not remain confined to governments alone, but must involve entrepreneurs, farmers, researchers, women, youth, and ordinary citizens as active participants.

He emphasised that the strength of BRICS lies in diversity and cooperation, noting that the trust of Global South nations in the grouping has grown because their voices are heard, their experiences respected, and solutions crafted with them rather than for them.

In his closing remarks, Modi highlighted that BRICS diversity is its identity, cooperation its inspiration, and progress its contribution to humanity.

He stated that although member nations are rooted in different realities, they rise together through cooperation and blossom for humanity. He urged that diversity must remain the identity of BRICS, cooperation its guiding force, and progress a benefit for all of humanity.

The Prime Minister’s warning about the weaponisation of technology and critical minerals drew particular attention, especially with Chinese President Xi Jinping present at the session. Modi stressed that such practices could hinder shared progress and reiterated the need for inclusivity in the adoption of technology.

His comments were significant in the context of China’s past restrictions on rare earth exports during its trade war with the United States. Although China has eased some of those restrictions, it continues to process around 90 per cent of the world’s rare earths, which are critical for manufacturing advanced technologies ranging from solar panels to smartphones.

Modi also pointed out that conflicts and tensions across the world are continuously increasing, with widespread negative impacts on ordinary people.

He noted that pandemics, climate disasters, and supply chain disruptions have demonstrated that in an interconnected world, no crisis can remain confined to a single region. His remarks reinforced the need for collective resilience and cooperation in addressing global challenges.

The session underscored India’s commitment to ensuring that the Global South is heard and included in shaping the future of global growth.

PM Modi’s speech reflected India’s broader agenda of promoting inclusivity, cooperation, and sustainability through the BRICS platform, while cautioning against practices that could undermine shared progress.

Agencies


PM Modi's Diplomatic Victory, BRICS Leaders Adopt New Delhi Declaration 2026


Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that BRICS member countries had unanimously adopted the New Delhi Declaration 2026, with no objections raised by any nation.

The adoption followed intensive negotiations aimed at bridging differences and achieving consensus on the joint statement. This marks a significant diplomatic success for India’s chairship of the summit.

The announcement came after a series of high-level bilateral engagements in New Delhi. On Friday, Prime Minister Modi held separate meetings with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Russian President Vladimir Putin and United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. These discussions took place on the sidelines of the 18th BRICS Summit, reflecting India’s active diplomatic outreach.

The summit was hosted by India under the theme “Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability.” Leaders gathered to deliberate on regional stability, economic ties and wider global challenges. The adoption of the declaration underscored the grouping’s ability to find common ground despite diverse perspectives.

Prime Minister Modi also held a bilateral meeting with Burundi President Évariste Ndayishimiye on Sunday. The meeting took place as leaders from BRICS member and partner countries convened in the capital for the two-day summit, which concluded the same day. The talks highlighted India’s engagement with African nations and its emphasis on amplifying the voice of the Global South.

India-Indonesia ties were in focus as Prime Minister Modi met Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto. The leaders reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening bilateral relations across a wide range of sectors. Modi described the interaction as warm and emphasised the continued expansion of cooperation between the two nations. Shortly after, President Subianto departed Delhi following his participation in the summit.

Prime Minister Modi also met South African President Cyril Ramaphosa on the sidelines of the summit. Their discussions centred on reviewing India-South Africa ties and exploring areas of bilateral cooperation. The meeting reinforced the importance of multilateral cooperation and shared economic priorities within the BRICS framework.

Chinese President Xi Jinping concluded a brief 24-hour visit to India, departing on Sunday after attending the summit. His visit provided insights into Beijing’s “Greater BRICS Initiative” and the trajectory of Sino-Indian relations. Xi’s presence underscored China’s strategic interest in shaping the future of the grouping.

Meanwhile, Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed Al Nahyan met Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian at the summit. Their talks focused on the Strait of Hormuz, with Tehran proposing an arrangement to allow more vessels to pass through the strategic waterway. Iran clarified that it would retain authority over which vessels could transit, while Oman sought to bring Iran and Gulf Cooperation Council states together for discussions.

The Delhi Traffic Police expressed gratitude to residents for their cooperation amid traffic restrictions during the summit. In a post on X, the police acknowledged that diversions had caused delays but appreciated commuters who followed advisories and used alternate routes to facilitate the safe movement of dignitaries.

Prime Minister Modi also held a bilateral meeting with Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. Their talks focused on strengthening bilateral engagement between India and Kazakhstan as the summit concluded. Modi further met Philippines President Ferdinand R. Marcos, with discussions likely covering bilateral ties and cooperation across multiple sectors.

Highlighting the growing strength of the BRICS grouping, Prime Minister Modi shared a group photograph featuring leaders of member and partner countries, outreach invitees and heads of international organisations.

He described the gathering as a reflection of BRICS’ expanding global resonance and stressed the shared focus on cooperation, partnership and progress.

Women’s empowerment was also highlighted during the summit. Avarna Jain, Chairperson of the BRICS Women’s Business Alliance, emphasised the role of women entrepreneurs in driving innovation, creating jobs and strengthening economic growth.

She called for greater support to help women-led businesses scale up, improve access to finance and expand into new BRICS markets. Jain argued that women’s economic empowerment should be viewed as part of a broader economic strategy rather than a sector-specific issue.

The 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi concluded with the unanimous adoption of the New Delhi Declaration 2026, reinforcing India’s role as a consensus builder in a fractured global environment. The summit showcased India’s leadership in fostering resilience, innovation and cooperation among emerging economies, while advancing the collective voice of the Global South in global governance.

Agencies


Iranian Cargo Ship Struck Near Qeshm, One Dead As Gulf Talks Postponed


An Iranian cargo vessel was struck early on Sunday off Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz, according to Iranian state media. Reports confirmed one fatality and four injuries.

The incident has renewed international focus on the strategic waterway, already tense after Iran-backed Houthi rebels captured an island in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait in the Red Sea the previous week.

Iran’s state-run IRNA quoted the Qeshm governor as blaming a “terrorist enemy” for the attack. The US military has not issued a statement, though it has previously targeted Iranian-flagged vessels during its blockade of Iranian ports. American forces are also contending with fresh threats from Iranian ballistic missiles aimed at US warships.

Qeshm Island lies about fourteen miles from Bandar Abbas and is a critical point for Iran’s enforcement of control over the Strait of Hormuz. Hours before the strike, President Masoud Pezeshkian declared on social media that Iran “won’t surrender” and “our people can’t be bullied into submission.”

US President Donald Trump, speaking from his golf course in Doonbeg, Ireland, remarked that Iran “wants to make a deal so bad” and “they’re calling constantly.” When asked if the US military carried out the strike, he replied, “I don’t want to say,” before boarding Air Force One to return to Washington.

Tehran had scheduled a meeting of regional foreign ministers in Oman on Monday to discuss shipping regulation initiatives pursued jointly with Muscat. However, Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi announced late Sunday that the gathering was postponed “in the interests of consensus.” He emphasised Oman’s commitment to dialogue supporting stability and cooperation.

Commercial vessel movement through the Strait of Hormuz remains heavily restricted amid hostilities. The UK Maritime Trade Operations monitoring service reported that another vessel was struck by a projectile on Sunday, sparking a major fire and prompting evacuation efforts. It is unclear if this incident was linked to the Qeshm attack.

The US maintains that substantial oil shipments continue to leave the region safely, with naval forces escorting traffic along Oman’s coast. Prior to the postponement of talks, only Iraq had confirmed participation, while Bahrain declined due to the absence of diplomatic ties with Tehran.

Since the war began on 28 February, launched by the US and Israel, Iran has pushed proposals requiring transit fees from commercial vessels. Tehran’s framework envisaged inbound traffic through Iranian waters and outbound voyages partly through Iranian and Omani waters. Regional capitals had initially welcomed the ministerial meeting as a chance to form a unified stance on a war they did not initiate, but cross-border strikes have complicated diplomacy.

Despite launching thousands of missiles and drones at a Gulf nation allied with the US, Iran has remained active in diplomatic channels. President Pezeshkian confirmed meeting Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed during the BRICS summit in New Delhi. He stated they discussed putting the past behind them and building a cooperative future.

ANI


QUAD Advances Logistics Network As India And China Seek Diplomatic Reset


Even as New Delhi works to consolidate a diplomatic thaw with Beijing, the Quad has advanced towards operationalising a logistics network designed to expedite humanitarian and disaster-relief operations across the Indo-Pacific.

Australia, India, Japan and the United States recently concluded a tabletop exercise in Tokyo aimed at driving forward the Quad Indo-Pacific Logistics Network. According to the Ministry of External Affairs, the four nations achieved significant progress in finalising standard operating procedures to establish a formal institutional framework for the network.

The drill, hosted by Japan’s Ministry of Defence on 3 and 4 September, centred on simulated natural-disaster scenarios. Officials assessed methods for pooling logistical assets from all four partners to enhance coordination and interoperability.

This exercise followed the initial IPLN tabletop drill in Hawaii in April last year and a subsequent field training exercise in Guam in December. Alongside logistical planning, delegations discussed coordinating crisis-response and emergency relief efforts, while extending condolences to populations affected by recent flooding.

The IPLN was originally introduced as a civilian initiative at the Quad leaders’ summit in September 2024. It harnesses the logistics resources of the four countries strictly for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief purposes.

The Tokyo exercise took place immediately after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Chinese President Xi Jinping in New Delhi on the sidelines of the BRICS summit. The encounter marked Xi’s first visit to India in seven years.

During the talks, Prime Minister Modi stressed that maintaining peace and tranquillity along the border is fundamental to restoring bilateral normalcy, emphasising adherence to established agreements and mutual understandings. Beijing, however, advocated for parallel progress, suggesting that bilateral cooperation should advance concurrently with efforts to resolve the boundary dispute.

Both governments noted the continued utility of active diplomatic and military mechanisms, referencing the 25th round of Special Representatives’ talks held on 25 August and senior commander-level flag meetings on 6 and 7 September.

While the Quad consistently maintains that it is not a military alliance, focusing instead on maritime security, critical technologies and humanitarian assistance, Beijing has repeatedly characterised the coalition as an exclusive bloc designed for containment. New Delhi firmly rejects this perspective.

The conclusion of the Tokyo drill coincides with a broader sequence of bilateral defence engagements involving India and the other three Quad member states, underscoring the coalition’s expanding operational depth.

ANI


India Condemns Attack On Vessel Off Oman Coast, 13 Indian Nationals Rescued


India has strongly condemned the attack on the Panama‑flagged commercial vessel MT El Gaia off the coast of Oman on Sunday, confirming that 13 of the 14 Indian crew members onboard have been rescued while search and rescue operations continue for the one missing Indian national.

The Ministry of External Affairs stated that the Indian Embassy in Oman is closely monitoring the situation and coordinating with Omani authorities in the ongoing search and rescue operation. The ministry emphasised its gratitude to Oman for its support in rescuing the Indian nationals.

In its statement, the MEA said, “We condemn the attack on the commercial vessel MT El Gaia off the coast of Oman earlier today. Of the 14 Indian crew onboard, 13 Indians have been rescued so far. Search and Rescue operations for the missing Indian national are continuing.”

The Embassy of India in Oman confirmed that search and rescue operations for 13 Indian nationals had been completed and that they had been safely shifted ashore. It added that Omani authorities are continuing efforts to locate the missing crew member. The embassy expressed appreciation for Oman’s continued support and assistance.

The MEA reiterated that the Indian Embassy is proactively coordinating with Omani authorities in the ongoing operation. It stressed that India continues to call for immediate de‑escalation of tensions in the region and urged all sides to pursue dialogue and diplomacy to bring peace.

India’s statement underlined that the targeting of commercial shipping, seafarers, civilians, and civilian infrastructure in the region is unacceptable. It highlighted the importance of safe navigation, uninterrupted commerce, and the safety and well‑being of seafarers amid the ongoing regional tensions.

The incident comes against the backdrop of heightened tensions in West Asia. BRICS nations, including Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the UAE, have recently called for de‑escalation and peace in the region.

The New Delhi Declaration, adopted by BRICS leaders on Saturday, expressed deep concern over the continued escalation of tensions in West Asia. It called for maximum restraint and urged all parties to avoid actions that could further aggravate the situation.

The declaration also emphasised the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, including respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity of states.

BRICS further called for dialogue and diplomacy towards a long‑term understanding that would contribute to lasting peace, security, and stability in the region. It stressed the need to maintain the smooth flow of global trade, supply chains, and energy in accordance with applicable international law.

India’s statement on the MT El Gaia incident reflects New Delhi’s consistent emphasis on maritime security, safe navigation, and uninterrupted commerce, particularly in light of the increasing risks faced by seafarers in conflict‑affected waters.

ANI


PM Modi's Big Diplomatic Success At BRICS 2026: Iran And UAE Vow To Move Forward As Pezeshkian Concludes India BRICS Visit


Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian concluded his visit to India for the 18th BRICS Summit by emphasising that Tehran and Abu Dhabi had agreed to put the past behind them and look towards the future.

His remarks followed a meeting with the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, on the sidelines of the summit in New Delhi, marking a significant diplomatic engagement amid the ongoing conflict in West Asia.

In a series of posts on X, the Embassy of Iran in India quoted Pezeshkian as saying that he had a good conversation with the Crown Prince and agreed to move forward. He also noted brief exchanges with the Presidents of Russia and China, highlighting a promising outlook for the expansion of economic cooperation.

During his visit, Pezeshkian also met Prime Minister Narendra Modi ahead of the summit. The two leaders discussed India-Iran bilateral relations and exchanged views on developments in West Asia, particularly the uncertainty and disruptions affecting the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

According to the Ministry of External Affairs, Modi reiterated India’s consistent position that all issues must be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy. He underscored the need for lasting peace and stability, freedom of navigation and commerce, and the safety of seafarers.

This was the second meeting between Modi and Pezeshkian in recent weeks, following their earlier engagement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit in Bishkek on 31 August.

PM Modi thanked Iran for its regular participation in BRICS-related meetings despite challenging circumstances and noted the potential for BRICS to foster resilience, innovation, cooperation and sustainability among countries of the Global South.

President Droupadi Murmu also met Pezeshkian at Rashtrapati Bhavan during his stay in New Delhi. In addition, the Iranian leader held discussions with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa on the sidelines of the summit. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi separately met Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla, exchanging views on bilateral relations and regional developments.

Addressing the BRICS Summit, Pezeshkian urged the grouping to take practical measures against unilateral and inhumane sanctions, insisting that BRICS must be a voice for justice.

He stressed that members have a responsibility to oppose the normalisation of attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities, warning that such actions pose a direct threat to international peace and security.

He also highlighted the issue of Palestine, calling it a serious test of global governance credibility and urging BRICS to play an active role in upholding the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination.

The BRICS leaders unanimously adopted the New Delhi Declaration 2026, which called for reforms in global governance and stronger representation of developing countries. The declaration expressed concern over escalating tensions in West Asia, urging maximum restraint and avoidance of actions that could worsen the situation.

It emphasised the protection of civilians and infrastructure, respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, and greater efforts through dialogue and diplomacy to achieve lasting peace and stability.

The declaration also stressed the importance of maintaining the smooth flow of global trade, supply chains and energy in accordance with international law. Prime Minister Modi described the summit’s outcome as a reflection of a BRICS that is wider in reach and stronger in purpose.

This visit by Pezeshkian, marked by multiple high-level engagements, underscored Iran’s intent to strengthen ties with India, the UAE and other BRICS members while positioning itself against unilateral sanctions and advocating for reforms in global governance. The diplomatic outreach also highlighted Iran’s efforts to balance regional tensions with constructive dialogue and economic cooperation.

ANI