Showing posts with label JS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JS. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

Pakistan Eyeing Bengal? God Knows How Many Pieces It'll Break Into: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh


The Indian Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh, has issued a robust warning to Pakistan following provocative comments made by his counterpart in Islamabad.

During an address in Barrackpore, Singh cautioned that if Pakistan were to cast an eye toward Bengal, "only God knows" how many fragments the nation would be partitioned into.

This forceful retort serves as a direct response to recent threats regarding potential strikes on Indian territory.

Singh’s remarks were specifically aimed at Pakistan’s Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, who reportedly claimed on Saturday that Islamabad would retaliate by targeting Kolkata in the event of any future military misadventure by India. Singh advised Asif against making such inflammatory statements, reminding the Pakistani leadership of the historical precedent set fifty-five years ago.

The Defence Minister alluded to the 1971 conflict, noting that Pakistan had already suffered significant consequences when the country was split into two parts, leading to the creation of Bangladesh. He suggested that a similar provocation regarding Bengal today could result in an even more fractured state, the scale of which remains known only to the divine.

The exchange has also ignited a domestic political firestorm within India. Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Abhishek Banerjee criticised the central government’s initial response during a public gathering.

Banerjee accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah of remaining silent in the face of external aggression, suggesting they were too preoccupied with election campaigning to defend India’s sovereignty.

The TMC leader further challenged the courage of the Union leadership, labelling their perceived hesitation as "gutless." He questioned whether the Prime Minister or the Home Minister possessed the resolve to condemn the threat against Kolkata or to empower the Indian Armed Forces and BSF to reclaim Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee also joined the chorus of criticism, questioning the Prime Minister’s silence on the matter. The internal political friction highlights a divide over how best to address threats to West Bengal, even as Rajnath Singh maintains that any external eye cast upon the state would lead to Pakistan's further disintegration.

ANI


Monday, December 8, 2025

Clashes And Stone-Pelting Incidents Erupted During The Sindh Culture Day Rally In Karachi


On Sunday, December 7, 2025, a Sindh Culture Day rally in Karachi turned violent, leading to the arrest of 45 individuals by the city police. The clashes began when participants reportedly threw stones at police officers as law enforcement sought to manage and reroute the crowd away from restricted areas. Dawn reported.

The South Deputy Inspector General of Police, Syed Asad Raza, explained that the confrontation escalated when the police attempted to divert the rally from Sharea Faisal towards safer designated routes.

He noted that officers came under attack, which prompted a baton charge and the use of tear gas to disperse the crowd. According to Raza, the South Senior Superintendent of Police was present at the scene to ensure control was maintained.

Police sources indicated that the rally participants were adamant about using the main route of Sharea Faisal, specifically from Jinnah Bridge, despite repeated instructions to follow an alternative path via the Lines Area towards Saddar and proceed to the Karachi Press Club (KPC). This refusal to comply with directives set off the violent exchanges.

During the clashes, five police personnel were injured by stone pelting, necessitating the use of tear gas by law enforcement to restore order. The situation quickly worsened as tensions over road access near the Finance and Trade Centre flyover led to an outbreak of violence and arrests.

Authorities kept the Red Zone closed throughout the day, with alternative traffic arrangements implemented for commuters. Officers were deployed at the Finance and Trade Centre bridge to prevent any unauthorised movement into the sensitive Red Zone area, which houses key government installations.

This preventative measure followed advisory warnings tied to previous years' incidents where demonstrators had breached security zones.

Twelve of the arrested individuals have since been released after the Karachi Bar Association president provided surety on their behalf. Sindh's Home Minister, Ziaul Hassan Lanjar, called for speedy legal action against those responsible for causing damage during the unrest. He instructed police officials to promptly detain anyone involved in vandalising police vehicles or public property.

Sindh Cultural Day is an annual event observed since 2009 on the first Sunday of December. It celebrates the diverse heritage of Sindh province through exhibitions, musical performances, and cultural discussions organised by political groups, cultural bodies, and government institutions.

Deputy Inspector General Raza reflected on prior incidents during Sindh Cultural Day. He recalled that in 2023, a police vehicle was damaged, and some protesters forcibly entered the Red Zone via Jinnah Bridge to reach the Karachi Press Club.

That year also saw around 10 to 12 rallies converging from different city areas, drawing an estimated 17,000 to 18,000 participants.

This recent episode at the rally marks another challenge for Karachi’s law enforcement in balancing cultural celebrations with security concerns, particularly in sensitive parts of the city. The police remain vigilant ahead of further public gatherings in the city during the festival season.

Monday, November 24, 2025

Rajnath Singh Contemplates Shifting Borders: Sindhudesh And PoK May Reintegrate With India


India’s Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh, recently stirred debate with remarks suggesting future border changes could see Sindh, a region now in Pakistan, returning to India. Speaking at a public event, Singh underscored Sindh’s enduring civilizational bond with India, even if it is “not a part of India today”.

His comments emphasised not only historical and cultural ties but also referenced those displaced during Partition, specifically Sindhi Hindus, who continue to feel estranged from their homeland.

Sindh, a fertile region along the Indus River, formed a pivotal part of pre-Partition India before its accession to Pakistan in 1947. The division resulted in a significant migration of Sindhi Hindus to India, many of whom have maintained a strong sentimental and cultural connection to Sindh despite seven decades of separation.

Singh cited veteran politician Lal Krishna Advani, himself of Sindhi origin, to highlight persistent emotional resistance among Sindhi Hindus regarding their severance from the region.

Rajnath Singh articulated deep reverence for the Indus River, regarded as sacred by Hindus throughout India and by many in Sindh itself. Quoting Advani, Singh remarked that the river’s sanctity is even comparable among Sindh’s Muslims to the Aab-e-Zamzam of Mecca.

This reflection on spiritual unity was used to reinforce the argument that, regardless of physical borders, Sindh “will always be a part of India”. He closed by asserting that, for Indians, the people of Sindh and their reverence for the river ensure lasting ties that transcend geopolitical realities.

In a notable shift from conventional rhetoric, Rajnath Singh observed that “borders can change”, leaving open the possibility that, in future, “Sindh may return to India again”.

This statement, while not indicative of any immediate policy shift, signals a willingness among some segments of India’s leadership to consider changes to the current territorial status quo. Singh’s words may be interpreted as a diplomatic signal to audiences within India and abroad regarding unresolved historic divisions.

Rajnath Singh’s perspective on shifting borders extends beyond Sindh, as he earlier expressed confidence that Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK) would, in time, rejoin India. In an interaction with the Indian community in Morocco, Singh stated his belief that such a transition would occur peacefully, noting emerging demands for autonomy within PoK itself.

Singh referenced public movements advocating freedom from Pakistan, suggesting that renewed sentiment among residents could facilitate integration without external aggression.

Singh’s remarks tie into broader strategic debates that followed India’s Operation Sindoor, a military action targeting terror infrastructure and supporting Pakistani forces. Some defence analysts had suggested India should have pushed further into PoK to secure territory historically claimed by India. 

While Singh did not directly endorse such military action, his comments implicitly support the notion that borders and territorial realities are not immutable, and could shift under particular circumstances.

Rajnath Singh’s comments reflect a blend of civilizational sentiment and evolving geopolitics in South Asia. By invoking historic and spiritual ties, the Defence Minister has reignited discussion around the possibility of territorial realignment for Sindh and PoK. While policy actions remain unchanged, Singh’s statements are likely to trigger further diplomatic and strategic debate in the region, especially concerning India’s long-term vision for its borders.

Agencies


Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Pashtun, Baloch, Sindhi And Kashmiri Activists Unite In Afghan United Front Meet Against Pakistani Control


The Afghan United Front recently convened an online meeting that brought together prominent activists from the Pashtun, Baloch, Sindhi, and Kashmiri communities. The participants reaffirmed their collective commitment to achieving freedom and independence from Pakistan’s control.

The virtual gathering was highlighted in a social media post by PoK activist Amjad Ayub Mirza, who underlined the shared struggle of these groups against what they termed Pakistan’s systemic oppression.

Speakers at the event criticised Islamabad for its long-standing use of education, media, and religious seminaries as vehicles of ideological indoctrination. They cited the rule of General Zia-ul-Haq between 1977 and 1988 as a turning point, when the number of madrassas in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa expanded from under a hundred to nearly ten thousand. According to them, this network became central to Zia’s efforts to impose rigid Islamist narratives across the region and weaken Pashtun nationalism within Pakistan.

Pashtun representatives argued that the creation of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the propagation of the idea of “Pashtunistan” were designed to divide and confuse the Pashtun identity. They asserted that the Pashtun homeland has historical and cultural roots tied deeply to Afghanistan, a connection consistently undermined by Pakistani state policies aimed at suppressing ethnic consciousness and self-determination movements.

Participants raised concerns over Pakistan’s handling of terrorism within its borders, questioning why such acts rarely occur in Punjab despite the presence of extremist leadership and infrastructure there. They claimed this reflected selective state control over militant activity and a deliberate attempt to keep peripheral regions destabilised while sparing the political heartland of Punjab.

Sindhi activists accused the Pakistan Army of maintaining systemic dominance in Sindh, pointing out that no Sindhi has ever held senior command positions such as Chief of Army Staff or Corps Commander.

They expressed frustration that despite Sindh’s vast contribution to Pakistan’s economy—providing the majority of the country’s GDP, gas, and oil output—the province continues to suffer economic marginalisation. They also highlighted the immense value of Sindh’s lignite coal reserves and contrasted it with the persistent poverty and political neglect of the local population.

Baloch speakers described Islamabad’s control over Balochistan as an occupation rather than governance. They rejected the separatist label, asserting instead that their cause is rooted in legitimate resistance to exploitation and repression.

They condemned ongoing military operations, enforced disappearances, and widespread human rights violations that have plagued the province for decades, claiming that these actions are intended to stifle Baloch demands for sovereignty and resource autonomy.

Kashmiri activists called for a unified coalition of all oppressed nations living under Pakistani administration. They emphasised that Pashtuns, Baloch, Sindhis, and Kashmiris face a shared crisis of identity and leadership under an unaccountable central authority. The speakers pressed for solidarity among political and resistance movements, urging coordinated efforts to advance justice, self-determination, and democratic rights.

The meeting concluded with a joint declaration reaffirming the participants’ determination to continue their struggle for independence, dignity, and the restoration of sovereign rights. It underscored that the ongoing resistance would persist until all oppressed nationalities under Pakistani rule achieve self-governance and freedom from domination.

Based On ANI Report


Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Over 900 Killed As Civilians Death Rise Sharply In Pakistan's Spiral of Violence


Pakistan has witnessed a drastic surge in violence over the past three months, with over 900 people killed amid intensifying militant attacks and military operations. According to a new report released by the Centre for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) in Islamabad, between July and September 2025, at least 901 deaths and 599 injuries were recorded in 329 violent incidents. This marks a sharp increase of more than 46 per cent compared to the previous quarter.

The cumulative death toll for 2025 so far has reached 2,414, nearly matching the total of 2,546 fatalities reported in all of 2024. With three months still left in the year, experts warn that Pakistan is on track to experience one of its deadliest years in the past decade.

The CRSS report highlights a significant change in the pattern of violence. While militant attacks were the leading cause of fatalities in previous years, 2025 has seen a shift, with more than half of all deaths stemming from army and police operations. This trend reflects an escalated military campaign in the country’s restive regions.

Between July and September, militants accounted for 57 per cent of the deaths, followed by civilians at 24 per cent, and security personnel at 18 per cent. This breakdown underscores both the intensity of operations targeting insurgents and the mounting toll on non-combatants caught in the crossfire.

Geographically, the violence was concentrated in the provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. KP was the worst-hit, reporting 638 deaths and over 200 incidents in just three months. Balochistan followed with 230 fatalities, primarily resulting from Pakistan Army operations aimed at separatist and militant groups.

Sindh province also saw a rise in fatalities, recording 21 deaths compared to just 8 in the previous quarter. Although its overall numbers remain relatively low, the increase suggests widening instability beyond the traditionally volatile regions.

Civilian casualties have shown a disturbing upward trend. Notably, a Pakistan Air Force airstrike in the Tirah Valley of KP last week killed 21 people, including women and children. In Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, protests against corruption and poor living conditions turned deadly, leaving at least 10 demonstrators killed.

Violence has also targeted infrastructure. On Sunday, an explosion on a railway track in Sindh’s Shikarpur district injured seven people and derailed four coaches of the Jaffar Express, adding a transport-security dimension to the ongoing crisis.

While militants suffered the highest number of fatalities overall, civilians remain the primary target in most attacks. The report details that out of all recorded incidents, 123 targeted civilians, 106 targeted security forces, and about 100 were directed at militants themselves. In terms of injuries, civilians again bore the brunt, with 355 wounded compared to 209 security personnel and 35 militants.

The CRSS assessment paints a bleak picture of Pakistan’s deteriorating security environment. If the current trajectory persists, 2025 may end as the bloodiest year for the country in a decade, signalling deepening instability and complex challenges for Pakistan’s government, security forces, and civilian population alike.

Based On ANI Report


Tuesday, October 7, 2025

'Bombs Its Own People, Conducts Systematic Genocide': India Strongly Denounces Pakistan's Atrocities and Propaganda at UN On Women, Peace, And Security

Permanent Representative of India to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish

At the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) debate on Women, Peace, and Security, India issued a strong rebuttal against Pakistan's repeated accusations. India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, called Pakistan’s statements a "delusional tirade," particularly criticising its narrative concerning Jammu and Kashmir. He emphasised that Pakistan’s attacks on India are baseless and intended solely to distract the international community.

Ambassador Harish highlighted Pakistan’s own grave human rights violations, citing Pakistan’s 1971 Operation Searchlight. During this military campaign, Pakistan’s army committed systematic genocide and mass rape of approximately 400,000 women citizens. India underscored that the global community remains aware of these atrocities, seeing through Pakistan's ongoing attempts at spreading propaganda.

India reaffirmed its record on advancing the agenda of women, peace, and security as "unblemished and unscathed," contrasting sharply with Pakistan’s history of violence against its own people. Ambassador Harish condemned Pakistan for bombing its own citizens and conducting what he described as "systematic genocide," labelling Pakistan’s accusations against India as misdirection and hyperbole.

The Indian statement came in response to remarks made by Counsellor Saima Saleem from Pakistan’s Permanent Mission to the UN, who had raised issues regarding India’s policies. The ongoing UNSC debate marked the 25th anniversary of UN Resolution 1325, adopted in 2000, which acknowledges the unique and disproportionate effects of armed conflict on women and stresses the importance of protecting women’s rights during such conflicts.

Earlier, in September 2025, India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar addressed the UN General Assembly and criticised Pakistan indirectly for being a "neighbour that is an epicentre of global terrorism." He condemned Pakistan’s state-supported terrorism, noting the frequent tracing of major international terrorist attacks back to Pakistan-based groups.

Minister Jaishankar called for strong condemnation of any nation that declares terrorism as state policy and fosters terror hubs operating on an industrial scale. He warned that those who condone such nations sponsoring terror will inevitably suffer repercussions, reinforcing India's position against Pakistan’s support for terrorism.

This diplomatic exchange highlights the continuing tensions between India and Pakistan at international forums, with India underscoring Pakistan’s record of domestic human rights violations and their impact on regional peace and security. The debate further reaffirmed India’s commitment to advancing women’s rights and security amid ongoing regional conflicts.

Based On ANI Report


Friday, June 20, 2025

Inside Pakistan’s Domestic Drone Campaign: Precision Strikes And Civilian Casualties


Pakistan has quietly transitioned into an era of domestic drone warfare, deploying advanced unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to monitor, target, and strike terrorist elements within its own borders—a tactic it once vocally condemned when used by the United States.

This shift comes amid Pakistan's ongoing struggle with some of the world's deadliest militant groups, including the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) and the Baloch Liberation Army, and as the country continues to rank among the most terrorism-affected nations globally.

Initially, the drone campaign in Pakistan was dominated by U.S. operations, with the CIA and Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) conducting hundreds of strikes from 2004 to 2018, targeting high-profile militants such as Al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders.

These operations, while effective in eliminating terrorist leadership, sparked widespread controversy over civilian casualties and violations of sovereignty. Pakistani officials often publicly criticised these strikes, even as evidence suggested some level of covert cooperation with the U.S..

In recent years, however, Pakistan’s own security forces have increasingly relied on domestically operated drones for counterterrorism. Reports and viral videos indicate that the Pakistani military now uses precision-guided drones to strike terrorist hideouts, particularly in the restive Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province bordering Afghanistan. These operations are often showcased online by pro-military accounts, with footage depicting surgical strikes that aim to neutralise militants while minimising damage to surrounding structures.

Despite claims of enhanced precision, Pakistan’s drone campaign has not been without controversy. Several incidents in 2024 and 2025 have raised concerns about collateral damage. Notably, strikes in North and South Waziristan have resulted in civilian casualties, including women and children, as well as injuries to bystanders during public gatherings.

While officials often attribute such casualties to militant activity or blame the Pakistani Taliban, opposition parties and local communities have criticised the government’s security strategy, arguing that the risk to civilians remains unacceptably high.

Unlike the earlier U.S. campaign, the Pakistani government has not officially acknowledged the full extent of its drone operations. However, security officials have become more vocal online, sharing videos and statements to counter criticism and demonstrate the effectiveness of drone strikes against high-value terrorist targets. This digital campaign is seen as an effort to shape public perception and justify the use of drones as a necessary tool in the fight against militancy.

Pakistan’s use of drones is not limited to internal security. During a brief military clash with India, Pakistan employed drones to target civilian areas, signalling its growing reliance on UAVs as both a tactical and symbolic weapon in regional conflicts.

Experts caution that while current drone exchanges between India and Pakistan have remained limited, the technology’s proliferation could mark the beginning of a more extensive and dangerous aerial rivalry.

Pakistan is now among a small group of countries—including Iraq, Nigeria, and Turkey—that use drones for domestic counterterrorism operations. This reflects a broader global trend in which states turn to UAVs for targeted killings, surveillance, and rapid response, despite ongoing debates over legality, ethics, and the risk of civilian harm.

Pakistan’s domestic drone campaign represents a significant evolution in its counterterrorism strategy, blending technological advancement with information warfare. While officials tout improved precision and effectiveness, incidents of civilian casualties and the lack of official transparency continue to fuel public debate. As the country navigates both internal threats and regional tensions, the future of drone warfare in Pakistan remains a critical—and controversial—component of its security landscape.

Based On A NDTV Report


Thursday, June 19, 2025

Sindhi Activist Laghari Criticises Asim Munir's Visit To White House, Calls President Trump 'Confused'


Sindhi human rights advocate and author Sufi Laghari has strongly criticised the recent visit of Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, to the White House, framing the event as emblematic of both U.S. transactional interests and the ongoing struggles of Sindhi and other marginalised communities in Pakistan.

Laghari accused U.S. President Donald Trump of being “confused” and driven by business interests in Pakistan, rather than genuine diplomatic or humanitarian concerns. According to Laghari, Trump’s invitation to General Munir was not an act of statesmanship but a calculated move to secure access to Pakistan’s resources and to leverage Pakistan’s military establishment against India. Laghari stated, “President Trump is confused. He is not a politician; he is a businessman.

He is eyeing the resources in Pakistan. There is no free lunch here; that is why he invited Asim Munir. Asim Munir's interest here is money to counter India...” This reflects a broader scepticism among Sindhi activists regarding U.S. engagement with Pakistan’s military, viewing it as transactional and ultimately detrimental to the interests of ethnic minorities within Pakistan.

South Asia analyst Michael Kugelman added, "For what it's worth, the scheduled Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't only be seen through the lens of the Israel-Iran war. There's been US-Pak engagement on critical minerals, crypto, and Counter Terrorism. Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these. And Munir is empowered to talk about it all. Also, Kashmir."

Laghari’s criticism was not isolated. During Munir’s visit, significant protests erupted outside the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C., where Munir was staying. These demonstrations, led primarily by Pakistani-Americans—including supporters of former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party—featured slogans such as “Islamabad ka qatil” (Killer of Islamabad) and “Pakistanio ke Qatil” (Killer of Pakistanis).

Protesters displayed placards and digital screens labelling Munir as a “mass murderer,” “dictator,” and “criminal dictator,” underscoring widespread anger within the diaspora over the military’s role in Pakistani politics and alleged human rights abuses.

Laghari himself was seen outside the White House holding a placard that read, “Asim Munir – Thief of River Indus, Butcher of Moro: Sindh,” highlighting grievances specific to the Sindhi community, such as alleged water theft and violence in the Sindh region.

Laghari’s remarks drew attention to long-standing issues faced by Sindhis, particularly regarding water rights. He accused the Punjabi-dominated Pakistani state of depriving Sindh of its rightful share of Indus River water through the construction of canals and dams, leading to severe water shortages. Laghari asserted, “Sindhis have been suffering for the last 76 years.

Now there is no water in the Indus; the river is running dry, and they blame it on India. Punjab is stopping our water—they are building canals and dams... Minorities, Sindhis, Sufis are suffering at the hands of the Pakistani regime and if we stay silent, our land and Indus will disappear...” This narrative reflects deep-seated resentment over perceived exploitation and marginalisation by the central government.

He also referenced a historical pattern of U.S. engagement with Pakistani military rulers, noting that previous army chiefs such as Ayub Khan, Zia ul Haq, and Pervez Musharraf were similarly welcomed by U.S. presidents, often to the detriment of democratic forces in Pakistan.

General Munir’s visit to the U.S.—the first by a Pakistani military leader to the White House in over two decades—occurred amid heightened regional tensions, particularly the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict. Analysts have suggested that the U.S. is seeking to strengthen counterterrorism cooperation with Pakistan, especially against groups like Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K), while also considering Pakistan’s potential role in broader regional security dynamics.

President Trump claimed credit for helping avert a war between India and Pakistan, though Indian officials clarified that the ceasefire was achieved through direct military talks. The meeting between Trump and Munir, which included a closed-door lunch at the White House, was viewed as highly significant, signalling a possible recalibration of U.S.-Pakistan relations and a renewed focus on military-to-military engagement.

Sufi Laghari’s outspoken criticism of both General Asim Munir’s visit and President Trump’s motivations reflects deep frustration among Sindhi and other minority activists regarding U.S. policy toward Pakistan.

The protests in Washington, D.C., and the strong language used by diaspora groups underscore the persistent tensions between Pakistan’s military establishment and its diverse ethnic and political communities, as well as scepticism about U.S. intentions in the region. The episode highlights the complex interplay of geopolitics, human rights, and diaspora activism shaping contemporary U.S.-Pakistan relations.

Based On ANI Report


Sunday, June 8, 2025

US Congressman Brad Sherman Raises Alarm Over Human Rights Crisis In Sindh During Meeting With Pakistani Delegation


In a notable diplomatic intervention, US Congressman Brad Sherman, a senior member of the House of Representatives, directly confronted a visiting Pakistani delegation with urgent concerns regarding the human rights situation in Sindh.

During the discussions, Sherman highlighted a series of critical issues — including severe water scarcity, enforced disappearances, and the systemic repression of the Sindhi people — drawing international attention to the longstanding grievances faced by the region’s population.

Sherman underscored the dire environmental and humanitarian crisis unfolding in Sindh, focusing particularly on the protection of the Indus River, which he described as the “lifeline for tens of millions of Sindhis.”

He stressed that safeguarding this vital water resource is essential, especially in light of recent unrest in Moro, Sindh, where two protesters, Irfan and Zahid Laghari, were reportedly killed while demanding water rights. The Congressman cited documentation from Pakistan’s Human Rights Commission, which records over 8,000 enforced disappearances since 2011, many of which remain un-investigated, highlighting the persistent pattern of political repression and extrajudicial killings in the region.

Sherman assured the delegation that he had directly raised the issue of enforced disappearances with Pakistani officials and pledged to continue advocating for accountability and justice. His intervention was welcomed by the Washington-based Sindhi Foundation, which praised his advocacy and confirmed that it had also written to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

The Foundation’s statement drew attention to multiple existential threats to Sindh and its people, including the illegal construction of canals over the Indus River for corporate farming, systematic disappearances of political activists, and alleged manipulation of the 2023 census aimed at altering Karachi’s demographic balance — all viewed as part of a broader effort to divide Sindh along linguistic lines. The marginalization of the Sindhi language was also cited as a significant cultural concern.

The Sindhi Foundation reiterated its commitment to raising these pressing issues in political corridors across the US and internationally until the rights and freedoms of the Sindhi people are fully realized. This development marks a rare and significant instance of Sindh-related human rights concerns being addressed at the highest levels of US policymaking, signalling increased international scrutiny of Pakistan’s treatment of the Sindhi population.

Based On ANI Report


Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Balochistan To Sindh, Pakistan Is Imploding Under Asim Munir’s Watch: Can US & China Save It?


Pakistan is experiencing a profound internal crisis under the leadership of Field Marshal Asim Munir, whose recent self-promotion following a military defeat by India has only underscored the fragility of his authority and the state itself. The crisis is multi-dimensional, spanning ethnic, political, economic, and security fronts, and is rapidly eroding the coherence of the Pakistani federation.

Balochistan: The Epicentre of Rebellion

Balochistan, Pakistan’s largest province by area but historically marginalized, has re-emerged as the epicentre of resistance. The Baloch independence movement, spearheaded by groups like the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), has escalated from sporadic attacks to high-profile operations such as the hijacking of the Jaffar Express train, which exposed the Pakistani state's inability to maintain control in the region.

The BLA’s recent declaration of independence and calls for international recognition are not mere propaganda; they reflect a significant administrative collapse, with reports that Pakistani security forces avoid venturing out in Quetta after dark. This unrest directly threatens Chinese interests, particularly the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), as Baloch militants have repeatedly targeted Chinese nationals and infrastructure, undermining Beijing’s confidence in Islamabad’s ability to provide security guarantees.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: Taliban Resurgence

In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the resurgence of Taliban violence has further destabilized the region. The expulsion of over 150,000 Afghan refugees by Munir in late 2023 strained relations with the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and fueled cross-border militancy. The Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) continues to mount attacks, exploiting the vacuum left by weak governance and the army’s overstretch. Munir’s hardline approach, including military strikes into Afghan and Iranian territory, has failed to stem the tide of violence and has instead deepened Pakistan’s regional isolation.

Sindh: Water Wars And Ethnic Tensions

Sindh is now boiling over due to acute water disputes with Punjab, exacerbated by India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty following recent hostilities. The province’s canal projects on the Indus River have sparked violent protests, as Sindhis view the water crisis as existential. The internal mismanagement of water resources, combined with external shocks, is pushing inter-provincial tensions toward open conflict, threatening the unity of the federation.

Punjab: Munir’s Last Bastion

Munir’s authority appears increasingly confined to Punjab, Pakistan’s most populous and politically powerful province. His consolidation of power has relied on purging dissent within the military and judiciary, extending his own tenure, and sidelining civilian institutions. However, this militarization of governance has alienated large segments of the population, especially the youth, and has failed to address the root causes of unrest in the peripheries.

Economic Meltdown And Desperate Measures

Economically, Pakistan is on the brink. Foreign exchange reserves are dangerously low, inflation is rampant, and the IMF’s support is insufficient to stabilize the economy. In desperation, the government is pursuing unorthodox measures, such as attempting to turn Islamabad into a crypto hub through questionable partnerships, but these gambits have little credibility and reflect the depth of the crisis.

Can The US Or China Save Pakistan?

Historically, Pakistan’s military elite have relied on external patrons—first the US, now increasingly China—to bail out the state in times of crisis. However, the current situation is testing the limits of this strategy.

China’s patience is wearing thin due to persistent attacks on its nationals and projects in Balochistan, while the US is wary of deeper involvement given Pakistan’s internal dysfunction and continued use of terrorism as state policy. Munir’s rumoured outreach to Washington for support in Balochistan signals desperation rather than confidence. No foreign aid package, whether from China’s yuan or Western financial institutions, can compensate for the deep structural fractures within Pakistan’s state and society.

Conclusion: A State On The Brink

Pakistan’s greatest threat is not external—neither India, the BLA, the TTP, nor water wars—but the rigidity and predatory nature of its own state structure. The army’s addiction to power has paralyzed civil institutions, deepened ethnic fault lines, and left the country vulnerable to fragmentation. As Pakistan implodes from within, the prospect of salvation by foreign powers appears increasingly remote. The crisis under Asim Munir’s watch is not just a leadership failure; it is a systemic unravelling that no external actor is likely to reverse.

Based On A News18 Report


Monday, May 19, 2025

Lashkar-E-Taiba Terrorist Razaullah Nizamani Killed By Unidentified Gunmen In Sindh


Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist Razaullah Nizamani Khalid, also known by several aliases including Abu Saifullah Khalid, Vinode Kumar, and Mohammed Salim, was shot dead by three unidentified gunmen in Sindh province, Pakistan, on Sunday, May 18, 2025.

Khalid was a high-ranking LeT operative, notorious for masterminding several major terror attacks in India, most notably the 2006 attack on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) headquarters in Nagpur, the 2005 Indian Institute of Science (IISc) attack in Bangalore, and the 2008 assault on a CRPF camp in Rampur, Uttar Pradesh.

Khalid had a long history within LeT, leading its operations from Nepal in the early 2000s. He was responsible for recruiting cadres, providing financial and logistical support, and facilitating the cross-border movement of operatives between Nepal and India. His activities enabled LeT to expand its sleeper networks and conduct high-profile attacks on Indian soil. Khalid worked closely with other top LeT figures, including Azam Cheema (alias Babaji), Yaqoob (the group’s chief accountant), and was a confidante of LeT chief Hafiz Saeed.

After Indian agencies exposed his Nepal module, Khalid returned to Pakistan, where he continued to play a significant role in LeT and Jamaat-ud-Dawah (JuD) operations, focusing on recruitment and fundraising in Sindh’s Badin and Hyderabad districts. Despite reportedly being provided security by Pakistani authorities, he was ambushed and killed near his residence in Matli, Sindh, sustaining multiple gunshot wounds. He was declared dead upon arrival at the hospital.

While Pakistani media reports have attributed his killing to personal enmity, the precision and timing of the attack, combined with Khalid’s high profile, have led to speculation about possible targeted action by external intelligence agencies, primarily with reference to India's external intelligence agency RAW .

So far, no group has claimed responsibility for the killing.

Khalid’s death is seen as a significant blow to Lashkar-e-Taiba’s operational infrastructure, particularly its historical Nepal-based network, and marks the end of a long manhunt by Indian security agencies. The United Jihad Council, an umbrella group of terror outfits, publicly mourned his death and praised his role in attacks against India.

Agencies


Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Protests Continue In Sindh Against Pakistan Government's Canal Project On River Indus


Protests in Sindh against the Pakistan government's canal project on the River Indus have intensified, entering their 11th consecutive day and causing significant disruption across the province.

The controversial project, known as the Cholistan Canal Project, aims to construct six new canals on the Indus River to irrigate the Cholistan desert in Punjab, with an estimated cost of PKR 211.4 billion. 

Proponents argue the project would bring 400,000 acres of barren land under cultivation and enhance food security, but it has been met with fierce resistance from Sindh’s political, civil, and legal communities.

The opposition is rooted in concerns that diverting Indus water to Punjab will exacerbate water shortages in Sindh, a province already facing acute scarcity and heavily reliant on the river for agriculture and livelihoods. Critics also argue the project violates the 1991 Water Apportionment Accord, which governs inter-provincial water sharing, and warn of severe ecological consequences, including reduced freshwater flow to the Indus Delta and threats to biodiversity.

Widespread sit-ins and rallies have paralyzed major highways and trade routes, stranding thousands of trucks and halting goods transport between Sindh, Punjab, and Balochistan. Key protest sites include the Khairpur Baberlo bypass, where the sit-in has lasted 11 days, and Mangrio Pump near Daharki, ongoing for nine days. Additional blockades at Kamo Shaheed in Obaro and Gola Mor in Kandhkot have created long vehicle queues and brought inter-provincial traffic to a standstill.

The legal fraternity has played a prominent role, staging sit-ins at multiple locations, including Karachi’s City Court, where gates remain shut to litigants. Lawyers have declared that protests will continue until the government formally withdraws the canal project notification. Judicial proceedings at the Sindh High Court, however, remain unaffected.

Tensions escalated after police attempted to disperse protesters with baton charges and tear gas in several towns, prompting further condemnation and solidarity rallies by lawyers, political parties, and civil society organizations across Sindh, including in Hyderabad, Thatta, Dadu, Matiari, Hala, and Nawabshah.

The Cholistan Canals issue has become a major political flashpoint between the Sindh government, led by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), and the federal government under Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. The PPP, a key coalition partner in the federal government, has rejected the project, and its leader Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has demanded its cancellation. In response to mounting pressure, the federal government has agreed to pause the project until a consensus is reached in the Council of Common Interests (CCI), which is scheduled to meet on May 2 to address the dispute.

Despite the government's assurances, protests have continued unabated, with demonstrators insisting on a formal withdrawal of the project before ending their sit-ins. Senior Sindh Minister Sharjeel Memon has called for dialogue and urged protesters to reopen blocked roads, expressing hope that the upcoming CCI meeting will bring a permanent resolution to the issue.

ANI


Monday, April 28, 2025

'Pakistan Sponsors Terrorism' World Sindhi Congress’ Hidayat Bhutto Slams Pak Over Pahalgam Attack


In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, which resulted in the deaths of numerous innocent civilians, Hidayat Bhutto, UK & Europe Organiser of the World Sindhi Congress (WSC), strongly condemned Pakistan, accusing it of sponsoring terrorism globally and providing safe havens to UN-designated terrorists such as Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar. Bhutto’s remarks reflect longstanding grievances held by Sindhi activists against the Pakistani state, which they accuse not only of fostering terrorism but also of perpetuating systemic oppression and exploitation of Sindh and its people.

Bhutto highlighted that since the signing of the Indus Water Treaty in 1960, Sindh’s interests have been consistently side-lined by Pakistan, with no Sindhi representation during the negotiations. He pointed out that prior to Pakistan’s formation in 1947, the Sindhu Delta was among the world’s most prosperous regions, thriving in agriculture and ecology.

However, aggressive dam and barrage construction by Pakistan, largely benefiting Punjab, has led to severe environmental degradation and economic decline in Sindh. According to historical water distribution records from 1945, Sindh was allocated 25% of the water share from Punjab’s rivers, but post-treaty developments have drastically reduced this share, threatening the survival of the Sindhi people.

Bhutto accused Punjab of breaking past promises and fraudulently diverting water meant for Sindh, exacerbating anger and unrest across the province. He warned that the construction of six new canals by Punjab, without any binding international guarantees, would further devastate Sindh’s environment and economy. The WSC continues to protest these actions, demanding an immediate halt to new canal and dam projects unless international oversight is ensured.

Beyond environmental and economic exploitation, the WSC has repeatedly brought attention to human rights violations in Sindh, including enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings of political activists, forced conversions of Sindhi Hindu girls, and ethnic cleansing.

Bhutto and other WSC leaders have urged the United Nations and the international community to intervene, calling for judicial inquiries, the release of missing persons, and the establishment of a fact-finding mission to investigate atrocities committed against Sindhi people.

These protests and statements underscore the WSC’s broader campaign to highlight the plight of Sindhis under Pakistani rule, linking the state’s alleged sponsorship of terrorism to its internal policies of repression and resource exploitation. The WSC’s demands remain focused on justice, protection of Sindhi rights, and international accountability for Pakistan’s actions both within its borders and beyond.

ANI


Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Payback Time: Pakistani Army Getting Sucked Into A Vortex of Violence


The recent display of military might by the Pakistan Army during the Pakistan Day parade on March 23 contrasts sharply with the internal turmoil and division reported within its ranks.

Despite the show of unity, the army faces unprecedented challenges, including daily attacks and a growing resentment among lower ranks, leading to calls for the resignation of the Army Chief.

This situation is exacerbated by the army's brutal counter-terrorism operations, which have indiscriminately targeted civilians, including women and children, further alienating the populace and damaging the army's cohesion.

Recent incidents, such as the hijacking of the Jaffar Express and a series of attacks in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, have highlighted the army's deteriorating grip on security.

Reports indicate that 2024 has already seen a record number of terror attacks, with 179 incidents resulting in 255 casualties by early March.

In response to these threats, the army has resorted to violent measures against civilians, igniting protests in regions like Balochistan, where figures such as Mehrang Baloch have emerged as symbols of resistance against military oppression.

The Pakistan Army's strategy appears ineffective; it lacks a coherent counter-terrorism approach and has historically engaged in heavy-handed tactics against its own citizens.

This has led to significant civilian displacement and destruction, particularly in areas like Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The erosion of trust between the army and local populations is evident, as soldiers are trained to fight honourable battles against recognized enemies rather than their own people.

Moreover, governance issues compound these military failures. Projects like the Gwadar deep-sea port remain stalled due to inadequate infrastructure and resources, despite international support from countries like China.

The military's overarching control over governance in Balochistan has not translated into effective management or stability.

The current state of the Pakistan Army marks a stark departure from its past reputation for professionalism and discipline. It is now perceived as an oppressive force rather than a protector.

As international attention grows regarding the situation in Balochistan, with activists gaining recognition on global platforms, there is a palpable sense that the army's leadership may face reckoning for its actions.

The irony lies in how the army's own strategies have contributed to its declining status and internal dissent, suggesting that it may indeed be facing a moment of reckoning.

IDN


Thursday, January 30, 2025

'Stop Atrocities, Uphold Human Rights': Conference In London Sheds Light On Sindh, Balochistan Plight


A recent conference in London, held on January 29, 2025, focused on the severe human rights violations occurring in Sindh and Balochistan, Pakistan. Organized by the Asian Human Rights Forum (AHRF) in collaboration with the World Sindh Congress (WSC) and the Baloch Human Rights Council (BHRC), the event aimed to raise awareness and advocate for the rights of oppressed communities in these regions.

British MP Bob Blackman, who hosted the conference, emphasized the need for a thorough review of Pakistan's human rights record. He urged that foreign aid to Pakistan should support its citizens rather than contribute to oppression.

Speakers at the conference highlighted systematic abuses, including enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings attributed to Pakistani security forces. Activists and community leaders shared testimonies about the dire conditions faced by individuals in Balochistan, where many have been subjected to torture and killings under a "kill and dump" policy.

The conference underscored the necessity for international pressure on Pakistan to uphold human rights. Participants called for coordinated efforts from global governments to ensure accountability for human rights violations and to protect civil society organizations operating in Pakistan.

Hidayatullah Bhutto from WSC discussed how military control over agricultural lands in Sindh has led to significant resource deprivation for local populations. The exploitation of Balochistan's natural resources, coupled with a lack of basic services like healthcare and education, was also a focal point of discussion.

The event concluded with a strong call for ongoing dialogue and action to secure human rights for the people of Sindh and Balochistan. The need for increased advocacy and international collaboration was emphasised as essential steps toward addressing these pressing issues.

This conference reflects a growing concern among international observers regarding the human rights situation in Pakistan, particularly in marginalized regions like Sindh and Balochistan.