Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Warns Pakistan: No Indus Waters For Terror Sponsors

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has delivered a stern warning to Pakistan, declaring that India will not allow the waters of the Sindhu river to reach those who sponsor terrorism.

Speaking at an ‘Intellectuals Meet’ organised by the Telangana BJP in Hyderabad, he condemned Pakistan’s continued support for cross‑border terror and emphasised that the NDA government remains resolute in its stance.

He stated that through Operation Sindoor, India has shown the world that it knows how to respond to those who fail to understand the language of peace and harmony.

Singh recalled the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, noting that India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty as a sovereign response under international law. He reiterated Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s declaration that “blood and water will not flow together,” stressing that those whose tears have dried up should not expect water from India.

He underlined that the suspension of the treaty will continue until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably renounces its support for terrorism. India’s message since Pahalgam has been consistent: treaties cannot operate in isolation from ground realities, and abnormal hostility cannot coexist with cooperation on shared resources.

The Indus Waters Treaty, signed on 19 September 1960 between India and Pakistan, has long been regarded as one of the world’s most cited water‑sharing agreements. However, Singh made clear that until Pakistan addresses what New Delhi describes as “abnormal hostility,” the treaty will remain suspended in both spirit and practice.

Operation Sindoor, launched in response to the Pahalgam attack, was highlighted as a demonstration of India’s ability to push back against aggression and to show that its red lines in counter‑terrorism are firm.

In his address, Singh also spoke about the NDA government’s achievements over the past twelve years. He cited the abrogation of Article 370, progress towards making the country largely free of Naxal violence, the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax, nationwide electrification, and reforms in the justice system. He reminded the audience that there was a time when Congress claimed Article 370 could never be abolished, yet his government achieved it with ease.

Turning to developments in Kashmir, Singh emphasised that the region, once synonymous with terrorism, is now witnessing growth in tourism, investments, and employment opportunities.

He pointed out that the tricolour now flies proudly at Srinagar’s Lal Chowk, Krishna Janmashtami is being celebrated there for the first time, Muharram processions are being conducted peacefully, and cinema halls that had remained closed for decades are reopening.

These changes, he argued, reflect the transformation of Kashmir under the NDA government’s policies, marking a shift from instability to progress.

Singh’s remarks reinforced India’s hardened diplomatic and strategic posture, linking water‑sharing arrangements directly to the issue of state‑sponsored terrorism. His warning to Pakistan underscores that India’s hydrological policy is inseparable from its national security imperatives, and that cooperation cannot continue alongside aggression. The message was clear: India will not allow its rivers to sustain those who patronise terror.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Pakistan Warns of 'Act of War' Over India’s Indus Water Strategy

India’s latest declaration on the Indus Waters Treaty has provoked a sharp diplomatic backlash from Pakistan, intensifying one of South Asia’s most enduring disputes.

Union Minister CR Patil stated that India would fully utilise its share of the Indus basin rivers and ensure “not a drop” flows into Pakistan. 

This uncompromising stance has been interpreted in Islamabad as a direct threat to its water security, prompting officials to warn that any restriction on flows would be considered an “act of war.”

The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960 under World Bank mediation, has long been regarded as a rare example of cooperation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. It allocates control of three eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — to India, while granting Pakistan rights over the three western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab. Despite multiple wars and decades of hostility, the treaty has survived, though it has increasingly come under strain in recent years.

India’s suspension of its participation in the treaty in May 2025, following the Pahalgam massacre in Kashmir which New Delhi blamed on Pakistan-backed militants, marked a turning point.

Since then, India has pursued projects aimed at maximising its use of the eastern rivers and exploring engineering options to regulate flows from the western rivers. While experts note that India’s existing infrastructure does not allow for complete diversion, the political signalling has been unmistakable.

Pakistan has consistently argued that India’s moves amount to “weaponizing water.” Officials in Islamabad insist that unilateral withdrawal from the treaty is legally impossible, and they have raised the matter at international forums including the United Nations Security Council.

The Pakistani government maintains that any attempt to alter flows would devastate its agriculture, which is heavily dependent on the Indus basin, and could destabilise its already fragile economy.

The Chenab River has emerged as a particular flashpoint. India’s National Hydroelectric Power Corporation recently issued tenders for a tunnel project to transfer water from the Chenab to the Beas basin. Pakistan has accused New Delhi of using technical works as a cover for strategic diversion, while Indian officials argue that such projects are within their rights under the treaty’s provisions.

The dispute is further complicated by the geography of Kashmir, where the headwaters of these rivers originate. The contested territory has been the site of repeated clashes, and the water issue adds another layer of volatility. The four-day conflict in 2025, involving drones, missiles, and artillery, underscored how quickly tensions can escalate.

International actors have expressed concern. The United States has urged restraint and dialogue, while China has backed Pakistan’s position, citing the dangers of politicising shared water resources. Analysts warn that the confrontation risks transforming water into a new theatre of strategic rivalry, with implications for regional stability.

India’s position reflects a broader shift in its strategic calculus. By asserting control over its water resources, New Delhi signals both domestic resolve and geopolitical leverage. Pakistan’s warnings of “serious consequences” highlight its vulnerability, but also its determination to resist what it sees as encroachment.

The Indus basin, sustaining hundreds of millions of people, is now at the centre of a renewed confrontation. What was once hailed as a model of cooperation has become a potential trigger for conflict. The rhetoric of “not a drop” and “act of war” illustrates how water, the most basic of resources, has become entwined with national security and survival in South Asia.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

India Tears Apart Pakistan’s 'Fitna al Hindustan' As A Hate Factory At UN

India has launched a sharp diplomatic offensive against Pakistan at the United Nations, exposing Islamabad’s latest propaganda narrative of “Fitna al Hindustan” as nothing more than state-sponsored disinformation.

Speaking at a United Nations Security Council session on Afghanistan, India’s Permanent Representative, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, accused Pakistan of deliberately manufacturing falsehoods to deflect blame for its internal crises and regional destabilisation.

Pakistan had previously issued official notifications instructing its agencies to label militant groups operating within its own territory as “Fitna al Hindustan”, alleging they were directed by India. 

However, no evidence was ever produced to substantiate these claims. Ambassador Harish countered that this was a calculated attempt to deceive both the Pakistani public and the international community. 

He described the narrative as “officially sponsored misinformation and disinformation dressed in religious terminology”, designed to sustain hostility against India while distracting citizens from domestic political and economic failures.

The envoy went further, branding Pakistan’s apparatus as “an organised factory of hate”. He argued that the campaign was a deliberate strategy by the Pakistani establishment to divert attention from pressing internal challenges, including constitutional amendments that have entrenched military dominance over civilian institutions.

Ambassador Harish highlighted how Pakistan’s political framework remains deeply compromised by the military’s overarching influence, which continues to undermine democratic governance.

Turning to regional security, India condemned Pakistan’s cross-border military operations, particularly aerial assaults in Afghanistan that have caused significant civilian casualties. Ambassador Harish stressed that “dressing up a massacre as a military operation does not absolve the perpetrator”, adding that killing and maiming civilians cannot be justified as counter-terrorism.

He accused Islamabad of hypocrisy, pointing out that Pakistan espouses lofty principles of international law and Islamic solidarity while simultaneously carrying out airstrikes during the holy month of Ramadan.

The envoy underscored Pakistan’s long-standing record of blaming its neighbours for its own internal shortcomings. This criticism comes amid escalating hostilities between Pakistan and Afghanistan. 

Earlier this year, UN records confirmed that Pakistani airstrikes in Afghan territory killed at least 13 civilians, including women and children, sparking the most intense border confrontation in years. By March, UN documentation revealed that cross-border strikes and subsequent manoeuvres had left 42 civilians dead, 104 wounded, and displaced over 100,000 people from their homes.

Tensions reached a breaking point when Afghan officials alleged that a Pakistani airstrike on a Kabul drug rehabilitation centre caused over 400 fatalities. The UN independently verified at least 269 deaths, underscoring the scale of devastation. Although a brief cessation of hostilities prevented a full-scale war, volatile skirmishes continue along the frontier, keeping the region on edge.

India’s intervention at the UN thus not only dismantled Pakistan’s “Fitna al Hindustan” narrative but also highlighted Islamabad’s broader strategy of exporting instability while masking its own governance failures. By exposing Pakistan’s disinformation campaign as a “factory of hate”, New Delhi reinforced its position that Islamabad must be held accountable for both its internal propaganda and its external aggression.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Pakistan Turns To Chinese Missiles, Turkish Drone After Operation Sindoor's Shock Pounding

Pakistan is accelerating its procurement of Chinese long‑range and medium‑range missile systems (despite its abject failure to stop Indian missiles destroying key  Pak military assets) alongside Turkish drones and loitering munitions, a move driven by vulnerabilities exposed during India’s Operation Sindoor in May 2025, as reported by India Today.

These acquisitions aim to plug gaps in Pakistan’s air defence network and enhance counter‑drone capabilities along the eastern border and Line of Control.

Pakistan is reported to be acquiring the HQ‑9 long‑range surface‑to‑air missile system from China, a platform often compared to Russia’s S‑400. With an engagement range of up to 250 kilometres, the HQ‑9 is designed to intercept aircraft, cruise missiles, and certain ballistic missile threats, providing Pakistan with a strategic shield against India’s stand‑off weapons.

Alongside this, the Pakistan Air Force is procuring HQ‑16, HQ‑17, and L‑17 medium‑range air defence missiles, which together form a layered network capable of addressing multiple aerial threats at varying altitudes and ranges.

The HQ‑9 system is expected to be deployed along Pakistan’s eastern border, where Indian Air Force operations pose the greatest challenge. The HQ‑16 and HQ‑17, already proven in Chinese service, will complement the HQ‑9 by covering shorter ranges and faster response scenarios.

The L‑17, a relatively newer system, adds redundancy and flexibility to Pakistan’s defensive posture. Collectively, these acquisitions represent a significant expansion of Pakistan’s reliance on Chinese technology, embedding Beijing’s defence architecture deeply into Islamabad’s strategic planning.

On the unmanned front, Pakistan is reportedly purchasing Karayel UAVs from Turkey. Developed by Vestel, the Karayel is a medium‑altitude, long‑endurance drone capable of reconnaissance and precision strikes. It has been combat‑tested in Middle Eastern theatres, where it demonstrated resilience against electronic warfare and effectiveness in precision targeting.

In addition, Turkish loitering munitions are being acquired, weapons that have gained prominence in recent conflicts for their ability to suppress radar sites and air defence systems. These munitions, often described as “suicide drones,” provide Pakistan with a cost‑effective means of neutralising high‑value targets during a conflict.

The acquisitions are directly linked to lessons from Operation Sindoor, where India employed BrahMos cruise missiles, Akash surface‑to‑air systems, and other stand‑off weapons to devastating effect. 

Pakistan’s existing air defence network was unable to adequately counter these attacks, exposing vulnerabilities in radar coverage and interception capability. The new Chinese and Turkish systems are intended to provide a layered defence against such threats, while also offering offensive options through UAVs and loitering munitions.

India has been closely monitoring these developments. The Indian Air Force and Ministry of Defence are focusing on enhancing electronic warfare capabilities to degrade adversary systems, while expanding deployment of indigenous platforms such as the S‑400 ‘Sudarshan’, Akash, and DRDO‑developed counter‑drone solutions.

The emphasis is on building resilience against both missile and drone threats, ensuring that India maintains its technological edge despite Pakistan’s acquisitions.

Strategically, Pakistan’s procurement underscores its dual reliance on China and Turkey for advanced defence technology. While Chinese systems provide the backbone of its air defence, Turkish drones add flexibility and offensive reach.

This combination reflects Islamabad’s attempt to diversify suppliers while still anchoring its defence modernisation in partnerships with Beijing. For India, the challenge lies in countering a more sophisticated and layered Pakistani defence network, which could complicate future operations along the border.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Operation Sheruwali Enters Twelfth Day In Rajouri’s Manjakote Sector

The joint anti-terror operation codenamed Sheruwali has now entered its twelfth day in the Manjakote sector of Rajouri district in Jammu and Kashmir.

The operation is being conducted by the Indian Army, Jammu and Kashmir Police and the Central Reserve Police Force in the dense forest areas of Gambhir Mughlan and Dorimal.

Security forces continue their efforts to track down suspected terrorists believed to be hiding in the region, maintaining a strong cordon and surveillance to prevent any escape.

Personnel have been seen checking the identification cards of travellers and locals while conducting intensive search operations across the area. The operation was launched following specific intelligence inputs indicating the presence of suspected militants in the forested terrain.

The move is aimed at ensuring that the terrorists remain trapped within the designated area while search teams continue their mission to neutralise the threat.

Heavy firing has been reported in the Dorimal forest as the operation enters a crucial phase. The challenging terrain and thick forest cover have added to the complexity of the mission, requiring forces to proceed cautiously while maintaining constant vigilance.

Security agencies are deploying all available resources, including advanced surveillance equipment, to track the movement of the suspected terrorists and eliminate any danger posed by their presence.

The entire region remains under heightened security, with access to certain locations being closely monitored. Officials have confirmed that search operations will continue until the area is fully sanitised and all security concerns are addressed.

The prolonged duration of Operation Sheruwali underscores both the determination of the security forces and the difficulties posed by the rugged terrain and well-prepared militants.

The operation reflects the broader counter-terror strategy in Jammu and Kashmir, where intelligence-led missions are being used to dismantle networks and prevent infiltration across sensitive sectors.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Navy Reveals Scale of ‘Operation Sindoor’ Deployment

The Indian Navy’s deployment during Operation Sindoor was one of its largest in decades, with 36 frontline warships, multiple submarines, and the INS Vikrant carrier battle group forward-positioned in the Arabian Sea.

This posture forced the Pakistan Navy to remain confined to its harbours, raised shipping risks, and imposed economic costs while showcasing India’s tri-service combat readiness.

Following the Pahalgam terror attack of April 2025, the Indian Navy moved with remarkable speed to establish a forward deployment in the Northern Arabian Sea. Within days, submarines, surface combatants, and carrier assets were placed on operational readiness.

Navy Chief Admiral Dinesh K. Tripathi described this as maintaining “constant pressure” on Pakistan, ensuring that its naval units were unable to operate freely and were largely restricted to the Makran coast and Karachi harbour.

At the heart of the deployment was the INS Vikrant-led carrier battle group, supported by destroyers armed with BrahMos missiles, guided-missile frigates, and stealth assets. Reports confirm that 36 frontline warships and several submarines were mobilised, marking one of the largest real-time operational movements outside peacetime exercises. This scale of deployment surpassed even the naval mobilisation during the 1971 war, underlining India’s enhanced maritime capabilities.

The Navy maintained an unprecedented operational tempo, clocking nearly 11,000 ship days and over 50,000 flying hours in 2025 alone. Within 96 hours of the Pahalgam attack, multiple weapon firings and tactical drills were conducted at sea, refining procedures and demonstrating readiness. Submarines added a stealth dimension, while aviation assets ensured surveillance and deterrence across the Arabian Sea.

Admiral Tripathi emphasised that Operation Sindoor validated the Navy’s combat readiness, operational reach, and deterrence capability. He noted that the deployment not only shaped the strategic environment but also imposed economic costs on Pakistan.

Shipping risks around its maritime zone increased sharply, leading to elevated insurance premiums and rerouting of international commercial vessels away from Karachi waters. This economic pressure complemented the military posture, creating a multi-dimensional impact.

The operation also highlighted tri-service coordination, with the Navy working seamlessly alongside the Army and Air Force. Joint operations ensured Pakistan faced pressure across land, air, and sea domains. 

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh later remarked that the Indian Navy had effectively confined the entire Pakistani fleet to its ports, underscoring the decisive maritime dimension of the campaign.

Operation Sindoor thus represented a watershed in India’s military doctrine. It demonstrated the ability to rapidly position combat power, sustain high-intensity operations, and integrate maritime strength into a broader tri-service framework.

The deployment showcased India’s capacity to impose costs on adversaries not only through precision strikes but also by leveraging maritime dominance to affect economic and strategic outcomes.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Army And J&K Police Foil Exfiltration Attempt In Uri Sector, Three Apprehended

Indian security forces successfully foiled an exfiltration attempt in Baramulla’s Uri sector, underscoring the continued vigilance along the Line of Control.

The joint operation was carried out by the Indian Army’s Chinar Corps in coordination with the Jammu and Kashmir Police after specific intelligence inputs indicated suspicious movement in the area.

During the cordon and search operation, alert troops intercepted two men from Sopore who were allegedly attempting to cross the border with hostile intent. Their local guide, who was facilitating the attempt, was also apprehended.

The Army confirmed that the suspects were taken into custody during the intelligence-led operation, and further investigations are currently underway to determine the extent of their involvement and possible links to cross-border networks.

In a statement posted on X, the Chinar Corps highlighted the swift action of its personnel, noting that the individuals were apprehended while attempting exfiltration in the Uri sector. The Army emphasised that the operation was conducted with precision and restraint, ensuring the suspects were captured without escalation.

Subsequently, the Army identified one of the apprehended individuals as an intruder from Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. He was intercepted while attempting to cross the Line of Control and was handed over to the Jammu and Kashmir Police for legal proceedings.

The Army noted that its troops maintained discipline and restraint while challenging the intruder, surgically apprehending him without incident.

This operation reflects the heightened security grid in the Uri sector, which has historically been a sensitive zone for infiltration and exfiltration attempts. The apprehension of suspects from Sopore, along with a PoJK intruder, highlights the continued threat posed by cross-border elements and the importance of intelligence-led coordination between the Army and police forces in Jammu and Kashmir.

The incident also demonstrates the proactive measures being taken to prevent any hostile activity along the Line of Control.

With investigations ongoing, authorities are expected to probe deeper into the motives of the apprehended individuals and their possible connections to wider networks operating across the border.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading

Indian Navy Confined Pakistan Fleet To Ports During Operation Sindoor, Says Defence Minister Rajnath Singh

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has underlined the decisive role played by the Indian Navy during Operation Sindoor, stating that the force compelled the entire Pakistan Navy to remain confined to its ports.

Speaking at the inauguration of the Nausena Shaurya Vatika in Lucknow, an open-air naval museum, Singh emphasised that the Navy’s deployment in the Arabian Sea with full preparedness and strength maintained constant pressure on Pakistan, ensuring its naval units did not venture out during the conflict.

Operation Sindoor, launched on 7 May 2025 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, saw Indian forces conduct precision strikes on multiple terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The military confrontation was halted on 10 May after both sides reached an understanding.

Singh highlighted that the Nausena Shaurya Vatika showcases the legacy, operational capabilities and maritime achievements of the Indian Navy. He described the museum as a source of pride not only for Lucknow and Uttar Pradesh but also for the nation.

He noted that in the coming years, the facility would evolve into a centre of inspiration, a tourist hub, and one of the city’s defining landmarks. The inauguration was attended by Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, Indian Navy Chief Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi, and deputy chief ministers Brajesh Pathak and Keshav Prasad Maurya. Developed jointly by the Indian Navy and the Uttar Pradesh Tourism Department, the museum is dedicated to the bravery, valour and technological excellence of the naval force.

Explaining the rationale for establishing a naval museum in a landlocked city, Singh said maritime security is linked to every citizen, as the Indian Ocean is vital to the nation’s economy, trade and energy requirements.

He stressed that the Navy is an asset of the entire nation, drawing strength from the resolve of citizens across villages, towns and cities. Referring to the decommissioned warship INS Gomati, which forms the centrepiece of the museum, Singh pointed out its symbolic connection with Lucknow.

Just as the Gomti river flows through the city to join the Ganga and eventually the sea, INS Gomati brought honour to Lucknow while serving in the Indian Ocean. Its crest even carried the image of Lucknow’s historic Chhatar Manzil.

Singh described the Shaurya Vatika as more than a tourist attraction, calling it a living centre of inspiration that will remind citizens of the sacrifices made by the armed forces. He said it would teach future generations the value of freedom and security, encouraging reflection on the immense contributions of those who safeguard daily life.

He also referred to India’s growing military preparedness and indigenous defence production capabilities. He noted that before 2014, India’s defence exports were worth less than ₹1,000 crore, but today the figure has risen to nearly ₹40,000 crore, with equipment being exported to countries worldwide.

Praising the transformation of Uttar Pradesh under Chief Minister Adityanath, Singh recalled that the state was once associated with criminal rule and poor law and order, deterring investors. He contrasted this with the present, where the state has shifted from “One District, One Mafia” to “One District, One Product.”

He commended Adityanath for personally ensuring the museum project was completed in record time, from budget approval to monitoring each stage of work. Singh also announced plans to enhance the attraction further, assuring citizens that efforts would be made to bring a submarine to the site.

The museum’s key attraction, INS Gomati, was decommissioned on 28 May 2022. Other exhibits include the ship’s anchor, CET-53M submarine obstacle equipment, main mast and propeller. Visitors will also be able to learn about maritime security, naval operations and the technological capabilities of the Indian Navy.

Singh’s remarks reinforced the enduring impact of Operation Sindoor, where India’s naval deployment not only showcased maritime strength but also forced Pakistan’s navy into a defensive posture, validating India’s ability to respond to asymmetric threats with deliberate and proportionate force.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

Defence Minister Unveils Operation Sindoor Volume Showcasing Soldiers’ First Hand Accounts

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has released a commemorative volume on Operation Sindoor, capturing the personal testimonies of 100 officers, sailors, and airmen who took part in the decisive military operation of May 2025.

The book departs from conventional military historiography by focusing on the lived experiences of combatants across the three Services, offering citizens a rare insight into the human dimension of modern warfare.

On 29 May 2026, Rajnath Singh unveiled the commemorative publication in New Delhi, in the presence of Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan, Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi, Chief of the Air Staff Air Chief Marshal A P Singh, and Chief of the Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi.

The Defence Minister described Operation Sindoor as an unprecedented success, noting that India compelled Pakistan to seek a ceasefire within four days of the strikes. He emphasised that the operation was unlike any other war India has fought, as it demonstrated seamless jointness, precision, and resilience.

The book documents the personal accounts of combat aviators, naval watchkeepers, surface-to-air missile crews, special forces operators, signallers, logisticians, medical officers, and personnel from integrated defence organisations.

These testimonies provide a ground-level perspective of the operation, highlighting moments such as soldiers on the Line of Control targeting adversary bunkers, air defence operators neutralising inbound drones, pilots releasing weapons in combat, and sailors at action stations as the fleet adopted heightened posture.

Compiled under the guidance of the CDS, the volume was supported by contributions from the Additional Directorate General of Strategic Communication, the Media and Public Information Cell, and the Directorate of Media and Public Relations, with publication assistance from the United Service Institution of India.

Singh stated that the book is a tribute to those who executed the operation and connects citizens with the devotion and resilience of soldiers. He urged citizens to draw inspiration from the accounts and become worthy of the sacrifices made to safeguard sovereignty.

The commemorative volume deliberately departs from the conventions of official military historiography, which often privilege the perspective of headquarters and commanders. Instead, it seeks to recover the texture of war as lived by combatants in real time.

This approach underscores the human dimension of modern warfare, where leadership, courage, judgment under pressure, and commitment translate strategy into success.

Operation Sindoor itself was launched in response to the brutal Pahalgam terror attack of April 2025, which claimed 26 lives. Between 7 and 10 May 2025, Indian forces struck terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, destroying multiple launchpads and crippling critical Pakistani air force assets.

The operation demonstrated India’s ability to conduct complex joint operations under pressure, compelling Pakistan to agree to a ceasefire after four days of hostilities.

The commemorative book thus serves not only as a historical record but also as a living testimony of courage and sacrifice. It offers citizens a rare opportunity to understand the operational realities faced by India’s armed forces and to appreciate the tremendous cost paid to ensure national security.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

India Warns Pakistan of Consequences For Sponsorship of Terrorism At UN

India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni, delivered a strong rebuttal against Pakistan’s continued acts of cross-border aggression during the UN Security Council Open Debate on “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-centred International System.”

He asserted that Islamabad must accept the consequences of its sponsorship of terrorism, stressing that India has every right to defend itself against such aggression.

Ambassador Parvathaneni highlighted that Pakistan has consistently harboured and harnessed malevolent forces of terrorism, religious extremism, violent radicalism, and anti-India rhetoric since its inception.

He condemned Pakistan’s long-standing policy of “bleeding India with a thousand cuts,” pointing out that this doctrine exposes the hollow nature of Islamabad’s commitment to the UN Charter.

He emphasised that Pakistan’s repeated wars, unprovoked aggression, and sponsorship of terrorism have violated the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and peaceful coexistence.

He reiterated India’s call for Pakistan to irrevocably end its support for all forms of terrorism. His remarks came in response to baseless and unwarranted comments made by Pakistan earlier in the week. 

India also strongly rejected references to Jammu and Kashmir in a joint statement issued by China and Pakistan, reaffirming that Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are integral and inalienable parts of India. The Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal, clarified that no other country has the locus standi to comment on these territories.

Jaiswal further rejected attempts to legitimise Pakistan’s illegal occupation of territories through projects under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). He stated that India resolutely opposes any moves by other countries to reinforce Pakistan’s forcible occupation of Indian sovereign territory, which impinges on India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He noted that this position has been clearly conveyed to both Pakistani and Chinese authorities on multiple occasions.

Ambassador Parvathaneni also reminded the UNSC that Independent India began its journey by facing cross-border aggression from Pakistan, which coveted territories that had legally and irrevocably acceded to India. His remarks underscored India’s consistent position that Pakistan’s actions undermine international peace and security, while also violating the very principles the UN Charter seeks to uphold.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Operation Sheruwali: Terrorist Hideout Busted In Rajouri As Search Enters Third Day

Security forces in Jammu and Kashmir have busted a terrorist hideout as the search under Operation Sheruwali entered its third consecutive day in Rajouri district.

The operation, launched jointly by the Army, Jammu and Kashmir Police and the Central Reserve Police Force, has been ongoing since Saturday in the Dorimal-Gambhir Moghla belt following specific intelligence inputs about suspected militant movement.

An encounter broke out on Saturday after contact was established with terrorists around 11:30 am, according to the Army’s White Knight Corps. The initial exchange of fire prompted the forces to expand their cordon-and-search operation across the forested terrain.

Officials suspect the presence of two to three terrorists in the area, and the operation has since been intensified with additional troops inducted to strengthen the cordon.

Armed with drones and sniffer dogs, the joint teams have widened their searches to adjoining areas. Surveillance measures have been put in place to prevent any escape attempts, and the cordon has been reinforced to ensure the suspected militants remain trapped.

The rugged terrain and dense forest cover of Rajouri’s Gambhir Moghla belt have made the operation particularly challenging, but the forces remain determined to flush out the terrorists.

During the course of the operation, a hideout was busted after brief firing. Reports suggest speculative firing was directed towards the hideout before it was stormed. Inside, security forces recovered eatables, cold drinks, water bottles, pickles, clothes, bags and polythene covers, believed to be personal belongings of the terrorists. Blood stains were also found at the site, indicating that militants may have been injured before fleeing or attempting to relocate.

The discovery of the hideout underscores the preparedness of the militants, who had stocked supplies to sustain themselves in the forested terrain.

However, the strong cordon and continuous surveillance have disrupted their plans. The operation remains active, with forces continuing extensive searches to track down the suspects and neutralise the threat.

The busting of the hideout marks a significant breakthrough in Operation Sheruwali, which has already demonstrated the resolve of the security forces to counter militant activity in Rajouri. The ongoing effort reflects the broader counter-terror strategy in Jammu and Kashmir, where intelligence-led operations are being used to dismantle networks and prevent infiltration attempts across the Pir Panjal belt.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

Delhi Red Fort Blast: NIA Exposes AI Misuse And Radicalised Doctor Module In Al-Qaida Plot

The National Investigation Agency’s probe into the Red Fort car blast in Delhi has revealed disturbing details of how artificial intelligence platforms were misused for what investigators termed “terror engineering.”

The chargesheet, running into 7,500 pages and filed on 14 May, outlines the involvement of accused individuals linked to Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind (AGuH), an offshoot of Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), in fabricating and deploying improvised explosive devices with laboratory-like precision.

The blast, which occurred on 10 November last year near the Red Fort, killed 11 people and injured several others. According to the chargesheet, Jasir Bilal Wani emerged as the “in-house engineer” of the module.

He allegedly stayed at Al Falah University in Faridabad on multiple occasions during 2024–25 to provide technical support. The University itself came under scrutiny after it was found that three doctors employed there were allegedly involved in the conspiracy.

Jasir was introduced to Dr Umer un Nabi, the driver of the explosive-laden car, by Dr Adeel Ahmed Rather. Investigators found that Adeel supplied key IED ingredients, including powdered sugar and potassium nitrate in the form of NPK fertiliser, while Dr Umer conducted research on rocket-based IEDs and provided technical guidance.

Jasir reportedly turned to YouTube and ChatGPT to search for instructions such as “how to make a rocket and in what proportion should the mixture be,” highlighting the misuse of digital and AI platforms in terror plots.

Rocket IEDs were tested in the Qazigund forest in Anantnag district by Jasir, Dr Umer, Dr Muzammil Shakeel, and other co-accused. Remnants of these devices were later recovered by NIA teams during extensive field investigations. In another instance, the group tested a cylinder-based IED in the Youshmurg forest near Mattan, also in Anantnag. The remnants of these experiments were seized at the instance of Dr Adeel.

The chargesheet also reveals that Dr Umer provided Jasir with two drones, instructing him to enhance their flying range and payload capacity. The plan was to weaponise the drones by fitting them with explosives to target security installations in Kashmir and other parts of India.

In controlled simulations conducted by the NIA, Jasir demonstrated his ability to fabricate functional rocket IEDs using commercially available materials before a bomb disposal squad.

The forensic findings point to the chilling sophistication of the trigger mechanism used in the vehicle-borne IED. Between December 2023 and January 2024, Jasir allegedly ordered components through his Flipkart account, including a sensor-inductive proximity switch, a heat gun, a piezo plate, a remote-control relay-switch RF transmitter and receiver kit, a flameless rechargeable pocket lighter, a soldering kit, and an LED electronic kit. These were procured via cash-on-delivery, funded by Dr Umer, and later assembled into a trigger mechanism that was used to detonate the blast.

The explosive used in the attack was Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP), clandestinely manufactured after procuring constituent ingredients and conducting experiments to perfect the mixture. The NIA’s investigation exposed a wider “Jihadi Conspiracy” involving radicalised medical professionals who were inspired by AQIS and AGuH ideology.

Earlier, Srinagar police had already busted the so-called “doctor” or “white-collar” module linked to the blast, but the NIA’s forensic and scientific probe has now laid bare the scale of the conspiracy.

The findings underscore the growing threat posed by the misuse of AI platforms and commercially available technologies in terror plots. Officials described the accused’s approach as “almost laboratory-grade,” reflecting a dangerous blend of technical expertise, radicalisation, and exploitation of modern tools.

AQIS and its offshoots, including AGuH, remain designated terrorist organisations by the Ministry of Home Affairs, and the case highlights the evolving nature of terror engineering in India’s security landscape.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

Security Forces Corner Terrorists In Rajouri’s Gambir Mughlan Forest

Security forces in Jammu and Kashmir have intensified a major anti-terror operation in Rajouri’s Gambir Mughlan forest, part of the Pir Panjal belt, where heavily armed terrorists have been cornered.

The breakthrough came on Sunday morning after a massive cordon-and-search operation was launched jointly by the Indian Army, Jammu and Kashmir Police, and the Central Reserve Police Force.

The operation began the previous day, and by 11:30 AM on Sunday, contact was established with the suspects, according to the Army’s White Knight Corps.

Officials believe that two to three terrorists are trapped within the dense forest belt. To prevent any escape attempts, heavy reinforcements have been rushed to the site, tightening the security grid around the rugged mountainous terrain.

The Gambir Mughlan forest is notorious for its thick cover and difficult geography, which makes search operations particularly challenging for security personnel. The terrain has historically been exploited by terrorists to evade detection, and the current operation reflects the determination of the forces to neutralise such threats.

Local residents have described the scale of the ongoing operation and the difficulties faced by the troops. Strict checkpoints have been set up in adjoining areas, with vehicular and pedestrian movement closely monitored.

Aqib Khan, a resident, noted that security forces have maintained a strong presence since Saturday after receiving intelligence inputs about suspected terrorists. He added that locals are cooperating with the agencies and hoping for a swift return to normalcy.

Mohd Jawed highlighted the challenges posed by the rugged terrain and dense forest cover, which complicate troop movement and search efforts. Another resident, Mohd Zubair, said that villagers learned the operation was launched following intelligence about terrorist movement, and communities nearby are keeping a close watch on developments while hoping for peace.

The Pir Panjal belt, which straddles Rajouri and Poonch districts, has seen heightened terror activity in recent years, with several infiltration attempts and ambushes targeting security forces.

Intelligence agencies have repeatedly warned of attempts by Pakistan-backed groups to revive militancy in this region, exploiting its difficult terrain and proximity to the Line of Control.

The current operation is part of a broader counter-terror grid that has been strengthened after recent encounters in Rajouri and Poonch, where security forces suffered casualties in ambushes. The Gambir Mughlan operation is therefore seen as a critical effort to flush out terrorists and restore confidence among local communities.

The operation was still actively underway at the time of reporting, with joint forces methodically closing in on the holed-up terrorists.

The outcome will be closely watched, as it could mark another significant step in neutralising terrorist presence in the Pir Panjal belt and reinforcing the security grid in Jammu and Kashmir.

ANI

Comments

Continue Reading

Pakistan’s PL‑15E Missile Use In 2025 Conflict Exposes Tactical Shortfalls Against Indian Defences

The 2025 India‑Pakistan air conflict saw the Pakistan Air Force deploy large numbers of Chinese‑made PL‑15E long‑range air‑to‑air missiles. These weapons, fired primarily from J‑10 fighter jets, were intended to provide Pakistan with a decisive standoff capability.

However, many of the missiles reportedly failed to hit their intended targets, raising questions about their combat reliability and the operational doctrine behind their employment.

It is common knowledge that, Indian electronic warfare capabilities and evasive manoeuvres diminished the effectiveness of PL-15 missile attacks sourced from China, and that the conflict exposed tactical and operational limitations in the combat employment of the PL-15E system.

Several missile fragments were recovered inside Indian territory, giving analysts a rare opportunity to study the weapon’s design, technology and vulnerabilities. The recovered debris allowed Indian teams to assess the missile’s electronic systems, propulsion characteristics and seeker performance.

This exploitation was particularly valuable because the PL‑15E is a relatively new export‑grade missile derived from China’s advanced PL‑15, and its battlefield use offered direct insight into its strengths and weaknesses.

Pakistan’s reliance on long‑range missile launches from J‑10 fighters, rather than engaging in close‑range air combat manoeuvres, highlighted a doctrinal preference for beyond‑visual‑range engagements.

This approach was intended to offset India’s numerical and technological advantages in certain sectors. Yet the effectiveness of these tactics was undermined by Indian countermeasures. Electronic warfare systems disrupted missile guidance and data links, while evasive manoeuvres by Indian pilots further reduced the probability of successful strikes.

The conflict underscored the limitations of the PL‑15E system when confronted with advanced defensive measures. While the missile boasts a dual‑pulse solid‑propellant motor and a reported range of up to 145 kilometres (claimed by China but never proven yet), its combat performance was compromised by India’s layered air defence and electronic warfare capabilities.

The missile’s theoretical speed, sometimes cited as exceeding Mach 5, did not translate into assured lethality under contested conditions.

Operationally, the heavy expenditure of PL‑15E missiles without corresponding results exposed a tactical imbalance. Pakistan’s emphasis on missile‑centric engagements revealed vulnerabilities in its air combat doctrine, particularly when adversaries are equipped with robust electronic countermeasures. 

The episode also demonstrated that reliance on imported systems without full integration into a comprehensive combat strategy can lead to diminished battlefield effectiveness.

For India, the conflict provided both a defensive success and an intelligence windfall. The recovered fragments and failed missile attempts allowed Indian analysts to refine their threat libraries and enhance counter‑tactics against future engagements.

The lessons learned are likely to inform both sides’ future procurement and doctrinal adjustments, with India reinforcing its electronic warfare edge and Pakistan reassessing the operational employment of its Chinese‑supplied arsenal.

The 2025 confrontation thus became a case study in the limitations of advanced missile systems when deployed without adequate tactical flexibility. It highlighted the enduring importance of electronic warfare, pilot skill, and adaptive combat doctrine in modern aerial conflicts, beyond the raw specifications of any single weapon system.

IDN (With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

Pakistani Officer Claims Strikes On Non-Existent Indian Airbases

In the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack in April 2025, tensions between India and Pakistan escalated dramatically, leading to a series of cross-border hostilities.

Pakistan launched Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos, which involved drone and missile attacks targeting Indian cities and defence infrastructure in retaliation for India’s Operation Sindoor.

These incursions were reported across Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat, marking one of the most intense phases of the conflict.

On 10 May 2025, Pakistan deployed the Fatah-1 guided artillery rocket as part of its offensive. However, India’s air defence network successfully intercepted and destroyed the rocket mid-air over Sirsa in Haryana, preventing any damage to its intended targets.

Despite this interception, Pakistani military propaganda attempted to portray the strike as a success. A video surfaced online featuring Captain Muneeb Zamal, a Pakistani officer, who claimed that their missile strikes had successfully hit two Indian airbases. The problem with this assertion was that the airbases he mentioned—Rajouri Airbase and Mamun Airbase—do not exist.

Rajouri is a district in Jammu and Kashmir but has no operational Air Force base. Mamun, meanwhile, is a military cantonment located in Pathankot, Punjab, and not an airbase at all. The officer’s confident declaration quickly became the subject of ridicule across social media platforms.

His statement that the presence of civilians during missile launch preparations acted as a “confidence building” element only added to the controversy. The video clip was widely shared, with users mocking the claims and pointing out the absurdity of targeting non-existent facilities.

Social media users responded with biting sarcasm. One post quipped that archaeologists, cartographers, Google Maps, and the Indian Air Force had launched a joint mission to locate the mythical “Rajouri airbase and Mamun airbase.” 

Another joked that the Fateh-1 missile had struck the airbases so hard they ceased to exist, with the next target being Atlantis. These satirical remarks highlighted the incredulity surrounding Pakistan’s claims and underscored the gap between propaganda and reality.

Meanwhile, missile debris from the failed offensive turned up in unexpected locations. Fragments were discovered in agricultural fields in Sirsa, Haryana, as well as in Barmer, Rajasthan, and Jalandhar, Punjab.

In September 2025, debris suspected to be from a Fatah-1 missile was even recovered from Srinagar’s Dal Lake, further illustrating the scattered and ineffective nature of the strikes. These findings reinforced the narrative that Pakistan’s missile campaign had failed to achieve its objectives and instead left behind evidence of misfires across Indian territory.

The incident serves as a reminder of the dangers of misinformation during conflict. While Pakistan sought to project strength through exaggerated claims, the reality on the ground revealed the effectiveness of India’s air defence systems and the inability of Pakistan’s offensive to cause meaningful damage.

The ridicule that followed Captain Zamal’s statements reflects the broader scepticism towards such propaganda and highlights how quickly false claims can be debunked in the digital age.

Agencies

Comments

Continue Reading