Indian Army Exposes Deepfake Video Falsely Claiming Chinese Control Over Arunachal Pradesh Areas

The Indian Army has issued a strong warning against a digitally manipulated deepfake video circulating on social media that falsely claims China has taken control of parts of Arunachal Pradesh.

The video also wrongly alleges that Indian Army personnel deployed in the region have been denied essential supplies.

The fabricated clip falsely attributes remarks to Lieutenant General Girish Kalia (AVSM, VSM), General Officer Commanding of the Spear Corps (3 Corps). The content was presented as a supposed "leaked admission" by the senior officer, claiming that China had occupied Asaphila, Longjou and the Taksing Circle in Arunachal Pradesh.

Debunking the claims, the Indian Army's official fact-checking unit, Indian Army Fact Check (@MythbusterXX), confirmed that the video had been digitally altered using Synthetic Generated Information technologies, including AI-based lip-syncing and voice cloning.

According to the Army, genuine archival footage was manipulated and overlaid with fabricated audio in an attempt to spread military disinformation and trigger unnecessary public alarm.

In its statement, the fact-checking team said: "A digitally altered video is being circulated with fabricated remarks attributed to Lt Gen Girish Kalia, claiming that China has taken control of Asaphila, Longjou and Taksing Circle in Arunachal Pradesh and that the Indian Army has been denied essential supplies."

It further stated: "The misleading video attempts to portray fabricated statements as a leaked admission by a senior Indian Army officer. The video uses #SyntheticGeneratedInformation to falsely attribute remarks to Lt Gen Girish Kalia."

The Army traced the source of the footage and established that the original video was recorded on 27 October 2023 in Kupwara, Jammu and Kashmir. At the time, Girish Kalia was serving as a Major General and General Officer Commanding of the 28 Infantry Division.

The briefing in question was related exclusively to counter-terrorist operations and security developments along the Line of Control. During that media interaction, the officer discussed infiltration attempts originating across the border and highlighted the Army's operational successes in the sector.

According to the original briefing, security forces had foiled 10 infiltration attempts and eliminated 27 terrorists. Large quantities of warlike stores, weapons and narcotics were also recovered during the operations.

The Army emphasised that at no point during the 2023 briefing did the officer mention China, Arunachal Pradesh, territorial control issues, border incursions, or any shortage of supplies for Indian troops.

Officials described the viral clip as part of a broader disinformation effort that combines authentic footage with synthetic audio and false context to create misleading narratives. The Army outlined the formula behind the campaign as: Old Military Briefing + Digitally Manipulated Remarks + False Attribution + Fabricated Territorial Claims = Misleading Military Disinformation.

Independent fact-checkers examining the viral content also found no credible evidence supporting the claims made in the altered video. Their analysis confirmed that the original footage dealt solely with counter-infiltration operations in Jammu and Kashmir and contained no references to developments along the India-China border.

The incident highlights the growing use of artificial intelligence tools to create convincing deepfakes capable of distorting public discourse, particularly on sensitive national security issues.

Security experts have increasingly warned that manipulated audio and video content can be exploited to spread misinformation, undermine trust in institutions and create confusion during periods of heightened geopolitical sensitivity.

Urging vigilance, the Indian Army advised citizens to scrutinise unverified videos carefully and verify information through official sources before sharing content online. The force reiterated that manipulated media designed to imitate genuine military communications should not be amplified without proper authentication.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

India Instructs META To Fix Facebook, Instagram Algorithms Over Misleading Content And Curb One-Sided Narratives

As reported by PTI, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has directed Meta to review the recommendation systems operating on Facebook and Instagram, amid concerns that misleading or manipulated content could be receiving excessive visibility on the social media platforms. 

Reports indicate that the advisory was issued on 10 October and focuses on strengthening safeguards against content capable of causing public confusion, unrest, violence or other unlawful activities.

The government asked Meta to enhance its monitoring of misleading information, altered visuals and material that may contribute to public disorder. It also called for closer scrutiny of content recommendation and ranking systems so that inaccurate or deceptive material is not amplified disproportionately through platform algorithms.

According to the advisory, Meta must ensure that users are not repeatedly exposed to only one perspective or a restricted set of viewpoints. The ministry stressed that recommendation systems should encourage a broader range of relevant and credible information rather than heavily promoting a single narrative.

A key element of the directive concerns photographs, videos, graphics and other content relating to ongoing public events. MeitY asked Meta to provide adequate context wherever the authenticity, timing, location or circumstances of content may not be immediately clear to users. The aim is to reduce the circulation of material that may be presented in a misleading or out-of-context manner.

The advisory reportedly contains six broad requirements for Meta. These include identifying and addressing prohibited content, strengthening escalation mechanisms and reviewing recommendation systems to reduce the likelihood that misleading material gains disproportionate reach.

MeitY further instructed the company to establish stronger systems for the rapid identification, review and escalation of content that is spreading widely through recommendations. The ministry warned that such material could potentially generate widespread confusion, apprehension, violence or disturbances to public order if not addressed swiftly.

Government sources indicated that agencies had raised concerns that Meta’s platforms were not promoting all viewpoints equally, with algorithms allegedly appearing to favour certain forms of content over others. These concerns are understood to have contributed to the ministry’s decision to issue the advisory.

Although the advisory does not cite a specific event as the reason for the intervention, it was issued during a period of heightened political activity and public debate. The timing coincides with continuing demands from the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and several opposition parties seeking the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

The ministry also reminded Meta of its obligations under the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. The advisory emphasised that intermediary platforms are required to exercise due diligence and take appropriate measures to limit the spread of harmful or unlawful content.

In addition, Meta has been asked to cooperate promptly with law enforcement agencies and authorised government bodies when information or assistance is requested under applicable legal provisions. The ministry stressed that such cooperation should be provided within the timelines specified under the IT Rules, 2021.

The move reflects growing regulatory attention worldwide on the influence of recommendation algorithms. Governments and regulators in multiple jurisdictions have increasingly raised concerns that algorithm-driven content promotion can unintentionally amplify misinformation, polarising narratives and manipulated media, particularly during periods of political sensitivity or major public events. 

Against this backdrop, India’s latest advisory signals a stronger focus on algorithmic accountability and platform responsibility in the country’s rapidly expanding digital ecosystem.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

India Strongly Rebukes UN Youth Rights Report, Cites Anonymous And Unverified Claims

India has strongly challenged a United Nations report that alleged young people in the country face retaliation or stigmatisation for speaking about issues such as mental health and gender justice.

The criticism was delivered by Indian diplomat Anuj Swarup during an interactive dialogue at the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly's Third Committee.

Swarup questioned the credibility of the findings and argued that the report relied heavily on anonymous and unverified submissions rather than independently verified evidence.

The report was prepared by UN Special Rapporteur Gina Romero, whose mandate covers the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

According to India, broad conclusions about the country’s young population cannot be justified on the basis of unnamed sources referenced in footnotes. Swarup described the allegations as unsupported by verifiable evidence and rejected them outright.

He argued that India's Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, as well as the freedoms of assembly and association, to all citizens. He added that these rights are protected through an independent judiciary, a free press and the National Human Rights Commission.

The Indian diplomat further contended that reliance on anonymous submissions to draw conclusions about one of the world's largest youth populations undermines the credibility of such assessments.

Swarup urged greater rigour, verification and fairness in the preparation of UN reports, maintaining that conclusions affecting a country of India's scale should be supported by substantial and transparent evidence.

India also pointed to continued youth engagement initiatives and government interaction with young citizens, including large-scale consultation efforts and action against examination fraud, as examples of institutional responsiveness to youth concerns.

The exchange underscores an ongoing disagreement between New Delhi and the United Nations over the assessment of civic freedoms and youth participation in India, particularly regarding the methodology used to evaluate conditions on the ground.

As a result, the debate has evolved beyond the report's specific allegations, focusing more broadly on standards of evidence, accountability and credibility in international human rights reporting.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

French-Made Rafale Proves Formidable Opponent for China's J-16, Pilots Report After Egypt Drills

Chinese fighter pilots who flew J-16 multirole aircraft during the joint Egypt-China air exercise 'The Eagles of Civilisation 2026' have reportedly informed senior military officials that the French-built Rafale is a far more capable adversary than previously believed, The Week reported.

The exercise, held between 22 August and early September 2026 across several Egyptian air bases, marked the first known occasion on which Chinese J-16 crews were able to conduct combat training against a modern Western-designed fighter aircraft in a realistic operational environment.

China deployed at least six J-16 heavy multirole fighters, supported by KJ-500 airborne early warning aircraft, Y-9LG electronic warfare aircraft, YY-20A aerial refuelling tankers, Y-20 strategic transport aircraft and Z-20 helicopters.

Beijing was reportedly keen to evaluate how the J-16 would perform against Egyptian Air Force combat aircraft, particularly the Rafale and MiG-29M/M2. The exercise offered Chinese pilots a rare opportunity to assess Western-origin platforms first hand and compare their performance against one of the People's Liberation Army Air Force's most advanced fighters.

According to reports emerging after the drills, Chinese crews concluded that the Rafale possesses notable advantages during within-visual-range engagements. Pilots reportedly found that the French aircraft can become a threat more quickly during close-range aerial combat, where reaction times are compressed and split-second decision-making often determines the outcome.

The assessment highlighted several areas in which the Rafale was considered superior. These included close-range manoeuvrability, instantaneous turning performance, rapid rolling capability, high-angle-of-attack control and nose-pointing authority.

Rapid rolling allows an aircraft to rotate swiftly around its longitudinal axis, enabling quicker changes in direction and more aggressive manoeuvring during air combat. Effective nose-pointing capability allows a fighter to bring its weapons towards an opponent faster, potentially securing a firing solution before the rival aircraft can respond.

The findings are notable because Chinese military commentators and social media accounts had earlier portrayed the J-16 as having achieved an overwhelming advantage over the Rafale during the exercise. Subsequent assessments from participating pilots, however, reportedly suggested a more balanced picture and recognised the strengths of the French aircraft.

The reported conclusions do not necessarily determine the outcome of an actual conflict. Modern aerial combat is influenced by numerous factors, including pilot training, weapons integration, sensor performance, networked warfare capabilities and electronic warfare systems.

China continues to invest heavily in advanced sensors, electronic warfare technologies and radar-jamming capabilities. These developments, together with increasingly capable beyond-visual-range missile systems, are designed to allow engagements to be fought at long distances, reducing the need for close-quarters manoeuvring contests.

Analysts also caution against drawing direct conclusions for any potential encounter involving the Indian Air Force. Egypt's Rafales are configured differently from those operated by India, with variations in weapons, mission systems, software integration and operational doctrine.

As a result, observations gathered during the Egyptian exercise would require significant adjustment before being applied to any Indian contingency planning scenario. There is also no publicly available evidence suggesting that Chinese personnel gained access to sensitive Indian Rafale configurations, mission data or operational planning through the exercise.

Nevertheless, the drills provided China with valuable insight into the handling characteristics of one of the world's leading multirole fighters. The reported feedback indicates that, despite advances in Chinese military aviation, the Rafale remains a credible and potentially challenging opponent in visual-range air combat.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

MEA Warns Against Misleading Social Media Claims On Jinping, Ramaphosa BRICS Leaders' Health

The Ministry of External Affairs has issued a strong caution against misleading and malicious social media posts concerning the health of world leaders who attended the BRICS Summit in New Delhi. The warning was prompted by unverified claims circulating online about Chinese President Xi Jinping and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

In a post on X, the MEA categorically dismissed such rumours, stating, ‘Misleading! We caution against such malicious posts on social media platforms!’ The ministry emphasised that these claims were unfounded and potentially harmful.

The controversy arose after several social media accounts alleged that President Xi had fainted during the summit and suffered a stroke before being flown back to Beijing for treatment. These allegations gained traction when reports noted his absence from the summit dinner. However, there has been no official confirmation of any medical emergency involving the Chinese leader.

The MEA’s remarks coincided with a statement from the South African Presidency, which confirmed that President Cyril Ramaphosa had withdrawn from public engagements following his return from India. The statement clarified that the 73-year-old leader was advised by doctors to rest due to ill health. It further noted that, where possible, ministers would represent him at scheduled events.

Ramaphosa’s office stressed that his temporary withdrawal was precautionary and aimed at ensuring his recovery. His absence from public duties has added to speculation, but the official communication sought to dispel rumours by providing clarity on his condition.

The BRICS Summit, held in New Delhi from 12 to 13 September under India’s chairship, brought together leaders of the expanded 11-member grouping. The summit was convened under the theme ‘Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability.’ It underscored India’s role in steering the agenda towards practical cooperation across economic development, technology, governance, and global challenges.

India’s hosting of the summit came at a time when the grouping continues to expand its membership and influence. The summit sought to build consensus among diverse nations while addressing pressing issues of economic cooperation, technological advancement, and sustainable development. The gathering reaffirmed BRICS’ commitment to strengthening global governance and promoting resilience in the face of geopolitical and economic uncertainties.

The MEA’s intervention highlights the growing challenge of misinformation in the digital age, particularly during high-profile international events. By cautioning against malicious claims, India underscored the importance of responsible communication and the need to safeguard the credibility of global forums such as BRICS.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Pakistan’s AI ‘War Film’ On Operation Sindoor Mocked As Internet Roasts Fake Propaganda Video

Pakistan’s Air Force has released an AI-generated video claiming that it struck 32 Indian Air Force bases, destroyed several fighter aircraft and even hit Parliament during Operation Sindoor, NDTV Profit reported.

The video was unveiled on Pakistan Air Force Day and presented as an animated account of the May 2025 hostilities. It depicted attacks on Indian military and strategic targets, including two S-400 air defence systems, four Rafales, one Sukhoi Su-30MKI, one MiG-29, one Mirage-2000 and one Heron drone.

However, the production contained no photographic or satellite evidence to substantiate the alleged destruction.

The video, titled Fizaon ke Pasban, relied heavily on animation and AI-generated visuals to portray Pakistan’s claimed military successes. It showed the Pakistani Air Force jamming satellites, crippling fuel supplies and disrupting India’s national power grid. It also depicted strikes on Parliament, Gujarat’s Kandla Port and INS Vikrant.

A prominent graphic declared “32 IAF bases hit” alongside claims of aircraft losses. Yet, despite the scale of these assertions, Pakistan did not release before-and-after imagery or verifiable material to establish the extent of damage.

The absence of evidence was particularly striking given the magnitude of the claims. If 32 IAF bases had indeed been hit, satellite imagery or independent verification would be expected. Pakistan’s military leadership, including Army Chief Asim Munir, has not provided supporting proof. India Today reported that the video relied entirely on AI visuals rather than real footage, raising questions about credibility.

By contrast, India released actual footage following Operation Sindoor. During daily briefings, visuals of strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan were made public, along with footage showing damage inflicted on 11 Pakistani military bases.

Independent open-source intelligence researchers later confirmed this evidence, with high-resolution satellite imagery revealing cratered runways and damaged hangars at PAF bases such as Bholari, Sargodha and Nur Khan.

The Washington Post described the strikes as India’s most extensive attack on Pakistani military infrastructure since the 1971 Liberation War.

Pakistan’s repeated claim of destroying India’s S-400 systems was also contradicted by subsequent events. Days after the conflict, Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Adampur Air Force Station and addressed personnel in front of an intact S-400 system.

This directly undermined Pakistan’s assertion that the system had been destroyed.

The timing of the PAF video is notable, coming weeks after Discovery released its two-part documentary Declassified: Operation Sindoor. That production featured first-hand accounts from Indian military officials and included previously unseen footage of the operation and damage inflicted on Pakistani military infrastructure.

Pakistan’s AI-heavy video appeared to be a counter-narrative, but its reliance on graphics rather than evidence drew widespread mockery online.

Social media users ridiculed the video’s lack of real footage. Journalist Abhijit Majumder described it as “Comedy Gold! AI credits loaned from Turkey and Saudi.”

Another commentator quipped that the actual footage of what Pakistan claimed to have destroyed amounted to “404 NOT FOUND.” Others joked that Pakistan no longer needed a defence budget, only an AI video generator to “win the war on YouTube.”

The latest production fits into a broader pattern since Operation Sindoor, with Pakistan repeatedly asserting that it inflicted major losses on Indian military assets. India Today noted that the new video adds to those claims but again relies on AI-generated visuals without independent evidence.

While India presented verifiable damage to Pakistani military infrastructure, Pakistan’s video offered only graphics, explosions and animated strikes without proof that the alleged destruction occurred.

In essence, India showed the damage, while Pakistan’s latest video showed the graphics.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Fake News Being Circulated That Chinese Air Force'S J-16 Fighters Defeated Rafale 7-1 In Egypt

Claims that Chinese J‑16 fighters defeated Rafales 7‑1 in Egypt during the “Civilized Eagle 2026” drills are unverified and widely regarded as propaganda. Neither Cairo nor Beijing has released official data, and defence analysts stress that the score line originated solely from Chinese social media and military blogs.

Reports circulating online suggested that the People’s Liberation Army Air Force’s J‑16 jets outgunned Egyptian Rafales in simulated beyond‑visual‑range missile engagements and dogfight confrontations. The alleged outcome was a 7‑1 victory for the Chinese side.

However, neither the Egyptian nor Chinese governments have confirmed these claims, and no official telemetry, kill ratios, or engagement records have been published.

The exercise itself was significant as it marked the first time Chinese fighters had trained against a Western‑built platform. The J‑16s were deployed alongside YY‑20A tankers, a KJ‑500 early warning aircraft, and support assets, flying over 6,000 km to reach Egypt. This long‑range deployment demonstrated China’s ability to project air power far beyond its borders.

Videos shared on social media were used to substantiate the claims. Yet analysts pointed out that the footage lacked missile launches, radar displays, adjudication overlays, weapons‑impact simulations, debriefing charts, or pilot testimony. Without such evidence, it is impossible to determine whether the recorded sequences represented genuine engagements, scripted manoeuvres, or simple exercise termination.

Chinese military blogs and NetEase/WeChat platforms were the first to circulate the 7‑1 score line. Some even claimed that one victory was “gifted” to Egypt to save face. Defence experts believe these narratives are part of an information campaign designed to influence public perception and potential arms buyers. China has previously used exaggerated claims to promote its aircraft in export markets, particularly in competition with French and Western designs.

Egypt’s Air Force, ranked 22nd in the Global Air Powers Rankings 2026, operates Rafales configured differently from those of the Indian Air Force. Their weapons, electronic‑warfare systems, software standards, training doctrines, and mission priorities vary substantially.

India, ranked sixth globally, operates 36 Rafales and is set to acquire 26 Rafale‑M for its Navy, with negotiations ongoing for 114 more. India is also exploring collaboration with France on the sixth‑generation FCAS program, which could enhance Rafale capabilities further.

For France and Dassault Aviation, the controversy highlights how peacetime exercises can be exploited for competitive information operations.

Dramatic cockpit imagery, selective disclosure, and algorithmically amplified speculation can shape perceptions long before technical evidence emerges. This is particularly relevant in export markets where rival manufacturers compete for contracts worth billions of $.

Ultimately, while the Civilized Eagle 2026 exercise was a milestone in Sino‑Egyptian military cooperation, the alleged 7‑1 score line remains unsubstantiated.

Analysts caution against accepting such claims at face value, noting China’s history of peddling propaganda to bolster its military image and sway potential buyers. Until official data is released, the narrative of J‑16 superiority over Rafale remains speculative and politically motivated.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

IISc And DRDO Launch HybridNet To Detect Fake News Using Multimodal AI

Researchers from the Indian Institute of Science and the Defence Research and Development Organisation have unveiled HybridNet, a multimodal framework designed to detect fake news by identifying mismatches between text and images.

The system represents a significant step in the fight against misinformation, particularly in an era where manipulated content spreads rapidly across digital platforms.

HybridNet’s core approach is to treat open-source Vision Language Models as reasoning tools rather than conventional classifiers.

This allows the framework to move beyond simple labelling and instead perform deeper logical checks on the consistency of multimodal content. By leveraging reasoning capabilities, the system can provide more reliable authenticity assessments.

The framework runs a three-stage consistency check. First, it examines image-text alignment to determine whether the visual content matches the accompanying narrative.

Second, it performs image-image comparisons to detect duplication, manipulation, or inconsistencies across visual datasets.

Third, it conducts text-text checks to identify contradictions or semantic mismatches within the written content itself. This layered approach ensures that HybridNet can capture subtle discrepancies that single-modality systems often miss.

HybridNet is designed to be lightweight. It distils observations into a compact classifier that generates clear, human-readable explanations alongside authenticity scores. This transparency is critical, as it allows analysts and end-users to understand why a particular piece of content has been flagged as suspicious, rather than relying on opaque machine outputs.

The system also incorporates active learning to reduce the burden of data annotation. By intelligently selecting which samples require labelling, HybridNet maintains high accuracy while using labels for less than half of the training data. This efficiency makes the framework more practical for large-scale deployment, where manual annotation is often a bottleneck.

Beyond its technical design, HybridNet reflects a broader push by IISc and DRDO to develop indigenous AI solutions for national security and information integrity. The framework is particularly relevant in the context of defence and strategic communication, where misinformation campaigns can have serious consequences.

By combining multimodal reasoning with efficient learning strategies, HybridNet positions itself as a robust tool against adversarial information operations.

This initiative also aligns with India’s wider focus on artificial intelligence for defence applications. DRDO has previously emphasised the importance of trusted indigenous AI systems, particularly in areas such as cyber defence and threat intelligence.

HybridNet complements these efforts by addressing the information warfare dimension, ensuring that fake news detection is not only accurate but also explainable and resource-efficient.

The project demonstrates how academic institutions and defence organisations can collaborate to tackle pressing technological challenges. IISc’s expertise in advanced AI research and DRDO’s focus on national security applications create a synergy that strengthens India’s capability to counter misinformation.

HybridNet is therefore not just a technical achievement but also a strategic milestone in safeguarding information ecosystems.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

India Rebukes Pakistan At ASEAN Forum For Misusing Platform To Spread Falsehoods

India has sharply rebuked Pakistan at the ASEAN Regional Forum in Manila, rejecting Ishaq Dar’s remarks on Kashmir and the Indus Waters Treaty as baseless and unwarranted.

New Delhi accused Islamabad of cynically misusing the multilateral platform to spread falsehoods and divert attention from its role as a safe haven for terrorism.

India strongly criticised the comments made by Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar during the 33rd ASEAN Regional Forum. The remarks, which touched upon Jammu and Kashmir and the Indus Waters Treaty, were described by New Delhi as baseless, unwarranted, and a futile attempt to deflect attention from Pakistan’s internal crisis.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar attended the ASEAN-India, East Asia Summit, and ARF meetings in Manila, where India’s delegation underscored its firm positions.

Responding to Dar’s assertions, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that Pakistan had once again cynically exploited a multilateral forum to amplify falsehoods and peddle state-sponsored disinformation.

India categorically rejected Pakistan’s claims, reiterating that Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain integral and inalienable parts of India. The Ministry emphasised that Pakistan has no locus standi to comment on these matters, dismissing Islamabad’s interventions as politically motivated and detached from reality.

On the Indus Waters Treaty, India reaffirmed its consistent stance. The treaty remains in abeyance following Pakistan’s continued sponsorship of cross-border terrorism, including the Pahalgam attack. India declared that the suspension will persist until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for terrorism. This position reflects New Delhi’s broader strategic shift linking water-sharing arrangements directly to security concerns.

India also condemned Pakistan’s continued practice of propagating officially sponsored disinformation. The use of religiously charged terminology such as “Fitna al-Hindustan” was described as a cynical ploy to distract from Pakistan’s domestic turmoil and its well-documented role as a safe haven for global terrorist networks. New Delhi stressed that such rhetoric only underscores Islamabad’s desperation to mask its failures.

The MEA spokesperson urged Pakistan to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism on its soil and to focus on its internal governance rather than misusing international platforms. India argued that Pakistan would serve its citizens far better by addressing domestic challenges instead of indulging in propaganda at global forums.

India’s intervention at the ASEAN Regional Forum highlights its hardened diplomatic posture. By rejecting Pakistan’s claims outright and linking the Indus Waters Treaty suspension to terrorism, New Delhi reinforced its narrative of accountability and sovereignty. The statement also reflects India’s determination to counter attempts to internationalise bilateral disputes.

The ASEAN Regional Forum, which brings together foreign ministers from across Asia and beyond, was intended to discuss regional security and cooperation. India’s sharp rebuttal ensured that Pakistan’s attempt to shift focus was met with firm resistance, reaffirming New Delhi’s position on both territorial integrity and counter-terrorism.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Army Denies Reports of Chinese Encroachment In Arunachal Pradesh, Calls Claims Baseless

The Indian Army has firmly rejected recent media reports alleging encroachment by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army in Arunachal Pradesh and the establishment of camps in the region.

In a statement issued on Monday, the Army described such claims as incorrect and without basis, emphasising that no such activity has taken place along the sensitive frontier.

The Army clarified that it had observed certain reports in a section of the media suggesting fresh incursions by Chinese forces. It categorically stated that these reports were unfounded and did not reflect the actual situation on the ground. The rebuttal was intended to dispel speculation and reassure the public about the stability of the border.

India and China recently held the 35th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on Border Affairs in Beijing. The Ministry of External Affairs later described the discussions as constructive and forward-looking, underscoring the progress made in maintaining peace and tranquillity along the border.

Both sides reviewed the situation in the border areas and expressed satisfaction with the measures taken to sustain stability. This progress has enabled gradual normalisation of bilateral relations, which had been strained in recent years due to tensions along the Line of Actual Control.

The Indian Army’s statement comes at a time when diplomatic and military-level contacts between the two countries are being maintained through established mechanisms. These engagements are seen as crucial in preventing misunderstandings and ensuring that border management remains effective.

The denial of encroachment reports also highlights the importance of accurate information in sensitive security matters. The Army’s clarification reinforces the message that the situation in Arunachal Pradesh remains under control and that peace-building efforts are continuing in line with recent diplomatic exchanges.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Air Force Document Confirms All 36 Rafales Operational, Pakistan’s Loss Claims Busted Again

Pakistan’s claims of Rafale losses during Operation Sindoor have been decisively refuted once again, with an official Indian Air Force document confirming that all 36 Rafale jets acquired under the 2016 deal remain in service, according to a report by India Today.

The June 2026 Request for Proposal for bridge support covers the entire fleet, leaving no room for speculation about combat losses. IDN had reported this development on 23-June-2026.

The Indian Air Force has issued a Request for Proposal in June 2026 seeking a five‑month bridge support package for all 36 Rafale fighter aircraft. This package includes maintenance, logistics and technical support, ensuring uninterrupted operations until a long‑term support contract is finalised.

The proposal anticipates around 2,250 flying hours during this period, underscoring the operational readiness of the fleet.

The inclusion of all 36 aircraft in the tender directly undermines Pakistan’s repeated assertions that several Rafales were destroyed during Operation Sindoor. Had any aircraft been lost, the fleet strength reflected in the maintenance proposal would have been lower. This official record therefore provides clear evidence that the Rafale fleet remains intact.

Pakistan had attempted to bolster its narrative through official statements and coordinated social media campaigns, claiming that its forces shot down multiple Rafales during India’s retaliatory strikes following the Pahalgam terrorist attack. India consistently dismissed these claims as disinformation, accusing Pakistan of running a propaganda campaign to undermine the success of the operation.

Further evidence had already weakened Islamabad’s assertions. Several Rafale aircraft bearing tail numbers that Pakistani accounts had claimed were “destroyed” were later photographed and recorded participating in operational flying. This visual proof reinforced India’s position that no Rafale was lost in combat.

The Rafale fleet played a central role during Operation Sindoor, executing precision strikes against targets inside Pakistan. Defence officials have maintained that the aircraft performed exactly as intended, delivering accurate results and sustaining no losses. The June 2026 tender now adds another layer of official confirmation to this narrative.

Meanwhile, India is pressing ahead with its ambitious Multi‑Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program, under which it plans to procure 114 additional Rafale jets from Dassault Aviation. Discussions on this acquisition were held recently between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron.

The framework emphasises Make in India principles, with co‑development, co‑design and co‑production forming the backbone of future defence cooperation.

Under the MRFA program, 18 Rafales will be delivered in flyaway condition, while the remaining aircraft will be manufactured in India with approximately 50 per cent indigenous content. This arrangement marks a significant step towards self‑reliance in defence production and strengthens India’s strategic partnership with France.

The latest developments therefore deliver a decisive rebuttal to Pakistan’s claims, reaffirming both the operational readiness of India’s Rafale fleet and the country’s long‑term commitment to expanding its air combat capabilities through indigenous production and international collaboration.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Singapore Blocks China-Origin Content Targeting Indian Community

Singapore has taken decisive action against online content that specifically targeted the Indian community.

The High Commission of Singapore in India announced that the government had ordered social media platforms to block such content, which was believed to have originated from China.

The move was made under the Online Criminal Harms Act 2023, with the Singapore Police Force issuing Disabling Directions to platforms including YouTube, Facebook and X.

These directions require the platforms to take all reasonable steps to disable access by Singapore users to the inflammatory posts.

According to the statement from the Ministry of Home Affairs, the content circulating online was designed to undermine Singapore’s model of multiculturalism. The ministry explained that narratives began appearing last month in the Chinese information space, suggesting that Singapore was anxious about its cultural identity and ethnic politics.

Shortly afterwards, online posts emerged portraying Singapore as being “overrun by Indians” and questioning the country’s commitment to cultural diversity.

The statement highlighted that these narratives claimed Singapore’s multiracial policy was merely a façade intended to appeal to Western values. They further alleged that the country’s stability was not due to its multiracial framework but rather its majority Chinese demographics.

Another strand of the disinformation suggested that ethnic Indian politicians in Singapore, whose numbers were said to be increasing, would act in favour of Indian immigrants. The content also argued that Singapore’s culture was fundamentally Chinese and that the government’s approach of “decoupling” from China while ignoring the supposed threat of a growing Indian community would lead to negative consequences.

Singapore’s authorities strongly rejected these claims, stressing that the government firmly opposes nativism and xenophobia. They emphasised that any attempt to pit one community against another must be firmly rejected.

The statement underscored that such attacks, especially when originating from foreign sources, were doubly unacceptable.

The government reiterated that it takes a serious view of threats to social cohesion and racial harmony, including those posed by external actors, and will act resolutely against them.

The Ministry of Home Affairs urged Singaporeans to be discerning when consuming and sharing information online. Citizens were encouraged to reject attempts to divide society and to remain vigilant against disinformation campaigns.

This development reflects Singapore’s broader commitment to safeguarding its multicultural identity and ensuring that external actors cannot destabilise its social fabric.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

India And Israel As Great Allies Must Unite Against The Eighth Front of Narrative Warfare: Former Mossad Agent

Former Mossad agent Sagiv Asulin has urged India and Israel to join forces against what he described as the “Eighth Front” of narrative warfare, a growing challenge in the modern era of information manipulation.

He stressed that both nations, bound by democratic values and strategic interests, are uniquely positioned to counter non-kinetic threats emerging through social media and digital platforms, particularly those targeting younger generations.

The “Eighth Front” represents a new strategic dimension in global conflict, where the battle is fought over narratives, perception, and influence. Unlike conventional military engagements, this front plays out across universities, media outlets, and virtual channels, shaping international opinion and diplomatic alignments.

Asulin drew parallels between Israel’s struggles with propaganda and India’s experience following its military response in ‘Operation Sindoor’, highlighting how both countries face similar perception battles.

Operation Sindoor was India’s decisive retaliation to the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam massacre, where Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 civilians after questioning them about their religion. India responded on May 7, 2025, by striking terror infrastructure across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, destroying nine major launchpads and eliminating over 100 terrorists.

The operation triggered a four-day conflict marked by drone attacks and shelling from Pakistan, with India retaliating by destroying radar installations in Lahore and near Gujranwala. A ceasefire was agreed upon on May 10 after Pakistan’s DGMO sought talks.

India also terminated the Indus Waters Treaty and bilateral trade, while Operation Mahadev later eliminated three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack. Asulin noted that India, like Israel, faced intense external information warfare during these events.

He underlined the depth of bilateral ties, stating that Israel has historically shared its best intelligence with India and will continue to do so. He described India as the world’s largest democracy and Israel as the only Jewish democracy, emphasising their shared values and strategic alignment.

Asulin warned that public perception has become a critical battlefield, driven by radical Islamist groups and ultra-left progressive movements, which he said are active in America, Europe, India, and Israel.

To illustrate the global nature of these perception battles, Asulin referred to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel, which killed around 1,200 people and led to the capture of over 250 hostages. The subsequent conflict has lasted more than two years, with the Palestinian Health Ministry reporting over 72,700 deaths in Gaza.

Despite a ceasefire agreement last October, violence has continued, with Palestinian officials citing over 880 deaths since then. Israel maintains that its operations are aimed at countering Hamas violations and protecting its security forces.

Asulin acknowledged that October 7 was a major intelligence failure, but clarified that it was not due to a lack of information. Mossad, he explained, operates outside Israel and does not cover Gaza or the West Bank.

The failure lay in analytical paradigms, with Israeli intelligence focusing on threats from Iran and northern fronts while underestimating Hamas in Gaza. He stressed that the gap was in analysis rather than data, and investigations are ongoing to understand what went wrong.

Given the global nature of narrative warfare, Asulin proposed the creation of an institutionalised mechanism to counter disinformation campaigns. He suggested starting with an organisation in Israel, but ultimately building a centralised international body to lead the fight against coordinated propaganda. He argued that since these threats are global and affect multiple nations simultaneously, cooperation between allies such as India and Israel is essential.

Asulin’s remarks highlight the evolving nature of modern conflict, where perception and information are as decisive as military strength. His call for a joint India-Israel front against the “Eighth Front” underscores the urgency of addressing narrative warfare as a global challenge that transcends borders and demands collective action.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Army Denounces Circulated Video Featuring Dismissed Personnel, AAP, RJD Politicians As Malicious Attempt To Tarnish Image

The Indian Army has strongly objected to a video circulating on social media that depicts men in military uniform participating in a press conference alongside political leaders. In its official statement issued on X, the Army described the video as an attempt to malign its image and warned citizens against falling prey to misinformation.

The press conference in question was held at the Press Club of India in New Delhi, where opposition MPs Manoj Kumar Jha of the RJD and Sanjay Singh of the AAP addressed reporters. They were joined by several individuals in uniform, including former Army personnel.

The Army clarified that three of the individuals seen in the video — Chandu Chavan, Harendra Yadav and P Narender — had previously been dismissed from service due to indiscipline and unsoldierly conduct.

It further stated that another individual, Shankar Singh Gujjar, is a deserter against whom disciplinary proceedings are ongoing in both military and civil courts. The Army emphasised that these men were deliberately spreading fake, malicious and misleading narratives to divert attention from their own misconduct and dismissal from service.

A photograph shared by the Army showed two men in uniform seated alongside the political leaders, with digital stamps marking the image as “false” and “misleading.” The Army did not name any political leader in its post but reiterated that the video was being circulated with the intent to damage its reputation. It cautioned netizens to remain vigilant, avoid rumours, and not fall prey to propaganda. The hashtags #FakeAlert and #Beware were used to underline the warning.

The controversy has stirred a sharp reaction, with the Army making clear that it views the circulation of such content as part of a broader attempt to undermine its credibility.

Officials stressed that the individuals involved were no longer serving soldiers and had lost their standing due to disciplinary failures.

By highlighting their status as dismissed personnel and a deserter, the Army sought to reassure the public that the institution remains committed to discipline and integrity, and that those attempting to exploit its image for political or personal gain should not be trusted.

This episode reflects the growing challenge of misinformation campaigns targeting national institutions. The Army’s proactive response, including the use of fact-checking visuals and public advisories, underscores its determination to protect its image and maintain public confidence.

It also highlights the importance of vigilance among citizens in an era where manipulated content can spread rapidly across platforms, potentially distorting perceptions of respected institutions.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

China Launches Disinformation Campaign To Undermine India’s Great Nicobar Port Project

Reports indicate that China has launched a disinformation campaign targeting India’s Great Nicobar Port project, portraying it as environmentally destructive and politically controversial.

Analysts suggest this is part of Beijing’s broader strategy to undermine India’s strategic foothold near the Strait of Malacca, a critical chokepoint for Chinese trade and energy supplies.

The Great Nicobar Island Development Project, approved by the Union Cabinet in 2021 and devised by NITI Aayog, is valued at approximately ₹81,000 crore (around $10 billion). It is designed to transform Great Nicobar into a major commercial and strategic hub.

The centrepiece is a transhipment port at Galathea Bay, built on a naturally deep harbour of 18 to 20 metres. The port is expected to handle 4 million TEUs by 2028 and expand to 16 million TEUs by 2058, rivalling Singapore’s capacity and positioning India as a key maritime player in the Indo-Pacific.

The project also includes an international greenfield airport with a 3,300-metre runway capable of accommodating wide-body aircraft, a 450 MW solar and gas-based power plant, and the expansion of the Andaman and Nicobar tri-service command into a frontline strategic arm.

These dual-use facilities will serve both civilian and military purposes, enhancing India’s ability to project power and secure its maritime interests.

China’s opposition stems from the project’s location. Great Nicobar sits at the mouth of the Six Degree Channel, one of the main routes into and out of the Strait of Malacca. More than 80% of China’s oil imports, valued at about $312 billion annually, and two-thirds of its overall trade pass through this narrow waterway.

The Chinese leadership has long recognised this vulnerability, famously described by former President Hu Jintao in 2003 as the “Malacca Dilemma.” With over 15 million barrels of oil consumed daily, and only 3.7 million transported via overland pipelines, China’s dependence on the strait remains acute.

India’s control of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, stretching over 700 kilometres, effectively places it at the gateway to this chokepoint. Great Nicobar, equidistant from Singapore, Port Klang, and Colombo, is geographically positioned as a natural aircraft carrier. For India, the project is a strategic trump card, offering leverage in any future confrontation with China and reinforcing its role as a rising power in the Indo-Pacific.

Reports suggest that China has sought to derail the project by amplifying environmental concerns and encouraging opposition within India’s political class. Campaigns highlighting ecological risks and questioning the project’s viability have been circulated, aiming to slow down or halt its progress. 

However, India has cleared major legal hurdles, with the National Green Tribunal refusing to interfere with environmental clearances earlier this year, allowing the project to advance.

The disinformation campaign reflects Beijing’s anxiety over India’s growing maritime capabilities and its ability to challenge Chinese dominance in the region. By attempting to sow discord and delay construction, China hopes to protect its vulnerable trade lifeline.

Yet, India’s determination to proceed underscores its recognition of the strategic importance of Great Nicobar, not just as an economic hub but as a cornerstone of its security architecture in the Indian Ocean.

IDN (With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading