India Rebukes Pakistan At ASEAN Forum For Misusing Platform To Spread Falsehoods

India has sharply rebuked Pakistan at the ASEAN Regional Forum in Manila, rejecting Ishaq Dar’s remarks on Kashmir and the Indus Waters Treaty as baseless and unwarranted.

New Delhi accused Islamabad of cynically misusing the multilateral platform to spread falsehoods and divert attention from its role as a safe haven for terrorism.

India strongly criticised the comments made by Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar during the 33rd ASEAN Regional Forum. The remarks, which touched upon Jammu and Kashmir and the Indus Waters Treaty, were described by New Delhi as baseless, unwarranted, and a futile attempt to deflect attention from Pakistan’s internal crisis.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar attended the ASEAN-India, East Asia Summit, and ARF meetings in Manila, where India’s delegation underscored its firm positions.

Responding to Dar’s assertions, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that Pakistan had once again cynically exploited a multilateral forum to amplify falsehoods and peddle state-sponsored disinformation.

India categorically rejected Pakistan’s claims, reiterating that Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain integral and inalienable parts of India. The Ministry emphasised that Pakistan has no locus standi to comment on these matters, dismissing Islamabad’s interventions as politically motivated and detached from reality.

On the Indus Waters Treaty, India reaffirmed its consistent stance. The treaty remains in abeyance following Pakistan’s continued sponsorship of cross-border terrorism, including the Pahalgam attack. India declared that the suspension will persist until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for terrorism. This position reflects New Delhi’s broader strategic shift linking water-sharing arrangements directly to security concerns.

India also condemned Pakistan’s continued practice of propagating officially sponsored disinformation. The use of religiously charged terminology such as “Fitna al-Hindustan” was described as a cynical ploy to distract from Pakistan’s domestic turmoil and its well-documented role as a safe haven for global terrorist networks. New Delhi stressed that such rhetoric only underscores Islamabad’s desperation to mask its failures.

The MEA spokesperson urged Pakistan to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism on its soil and to focus on its internal governance rather than misusing international platforms. India argued that Pakistan would serve its citizens far better by addressing domestic challenges instead of indulging in propaganda at global forums.

India’s intervention at the ASEAN Regional Forum highlights its hardened diplomatic posture. By rejecting Pakistan’s claims outright and linking the Indus Waters Treaty suspension to terrorism, New Delhi reinforced its narrative of accountability and sovereignty. The statement also reflects India’s determination to counter attempts to internationalise bilateral disputes.

The ASEAN Regional Forum, which brings together foreign ministers from across Asia and beyond, was intended to discuss regional security and cooperation. India’s sharp rebuttal ensured that Pakistan’s attempt to shift focus was met with firm resistance, reaffirming New Delhi’s position on both territorial integrity and counter-terrorism.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Army Denies Reports of Chinese Encroachment In Arunachal Pradesh, Calls Claims Baseless

The Indian Army has firmly rejected recent media reports alleging encroachment by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army in Arunachal Pradesh and the establishment of camps in the region.

In a statement issued on Monday, the Army described such claims as incorrect and without basis, emphasising that no such activity has taken place along the sensitive frontier.

The Army clarified that it had observed certain reports in a section of the media suggesting fresh incursions by Chinese forces. It categorically stated that these reports were unfounded and did not reflect the actual situation on the ground. The rebuttal was intended to dispel speculation and reassure the public about the stability of the border.

India and China recently held the 35th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on Border Affairs in Beijing. The Ministry of External Affairs later described the discussions as constructive and forward-looking, underscoring the progress made in maintaining peace and tranquillity along the border.

Both sides reviewed the situation in the border areas and expressed satisfaction with the measures taken to sustain stability. This progress has enabled gradual normalisation of bilateral relations, which had been strained in recent years due to tensions along the Line of Actual Control.

The Indian Army’s statement comes at a time when diplomatic and military-level contacts between the two countries are being maintained through established mechanisms. These engagements are seen as crucial in preventing misunderstandings and ensuring that border management remains effective.

The denial of encroachment reports also highlights the importance of accurate information in sensitive security matters. The Army’s clarification reinforces the message that the situation in Arunachal Pradesh remains under control and that peace-building efforts are continuing in line with recent diplomatic exchanges.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Air Force Document Confirms All 36 Rafales Operational, Pakistan’s Loss Claims Busted Again

Pakistan’s claims of Rafale losses during Operation Sindoor have been decisively refuted once again, with an official Indian Air Force document confirming that all 36 Rafale jets acquired under the 2016 deal remain in service, according to a report by India Today.

The June 2026 Request for Proposal for bridge support covers the entire fleet, leaving no room for speculation about combat losses. IDN had reported this development on 23-June-2026.

The Indian Air Force has issued a Request for Proposal in June 2026 seeking a five‑month bridge support package for all 36 Rafale fighter aircraft. This package includes maintenance, logistics and technical support, ensuring uninterrupted operations until a long‑term support contract is finalised.

The proposal anticipates around 2,250 flying hours during this period, underscoring the operational readiness of the fleet.

The inclusion of all 36 aircraft in the tender directly undermines Pakistan’s repeated assertions that several Rafales were destroyed during Operation Sindoor. Had any aircraft been lost, the fleet strength reflected in the maintenance proposal would have been lower. This official record therefore provides clear evidence that the Rafale fleet remains intact.

Pakistan had attempted to bolster its narrative through official statements and coordinated social media campaigns, claiming that its forces shot down multiple Rafales during India’s retaliatory strikes following the Pahalgam terrorist attack. India consistently dismissed these claims as disinformation, accusing Pakistan of running a propaganda campaign to undermine the success of the operation.

Further evidence had already weakened Islamabad’s assertions. Several Rafale aircraft bearing tail numbers that Pakistani accounts had claimed were “destroyed” were later photographed and recorded participating in operational flying. This visual proof reinforced India’s position that no Rafale was lost in combat.

The Rafale fleet played a central role during Operation Sindoor, executing precision strikes against targets inside Pakistan. Defence officials have maintained that the aircraft performed exactly as intended, delivering accurate results and sustaining no losses. The June 2026 tender now adds another layer of official confirmation to this narrative.

Meanwhile, India is pressing ahead with its ambitious Multi‑Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program, under which it plans to procure 114 additional Rafale jets from Dassault Aviation. Discussions on this acquisition were held recently between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron.

The framework emphasises Make in India principles, with co‑development, co‑design and co‑production forming the backbone of future defence cooperation.

Under the MRFA program, 18 Rafales will be delivered in flyaway condition, while the remaining aircraft will be manufactured in India with approximately 50 per cent indigenous content. This arrangement marks a significant step towards self‑reliance in defence production and strengthens India’s strategic partnership with France.

The latest developments therefore deliver a decisive rebuttal to Pakistan’s claims, reaffirming both the operational readiness of India’s Rafale fleet and the country’s long‑term commitment to expanding its air combat capabilities through indigenous production and international collaboration.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Singapore Blocks China-Origin Content Targeting Indian Community

Singapore has taken decisive action against online content that specifically targeted the Indian community.

The High Commission of Singapore in India announced that the government had ordered social media platforms to block such content, which was believed to have originated from China.

The move was made under the Online Criminal Harms Act 2023, with the Singapore Police Force issuing Disabling Directions to platforms including YouTube, Facebook and X.

These directions require the platforms to take all reasonable steps to disable access by Singapore users to the inflammatory posts.

According to the statement from the Ministry of Home Affairs, the content circulating online was designed to undermine Singapore’s model of multiculturalism. The ministry explained that narratives began appearing last month in the Chinese information space, suggesting that Singapore was anxious about its cultural identity and ethnic politics.

Shortly afterwards, online posts emerged portraying Singapore as being “overrun by Indians” and questioning the country’s commitment to cultural diversity.

The statement highlighted that these narratives claimed Singapore’s multiracial policy was merely a façade intended to appeal to Western values. They further alleged that the country’s stability was not due to its multiracial framework but rather its majority Chinese demographics.

Another strand of the disinformation suggested that ethnic Indian politicians in Singapore, whose numbers were said to be increasing, would act in favour of Indian immigrants. The content also argued that Singapore’s culture was fundamentally Chinese and that the government’s approach of “decoupling” from China while ignoring the supposed threat of a growing Indian community would lead to negative consequences.

Singapore’s authorities strongly rejected these claims, stressing that the government firmly opposes nativism and xenophobia. They emphasised that any attempt to pit one community against another must be firmly rejected.

The statement underscored that such attacks, especially when originating from foreign sources, were doubly unacceptable.

The government reiterated that it takes a serious view of threats to social cohesion and racial harmony, including those posed by external actors, and will act resolutely against them.

The Ministry of Home Affairs urged Singaporeans to be discerning when consuming and sharing information online. Citizens were encouraged to reject attempts to divide society and to remain vigilant against disinformation campaigns.

This development reflects Singapore’s broader commitment to safeguarding its multicultural identity and ensuring that external actors cannot destabilise its social fabric.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

India And Israel As Great Allies Must Unite Against The Eighth Front of Narrative Warfare: Former Mossad Agent

Former Mossad agent Sagiv Asulin has urged India and Israel to join forces against what he described as the “Eighth Front” of narrative warfare, a growing challenge in the modern era of information manipulation.

He stressed that both nations, bound by democratic values and strategic interests, are uniquely positioned to counter non-kinetic threats emerging through social media and digital platforms, particularly those targeting younger generations.

The “Eighth Front” represents a new strategic dimension in global conflict, where the battle is fought over narratives, perception, and influence. Unlike conventional military engagements, this front plays out across universities, media outlets, and virtual channels, shaping international opinion and diplomatic alignments.

Asulin drew parallels between Israel’s struggles with propaganda and India’s experience following its military response in ‘Operation Sindoor’, highlighting how both countries face similar perception battles.

Operation Sindoor was India’s decisive retaliation to the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam massacre, where Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 civilians after questioning them about their religion. India responded on May 7, 2025, by striking terror infrastructure across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, destroying nine major launchpads and eliminating over 100 terrorists.

The operation triggered a four-day conflict marked by drone attacks and shelling from Pakistan, with India retaliating by destroying radar installations in Lahore and near Gujranwala. A ceasefire was agreed upon on May 10 after Pakistan’s DGMO sought talks.

India also terminated the Indus Waters Treaty and bilateral trade, while Operation Mahadev later eliminated three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack. Asulin noted that India, like Israel, faced intense external information warfare during these events.

He underlined the depth of bilateral ties, stating that Israel has historically shared its best intelligence with India and will continue to do so. He described India as the world’s largest democracy and Israel as the only Jewish democracy, emphasising their shared values and strategic alignment.

Asulin warned that public perception has become a critical battlefield, driven by radical Islamist groups and ultra-left progressive movements, which he said are active in America, Europe, India, and Israel.

To illustrate the global nature of these perception battles, Asulin referred to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel, which killed around 1,200 people and led to the capture of over 250 hostages. The subsequent conflict has lasted more than two years, with the Palestinian Health Ministry reporting over 72,700 deaths in Gaza.

Despite a ceasefire agreement last October, violence has continued, with Palestinian officials citing over 880 deaths since then. Israel maintains that its operations are aimed at countering Hamas violations and protecting its security forces.

Asulin acknowledged that October 7 was a major intelligence failure, but clarified that it was not due to a lack of information. Mossad, he explained, operates outside Israel and does not cover Gaza or the West Bank.

The failure lay in analytical paradigms, with Israeli intelligence focusing on threats from Iran and northern fronts while underestimating Hamas in Gaza. He stressed that the gap was in analysis rather than data, and investigations are ongoing to understand what went wrong.

Given the global nature of narrative warfare, Asulin proposed the creation of an institutionalised mechanism to counter disinformation campaigns. He suggested starting with an organisation in Israel, but ultimately building a centralised international body to lead the fight against coordinated propaganda. He argued that since these threats are global and affect multiple nations simultaneously, cooperation between allies such as India and Israel is essential.

Asulin’s remarks highlight the evolving nature of modern conflict, where perception and information are as decisive as military strength. His call for a joint India-Israel front against the “Eighth Front” underscores the urgency of addressing narrative warfare as a global challenge that transcends borders and demands collective action.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Army Denounces Circulated Video Featuring Dismissed Personnel, AAP, RJD Politicians As Malicious Attempt To Tarnish Image

The Indian Army has strongly objected to a video circulating on social media that depicts men in military uniform participating in a press conference alongside political leaders. In its official statement issued on X, the Army described the video as an attempt to malign its image and warned citizens against falling prey to misinformation.

The press conference in question was held at the Press Club of India in New Delhi, where opposition MPs Manoj Kumar Jha of the RJD and Sanjay Singh of the AAP addressed reporters. They were joined by several individuals in uniform, including former Army personnel.

The Army clarified that three of the individuals seen in the video — Chandu Chavan, Harendra Yadav and P Narender — had previously been dismissed from service due to indiscipline and unsoldierly conduct.

It further stated that another individual, Shankar Singh Gujjar, is a deserter against whom disciplinary proceedings are ongoing in both military and civil courts. The Army emphasised that these men were deliberately spreading fake, malicious and misleading narratives to divert attention from their own misconduct and dismissal from service.

A photograph shared by the Army showed two men in uniform seated alongside the political leaders, with digital stamps marking the image as “false” and “misleading.” The Army did not name any political leader in its post but reiterated that the video was being circulated with the intent to damage its reputation. It cautioned netizens to remain vigilant, avoid rumours, and not fall prey to propaganda. The hashtags #FakeAlert and #Beware were used to underline the warning.

The controversy has stirred a sharp reaction, with the Army making clear that it views the circulation of such content as part of a broader attempt to undermine its credibility.

Officials stressed that the individuals involved were no longer serving soldiers and had lost their standing due to disciplinary failures.

By highlighting their status as dismissed personnel and a deserter, the Army sought to reassure the public that the institution remains committed to discipline and integrity, and that those attempting to exploit its image for political or personal gain should not be trusted.

This episode reflects the growing challenge of misinformation campaigns targeting national institutions. The Army’s proactive response, including the use of fact-checking visuals and public advisories, underscores its determination to protect its image and maintain public confidence.

It also highlights the importance of vigilance among citizens in an era where manipulated content can spread rapidly across platforms, potentially distorting perceptions of respected institutions.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

China Launches Disinformation Campaign To Undermine India’s Great Nicobar Port Project

Reports indicate that China has launched a disinformation campaign targeting India’s Great Nicobar Port project, portraying it as environmentally destructive and politically controversial.

Analysts suggest this is part of Beijing’s broader strategy to undermine India’s strategic foothold near the Strait of Malacca, a critical chokepoint for Chinese trade and energy supplies.

The Great Nicobar Island Development Project, approved by the Union Cabinet in 2021 and devised by NITI Aayog, is valued at approximately ₹81,000 crore (around $10 billion). It is designed to transform Great Nicobar into a major commercial and strategic hub.

The centrepiece is a transhipment port at Galathea Bay, built on a naturally deep harbour of 18 to 20 metres. The port is expected to handle 4 million TEUs by 2028 and expand to 16 million TEUs by 2058, rivalling Singapore’s capacity and positioning India as a key maritime player in the Indo-Pacific.

The project also includes an international greenfield airport with a 3,300-metre runway capable of accommodating wide-body aircraft, a 450 MW solar and gas-based power plant, and the expansion of the Andaman and Nicobar tri-service command into a frontline strategic arm.

These dual-use facilities will serve both civilian and military purposes, enhancing India’s ability to project power and secure its maritime interests.

China’s opposition stems from the project’s location. Great Nicobar sits at the mouth of the Six Degree Channel, one of the main routes into and out of the Strait of Malacca. More than 80% of China’s oil imports, valued at about $312 billion annually, and two-thirds of its overall trade pass through this narrow waterway.

The Chinese leadership has long recognised this vulnerability, famously described by former President Hu Jintao in 2003 as the “Malacca Dilemma.” With over 15 million barrels of oil consumed daily, and only 3.7 million transported via overland pipelines, China’s dependence on the strait remains acute.

India’s control of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, stretching over 700 kilometres, effectively places it at the gateway to this chokepoint. Great Nicobar, equidistant from Singapore, Port Klang, and Colombo, is geographically positioned as a natural aircraft carrier. For India, the project is a strategic trump card, offering leverage in any future confrontation with China and reinforcing its role as a rising power in the Indo-Pacific.

Reports suggest that China has sought to derail the project by amplifying environmental concerns and encouraging opposition within India’s political class. Campaigns highlighting ecological risks and questioning the project’s viability have been circulated, aiming to slow down or halt its progress. 

However, India has cleared major legal hurdles, with the National Green Tribunal refusing to interfere with environmental clearances earlier this year, allowing the project to advance.

The disinformation campaign reflects Beijing’s anxiety over India’s growing maritime capabilities and its ability to challenge Chinese dominance in the region. By attempting to sow discord and delay construction, China hopes to protect its vulnerable trade lifeline.

Yet, India’s determination to proceed underscores its recognition of the strategic importance of Great Nicobar, not just as an economic hub but as a cornerstone of its security architecture in the Indian Ocean.

IDN (With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

DRDO's Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE) Receives Bomb Threat Email

A significant security alert was triggered at the Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE) in Bengaluru following the receipt of multiple threatening emails.

The facility, operates as a critical laboratory under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). Upon receiving the alerts, local authorities were immediately notified to manage the escalating situation.

The correspondence, which was authored entirely in the Tamil language, contained an explicit warning that several Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) had been concealed throughout the premises. The sender claimed that these devices were timed to detonate during the afternoon, specifically at approximately 1:30 pm. This specific timeline necessitated an urgent response from emergency services to ensure the safety of the personnel on-site.

In response to the gravity of the message, officials ordered a total evacuation of the laboratory. A comprehensive search operation was conducted by the police, assisted by the fire services and a specialised bomb disposal squad. After a thorough sweep of the buildings and grounds, no explosive materials were discovered, and the threat was officially categorised as a hoax.

Beyond the immediate threat of a bomb attack, the emails contained a second, highly specific warning regarding a kidnapping plot. The sender threatened the abduction of the grandson of a prominent and influential politician from Tamil Nadu. This added a layer of political complexity to the investigation, moving it beyond a standard security threat against a military establishment.

Reports indicate that the messages originated from an email address identified as 'Kiruthiha.udhayanidhi@hotmail'. The content of the communication allegedly detailed a plot to kidnap Inbanidhi, who is the grandson of the current Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, M. K. Stalin. This specific detail has shifted the focus of the investigation toward identifying the person or group attempting to impersonate or target the Chief Minister’s family.

The Central Crime Branch (CCB) has since intensified its efforts to track the digital footprint of the accused and uncover the identity of those behind the emails. While the initial bomb threat was proven false, the authorities are not taking the matter lightly.

As a direct result of these events, security protocols have been significantly bolstered at various defence establishments across the city to prevent further incidents.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

Guardian of The Digital Skies: The Indian Air Force Bolsters National Security With AI-Driven OSINT

The Indian Air Force is currently spearheading the development and deployment of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence-based Open-Source Intelligence analysis and monitoring systems. This proactive measure is designed to identify and neutralise online misinformation, disinformation, and evolving cyber threats that pose a risk to national stability.

By integrating these technologies, the IAF aims to reinforce a comprehensive strategy for securing both India’s sovereign airspace and its critical military operations within an increasingly complex digital landscape.

A primary driver for this initiative is the urgent need to combat digital warfare, specifically anti-India propaganda and orchestrated misinformation campaigns. The urgency of this mission was underscored by the rise of AI-generated deepfakes and manipulated digital content encountered during heightened military tensions in mid-2025.

These tools allow the IAF to parse through vast amounts of data to protect the cognitive domain of its personnel and the general public from hostile influence operations.

Central to these advancements is the IAF’s dedicated AI Centre of Excellence, which operates under the UDAAN umbrella, an acronym for Unit for Digitisation, Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Application Networking.

This specialised hub is tasked with managing large-scale Big Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Natural Language Processing. Through UDAAN, the air force is transforming raw information into actionable intelligence with unprecedented speed and accuracy.

The development of these capabilities is not a solitary effort but a collaborative venture involving the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. Together, they are refining tools for intelligence processing that can automatically extract concise summaries from various intelligence inputs. These systems utilize deep learning techniques to synthesise data from a multitude of formats, ensuring that decision-makers are not overwhelmed by the volume of incoming reports.

Among the system's key functional capabilities is robust threat monitoring conducted within the IAF’s own captive networks to prevent internal breaches.

Furthermore, the platform is specifically engineered for social media analysis, allowing the military to track the spread of fake news and malicious narratives in real-time. This ensures that the IAF can respond to digital provocations as quickly as they emerge on public platforms.

In addition to textual and social data, the AI tools provide critical support for imagery intelligence analysis. By leveraging computer vision, the systems can accurately identify enemy assets, pin-point specific targets, and assess hostile troop movements from satellite and aerial reconnaissance. This automated analysis reduces the burden on human analysts and increases the reliability of surveillance data.

These AI-driven OSINT tools are being fully integrated into the broader framework of Command, Control, Communication, Computer, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance operations.

This integration into the C2ISR architecture is vital for maintaining real-time situational awareness during active missions. By streamlining the flow of information, the IAF ensures that its tactical responses are based on the most current and verified data available.

IDN (With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

Echoes of Silence: Unmasking The Global Media Bias In Modern Air Warfare

The striking disparity in global media coverage between Operation Sindoor and Operation Epic Fury reveals a profound inconsistency in how military narratives are curated for the public. While prominent international outlets such as The New York Times, Reuters, The Washington Post and Al Jazeera have dedicated dozens of articles to unverified claims regarding the loss of Indian Rafale jets, they remain noticeably silent on documented losses during Western-led campaigns.

This selective reporting suggests a predisposition to scrutinise Indian military successes while overlooking the logistical and combat realities of global superpowers. Indian media web portal The Wire had the maximum number of news articles of the purported Rafale jets going down during Operation Sindoor.

In the case of Operation Sindoor, the Indian Air Force maintained a high level of operational integrity, with officials and manufacturers like Dassault Aviation confirming that no Rafales were lost to enemy action.

Despite this, a surge of reports from Western and regional agencies amplified speculative claims, often rooted in disinformation campaigns designed to undermine India’s strategic standing. The sheer volume of these articles, contrasted with the lack of physical evidence such as wreckage or radar data, points to an editorial bias that favours sensationalist narratives over verified military briefings.

Conversely, the lack of mainstream coverage regarding the sixteen American fighter jets reported lost during Operation Epic Fury highlights a significant blind spot in the international press. Even when presented with proof, the silence from major publications like The Washington Post and Reuters is deafening. This absence of scrutiny allows Western military narratives to remain unchallenged, creating a protected information space that is rarely afforded to developing nations or non-Western powers.

Such a clear divergence in reportage raises serious questions about the "double standards" inherent in modern journalism. When Indian forces achieve their objectives with precision, they are met with a barrage of sceptical investigations.

Yet, when Western assets face significant setbacks, the same outlets often fail to provide even a baseline level of reporting. This imbalance not only misleads the global audience but also attempts to diminish the technological and tactical superiority displayed by the Indian Air Force during critical missions.

Ultimately, the data suggests that the "truth" in international media is often a matter of geography and political alignment. By prioritising unverified rumours against India while suppressing factual losses in Western operations, these outlets have compromised their role as objective observers.

India’s steadfast denial of aircraft losses during Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to its operational transparency, especially when compared to the opaque and protected reporting surrounding recent American aerial engagements.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

PM Netanyahu Quells Death Hoax With Fresh Footage As Disinformation Surges

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has once again taken to social media to counter rampant rumours of his death, releasing a new video on Monday that shows him engaging with members of the public.

The footage, captioned "Sticking to the guidelines and winning together", depicts the leader in good spirits amid a wave of online speculation.

This latest release follows a similar video posted on Sunday, in which Netanyahu was seen sipping coffee and deliberately showing all five fingers on his hand.

That clip directly addressed claims from Iranian social media accounts alleging his assassination, with detractors insisting an earlier appearance featured a 'sixth finger'—a supposed hallmark of AI manipulation.

Israel's Ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, swiftly intervened to affirm Netanyahu's wellbeing. Speaking to the press, Azar declared, "Prime Minister Netanyahu is alive. I saw him personally when I was in Israel more than once. This video at the cafe is not AI-fabricated. There is a lot of disinformation." His comments underscore the challenges posed by digital falsehoods in an era of heightened tensions.

The rumours exploded after Netanyahu shared a press conference video on Friday, discussing the ongoing Israel-US-Iran conflict. eagle-eyed social media users zoomed in on the 0:35 timestamp, where he raised his hands, claiming an anomalous 'extra flesh' near his little finger betrayed AI generation—a 'classic AI finger glitch', as one post virialized it.

Netanyahu's office issued a terse rebuttal earlier on Sunday, responding to queries from Anadolu Agency correspondent. "These are fake news; the Prime Minister is fine," the statement read, aiming to douse the flames of speculation that had spread across platforms like X and Telegram.

Such disinformation fits a pattern amid Israel's protracted conflicts, particularly with Iran and its proxies. Pro-Iran accounts have a history of amplifying unverified claims to sow confusion, especially following recent escalations including missile exchanges and proxy skirmishes in the region.

Experts note that AI deepfakes have become a potent weapon in information warfare. Subtle artefacts like irregular fingers or unnatural lighting often betray fakes, yet they fuel conspiracy theories faster than fact-checks can catch up. Netanyahu's deliberate finger display cleverly flips this narrative, turning a glitch into proof of authenticity.

The prime minister's resilience in addressing these rumours personally highlights his media savvy. By posting unscripted, real-time content, he bypasses intermediaries and connects directly with audiences wary of official channels.

This episode arrives against a tense geopolitical canvas. Israel faces multi-front pressures: Iran's nuclear ambitions, Hezbollah's rocket barrages from Lebanon, and Houthi disruptions in the Red Sea. Netanyahu's visibility reassures allies while projecting defiance to adversaries.

Domestic politics add another layer. Netanyahu, long a polarising figure, battles corruption trials and coalition fractures at home. Health rumours could erode public confidence, making swift debunkings essential for stability.

Social media's role cannot be overstated. Algorithms prioritise sensationalism, propelling unverified posts to millions before corrections gain traction. Platforms like X have flagged some content, but the damage lingers.

International observers, including Indian diplomats tracking Middle East dynamics, view this as symptomatic of hybrid warfare. Israel's embassy in New Delhi emphasised authentic footage, reinforcing bilateral ties amid shared concerns over Iranian influence.

Netanyahu's team has not elaborated on the video's precise location or context, but its casual tone—interacting with passers by—contrasts sharply with the formal press conference that sparked the furore.

As the dust settles, this incident serves as a stark reminder of disinformation's speed in modern conflicts. Netanyahu's repeated proofs of life not only silence doubters but also spotlight the need for digital literacy.

Yet questions persist: who originated the six-finger claim, and what ulterior motives drive it? Iranian state media's involvement suggests state-sponsored Psyops, aimed at undermining Israel's leadership at a vulnerable juncture.

For now, the prime minister soldiers on, his videos a bulwark against the fog of fake news. In an age where truth is pixelated, such transparency remains a vital defence.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

PM Netanyahu's Five-Fingered Coffee Rebuttal Crushes Iranian Assassination Hoax Amid Escalating War

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has firmly debunked viral rumours claiming his assassination, amid heightened tensions in the Middle East. On 15 March 2026, social media platforms erupted with claims that Netanyahu had been killed, fuelled by speculation over a recent video appearance.

The rumours intensified after Netanyahu shared a press conference video on Friday, discussing the escalating conflict involving Israel, the United States, and Iran. Observant viewers alleged the footage was AI-generated, pointing to what they described as a 'classic AI finger glitch' at the 0:35 mark, where his right hand appeared to show six fingers.

Iranian social media accounts amplified the narrative, asserting that Netanyahu was dead and that the video was fabricated using artificial intelligence. They highlighted the supposed anomaly as evidence, sparking a wave of posts across platforms like X.

In response, Netanyahu posted a new video on X late on Sunday, casually sipping coffee while raising his hand to display five fingers clearly. He captioned it provocatively: "They say I'm what? Watch >>". The clip swiftly quelled speculation among his supporters.

Netanyahu's office had already issued a statement earlier that day, confirming the Prime Minister was "fine" after queries from Anadolu Agency. They dismissed the circulating claims as "fake news", urging the public to disregard unverified digital rumours.

American conservative commentator Candace Owens waded into the fray, posting on X: "Where's Bibi?" She questioned why Netanyahu's office would release and then delete purportedly fake AI videos, while alleging "mass panic at the White House".

X's AI chatbot, Grok, intervened with a fact-check, clarifying that Netanyahu has the standard five fingers per hand. It attributed the perceived anomalies to optical illusions from shadows, hand angles, or natural palm features like the hypothenar eminence. Official footage from Israel's Government Press Office corroborated this.

This episode unfolds against a volatile regional backdrop. The current escalation traces back to 28 February 2026, when Israel and the United States launched coordinated attacks on Iran, resulting in the death of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the opening day.

Iran retaliated with strikes on neighbouring oil-exporting nations, disrupting global energy markets and drawing in broader alliances. Netanyahu's press conference video addressed these developments, outlining Israel's strategic posture.

Such disinformation campaigns are not new in the Israel-Iran shadow war. AI deepfakes have proliferated since tools like generative models became accessible, often exploited by state actors to sow confusion during conflicts.

Netanyahu's coffee-sipping rebuttal echoes past instances where leaders have used simple, real-time visuals to counter death hoaxes—think Saddam Hussein's 2003 video or more recent Middle Eastern precedents. It underscores the power of authentic imagery in the digital age.

Experts warn that these rumours could distract from real military movements. With Iran's leadership in flux and US involvement deepening, verifying information remains critical for analysts and policymakers alike.

The incident highlights the dual-edged sword of social media in modern geopolitics: rapid information flow enables swift debunking but also accelerates misinformation. Netanyahu's office has since ramped up real-time verifications to maintain public trust.

As the conflict persists, expect more such psychological operations. For now, the Prime Minister's five-fingered salute serves as a stark reminder that not every glitch signals doom.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

IAF Displays Another Rafale Allegedly Downed By Pakistan, Exposing Pak, China, And Western Media Lies

During the heightened tensions that followed Operation Sindoor in May 2025, Pakistan, China‑linked information outlets and several Western media reports claimed that at least one Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafale fighter had been shot down over the Line of Control or in Pakistani airspace.

These narratives were amplified by doctored imagery, recycled crash‑footage from unrelated accidents, and selective commentary from retired regional officers and defence analysts sympathetic to Pakistan’s position.

The claims were quickly mirrored by Chinese state‑linked platforms, which sought to portray the Rafale as vulnerable to Chinese‑origin radar and missile systems deployed with the Pakistan Air Force.

In response, the IAF chose not merely to issue written rebuttals but to release a high‑definition video during the Republic Day week of 2026, showing a Rafale bearing the tail number BS‑022 taxiing, undergoing checks and then taking off in full operational configuration. And recently BS-021, which Pakistan claimed was shot down over Srinagar in May 2025, was seen flying at Vayu Shakti 2026.

This specific aircraft had been singled out in earlier Pakistani and social‑media narratives as one of the “Rafales shot down” during the four‑day air stand‑off after Operation Sindoor.

By visually displaying the same jet in pristine condition, the IAF effectively turned the disputed tail number into a symbol of countering misinformation, demonstrating that the aircraft not only survived but remained fully mission‑ready.

The footage, released in 4K resolution through the IAF’s official media‑cell channels, also served a broader information‑warfare purpose. It showed the Rafale in its war‑stripped configuration, loaded with advanced weapons such as the Meteor beyond‑visual‑range air‑to‑air missile and other precision‑guided munitions, signalling continued operational confidence in the platform.

The video was edited alongside clips of Sukhoi‑30MKIs and TEJAS fighters, underscoring that multiple legs of the IAF’s strike package had executed Operation Sindoor without sustaining the catastrophic losses alleged by Pakistan. By choosing a public, image‑heavy format, the IAF bypassed technical jargon and communicated directly with both domestic audiences and international defence watchers.

Behind the scenes, Indian and French officials had already begun pushing back against the narrative of a Rafale loss. Dassault Aviation’s leadership publicly stated that there was no evidence to support claims that a Rafale had been destroyed by Pakistan, and French technical and intelligence sources pointed out incongruities in the imagery and radar‑signature interpretations circulated by pro‑Pakistan outlets.

French media and defence analysts, in turn, noted that satellite imagery and electronic‑intelligence patterns did not corroborate the Pakistani‑claimed kill. This dual‑track effort—technical‑diplomatic outreach plus visible, tangible proof via the IAF’s video—undermined the credibility of the initial downing narrative.

Pakistan’s Defence Ministry and military spokespersons had initially asserted that Chinese‑made J‑10C fighters, armed with PL‑15E missiles, had downed multiple Indian aircraft, including three or four Rafales, during the retaliatory phase of the conflict.

These claims were embraced by certain Western wire‑services that relied on unnamed “US officials,” even as New Delhi maintained a strict policy of not confirming any fratricide or loss of advanced platforms.

The absence of wreckage photos, cockpit‑voice recordings or verifiable GPS coordinates, coupled with the IAF’s ability to later parade the same aircraft that was supposedly destroyed, left such accounts increasingly exposed as speculative or politically‑driven.

From a strategic‑communication standpoint, the IAF’s decision to display this particular Rafale underscores a deliberate shift in how India handles information warfare surrounding high‑value platforms. Instead of confining itself to opaque “no‑comment” postures, the service used tightly controlled imagery to deconstruct foreign narratives, while still protecting broader operational details such as exact sortie‑counts, tactics and electronic‑warfare configurations.

The move also reassured existing and potential foreign buyers of the Rafale, conveying that the type continued to perform robustly in contested environments despite concerted efforts to discredit it.

The episode also highlights how misinformation around air‑combat outcomes can have tangible effects beyond the battlefield. False claims of a Rafale downing were used to question India’s procurement choices, especially by Congress, India's main opposition party. It also aided to cast doubt on the Meteor missile’s lethality, and to bolster narratives about Chinese‑made systems outperforming Western‑origin platforms in active service.

By juxtaposing Pakistan’s verbal assertions with the physical evidence of a fully operational BS‑022 Rafale, the IAF not only defended the aircraft’s reputation but also reinforced the idea that India’s deterrent posture remains credible and intact.

In the longer term, the display of this Rafale may be seen less as a simple rebuttal and more as a marker of a new, more transparent approach to combat‑narrative management.

It suggests that India is willing to selectively reveal hardware and weapons payloads to counter disinformation, without compromising classified capabilities.

For Pakistan, China and their allied media ecosystems, the episode serves as a reminder that unverified kill‑claims can backfire when a well‑documented counter‑image can be produced in a matter of months.

IDN (With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

China-Pak JF-17 Fake Narrative: Pakistan's Defence Export Ambitions Grounded In Reality

In recent days, Islamabad has aggressively promoted the narrative of surging global demand for the Pakistan-China manufactured JF-17 Thunder aircraft.

This comes amid unsubstantiated claims by both Pakistan and China that their JF-17 and J-10 fighters downed a French Rafale during India's Operation Sindoor. Lacking any evidence, these assertions appear designed to boost sales of Chinese-origin platforms, wrote Major General Harsha Kakar.

In most global news outlets, Pakistani reporters are present and frequently promote narratives aligned with their state's propaganda. A reporter Samaan Lateef initiated this narrative, which was then amplified by other Pakistani reporters worldwide. Curiously, no other publication expressing interest in the fighter jet has published a single report supporting Lateef's claims. The effectiveness of such PsyOps is dangerously evident in how this fabricated narrative has proliferated.

French intelligence reports have highlighted a coordinated Pakistan-China disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting the Rafale, particularly targeting markets in South-East Asia. The timing aligns with waning interest in Chinese equipment, following reports of its air defence systems failing in Venezuela—echoing earlier disappointments in Pakistan.

Pakistan's propaganda machine sprang into action with a flurry of daily announcements. On 7 January, media outlets claimed Bangladesh would procure JF-17s. The next day, Saudi Arabia emerged as a supposed buyer; on 9 January, Sudan followed; and soon after, Indonesia was named. Days earlier, Libya, Sudan, and Iraq had allegedly shown keen interest. Such rapid, uncoordinated claims undermine credibility, lacking the intelligence typical of genuine sales drives.

Even Pakistan's Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, joined the chorus in an interview, boasting that JF-17 orders could eliminate the need for IMF bailouts within six months. In reality, the JF-17 is 58% produced in Pakistan and 42% in China, yet Islamabad markets it as a homegrown triumph.

Chinese social media handles amplified the narrative, positioning the JF-17 and J-10 as superior alternatives to the Rafale. This push gains urgency as demand for Chinese gear falters, with nations regretting prior purchases due to reliability issues.

Nigeria's experience exemplifies the pitfalls. After acquiring three JF-17s, the air force reported sluggish manoeuvrability, limited avionics, outdated radars, frequent glitches, and maintenance nightmares. Even in low-threat counter-insurgency roles, the jets underperformed. Desperate, Nigeria sidelined them and opted for Italian M-346FA aircraft.

Myanmar suffered a similar fate, influenced by Chinese pressure. Jets delivered between 2019 and 2021 developed structural cracks and technical faults shortly after arrival, rendering most airframes unfit for operations. Pakistani engineers failed to rectify the issues, straining bilateral ties and forcing Myanmar to turn to Russian Su-30s.

China's J-10 fares no better. No nation has committed to purchases despite propaganda touting successes in Operation Sindoor. Indonesia briefly expressed interest but quickly pivoted to 66 Rafales after recognising performance shortfalls.

The Indonesian Defence Minister's recent Pakistan visit sparked false hopes. Pakistan's DG ISPR proclaimed Jakarta's JF-17 interest, but Indonesian outlet The Jakarta Times described discussions as general defence cooperation—strategic dialogues, institutional communication, and mutual opportunities—with no mention of equipment deals. Why would a Rafale buyer opt for unreliable JF-17s?

Saudi Arabia's supposed interest ties into Pakistan's unpaid $2 billion debt, often rolled over by Riyadh. The DG ISPR announced the 'deal', but Pakistan's Foreign Office spokesperson admitted having no details. Riyadh offered no confirmation. Saudi Arabia, flying F-15s and Eurofighters while eyeing F-35s, has no need for obsolete JF-17s—any aid might benefit its backed Sudanese factions instead.

Azerbaijan ordered 16 JF-17s in late 2024, parading five in November 2025. Delivery status of the rest remains unclear, but reports suggest dissatisfaction with subpar performance as it seeks to replace Soviet-era jets.

Unverified reports swirl around Bangladesh, Libya, Iraq, and Sudan. Dhaka has issued no confirmation—only Pakistan has. Offers during visits often stem from diplomatic courtesy, with rejections following later, as seen with the Indo-US F-35 overture from Trump.

The aviation sector knows the JF-17's limitations: poor reliability, substandard avionics, and unsuitability beyond ceremonial flypasts. The fake Rafale 'kill' narrative briefly buoyed interest, but global scrutiny revealed Pakistan's losses and Chinese equipment failures.

Only sanctioned or cash-strapped allies like Azerbaijan, Libya's regime, Iraq, or Sudan consider it out of necessity. Pakistan-embedded media figures, citing anonymous sources, push this via global outlets on DG ISPR's behalf.

This sales frenzy accelerated as India announced plans for 114+ Rafales, possibly to reassure Pakistan's public that Western jets pose no threat amid JF-17's 'global popularity'. Yet any narrative from Islamabad demands scepticism, backed by the stark lessons from Nigeria and Myanmar: buyers risk grounded fleets, zero support, and costly pivots elsewhere.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

China's Boastful Superior Weapons Claims Crumble In Real Combat Conditions

China's "Justice Mission 2025" exercises, conducted from 29 to 30 December 2025, marked the sixth major military drill around Taiwan since 2022, involving the People's Liberation Army's air force, navy, army, and rocket forces across five designated zones.

These manoeuvres simulated blockades, live-fire operations, and control of key ports, aimed at projecting Beijing's dominance over the Taiwan Strait amid heightened tensions.

The drills followed a US$11 billion US arms sale to Taiwan and Japanese statements linking a potential Chinese blockade to national survival, underscoring the geopolitical flashpoint.

Beijing released footage to emphasise its missile launches and air superiority, portraying readiness to encircle and seize Taiwan while intimidating global observers. State messaging framed the exercises as a stern warning against separatism, with psychological operations targeting Taiwanese morale.

Yet, this display of might quickly unravelled when Taiwanese forces countered effectively, exposing vulnerabilities in China's advanced platforms.

Taiwanese F-16V Viper fighters, upgraded with US-supplied advanced avionics including AN/APG-83 AESA radars and Sniper targeting pods, achieved radar locks on PLA J-16 multirole fighters during the exercises.

Footage shared by Taiwan's Ministry of National Defence showed these fourth-generation jets silently tracking the J-16s, contradicting Chinese claims of superior stealth and jamming resistance. Had Taiwan opted for engagement, multiple J-16s could have been downed, revealing a stark performance gap.

The J-16, a Flanker derivative touted by Beijing for its AESA radar with 200-250 km detection range and electronic warfare suites, proved trackable by Taiwan's upgraded F-16Vs.

These Vipers feature passive detection via infrared search and track systems alongside active radars, allowing silent locks without emissions that could alert foes. This incident highlights how real-world integration of sensors and tactics can neutralise hyped capabilities.

Taiwan leveraged social media strategically, disseminating images and videos of the locks to boost domestic morale and wage narrative warfare against Beijing. This transparent approach reassures citizens of readiness while subtly undermining PLA invincibility claims. Analysts note it as a sophisticated deterrent, blending operational demos with information operations.

Defence experts view this as emblematic of China's rhetoric-reality disconnect, where boasts of superiority falter under scrutiny. Parallels emerge with Russia's Ukrainian setbacks, where numerical edges yielded to tactical proficiency and resolve from smaller forces. Overconfidence in untested systems risks strategic embarrassment for Beijing in any Taiwan campaign.

Taiwan's posture, fortified by US arms and allied support, maintains the balance despite China's asset volume. International scrutiny, including from Japan, amplifies the costs of escalation. These episodes serve as checks on aggression, affirming that preparation trumps propaganda in contested skies.

Agencies

​

Comments

Continue Reading